Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Four Perspectives on What Matters for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles

Authors : Geoff Keeling, Katherine Evans, Sarah M. Thornton, Giulio Mecacci, Filippo Santoni de Sio

Published in: Road Vehicle Automation 6

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The ethical discussion on automated vehicles (AVs) has for the most part focused on what morality requires in AV collisions which present moral dilemmas. This discussion has been challenged for its failure to address the various kinds of risk and uncertainty which we can expect to arise in AV collisions; and for overlooking certain morally relevant facts which are unique to the context of AVs. We take these criticisms as a starting point and outline four perspectives on what matters for the ethics of AVs: risk and uncertainty, value sensitive design, partiality towards passengers and meaningful human control.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Business + Economics & Engineering + Technology"

Online-Abonnement

Springer Professional "Business + Economics & Engineering + Technology" gives you access to:

  • more than 102.000 books
  • more than 537 journals

from the following subject areas:

  • Automotive
  • Construction + Real Estate
  • Business IT + Informatics
  • Electrical Engineering + Electronics
  • Energy + Sustainability
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Leadership
  • Marketing + Sales
  • Mechanical Engineering + Materials
  • Insurance + Risk


Secure your knowledge advantage now!

Springer Professional "Engineering + Technology"

Online-Abonnement

Springer Professional "Engineering + Technology" gives you access to:

  • more than 67.000 books
  • more than 390 journals

from the following specialised fileds:

  • Automotive
  • Business IT + Informatics
  • Construction + Real Estate
  • Electrical Engineering + Electronics
  • Energy + Sustainability
  • Mechanical Engineering + Materials





 

Secure your knowledge advantage now!

Springer Professional "Business + Economics"

Online-Abonnement

Springer Professional "Business + Economics" gives you access to:

  • more than 67.000 books
  • more than 340 journals

from the following specialised fileds:

  • Construction + Real Estate
  • Business IT + Informatics
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Leadership
  • Marketing + Sales
  • Insurance + Risk



Secure your knowledge advantage now!

Footnotes
1
This work is part of the research project Meaningful Human Control over Automated Driving Systems with project number MVI.16.044, which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leben, D.: A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Inf. Technol. 19(2), 107–115 (2017)CrossRef Leben, D.: A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Inf. Technol. 19(2), 107–115 (2017)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference de Sio, F.S.: Killing by autonomous vehicles and the legal doctrine of necessity. Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 20(2), 411–429 (2017)CrossRef de Sio, F.S.: Killing by autonomous vehicles and the legal doctrine of necessity. Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 20(2), 411–429 (2017)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Contissa, G., Lagioia, F., Sartor, G.: The ethical knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law. Artif. Intell. Law 25(3), 365–378 (2017)CrossRef Contissa, G., Lagioia, F., Sartor, G.: The ethical knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law. Artif. Intell. Law 25(3), 365–378 (2017)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Keeling, G.: Legal necessity, pareto efficiency and justified killing in autonomous vehicle collisions. Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 21(2), 413–427 (2018)CrossRef Keeling, G.: Legal necessity, pareto efficiency and justified killing in autonomous vehicle collisions. Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 21(2), 413–427 (2018)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Keeling, G.: Against Leben’s Rawlsian collision algorithm for autonomous vehicles. In: Müller, V. (eds.) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence (PT-AI 2017). Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol. 44. Springer, Cham (2017) Keeling, G.: Against Leben’s Rawlsian collision algorithm for autonomous vehicles. In: Müller, V. (eds.) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence (PT-AI 2017). Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol. 44. Springer, Cham (2017)
6.
go back to reference Bonnefon, J., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I.: The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 365(6293), 1573–1576 (2016)CrossRef Bonnefon, J., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I.: The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 365(6293), 1573–1576 (2016)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Himmelreich, J.: Never mind the trolley: The ethics of autonomous vehicles in mundane situations. Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 21(3), 669–684 (2018)CrossRef Himmelreich, J.: Never mind the trolley: The ethics of autonomous vehicles in mundane situations. Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 21(3), 669–684 (2018)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hevelke, A., Nida-Rümelin, J.: Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis. Sci. Eng. Ethics 21(3), 619–630 (2015)CrossRef Hevelke, A., Nida-Rümelin, J.: Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis. Sci. Eng. Ethics 21(3), 619–630 (2015)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goodall, N.: Away from trolley problems and towards risk-management. Appl. Artif. Intell. 30(8), 810–821 (2016)CrossRef Goodall, N.: Away from trolley problems and towards risk-management. Appl. Artif. Intell. 30(8), 810–821 (2016)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nyholm, S., Smids, J.: The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: an applied trolley problem? Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 19(5), 1275–1289 (2016)CrossRef Nyholm, S., Smids, J.: The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: an applied trolley problem? Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 19(5), 1275–1289 (2016)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goodall, N.: Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes. Transp. Res. Rec. 2424(1), 58–65 (2014)CrossRef Goodall, N.: Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes. Transp. Res. Rec. 2424(1), 58–65 (2014)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goodall, N.: Machine ethics and automated vehicles. In: Meyer, G., Beiker, S. (eds.) Road Vehicle Automation. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham (2014) Goodall, N.: Machine ethics and automated vehicles. In: Meyer, G., Beiker, S. (eds.) Road Vehicle Automation. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham (2014)
13.
go back to reference Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H.: Human values, ethics, and design. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 1177–1201. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003) Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H.: Human values, ethics, and design. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 1177–1201. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)
14.
go back to reference Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang, P., Galletta, D. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems, vol. 5, pp. 348–372. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY (2006) Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang, P., Galletta, D. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems, vol. 5, pp. 348–372. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY (2006)
15.
go back to reference Kochenderfer, M.J.: Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Theory and Application. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)CrossRef Kochenderfer, M.J.: Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Theory and Application. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Thornton, S.M.: Autonomous vehicle motion planning with ethical considerations. PhD thesis. Stanford University (2018) Thornton, S.M.: Autonomous vehicle motion planning with ethical considerations. PhD thesis. Stanford University (2018)
18.
go back to reference Ogienr, R.: L’éthique aujourd’hui. Maximalistes et minimalistes, pp. 144–152. Gallimard, Paris (2015) Ogienr, R.: L’éthique aujourd’hui. Maximalistes et minimalistes, pp. 144–152. Gallimard, Paris (2015)
19.
go back to reference Millar, J.: Technology as a moral proxy: autonomy and paternalism by design. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 34(2), 47–55 (2015)CrossRef Millar, J.: Technology as a moral proxy: autonomy and paternalism by design. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 34(2), 47–55 (2015)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Selman, B., Brooks, R., Dean, T., Horvitz, E., Mitchell, T., Nilsson, N.: Challenge problems for artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of AAAI-96, Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1340–1345 (1996) Selman, B., Brooks, R., Dean, T., Horvitz, E., Mitchell, T., Nilsson, N.: Challenge problems for artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of AAAI-96, Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1340–1345 (1996)
22.
go back to reference van Gerven, M.: Computational foundations of natural intelligence. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 11, 112 (2017)CrossRef van Gerven, M.: Computational foundations of natural intelligence. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 11, 112 (2017)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Matthias, A.: The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6(3), 175–183 (2004)CrossRef Matthias, A.: The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6(3), 175–183 (2004)CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Di Nucci, E., de Sio, F.S.: Drones and responsibility: mapping the field. Routledge (2016) Di Nucci, E., de Sio, F.S.: Drones and responsibility: mapping the field. Routledge (2016)
25.
go back to reference Horowitz, M.C., Scharre, P.: Meaningful Human Control in Weapons Systems: A Primer (2015) Horowitz, M.C., Scharre, P.: Meaningful Human Control in Weapons Systems: A Primer (2015)
26.
go back to reference Nyholm, S.: Attributing agency to automated systems: reflections on human-robot collaborations and responsibility-loci. Sci. Eng. Ethics 24(4), 1201–1219 (2018)CrossRef Nyholm, S.: Attributing agency to automated systems: reflections on human-robot collaborations and responsibility-loci. Sci. Eng. Ethics 24(4), 1201–1219 (2018)CrossRef
27.
go back to reference de Sio, F.S., van den Hoven, J.: Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: a philosophical account. Front. Robot. AI 5, 15 (2018)CrossRef de Sio, F.S., van den Hoven, J.: Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: a philosophical account. Front. Robot. AI 5, 15 (2018)CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Scharre, P.: Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. W. W. Norton, New York (2018) Scharre, P.: Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. W. W. Norton, New York (2018)
29.
go back to reference Moyes, R.: Key Elements of Meaningful Human Control. Article 36 (2016) Moyes, R.: Key Elements of Meaningful Human Control. Article 36 (2016)
31.
go back to reference Mittelstadt, B.D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., Floridi, L.: The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 3(2), 1–21 (2016)CrossRef Mittelstadt, B.D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., Floridi, L.: The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 3(2), 1–21 (2016)CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bennett, S.: A brief history of automatic control. IEEE Control Syst. Soc. 16, 17–25 (1996)CrossRef Bennett, S.: A brief history of automatic control. IEEE Control Syst. Soc. 16, 17–25 (1996)CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Flemisch, F.O., Adams, C.A., Conway, S.R., Goodrich, K.H., Palmer, M.T., Schutte, P.C.: The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction, January 2003 Flemisch, F.O., Adams, C.A., Conway, S.R., Goodrich, K.H., Palmer, M.T., Schutte, P.C.: The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction, January 2003
34.
go back to reference Michon, J.A.: Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. Springer, Boston (1985) Michon, J.A.: Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. Springer, Boston (1985)
35.
go back to reference Calvert, S.C., Mecacci, G., Heikoop, D.D., de Sio, F.S.: Full platoon control in truck platooning: a meaningful human control perspective. In: 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 3320–3326 (2018) Calvert, S.C., Mecacci, G., Heikoop, D.D., de Sio, F.S.: Full platoon control in truck platooning: a meaningful human control perspective. In: 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 3320–3326 (2018)
36.
go back to reference Mecacci, G., de Sio, F.S.: Meaningful Human Control, Practical Reasoning and Dual-Mode Vehicles (2019, under review) Mecacci, G., de Sio, F.S.: Meaningful Human Control, Practical Reasoning and Dual-Mode Vehicles (2019, under review)
37.
go back to reference Heikoop, D., Hagenzieker, M., Mecacci, G., Calvert, S., de Sio, F.S., van Arem, B.: Human behaviour with automated driving systems: a quantitative framework for meaningful human control (2018, under review) Heikoop, D., Hagenzieker, M., Mecacci, G., Calvert, S., de Sio, F.S., van Arem, B.: Human behaviour with automated driving systems: a quantitative framework for meaningful human control (2018, under review)
Metadata
Title
Four Perspectives on What Matters for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles
Authors
Geoff Keeling
Katherine Evans
Sarah M. Thornton
Giulio Mecacci
Filippo Santoni de Sio
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22933-7_6