Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Small Business Economics
Published in: Small Business Economics 2/2020

13-04-2018

From knowledge to business ecosystems: emergence of an entrepreneurial activity during knowledge replication

Authors: Amel Attour, Nathalie Lazaric

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 2/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Our article emphasizes the relationship between knowledge and business ecosystems. Transformation of a knowledge ecosystem can lead to the emergence of a technological platform embodying a business ecosystem and providing the resources required especially for firm startup. The role of knowledge replication in an innovation ecosystem is identified through exploratory research and a qualitative case study in the technology hotspot of Sophia-Antipolis. Our findings provide evidence of a new technological trajectory in near-field communication ecosystems resulting from a radical transformation of traditional knowledge ecosystems. We show that the role of a knowledge filter is reduced by some public actors and universities acting as the “tenant anchor” and accelerating the replication of knowledge, and the resolution of intellectual property rights issues in emergent business ecosystems. We highlight the critical role of a public actor in enabling the emergence and creation of a business ecosystem, and its involvement in this entrepreneurial activity.
previous article The role of industry variety in the creation of innovative start-ups in Italy
next article Workers’ participation in regional economic change following establishment closure

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
“Entrepreneurship facilitates the spill over of knowledge in the form of starting a new firm” (Braunerhjelm et al., 2010: 107).
 
2
NFC is a standards-based short-range (less than 3 cm) wireless communication (unlicensed 13.56 MHz radio frequency) technology to enable half or full duplex applications. It offers a general-purpose connection to other wireless devices (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, GPRS, etc.) and can be used with several other devices (RFID tags, smart cards, etc.) for communication.
 
3
TSM is a NFC ecosystem, a neutral broker that sets up business agreements and technical connections with mobile network operators, phone manufacturers, and other entities controlling the secure element on mobile phones. TSM enables service providers to distribute and manage their contactless applications remotely by allowing access to the secure element in NFC-enabled handsets.
 
4
Several other companies are official project participants: Ardis, CEV Group, Constructive Card, Digital Airways, Monext, High Co, Netinf, NXP, Oberthur T. In this research, we interviewed only project partners which are stakeholders in the work package related to the development of a mobile application for secure data storage and transfer over a NFC reader and in which UNS was an active player.
 
5
These categories required coding technologies or functionalities used at the beginning of the projects and resulting from innovation (cf. Appendix 1 Table 3). The codes allowed us to identify knowledge that was combined and replicated from one project to the next (cf. Table 2 and appendix 1 Table 3).
 
6
To be precise, the plastic UNS student card includes a micro-payment function for use in the university canteen. This offer is the result of a partnership between Moneo, UNS, and the Centre Régional des Oeuvres Universitaires (CROUS).
 
7
With other NFCampus members, knowledge sharing was within a collaborative arrangement specifying that members should provide temporary access through a free license (limited to the duration of the project) to all the patented technologies (see Annex 1 Table 3).
 
Literature
Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P. & Carlsson, B. (2003). The missing link: the knowledge filter and endogenous growth, Working paper presented at the Druid summer conference 2003 on Creating, sharing and transferring knowledge. Copenhagen, Denmark, June 12–14.
Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.CrossRef
Agarwal, R., & Shah, S. K. (2014). Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Research Policy, 43(7), 1109–1133.CrossRef
Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Anderson, P. (2013). Forming and exploiting opportunities: the implications of discovery and creation processes for entrepreneurial and organizational research. Organization Science, 24(1), 301–317.CrossRef
Antonelli, C., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2010). Recombinant knowledge and growth: the case of ICTs. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21, 50–69.CrossRef
Attour, A. (2014). Quel leader et business model ouvert pour les écosystèmes-plateformes de type NFC. Management & Avenir, 73, 33–53.CrossRef
Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implementation of learning by doing. Review of Economics and Statistics., 80, 155–173.CrossRef
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. (1996). R&D Spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review., 86(3), 630–640.
Baldwin, C., & Woodward, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: a unified view. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 19–44). London: Edward Elgar.
Basole, R. (2009). Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology. (00), 1–16.
Becker, M., & Lazaric, N., (2003). The influence of knowledge in the replication of routines. Economie Appliquée. Tome LVI (3), 65–94.
Bourdon, I., & Bourdil, M., (2007). Récompenses et gestion des connaissances, des liens complexes. La revue des Sciences de Gestion. n°226-227, 165–171.
Boudreau, K, Lakhani, K., (2009), How to Manage outside innovation: competitive markets or collaborative communities?.MIT Sloan Management Review. 50(.4), 69–75.
Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics., 34, 105–125.CrossRef
Camison, C., & Forés, B. (2011). Knowledge creation and absorptive capacity: the effect of intra-district shared competences. Scandinavian Journal of Management., 27, 66–86.CrossRef
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43, 1164–1176.CrossRef
Einsenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alystyne, M. W. (2009). Opening platforms: how, when and why? In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 131–162). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Eisenhardt, K., & Galunic, D. C. (2000). Coevolving at last a way to make synergies work. Harvard Business Review., 78, 91–101.
Gawer, A. (2010). The organization of technological platforms. Research in the Sociology of Organizations., 29, 287–296.CrossRef
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249.CrossRef
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2012). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Conference DRUID 2012. Copenhagen: CBS.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: HBS Press.
Isckia, T., & Lescop, D. (2009). Open Innovation within business ecosystems: a tale from Amazon.​com. Communications & Strategies. 74 (2nd quarter 2009), 37–54.
Koenig, G. (2013). Business ecosystem revisited. In L. S. Ben (Ed.), Understanding business ecosystems (pp. 69–84). Paris: De Boeck.
Lazaric, N., Longhi, C., & Thomas, C. (2008). Gatekeepers of knowledge versus platforms of knowledge: from potential to realized absorptive capacity. Regional Studies., 42(6), 837–852.CrossRef
Miranda, S., Pastorelly, N., Ishkina, E., Torre, D., & Chaix, L. (2011). Lessons inferred from NFC mobiquitous innovative information service. RTSI- Ingénierie des systèmes d’information., 16(04), 15–47.CrossRef
McKelvey, M. (2016). Firms navigating through innovation spaces: a conceptualization of how firms search and perceive technological, market and productive opportunities globally. Journal of Evolutionary Economics., 26(4), 785–802.CrossRef
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.CrossRef
Oh, D. S., Philips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: a critical examination. Technovation, 54(August 2016), 1–6.CrossRef
Pastorelly, N., Benouali, H., Leblanc, C., Miranda, S., & Attour, A. (2011). Nice Futur Campus, un bouquet de services NFC dans une carte virtuelle étudiant. RTSI- Ingénierie des systèmes d’information, 16(04/2011), 63–86.CrossRef
Powell, W. W., Packalen, K., & Whittington, K. (2012). Organizational and institutional genesis: the emergence of high-tech clusters in the life sciences. In J. Padgett & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The emergence of organizations and markets (pp. 434–464). Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Saviotti, P. P. (1996). Technology evolution, variety and the economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Saviotti, P. P., de Looze, M. A., & Maupertuis, M. A. (2005). Knowledge dynamics, firm strategy, mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology based sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology., 14, 103–124.CrossRef
Szulzanski, G., Cappetta, R., & Jensen, J. R. (2004). When and how trustworthiness matters: knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organization Science., 15, 600–613.CrossRef
Tsvetkova, A., & Gustafsson, M. (2012). Business models for industrial ecosystems: a modular approach. Journal of Cleaner Production., 29-30, 246–254.CrossRef
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Huber, G. P. (1990). Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organization Science., 1(3), 213–219.CrossRef
Weitzman, M. L. (1996). Hybridizing growth theory. American Economic Review, 86, 207–212.
Winter, S. G. (2016). The place of entrepreneurship in “The Economics that Might Have Been”. Small Business Economics., 47(1), 15–34.CrossRef
Yin, R. L. (1989). Application of case study research. Applied social research series, second edition, 34. Sage Publications.
Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business Horizons., 55(3), 219–229.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
From knowledge to business ecosystems: emergence of an entrepreneurial activity during knowledge replication
Authors
Amel Attour
Nathalie Lazaric
Publication date
13-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Small Business Economics / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0035-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Small Business Economics 2/2020 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Destructive entrepreneurship in the small business sector: bankruptcy fraud in Sweden, 1830–2010

OriginalPaper

Productive entrepreneurship and the effectiveness of insolvency legislation: a cross-country study

OriginalPaper

Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems

OriginalPaper

The role of industry variety in the creation of innovative start-ups in Italy

EditorialNotes

Knowledge, entrepreneurship and regional transformation: contributing to the Schumpeterian and evolutionary perspective on the relationships between them

OriginalPaper

Bankruptcy delay and firms’ dynamics