Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Frühe Prägungen akademischer Gründer anhand sozialer Lernprozesse: Einfluss verschiedener Lebensbereiche auf die Gründungsentscheidung am Beispiel von BG ThinkTank

Author : Monika Sienknecht

Published in: Fallstudien zu akademischen Ausgründungen

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Akademische Spin-Offs (fortan ASOs) bezeichnen gewerbliche Ausgründungen von Hochschulabsolventen oder Mitarbeitern öffentlicher Forschungseinrichtungen. Obgleich noch immer ein seltenes Phänomen (Braun-Thürmann et al. 2010; Shane 2004), steigt weltweit die Relevanz akademischer Spin-Offs als Transferkanäle von Wissen und Technologien aus öffentlichen Forschungseinrichtungen (Hemer et al. 2006; Mustar und Wright 2010). Voraussetzung für diese spezielle Form des Entrepreneurship ist der Wandel von Hochschulangehörigen zu Entrepreneuren.
In diesem Kontext liefert das Konzept der Prägung (engl. Imprinting) einen theoriegeleiteten Zugang, um die Entstehung unternehmerischer Verhaltensweisen von Akademikern zu untersuchen. Dabei erscheint es zielführend, die spezifischen Lebensbereiche akademischer Entrepreneure unter Berücksichtigung der Argumente und Erkenntnisse der sozialen Lerntheorie differenziert zu betrachten. Die vorliegende Fallstudie beleuchtet daher frühe Prägungen eines akademischen Gründers (fortan Gründer A), die auf professionelle und familiäre Lebensabschnitte zurückgeführt werden können. Darüber hinaus wird in dem vorliegenden Beitrag die Bedeutung sozialer Nähe für frühe unternehmerische Prägungen analysiert.
Das konzeptionelle Modell wird anhand einer explorativen Fallstudie des akademischen Gründers der BG ThinkTank GmbH & Co. KG (fortan ThinkTank) validiert. Das Gründerteam von ThinkTank hat sich im Bereich der Softwareentwicklung spezialisiert. Als Hauptapplikation entwickelten sie eine automatische Bilderkennungssoftware, die in verfügbare Sicherheitslösungen (z. B. Videoüberwachungssysteme) integriert werden kann, um potenziell gefährliche Situationen in Echtzeit zu erkennen und zu analysieren. Eingesetzt wird die Software derzeit bei Großveranstaltungen, wie Fußballspielen, um die Sicherheit im Stadion zu erhöhen.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
next chapter Prägung des unternehmerischen Verhaltens von Akademikern durch biografische Netzwerke: Fallstudienanalyse des akademischen High-Tech Unternehmens Optosight GmbH
Footnotes
1
Erwachsene umfassen alle Befragten im Alter von 18 bis 64 Jahren.
 
2
Die Grundgesamtheit im Jahr 2016 bestand aus 390 staatlichen und staatlich anerkannten privaten Hochschulen. Somit umfasst die Stichprobe rund 50 Prozent der Grundgesamtheit.
 
3
Weitere Formen der Transformation von Prägungen sind in der einschlägigen Literatur nachzulesen und werden aufgrund des Forschungsschwerpunktes dieser Arbeit nicht näher dargelegt.
 
4
Zwar stellen Marquis und Huang (2010) eine Ausnahme dar, ihre Analyse forciert jedoch Prägungen von Unternehmen durch intraorganisationale Prozesse und bewegt sich folglich auf einer makroökonomischen Ebene.
 
Literature
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., & Stein, J. (2008). Academic freedom, private sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(3), 617–635.CrossRef
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRef
Aldrich, H. E., & Kim, P. H. (2007). A life course perspective on occupational inheritance: Self-employed parents and their children. In M. Ruef & M. Lounsbury (Hrsg.), The sociology of etrepreneurship (S. 33–82). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRef
Aldrich, H. E., & Yang, T. (2014). How do entrepreneurs know what to do? Learning and organizing in new ventures. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(1), 59–82.CrossRef
Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Hrsg.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (S. 3–23). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
Aschhoff, B., & Grimpe, C. (2014). Contemporaneous peer effects, career age and the industry involvement of academics in biotechnology. Research Policy, 43(2), 367–381.CrossRef
Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.
Azoulay, P., Liu, C. C., & Stuart, T. E. (2017). Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. American Journal of Sociology, 122(4), 1223–1271.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.CrossRef
Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.CrossRef
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRef
Bosma, N., Hessels, J., Schutjens, V., Van Praag, M., & Verheul, I. (2012). Entrepreneurship and role models. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), 410–424.CrossRef
Braun-Thürmann, H., Knie, A., & Simon, D. (2010). Unternehmen Wissenschaft: Ausgründungen als Grenzüberschreitungen akademischer Forschung. Bielefeld: transcript.CrossRef
Bryant, P. T. (2014). Imprinting by design. The microfoundations of entrepreneurial adaptation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1081–1102.CrossRef
Burton, M. D., & Beckman, C. M. (2007). Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. American Sociology Review, 72(2), 239–266.CrossRef
Burton, M. D., Sørensen, J. B., & Beckman, C. M. (2002). Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. In M. Lounsbury & M. J. Ventresca (Hrsg.), Social structure and organizations revisited (S. 229–262). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRef
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.CrossRef
Carnabuci, G., & Wezel, F. C. (2011). Back to the future: Career transitions at the dawn of capitalism: The immigration of merchants from the southern Netherlands to Amsterdam, 1578–1602. Organization Studies, 32(12), 1621–1637.CrossRef
Carr, J. C., & Sequeira, J. M. (2007). Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A theory of planned behavior approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1090–1098.CrossRef
Chen, C. (2012). Sector imprinting: Exploring its impacts on managers’ perceived formalized personnel rules, perceived red tape, and current job tenure. American Review of Public Administration, 42(3), 320–340.CrossRef
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European Research Institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216.CrossRef
Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084–1093.CrossRef
Cohen-Scali, V. (2003). The influence of family, social, and work socialization on the construction of the professional identity of young adults. Journal of Career Development, 29(4), 237–249.
Cope, J. (2003). Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection: Discontinuous events as triggers for ‚higher-level‘ learning. Management Learning, 34(4), 429–450.CrossRef
Cronqvist, H., Makhija, A. K., & Yonker, S. E. (2012). Behavioral consistency in corporate finance: CEO personal and corporate leverage. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 20–40.CrossRef
Denrell, J. (2003). Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organization Science, 14(3), 227–243.CrossRef
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef
Dobrev, S. D., & Barnett, W. P. (2005). Organizational roles and transition to entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 433–449.CrossRef
Dokko, G., Wilk, S. L., & Rothbard, N. P. (2009). Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 51–68.CrossRef
Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2002). Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: The influence of colleagues’ choices. Journal of Public Economics, 85(1), 121–148.CrossRef
Dyer, W. G. (1994). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial careers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(2), 7–21.CrossRef
EACEA. (2012). Entrepreneurship education at school in Europe: National strategies, curricula and learning outcomes. Brüssel: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
Eesley, C., & Wang, Y. (2017). Social influence in career choice: Evidence from a randomized field experiment on entrepreneurial mentorship. Research Policy, 46(3), 636–650.CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRef
Elfenbein, D. W., Hamilton, B. H., & Zenger, T. R. (2010). The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Science, 56(4), 659–681.CrossRef
Ellis, S., Aharonson, B. S., Drori, I., & Shapira, Z. (2017). Imprinting through inheritance: A multi-genealogical study of entrepreneurial proclivity. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 500–522.CrossRef
Entwisle, D. R., & Hayduk, L. A. (1988). Lasting effects of elementary school. Sociology of Education, 61(3), 147–159.CrossRef
Farmer, S. M., Yao, X., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2011). The behavioral impact of entrepreneur identity aspiration and prior entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 245–273.CrossRef
Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionarians: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957.CrossRef
Fernández-Pérez, V., Alonso-Galicia, P. E., Rodríquez-Ariza, L., & del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M. (2015). Professional and personal social networks: A bridge to entrepreneurship for academics? European Management Journal, 33(1), 37–47.CrossRef
Fini, R., & Toschi, L. (2016). Academic logic and corporate entrepreneurial intentions: A study of the interaction between cognitive and institutional factors in new firms. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 637–659.CrossRef
Fini, R., Fu, K., Mathisen, M. T., Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2017). Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: A longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 361–391.CrossRef
Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D., & Wiklund, J. (2018). Rethinking the commercialization of public science: From entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 4–20.CrossRef
Floyd, K., & Parks, M. R. (1995). Manifesting closeness in the interactions of peers: A look at siblings and friends. Communication Reports, 8(2), 69–76.CrossRef
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.CrossRef
Frank, A., Krempkow, R., & Mostovova, E. (2017). Gründungsradar 2016: Wie Hochschulen Unternehmensgründungen fördern. Essen: Edition Stifterverband-Verwaltungsgesellschaft für Wissenschaftspflege mbH.
Friesl, M., Sackmann, S. A., & Kremser, S. (2011). Knowledge sharing in new organizational entities: The impact of hierarchy, organizational context, micro-politics and suspicion. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 71–86.CrossRef
Goethner, M., Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Cantner, U. (2012). Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 628–641.CrossRef
Göktepe-Hultén, D. (2008). Academic inventors and research groups: Entrepreneurial cultures at universities. Science and Public Policy, 35(9), 657–667.CrossRef
Grave, B., Hetze, P., & Kanig, A. (2014). Gründungsradar 2013: Wie Hochschulen Unternehmensgründungen fördern. Analysen. Essen: Stifterverband für die deutsche Wissenschaft.
Gruber, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2017). Entrepreneurial behavior: A reconceptualization and extension based on identity theory. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 271–286.CrossRef
Grusec, J. E. (1992). Social learning theory and developmental psychology: The legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 776–786.CrossRef
Halaby, C. N. (2003). Where job values come from: Family and schooling background, cognitive ability, and gender. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 251–278.CrossRef
Handel, G., Cahill, S., & Elkin, F. (2007). Children and society: The sociology of children and childhood socialization. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Hannan, M. T., Burton, M. D., & Baron, J. N. (1996). The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(2), 239–275.CrossRef
Hayter, C. S. (2016). Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 45(2), 475–490.CrossRef
Hemer, J., Schleinkofer, M., & Göthner, M. (2006). Akademische Spin-offs in Ost- und Westdeutschland und ihre Erfolgsbedingungen (Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag, Arbeitsbericht Nr. 109). Berlin: Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Dt. Bundestag (TAB).
Higgins, M. C. (2005). Career imprints: Creating leaders across an industry (1. Aufl.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hoang, H., & Gimeno, J. (2010). Becoming a founder. How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 41–53.CrossRef
Hsu, D. H., Roberts, E. B., & Eesley, C. E. (2007). Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Research Policy, 36(5), 768–788.CrossRef
Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935.CrossRef
Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., & Rau, S. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29–49.CrossRef
Johnson, M. K. (2002). Social origins, adolescent experiences, and work value trajectories during the transition to adulthood. Social Forces, 80(4), 1307–1340.CrossRef
Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262–279.
Kacperczyk, A. J. (2009). Inside or outside: The social mechanisms of entrepreneurship choices. Evidence from the mutual fund industry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Kacperczyk, A. J. (2013). Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organization Science, 24(3), 664–683.CrossRef
Kautonen, T., Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655–674.CrossRef
Keller, B. K., & Whiston, S. C. (2008). The role of parental influences on young adolescents’ career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 198–217.CrossRef
Klandt, H. (2004). Entrepreneurship education and research in German-speaking Europe. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 293–301.CrossRef
Kohn, M. L., Slomczynski, K. M., & Schoenbach, C. (1986). Social stratification and the transmission of values in the family: A cross-national assessment. Sociological Forum, 1(1), 73–102.CrossRef
Kolb, C., & Wagner, M. (2015). Crowding in or crowding out: The link between academic entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial traits. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 387–408.CrossRef
Krabel, S., & Mueller, P. (2009). What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists. Research Policy, 38(6), 947–956.CrossRef
Lacetera, N. (2009). Different missions and commitment power in R&D organizations: Theory and evidence on industry-university alliances. Organization Science, 20(3), 565–582.CrossRef
Law, H. (2013). The psychology of coaching, mentoring and learning. Malden: Wiley.CrossRef
Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1169–1191.CrossRef
Lee, M., & Battilana, J. (2013). How the zebra got its stripes: Imprinting of individuals and hybrid social ventures (Working paper, no. 14-005. Harvard Business School). Boston: Organizational Behavior Unit.
Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.CrossRef
Marquis, C., & Huang, Z. (2010). Acquisitions as exaptation: The legacy of founding institutions in the US commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 441–1473.CrossRef
Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245.CrossRef
Mathias, B. D., Williams, D. W., & Smith, A. R. (2015). Entrepreneurial inception: The role of imprinting in entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 11–28.CrossRef
McEvily, B., Jaffee, J., & Tortoriello, M. (2012). Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organization Science, 23(2), 547–563.CrossRef
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.CrossRef
Menaghan, E. G., & Parcel, T. L. (1995). Social sources of change in children’s home environments: The effects of parental occupational experiences and family conditions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 69-84.
Milanov, H., & Fernhaber, S. A. (2009). The impact of early imprinting on the evolution of new venture networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 46–61.CrossRef
Miller, G. A. (1976). Professionals in bureaucracy: Alienation among industrial scientists and engineers. American Sociological Review, 32(5), 755–768.CrossRef
Mungai, E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2011). Parental entrepreneurial role model influence on male offspring: Is it always positive and when does it occur? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 337–357.CrossRef
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Ramaciotti, L. (2016). The effects of university rules on spinoff creation: The case of academia in Italy. Research Policy, 45(7), 1386–1396.CrossRef
Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 42–65.CrossRef
Mustar, P., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 67–80.CrossRef
Nanda, R., & Sørensen, J. B. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116–1126.CrossRef
Özcan, S., & Reichstein, T. (2009). Transition to entrepreneurship from the public sector: Predispositional and contextual effects. Management Science, 55(4), 604–618.CrossRef
Sauermann, H., & Stephan, P. (2013). Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science, 24(3), 889–909.CrossRef
Schein, E. H. (1971). The individual, the organization, and the career: A conceptual scheme. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 401–426.CrossRef
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scherer, R. F., Adams, J. S., Carley, S. S., & Wiebe, F. A. (1989). Role model performance effects on development of entrepreneurial career preference. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 53–72.CrossRef
Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291–332.CrossRef
Schwens, C., & Kabst, R. (2009). How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: Experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. International Business Review, 18(5), 509–522.CrossRef
Shah, P. P. (1998). Who are employees’ social referents? Using a network perspective to determine referent others. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 249–268.
Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef
Shane, S., & Khurana, R. (2003). Bringing individuals back in: The effects of career experience on new firm founding. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(3), 519–543.CrossRef
Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170.CrossRef
Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, D. Sexton & K. Vesper (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (S. 72–90). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 549–573.CrossRef
Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., & Heavey, C. (2015). What’s past is prologue: A framework, review, and future directions for organizational research on imprinting. Journal of Management, 41(1), 288–317.CrossRef
Sørensen, J. B. (2007a). Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 387–412.CrossRef
Sørensen, J. B. (2007b). Closure and exposure: Mechanisms in the intergenerational transmission of self-employment. In M. Ruef & M. Lounsbury (Hrsg.), Research in the sociology of organizations (S. 83–124). New York: Elsevier/JAI.
Sternberg, R., & von Bloh, J. (2017). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). Länderbericht Deutschland 2016.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizations (S. 142–193). London: Routledge.
Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.CrossRef
Stuart, T. E., & Sørenson, O. (2007). Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 211–227.CrossRef
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Hrsg.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (S. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
Tilcsik, A. (2013). Remembrance of things past: Individual imprinting in organizations. Doctoral dissertation.
Tilcsik, A. (2014). Imprint-environment fit and performance. How organizational munificence at the time of hire affects subsequent job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 639–668.CrossRef
Tyre, M. J., & Von Hippel, E. (1997). The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science, 8(1), 71–83.CrossRef
Van Auken, H., Fry, F. L., & Stephens, P. (2006). The influence of role models on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 157–167.CrossRef
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.CrossRef
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175.CrossRef
Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 760–773.CrossRef
Whiston, S. C., & Keller, B. K. (2004). The influences of the family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 32(4), 493–568.CrossRef
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (9. Aufl.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Frühe Prägungen akademischer Gründer anhand sozialer Lernprozesse: Einfluss verschiedener Lebensbereiche auf die Gründungsentscheidung am Beispiel von BG ThinkTank
Author
Monika Sienknecht
Copyright Year
2019
Book
Fallstudien zu akademischen Ausgründungen

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25699-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-25700-2

Copyright Year: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25700-2_1