Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Fire Technology 4/2019

06-08-2018

Fire Fragility Functions for Steel Frame Buildings: Sensitivity Analysis and Reliability Framework

Authors: Thomas Gernay, Negar Elhami Khorasani, Maria Garlock

Published in: Fire Technology | Issue 4/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Fire fragility functions are a powerful method to characterize the probabilistic vulnerability of buildings to fire in the context of urban resilience assessment. But this method is recent and the influence of the different uncertain parameters on the functions has not been systematically studied. The first objective of this paper is to identify the prevailing parameters in constructing fire fragility functions for steel frame buildings. To this end, sensitivity analyses are conducted using Monte Carlo Simulations and a variance-based method, focusing on column failure fragilities. Fragilities for buildings with 3 to 12 stories, 0 to 3 h fire resistance rating and various occupancies are compared, assuming compartment areas ranging from 15 m2 to 80 m2. Results show that uncertainties in fire, heat transfer and structural models all generate significant variability in the fire fragility. In addition to fire load as the intensity measure, significant probabilistic parameters are the compartment geometry and openings, the thickness and thermal conductivity of fire protection, and the temperature dependent mechanical properties of steel. The second objective is to clarify the incorporation of fragility functions in a comprehensive structural fire reliability framework. A methodology for combining the functions with the ignition likelihood per year and with the fire loading in MJ/m2 is described, yielding annual probability estimates of column failure due to fire in the buildings. For a sprinklered office building designed according to prescriptive provisions, this annual probability ranges from 1.90 × 10−7 to 0.12 × 10−7 per year as a function of the building height. The probabilistic modeling techniques proposed in this paper can be used to establish consistent reliability levels in different buildings and to evaluate resilience for fire scenarios.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Elhami Khorasani N, Garlock M, Gardoni P (2014) Fire load: survey data, recent standards, and probabilistic models for office buildings. Eng Struct 58: 152–165CrossRef Elhami Khorasani N, Garlock M, Gardoni P (2014) Fire load: survey data, recent standards, and probabilistic models for office buildings. Eng Struct 58: 152–165CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bruls A, Cajot LG, Franssen JM (1988) Characterization of an insulating material with regard to ECCS recommendations for the fire safety of steel structures. J Constr Steel Res 9(2): 111–135CrossRef Bruls A, Cajot LG, Franssen JM (1988) Characterization of an insulating material with regard to ECCS recommendations for the fire safety of steel structures. J Constr Steel Res 9(2): 111–135CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bentz DP, Prasad KR (2007) Thermal performance of fire resistive materials I. Characterization with respect to thermal performance models. Report No. NISTIR 7401, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD Bentz DP, Prasad KR (2007) Thermal performance of fire resistive materials I. Characterization with respect to thermal performance models. Report No. NISTIR 7401, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD
4.
go back to reference Luecke WE, Banovic S, McColskey JD (2011) High temperature tensile constitutive data and models for structural steels in fire. NIST Technical Note 1714, Gaithersburg, MD Luecke WE, Banovic S, McColskey JD (2011) High temperature tensile constitutive data and models for structural steels in fire. NIST Technical Note 1714, Gaithersburg, MD
5.
go back to reference Naus D (2010) A compilation of elevated temperature concrete material property data and information for use in assessments of nuclear power plant reinforced concrete structures. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC Naus D (2010) A compilation of elevated temperature concrete material property data and information for use in assessments of nuclear power plant reinforced concrete structures. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC
6.
go back to reference Hadjisophocleous GV, Benichou N (1999) Performance criteria used in fire safety design. Autom Constr 8: 489–501CrossRef Hadjisophocleous GV, Benichou N (1999) Performance criteria used in fire safety design. Autom Constr 8: 489–501CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hopkin D, Van Coile R, Lange D (2017) Certain uncertainty—demonstrating safety in fire engineering and the need for safety targets. In: SFPE Europe, 07. Hopkin D, Van Coile R, Lange D (2017) Certain uncertainty—demonstrating safety in fire engineering and the need for safety targets. In: SFPE Europe, 07.
8.
go back to reference Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010) Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng Struct 32(11): 3639–3649CrossRef Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010) Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng Struct 32(11): 3639–3649CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2010) A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 32(5): 1312–1323CrossRef Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2010) A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 32(5): 1312–1323CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Phan HN, Paolacci F, Bursi OS, Tondini N (2017) Seismic fragility analysis of elevated steel storage tanks supported by reinforced concrete columns. J Loss Prev Process Ind 47: 57–65CrossRef Phan HN, Paolacci F, Bursi OS, Tondini N (2017) Seismic fragility analysis of elevated steel storage tanks supported by reinforced concrete columns. J Loss Prev Process Ind 47: 57–65CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shinozuka M, Feng MG, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech ASCE 126(12): 1224–1231CrossRef Shinozuka M, Feng MG, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech ASCE 126(12): 1224–1231CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van Coile R, Caspeele R, Taerwe L (2014) Reliability-based evaluation of the inherent safety presumptions in common fire safety design. Eng Struct 77:181–192CrossRef Van Coile R, Caspeele R, Taerwe L (2014) Reliability-based evaluation of the inherent safety presumptions in common fire safety design. Eng Struct 77:181–192CrossRef
13.
go back to reference De Sanctis G, Fischer K, Kohler J, Faber MH, Fontana M (2014) Combining engineering and data-driven approaches: development of a generic fire risk model facilitating calibration. Fire Saf J 70: 23–33CrossRef De Sanctis G, Fischer K, Kohler J, Faber MH, Fontana M (2014) Combining engineering and data-driven approaches: development of a generic fire risk model facilitating calibration. Fire Saf J 70: 23–33CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Anderson J, Lange D, Bostrom L (2016) Applying uncertainty quantification in modelling of a steel beam exposed to fire. In: 9th international conference on structures in fire (SiF 2016). Princeton University, NJ, USA, pp 925–932 Anderson J, Lange D, Bostrom L (2016) Applying uncertainty quantification in modelling of a steel beam exposed to fire. In: 9th international conference on structures in fire (SiF 2016). Princeton University, NJ, USA, pp 925–932
15.
go back to reference Molkens T, Van Coile R, Gernay T (2017) Assessment of damage and residual load bearing capacity of a concrete slab after fire: applied reliability-based methodology. Eng Struct 150: 969–985CrossRef Molkens T, Van Coile R, Gernay T (2017) Assessment of damage and residual load bearing capacity of a concrete slab after fire: applied reliability-based methodology. Eng Struct 150: 969–985CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Van Coile R, Balomenos GP, Pandey MD, Caspeele R (2017) An unbiased method for probabilistic fire safety engineering, requiring a limited number of model evaluations. Fire Technol 53(5): 1705–1744CrossRef Van Coile R, Balomenos GP, Pandey MD, Caspeele R (2017) An unbiased method for probabilistic fire safety engineering, requiring a limited number of model evaluations. Fire Technol 53(5): 1705–1744CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Guo Q, Jeffers AE (2015) Finite-element reliability analysis of structures subjected to fire. J Struct Eng 141(4): 04014129CrossRef Guo Q, Jeffers AE (2015) Finite-element reliability analysis of structures subjected to fire. J Struct Eng 141(4): 04014129CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Elhami Khorasani N, Gernay T, Garlock M (2016) Probabilistic measures of earthquake effects on fire performance of tall buildings. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on structural engineering, mechanics and computation. Taylor & Francis, Routledge, pp 1744–1749 Elhami Khorasani N, Gernay T, Garlock M (2016) Probabilistic measures of earthquake effects on fire performance of tall buildings. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on structural engineering, mechanics and computation. Taylor & Francis, Routledge, pp 1744–1749
21.
go back to reference Annerel E, Caspeele R, Taerwe L (2013) Full-probabilistic analysis of concrete beams during fire. J Struct Fire Eng 4(3):165–174CrossRef Annerel E, Caspeele R, Taerwe L (2013) Full-probabilistic analysis of concrete beams during fire. J Struct Fire Eng 4(3):165–174CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wang L, Van Coile R, Caspeele R, Taerwe L (2018) A parametric study on concrete columns exposed to biaxial bending at elevated temperatures using a probabilistic analysis. In: High tech concrete: where technology and engineering meet. Springer, Cham, pp 1662–1670 Wang L, Van Coile R, Caspeele R, Taerwe L (2018) A parametric study on concrete columns exposed to biaxial bending at elevated temperatures using a probabilistic analysis. In: High tech concrete: where technology and engineering meet. Springer, Cham, pp 1662–1670
25.
go back to reference Shrivastava M, Abu AK, Dhakal RP, Moss PJ (2017) Efficiency of different intensity measures for probabilistic fire engineering. In: Hao H, Zhang C (eds) Proceedings of the 24th Australasian conference on mechanics of structures and materials: advancements and challenges. Taylor and Francis Group Shrivastava M, Abu AK, Dhakal RP, Moss PJ (2017) Efficiency of different intensity measures for probabilistic fire engineering. In: Hao H, Zhang C (eds) Proceedings of the 24th Australasian conference on mechanics of structures and materials: advancements and challenges. Taylor and Francis Group
26.
go back to reference Lange D, Devaney S, Usmani A (2014) An application of the PEER performance based earthquake engineering framework to structures in fire. Eng Struct 66(0): 100–115CrossRef Lange D, Devaney S, Usmani A (2014) An application of the PEER performance based earthquake engineering framework to structures in fire. Eng Struct 66(0): 100–115CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gernay T, Elhami Khorasani N, Garlock M (2016) Fire fragility curves for steel buildings in a community context: a methodology. Eng Struct 113: 259–276CrossRef Gernay T, Elhami Khorasani N, Garlock M (2016) Fire fragility curves for steel buildings in a community context: a methodology. Eng Struct 113: 259–276CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Elhami Khorasani N, Gernay T, Garlock M (2015) Tools for measuring a city’s resilience in a fire following earthquake scenario. In: IABSE conference on structural engineering: providing solutions to global challenges, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 886–889 Elhami Khorasani N, Gernay T, Garlock M (2015) Tools for measuring a city’s resilience in a fire following earthquake scenario. In: IABSE conference on structural engineering: providing solutions to global challenges, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 886–889
29.
go back to reference Elhami Khorasani N, Gernay T, Garlock M (2017) Data-driven probabilistic post-earthquake fire ignition model for a community. Fire Saf J 94: 33–44CrossRef Elhami Khorasani N, Gernay T, Garlock M (2017) Data-driven probabilistic post-earthquake fire ignition model for a community. Fire Saf J 94: 33–44CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rush D, Lange D (2017) Towards a fragility assessment of a concrete column exposed to a real fire–tisova fire test. Eng Struct 150, 537–549CrossRef Rush D, Lange D (2017) Towards a fragility assessment of a concrete column exposed to a real fire–tisova fire test. Eng Struct 150, 537–549CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Marasco S, Zamani Noori A, Cimellaro GP (2017) Cascading hazard analysis of a hospital building. J Struct Eng 143(9): 04017100CrossRef Marasco S, Zamani Noori A, Cimellaro GP (2017) Cascading hazard analysis of a hospital building. J Struct Eng 143(9): 04017100CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Guo Q, Shi K, Jia Z, Jeffers AE (2013) Probabilistic evaluation of structural fire resistance. Fire Technol 49(3), 793–811CrossRef Guo Q, Shi K, Jia Z, Jeffers AE (2013) Probabilistic evaluation of structural fire resistance. Fire Technol 49(3), 793–811CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Franssen JM, Gernay T (2017) Modeling structures in fire with SAFIR®: theoretical background and capabilities. J Struct Fire Eng 8(3), 300–323CrossRef Franssen JM, Gernay T (2017) Modeling structures in fire with SAFIR®: theoretical background and capabilities. J Struct Fire Eng 8(3), 300–323CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hopkin D, Van Coile R, Fu I (2018) Developing fragility curves and estimating failure probabilities for protected steel structural elements subjected to fully developed fires. In: 10th international conference on structures in fire (SiF 2018). Belfast, UK. Hopkin D, Van Coile R, Fu I (2018) Developing fragility curves and estimating failure probabilities for protected steel structural elements subjected to fully developed fires. In: 10th international conference on structures in fire (SiF 2018). Belfast, UK.
35.
go back to reference Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saisana M, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Wiley, New YorkMATH Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saisana M, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Wiley, New YorkMATH
36.
go back to reference FEMA (2014) Hazus: MH 2.1 technical manual—earthquake model. Developed by the Department of Homeland Security. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Mitigation Division. Washington, DC FEMA (2014) Hazus: MH 2.1 technical manual—earthquake model. Developed by the Department of Homeland Security. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Mitigation Division. Washington, DC
37.
go back to reference SAC (2000) FEMA 355C: state of the art report on system performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C SAC (2000) FEMA 355C: state of the art report on system performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C
38.
go back to reference IBC (2012) International building code. International Code Council Inc., Country Club Hills IBC (2012) International building code. International Code Council Inc., Country Club Hills
39.
go back to reference Isolatek (2014) Isolatek international product manual. Isolatek International, Stanhope Isolatek (2014) Isolatek international product manual. Isolatek International, Stanhope
40.
go back to reference Drysdale D (1998) An introduction to fire dynamics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester Drysdale D (1998) An introduction to fire dynamics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
41.
go back to reference EC1 (2002) Eurocode 1: actions on structures—part 1–2: general actions—actions on structures exposed to fire. EN 1991-1-2. CEN, Brussels EC1 (2002) Eurocode 1: actions on structures—part 1–2: general actions—actions on structures exposed to fire. EN 1991-1-2. CEN, Brussels
42.
go back to reference Reitgruber S, Di Blasi C, Franssen JM (2006) Some comments on the parametric fire model of Eurocode 1. In: Conference on fire in enclosures, University of Ulster, Jordanstown, UK, pp 1–14 Reitgruber S, Di Blasi C, Franssen JM (2006) Some comments on the parametric fire model of Eurocode 1. In: Conference on fire in enclosures, University of Ulster, Jordanstown, UK, pp 1–14
43.
go back to reference Hamilton SR (2011) Performance-based fire engineering for steel framed structure: a probabilistic methodology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University Hamilton SR (2011) Performance-based fire engineering for steel framed structure: a probabilistic methodology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University
44.
go back to reference NFPA: National Fire Protection Association (2012) NFPA 557 standard for determination of fire loads for use in structural fire protection design. NFPA, Quincy NFPA: National Fire Protection Association (2012) NFPA 557 standard for determination of fire loads for use in structural fire protection design. NFPA, Quincy
45.
go back to reference JCSS (2001) JCSS probabilistic model code—part 2: load models, joint committee on structural safety. ISBN 978-3-909386-79-6. JCSS (2001) JCSS probabilistic model code—part 2: load models, joint committee on structural safety. ISBN 978-3-909386-79-6.
46.
go back to reference EC3 (2005) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design. EN 1993-1-2. CEN, Brussels. EC3 (2005) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design. EN 1993-1-2. CEN, Brussels.
47.
go back to reference Carino NJ, Stranes MA, Gross JL, Yang JC et al (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the world trade center disaster—passive fire protection, NIST NCSTAR 1-6A, September Carino NJ, Stranes MA, Gross JL, Yang JC et al (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the world trade center disaster—passive fire protection, NIST NCSTAR 1-6A, September
49.
go back to reference Van Coile R, Gernay T, Elhami Khorasani N, Hopkin D (2018) Evaluating uncertainty in steel-composite structure under fire—application of the ME-MRDM. In: 10th international conference on structures in fire, FireSERT, Ulster University, Belfast, UK Van Coile R, Gernay T, Elhami Khorasani N, Hopkin D (2018) Evaluating uncertainty in steel-composite structure under fire—application of the ME-MRDM. In: 10th international conference on structures in fire, FireSERT, Ulster University, Belfast, UK
50.
go back to reference Ellingwood BR (2005) Load combination requirements for fire-resistant structural design. J Fire Prot Eng 15(1), 43–61.CrossRef Ellingwood BR (2005) Load combination requirements for fire-resistant structural design. J Fire Prot Eng 15(1), 43–61.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Law A, Butterworth N, Stern-Gottfried J (2015) A risk based framework for time equivalence and fire resistance. Fire Technol 50(4): 771–784.CrossRef Law A, Butterworth N, Stern-Gottfried J (2015) A risk based framework for time equivalence and fire resistance. Fire Technol 50(4): 771–784.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Vassart O, Zhao B, Cajot LG, Robert, F, Meyer U, Frangi A (2014) Eurocode: background and applications. Structural fire design. Worked examples. JRC, Luxemburg. Vassart O, Zhao B, Cajot LG, Robert, F, Meyer U, Frangi A (2014) Eurocode: background and applications. Structural fire design. Worked examples. JRC, Luxemburg.
53.
go back to reference Hopkin D, Anastasov S, Swinburne K, Rush D, Van Coile R (2017) Applicability of ambient temperature reliability targets for appraising structures exposed to fire. In: 2nd international conference on structural safety under fire and blast loading, London, UK, Sep 10–12. Hopkin D, Anastasov S, Swinburne K, Rush D, Van Coile R (2017) Applicability of ambient temperature reliability targets for appraising structures exposed to fire. In: 2nd international conference on structural safety under fire and blast loading, London, UK, Sep 10–12.
Metadata
Title
Fire Fragility Functions for Steel Frame Buildings: Sensitivity Analysis and Reliability Framework
Authors
Thomas Gernay
Negar Elhami Khorasani
Maria Garlock
Publication date
06-08-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Fire Technology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0015-2684
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8099
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0764-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Fire Technology 4/2019 Go to the issue