Skip to main content
Top

2010 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Extended Natural Deduction

Author : Dr. Andrzej Indrzejczak

Published in: Natural Deduction, Hybrid Systems and Modal Logics

Publisher: Springer Netherlands

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this Chapter there is a continual emphasis on the application of ND as a tool of proof search and possibly of automation. In particular, we take up the question of how to make ND a universal system. In order to find satisfactory solutions we compare ND with other types of DS’s. Although ND systems are rather rarely considered in the context of automated deduction they presumably accord with each other and ND systems may be turned into useful automatic proof search procedures. Moreover, even if there are some problems with the construction of efficient ND-based provers, it seems that for the widely understood computer-aided forms of teaching logic, ND should be acknowledged. A good evidence for this claim is provided by the increasing number of proof assistants, tutors, checkers and other interactive programs of this sort based on some forms of ND. Section 4.1. is devoted to the general discussion of these questions, whereas the rest of the Chapter takes up successively the presentation of some concrete, universal and analytic versions of ND for classical and free logic.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
One may consult in this matter e.g. papers collected in the monographic volume of Studia Logica (1998) devoted to automated ND.
 
2
Cf. e.g. remarks on performance of OSCAR in [216] and more substantial comparison of OSCAR and OTTER performance in [217].
 
3
Von Plato discovered that Gentzen himself has proved a normalization theorem for intuitionistic ND; he published Gentzen’s version in [213].
 
4
For example, the original proof of Prawitz is for the system with rules for \(\bot, \wedge, \rightarrow, \forall\); the solution for full first-order language was provided much later by Seldin [247] and Stalmarck [263].
 
5
The exception for classical logic is the work of Sieg mentioned above.
 
6
In fact, only special sort of such analytic applications is needed. For details see Section 3.​3.
 
7
For those who prefer TS with rules introducing parameters instead of free variables the system KMP may be more convenient.
 
8
The same result may be demonstrated by showing that any β may be used to creation of new subderivations at most \(2^{n+1}\) times, where n is the number of β-formulae preceding this \(\beta \) in the derivation.
 
9
Such a solution was applied by the author in [147].
 
10
As we will see in Chapter 10 the application of cut in modal logics may lead to other problems, as well.
 
11
This is somewhat related to the strategies from resolution provers, like ordering or selection function, which are applied to reduce the number of useless inferences. But it is not possible to transfer these strategies directly to ordinary ND since it does not work on clauses – one more good reason to introduce RND in the next section.
 
12
But remember that these results should not be treated as indicating the weakness of tableaux for automated deduction in general, since the possibility of obtaining shorter proofs does not mean that the space of proof search is also smaller; sometimes it is just the opposite. We have mentioned about that already in Chapter 3.
 
13
One may find it also in [150].
 
Literature
[95]
go back to reference Fitting, M. 1996. First-order logic and automated theorem proving. Berlin; Springer. Fitting, M. 1996. First-order logic and automated theorem proving. Berlin; Springer.
[46]
go back to reference Bolotov, A., V. Bocharov, A. Gorchakov, and V. Shangin. 2005. Automated first order natural deduction. In Proceedings of IICAI, 1292–1311. Bolotov, A., V. Bocharov, A. Gorchakov, and V. Shangin. 2005. Automated first order natural deduction. In Proceedings of IICAI, 1292–1311.
[261]
go back to reference Smullyan, R. 1968. First-order logic. Berlin: Springer. Smullyan, R. 1968. First-order logic. Berlin: Springer.
[117]
go back to reference Goré, R. 1999. Tableau methods for modal and temporal logics. In Handbook of tableau methods, eds. M. D’Agostino et al., 297–396. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Goré, R. 1999. Tableau methods for modal and temporal logics. In Handbook of tableau methods, eds. M. D’Agostino et al., 297–396. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[93]
go back to reference Fitting, M. 1983. Proof methods for modal and intuitionistic logics. Dordrecht; Rei-del. Fitting, M. 1983. Proof methods for modal and intuitionistic logics. Dordrecht; Rei-del.
[3]
go back to reference Aho, A.V., and J.D. Ullman. 1995. Foundations of computer science. New York: W.H. Freeman and CO. Aho, A.V., and J.D. Ullman. 1995. Foundations of computer science. New York: W.H. Freeman and CO.
[65]
go back to reference Cellucci, C. 1992. Existential instatiation and normalization in sequent natural deduction. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 58: 111–148.CrossRef Cellucci, C. 1992. Existential instatiation and normalization in sequent natural deduction. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 58: 111–148.CrossRef
[204]
go back to reference Pelletier, F.J. 1998. Automated natural deduction in THINKER. Studia Logica 60: 3–43.CrossRef Pelletier, F.J. 1998. Automated natural deduction in THINKER. Studia Logica 60: 3–43.CrossRef
[68]
go back to reference Chang, C.L., and R.C.T. Lee. 1973. Symbolic logic and mechanical theorem proving. Orlando: Academic Press. Chang, C.L., and R.C.T. Lee. 1973. Symbolic logic and mechanical theorem proving. Orlando: Academic Press.
[53]
go back to reference Borićić, B.R. 1985. On sequence-conclusion natural deduction systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 14: 359–377.CrossRef Borićić, B.R. 1985. On sequence-conclusion natural deduction systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 14: 359–377.CrossRef
[77]
go back to reference Davis, M., and H. Putnam. 1960. A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 7: 201–215. Davis, M., and H. Putnam. 1960. A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 7: 201–215.
[216]
go back to reference Pollock, J.L. 1992. Interest driven suppositional reasoning. Journal of Automated Reasoning 6: 419–462. Pollock, J.L. 1992. Interest driven suppositional reasoning. Journal of Automated Reasoning 6: 419–462.
[150]
go back to reference Indrzejczak, A. 2002. Resolution based natural deduction. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 31(3): 159–170. Indrzejczak, A. 2002. Resolution based natural deduction. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 31(3): 159–170.
[219]
go back to reference Portoraro, D.F. 1998. Strategic construction of Fitch-style proofs. Studia Logica 60: 45–67.CrossRef Portoraro, D.F. 1998. Strategic construction of Fitch-style proofs. Studia Logica 60: 45–67.CrossRef
[226]
go back to reference Quine W. Van O. 1950. Methods of logic. New York: Colt. Quine W. Van O. 1950. Methods of logic. New York: Colt.
[254]
go back to reference Sieg, W., and J. Byrnes. 1998. Normal natural deduction proofs (in classical logic). Studia Logica 60: 67–106.CrossRef Sieg, W., and J. Byrnes. 1998. Normal natural deduction proofs (in classical logic). Studia Logica 60: 67–106.CrossRef
[247]
go back to reference Seldin, J. 1989. Normalization and excluded middle I. Studia Logica, 48: 193–217.CrossRef Seldin, J. 1989. Normalization and excluded middle I. Studia Logica, 48: 193–217.CrossRef
[213]
go back to reference Plato von, J. 2008. Gentzen’s prof of normalization for ND. The bulletin of symbolic logic 14(2): 240–257.CrossRef Plato von, J. 2008. Gentzen’s prof of normalization for ND. The bulletin of symbolic logic 14(2): 240–257.CrossRef
[81]
go back to reference Dyckhoff, R. 1987. Implementing a simple proof assistant. In Proceedings of workshop on programming for logic teaching, eds. J. Derrick, and H.A. Lewis, 49–59. Dyckhoff, R. 1987. Implementing a simple proof assistant. In Proceedings of workshop on programming for logic teaching, eds. J. Derrick, and H.A. Lewis, 49–59.
[193]
go back to reference Negri, S., and J. von Plato. 2001. Structural proof theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Negri, S., and J. von Plato. 2001. Structural proof theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[220]
go back to reference Prawitz, D. 1965. Natural deduction. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. Prawitz, D. 1965. Natural deduction. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
[2]
go back to reference D’Agostino, M. 1999. Tableau methods for classical propositional logic. In Handbook of tableau methods, eds. M. D’Agostino et al., 45–123. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. D’Agostino, M. 1999. Tableau methods for classical propositional logic. In Handbook of tableau methods, eds. M. D’Agostino et al., 45–123. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[263]
go back to reference Stalmarck, G. 1991. Normalizations theorems for full first order classical natural deduction. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 56: 129–149.CrossRef Stalmarck, G. 1991. Normalizations theorems for full first order classical natural deduction. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 56: 129–149.CrossRef
[259]
go back to reference Smullyan, R. 1965. Analytic natural deduction. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 30(2): 123–139.CrossRef Smullyan, R. 1965. Analytic natural deduction. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 30(2): 123–139.CrossRef
[276]
go back to reference Troelstra, A.S., and H. Schwichtenberg. 1996. Basic proof theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Troelstra, A.S., and H. Schwichtenberg. 1996. Basic proof theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[147]
go back to reference Indrzejczak, A. 2001. Decision procedure for modal logics in natural deduction setting. Unpublished version, Łódź. Indrzejczak, A. 2001. Decision procedure for modal logics in natural deduction setting. Unpublished version, Łódź.
[179]
go back to reference Loveland, D.W. 1978. Automated theorem proving: A logical basis. Amsterdam: North Holland. Loveland, D.W. 1978. Automated theorem proving: A logical basis. Amsterdam: North Holland.
[94]
go back to reference Fitting, M. 1990. Destructive modal resolution. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(1): 83–97.CrossRef Fitting, M. 1990. Destructive modal resolution. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(1): 83–97.CrossRef
[260]
go back to reference Smullyan, R. 1966. Trees and nest structures. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31(3): 303–321.CrossRef Smullyan, R. 1966. Trees and nest structures. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31(3): 303–321.CrossRef
[227]
go back to reference Raggio, A. 1965. Gentzen’s hauptsatz for the systems NI and NK. Logique et Analyse 8: 91–100. Raggio, A. 1965. Gentzen’s hauptsatz for the systems NI and NK. Logique et Analyse 8: 91–100.
[10]
go back to reference Areces, C., H. DeNivelle, and M. DeRijke. 2001. Resolution in modal, description and hybrid logic. Journal of Logic and Computation 11: 717–736.CrossRef Areces, C., H. DeNivelle, and M. DeRijke. 2001. Resolution in modal, description and hybrid logic. Journal of Logic and Computation 11: 717–736.CrossRef
[159]
go back to reference Kalish, D., and R. Montague. 1964. Logic, techniques of formal reasoning. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. Kalish, D., and R. Montague. 1964. Logic, techniques of formal reasoning. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Metadata
Title
Extended Natural Deduction
Author
Dr. Andrzej Indrzejczak
Copyright Year
2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8785-0_4

Premium Partner