Skip to main content
Register
Springer Professional
SEARCH
MENU 1 2 3 4
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

Published in:
Introduction: Dependency as a Research Program: From Situations to Mechanisms of Dependency Read chapter Read first chapter

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Financialization and the Construction of Peripheral Business Power in the Chilean Pension System

Author: Felipe Ruiz Bruzzone

Published in: Dependent Capitalisms in Contemporary Latin America and Europe

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationship between financialization and the construction of business power from a dependency perspective. Focusing on the Chilean pension system, considered an exception among global social security systems due its long-term and sustained continuity as a privately administered and heavily financialized pension system, the chapter exposes how the financial expropriation of social security contributions from workers becomes a source of accumulation for international capital, and of structural and instrumental power for local and foreign business groups. Based on this, it concludes that privatized social security systems act as a “financial valve” mediating local and foreign businesses in what is called “dependent and associated financialization.”
previous chapter Dependency, Rent, and the Failure of Neo-Extractivism
next chapter Conclusions: Rethinking Dependency, Refining Our Analytical Tools
Footnotes
1
In Latin America for instance, the Argentinian and Bolivian governments re-nationalized pension funds, reverting to the privatisation and financialization dynamics of the 1990s (Becker et al., 2013; Naczyk & Domonkos, 2016). In Eastern and Central Europe, though during the last three decades there had been partial retrenchments of occupational pension schemes (encouraging the development of private fully-funded pension systems), this tendency started to be reversed after the 2007–2008 financial crisis (Naczyk, 2013; Naczyk & Domonkos, 2016).
 
2
While the first perspective is unsuited to explain the Chilean case due to the fact that Chile was often taken and diffused by other countries as an example of pension privatization to be imitated (rather than the other way around), the absence of a consolidated financial market and related business actors in the country at the outset of reform (investment funds, insurance companies and other financial companies) speaks against the second (see, e.g., Santillán et al., 2010).
 
3
Mandatory contributions to individual accounts amount to 10% of the salary of dependent workers. This is not supplemented by either employer or state contributions. The publicly funded pillar offers a minimum non-contributory pension for those who do have funds in their individual accounts. It also provides a supplementary pension contribution for those individual-account pensions higher than the minimum pension, but below a certain threshold.
 
4
The armed forces and police were spared pension privatisation and maintained their previous publicly funded pay-as-you-go system in 1981. After four decades, armed forces and police pensions show better results than the civil pension schemes. In practice, the pensions received by these groups are on average five times higher than those in the system for the civilian population (Solimano, 2017). For analysis purposes I only present data for civil pension expenditures. If expenditures in military and police are considered, during the last twelve months public expenditure in pensions rises to 76% and the relative amount payed in pensions by AFPS is reduced to only 24% of total pensions expenditures (CENDA, 2020).
 
5
Tables 10.1 and 10.2 present the cumulative results from March 1981 to October 2020 of expenditures and incomes of the civil pension system in Chile as reported by CENDA (2020). The exchange rate used USD 1 = CLP 649 (2017 average).
 
6
According to the latest information published by the pension regulator (Superintendencia de Pensiones, 2020), in 2018 96.81% of this category—or 39.86% of the total pension fund—is invested in foreign capital market instruments (investment funds, shares and alternative assets).
 
7
During its first decade, the institutional regulation of the system did not allow the pension funds to be invested abroad. The legislation was changed in 1991 and that is why this sector starts playing a role only from 1993 onwards.
 
8
In Chile there were mainly three cycles of privatisation policies. The first focused on state-owned enterprises in the 1970s. The second focused on the public service system (health, education, pensions) in the 1980s (Boccardo et al., 2020). The third focused on the incorporation of business actors in the administration and provision of public services (such as water and electricity) through the mechanism of “public–private partnerships” during the 1990s.
 
9
The term “denationalized” is used to account for a trajectory in which the control of the administrator ceased to be in the hands of Chilean economic actors. By contrast, with “internationalised” we refer to the processes of alliance between local and foreign capital.
 
10
The Enel group in Chile is an alliance between the former Enersis group (of Chilean origin) and the Italian transnational Enel Group.
 
11
USD millions. Exchange rate: 1 USD = 649 CLP (2017 average).
 
12
There are other important factors excluded from this work due to extension issues. For instance, several corruption scandals around pension management, regarding civil and military pension systems, that occurred since the late 2000s have impacted public opinion, contributing to a strong cry against AFPs and the privatised social security system in Chile. For a more detailed view on this process, see Mejías and Panes (2018) and Ruiz Bruzzone (2019).
 
13
I prefer this denomination to “dependency theory". As stated in the introduction to this volume, within this tradition there are diverse rather than unified approaches. I also adhere to the idea of conceiving the analytical approach of the dependentistas more as an “approach” than as a “theory".
 
Literature
Abeles, M., Pérez E., & Valdecantos, S. (Eds.). (2018). Estudios sobre financierización en América Latina. Comisión Económica Para América Latina.
Amable, B., Regan, A., Avdagic, S., Baccaro, L., Pontusson, J., & Van der Zwan, N. (2019). New approaches to political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 17(2), 433–459.
Arenas, A. (2010 ). Historia de la reforma previsional chilena: Una experiencia exitosa de política pública en democracia. Oficina Internacional del Trabajo.
Baccaro, L., & Pontusson, J. (2016). Rethinking comparative political economy: The growth model perspective. Politics & Society, 44(2), 175–207.
Barbero, M. I. (2017). Las multinacionales chilenas: contextos, trayectorias estrategias. In Empresas y empresarios en la historia de Chile: 1930–2015 (pp. 235–284). Editorial Universitaria.
Becker, U., Mesa-Lago, C., Hohnerlein, E., Ossio, L., & Simonovits, A. (2013). Re-reformas de sistemas de pensiones privatizadas en el mundo: estudio comparativo de Argentina, Bolivia, Chile y Hungría. Revista Trabajo, 10(7), 43–53.
Bizberg, I. (2018). Is there a diversity of dependent capitalisms in Latin America? Revue de La Régulation. Capitalisme, Institutions, Pouvoirs (24).
Boccardo, G. (2014). Cambios recientes en la estructura social de Argentina, Brasil y Chile (1980–2010). Entramados y Perspectivas, 2, 43–70.
Braun, B., Gabor, D., & Hübner, M. (2018). Governing through financial markets: Towards a critical political economy of capital markets union. Competition & Change, 22(2), 101–116.
Bril-Mascarenhas, T., & Maillet, A. (2018). How to build and wield business power: The political economy of pension regulation in Chile, 1990–2018. Latin American Politics and Society, 60(4), 1–25. CrossRef
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1996 [1969]). Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina: ensayo de interpretación sociológica. Siglo XXI.
Chesnais, F. (2017). Finance capital today: Corporations and banks in the lasting global slump. Haymarket Books.
Fairfield, T. (2015). Structural power in comparative political economy: Perspectives from policy formulation in Latin America. Business and Politics, 17(3), 411–441. CrossRef
Fazio, H. (2016). Los mecanismos fraudulentos de hacer fortuna: Mapa de la extrema riqueza 2015. LOM Ediciones.
Forbes. 2017a. The world’s biggest public companies. Ranking 2017. Forbes Magazine.
Forbes. (2017b). The world’s billionaire list. Ranking 2017. Forbes Magazine.
Fumagalli, A., & Lucarelli, S. (2011). A financialized monetary economy of production. International Journal of Political Economy., 40(1), 48–68. CrossRef
González, F., & Madariaga, A. (2019). Economic sociology, political economy, and Latin America’s capitalism. Quo vadis? Economic Sociology. The European Electronic Newsletter, 20(3), 1–5.
Huneeus, C. (2005). El régimen de Pinochet. Editorial Sudamericana.
Kalaitzake, M. (2018). Central banking and financial political power: An investigation into the European Central Bank. Competition & Change, 23.
Kremerman, M., & Gálvez, R. (2020a). ¿AFP para quien? Donde se invierten los fondos de pensiones en Chile. Documento de trabajo del Área de Seguridad Social. Fundación SOL.
Kremerman, M., & Gálvez, R. (2020b). Pensiones bajo el mínimo: Los montos de las pensiones que paga el sistema de capitalización individual en Chile. Documento de trabajo. Fundación SOL.
Lapavitsas, C. (2016). Beneficios sin producción. Cómo nos explotan las finanzas. Traficantes de Sueños.
Mazzucato, M., & MacFarlane, L. (2019). Patient finance for innovation-driven growth. IIPP Policy Brief. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose.
Mazzucato, M., & Shipman, A. (2014). Accounting for productive investment and value creation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(4), 1059–1085. CrossRef
Mejías, S., & Panes, D. (2018). Reestucturación neoliberal y crisis del sistema previsional. Análisis a partir de las transformaciones del Estado y la acción de los trabajadores en Chile. In Desigualdades, exclusión y crisis de sustentabilidad en los sistemas previsionales de América Latina y el Caribe (pp. 47–83). CLACSO-CLATE.
Mönckeberg, M. (2015). La máquina de defrauder. Los casos Penta y Soquimich. Penguin Random House Group Editorial.
Naczyk, M. (2013). Agents of privatization? Business groups and the rise of pension funds in Continental Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 11(3), 441–469. CrossRef
Naczyk, M., & Domonkos, S. (2016). The financial crisis and varieties of pension privatization reversals in Eastern Europe. Governance, 29(2), 167–184. CrossRef
Piñera, J. (1991). El cascabel al gato: la batalla por la reforma previsional. Editorial Zig-Zag.
Rozas Bugueño, J., & Maillet, A. (2019). Entre marchas, plebiscitos e iniciativas de ley: innovación en el repertorio de estrategias del movimiento No Más AFP en Chile (2014-2018). Izquierdas, 48,1–21.
Ruiz Bruzzone, F. (2016). Panorámica del Trabajo en el Chile Neoliberal. Editorial Universitaria.
Ruiz Bruzzone, F. (2019). El empresariado del sistema de pensiones en Chile (2000–2018). Tesis para optar al grado de magíster en Ciencias Sociales, con mención en Sociología de la Modernización y al título profesional de sociólogo. Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile.
Ruiz Bruzzone, F. (2020). Formación de clases y conflicto social en el sistema previsional chileno: mecanismos de acumulación capitalista y desafíos para la democracia. Revista Encuentros, 18(3), 88–99.
Ruiz, C. (2020). Octubre chileno: La irrupción de un nuevo pueblo. Taurus.
Ruiz, C., & Boccardo, G. (2014). Los chilenos bajo el neoliberalismo. Clases y conflicto social. El Desconcierto-Fundación Nodo XXI.
Ruiz, C., & Caviedes, S. (2019). Pugnas empresariales, crecimiento y desafíos gubernamentales. Cuadernos de Coyuntura.
Santillán, R., López, D., & Montenegro, J. (2010). Las Administradoras De Fondos De Pensiones Y El Desarrollo Del Mercado De Capitales En Chile. Ensayos Revista de Economía, 29(2), 53–76.
Solimano, A. (2017). Pensiones a la chilena. La experiencia internacional y el camino a la desprivatización. Catalonia.
Streeck, W. (2016). Varieties of varieties: “VoC” and the growth models. Politics & Society, 42(2).
Trampusch, C., & Fastenrath, F. (2019). States’ interests as limits to the power of finance: regulatory reforms in early local government financialization in the US and UK. Regulation & Governance.
Undurraga, T. (2012). Transformaciones sociales y fuentes de poder del empresariado chileno (1975–2010). Ensayos De Economía, 22(41), 201–225.
Van der Zwan, N. (2014). Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review, 12(1), 99–129.
Metadata
Title
Financialization and the Construction of Peripheral Business Power in the Chilean Pension System
Author
Felipe Ruiz Bruzzone
Copyright Year
2021
Book
Dependent Capitalisms in Contemporary Latin America and Europe

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71314-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-71315-7

Copyright Year: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71315-7_10

Premium Partner

Pluta Rombach Rechtsanwälte
    Image Credits

    Version: 0.2002.0