Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Events
Topic Page
Marketing
Log in
Learn more about individual access
Request company access
Electric Powertrains and Energy Systems 2025 | 26 + 27 March 2025

19th International MTZ Congress on Future Powertrains

Take this opportunity to attend the conference. Experts from the automotive industry, energy providers, and grid operators will meet up with representatives from politics and science to discuss important topics for this sector.
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published in:

01-04-2015 | ADVANCING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT

From behind the curtain: talking about values in LCA

Author: Susanne Freidberg

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 7/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Practitioners of life cycle assessment (LCA) acknowledge that more input from social scientists can help advance the cause of life cycle management (LCM). This commentary offers a social science perspective on a long-running question within LCA, namely, how the field should manage not only stakeholders’ values but also those of practitioners themselves.

Methods

More than 60 interviews were conducted with LCA practitioners and their industry clients. Qualitative data were also collected through participant observation at several LCA and LCM conferences, a study of the field’s history, and extensive content and discourse analysis of LCA publications and online forums.

Results and discussion

Results show that LCA practitioners’ values are informed partly by the knowledge acquired through their LCA work. At the same time, LCA standards and professional norms implicitly advise practitioners to keep those values out of their work as much as possible, so as not to compromise its apparent objectivity. By contrast, many social scientists contend openly that value-based judgments, based on “situated knowledge,” can actually enhance the rigor, accountability, and credibility of scientific assessments.

Conclusions

LCA practitioners’ own situated knowledge justifies not only the value choices required by LCA but also their evaluative judgments of contemporary life cycle-based sustainability initiatives. This more critical voice could advance the goals of LCM while also boosting the credibility of LCA more generally.
previous article The state of play in disseminating LCM practices in the Western Balkan region: the attitude of Serbian SMEs
next article The legitimacy of life cycle assessment in the waste management sector

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
Arvesen A, Bright RM, Hertwich EG (2011) Considering only first-order effects? How simplifications lead to unrealistic technology optimism in climate change mitigation. Energ Policy 39:7448–7454CrossRef
Baumann H, Rydberg T (1994) Life cycle assessment: a comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluation. J Clean Prod 2:13–20CrossRef
Dauvergne P, Lister J (2012) Big brand sustainability: governance prospects and environmental limits. Glob Environ Chang 22:36–45CrossRef
De Schryver AM, Humbert S, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) The influence of value choices in life cycle impact assessment of stressors causing human health damage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:698–706CrossRef
European Commission (2013) Annex II-Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide to the commission recommendation on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations
Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:91–94CrossRef
Finkbeiner M (2014a) The international standards as the constitution of life cycle assessment: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring. In Klöpffer W (ed) Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment. Springer, pp 85-106
Finkbeiner M (2014b) Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:266–271CrossRef
Finkbeiner M, Ackermann R, Bach V, Berger M, Brankatschk G, Chang Y-J, Wolf K (2014) Challenges in life cycle assessment: an overview of current gaps and research needs. In: Klöpffer W (ed) Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment, Springer, pp 207-58
Finnveden G (1997) Valuation methods within LCA—where are the values? Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:163–169CrossRef
Fullana i Palmer P, Puig R, Bala A, Baquero G, Riba J, Raugei M (2011) From life cycle assessment to life cycle management. J Ind Ecol 15:458–475CrossRef
Haas P (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46(1):1–35CrossRef
Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud 14:575–599CrossRef
Heiskanen E (1997) The social shaping of a technique for environmental assessment. Sci Stud 11:27–51
Hertwich EG, Pease WS (1998) ISO 14042 restricts use and development of impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:180–181CrossRef
Hertwich EG, Hammitt J, Pease W (2000) A theoretical foundation for life cycle assessment: recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making. J Ind Ecol 4:13–28CrossRef
Hofstetter P, Baumgartner T, Scholz R (2000) Modelling the valuesphere and the ecosphere: integrating the decision makers’ perspectives into LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:161–175CrossRef
Huppes G, Oers L, Pretato U, Pennington DW (2012) Weighting environmental effects: analytic survey with operational evaluation methods and a meta-method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:876–891CrossRef
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Geneva
ISO (2006b) ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, Geneva
Klöpffer W (1998) Subjective is not arbitrary. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:61–62CrossRef
Lloyd SM, Ries R (2007) Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J Ind Ecol 11:161–179CrossRef
Longino HE (1990) Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton
Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Mouron P, Rossi V, Humbert S (2014) World Food LCA Database: methodological guidelines for the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Quantis and Agriscope, Lausanne
Pizzirani S, McLaren SJ, Seadon JK (2014) Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1316–1330CrossRef
Porter T (1994) Objectivity as standardization: the rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics, and cost-benefit analysis. In: Megill A (ed) Rethinking Objectivity. Duke, Durham, pp 197–237
Potting J, Curran MA, von Blottnitz H (2010) From life cycle talking to taking action. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:326–329CrossRef
Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008a) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:290–300CrossRef
Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008b) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment part 2. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:374–388CrossRef
Rose G (1997) Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Prog Hum Geog 21:305–320CrossRef
Satterfield T, Gregory R, Klain S, Roberts M, Chan KM (2013) Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J Environ Manag 117:103–114CrossRef
Sayer A (2011) Why things matter to people: social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Steen B (2006) Describing values in relation to choices in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:277–283CrossRef
Turnpenny J, Jones M, Lorenzoni I (2011) Where now for post-normal science? A critical review of its development, definitions, and uses. Sci Technol Hum Val 36:287–306CrossRef
Volkwein S, Klöpffer W (1996) The valuation step within LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:36–39CrossRef
Zamagni A, Pesonen H-L, Swarr T (2013) From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1637–1641CrossRef
Metadata
Title
From behind the curtain: talking about values in LCA
Author
Susanne Freidberg
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0879-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Evaluating the carbon footprint of the cork sector with a dynamic approach including biogenic carbon flows

  • LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

Integrating life cycle assessment and material flow cost accounting to account for resource productivity and economic-environmental performance

  • LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

A triple bottom line evaluation of solid waste management strategies: a case study for an arid Gulf State, Kuwait

  • LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

Tracking current and forecasting future land-use impacts of agricultural value chains. 67th Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment, 3rd of November 2017, Zurich, Switzerland

  • CONFERENCE REPORT

Michael Z. Hauschild, Ralph K. Rosenbaum, and Stig Irvin Olsen (eds): Life Cycle Assessment—Theory and Practice

  • Book Review

Sustainability governance service providers: the role of third-party product certification in facilitating corporate life cycle management

  • ADVANCING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT