Advertisement
Published in:
2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
6. General Conclusions
Author : Alfredo Narváez Medécigo
Published in: Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Abstract
The question on whether the legal rules that make up a system of constitutional review—and thus the law as such—are a determinant of Rule-of-Law achievement in a country must be clearly answered with a ‘yes’. Cultural differences among legal systems are somewhat overrated as a source of explanation for Rule-of-Law failure. While this study does not exactly reach “beauty of diversity” conclusions like traditional comparative research usually does, the method followed to assess constitutional review arrangements in different legal systems—all of them with Rule-of-Law ambitions—allows making this critique objectively.