Top

Published in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Geopolymers Made of Construction and Demolition Waste: Current Trends and Perspectives

Authors : Angelica Cardoza, Henry A. Colorado

Published in: REWAS 2022: Developing Tomorrow’s Technical Cycles (Volume I)

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The review deals with geopolymers based on construction and demolition waste (CDW). A review of the research of the last 5 years (2015–2020) is presented in three different study areas: Energy—Business, Management, and Accounting—Environmental Sciences. This article initially emphasizes the environmental impact from the point of view of opportunities for this type of recycled materials. In a second part, it focuses on the experimental design of geopolymers, concentrating on the used materials and manufacturing methods. Finally, the third part focused on the mechanical properties obtained by different authors, carried out via a systematic review for providing a detailed summary of the different parameters found in the literature.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Fe-Si Alloy Preparation and Alumina Extraction from Red Mud and Silica Fume via Vacuum Carbothermal Reduction

next chapter KIGAM Technology for the Recovery of NdFeB Waste Magnet and Manufacturing Scraps

He Z, Zhu X, Wang J, Mu M, Wang Y (2019) Comparison of CO2 emissions from OPC and recycled cement production. Constr Build Mater 211:965–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.289CrossRef

Davidovits J (2015) False values on CO2 emission for geopolymer cement/concrete published in scientific papers. Geopolymer Inst Libr

Chen L, Wang Z, Wang Y, Feng J (2016) Preparation and properties of alkali activated metakaolin-based geopolymer. Materials (Basel) 9(9):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090767CrossRef

Tailby J, MacKenzie KJD (2010) Structure and mechanical properties of aluminosilicate geopolymer composites with Portland cement and its constituent minerals. Cem Concr Res 40(5):787–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.12.003CrossRef

Ouellet-Plamondon C, Habert G (2015) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of alkali-activated cements and concretes. In: Pacheco-Torgal F, Labrincha JA, Leonelli C, Palomo A Chindaprasirt P (eds) Handbook of alkali-activated cements, mortars and concretes, Woodhead Publishing. pp 663–686 https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-16511-7

Habert G, D’Espinose De Lacaillerie JB, Roussel N (2011) An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. J Clean Prod 19(11):1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012CrossRef

Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, Van Deventer JSJ (2007) Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci 42(9):2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-zCrossRef

Davidovits J (1994) Properties of geopolymer cements. Alkaline Cem Concr KIEV Ukr 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811322106

Davidovits J (1991) Geopolymers—Inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal 37(8):1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912193CrossRef

10.

Torres-Carrasco M, Puertas F (2017) Alkaline activation of different aluminosilicates as an alternative to Portland cement: alkali activated cements or geopolymers | La activación alcalina de diferentes aluminosilicatos como una alternativa al Cemento Portland: cementos activados alcaliname. Rev Ing Constr 32(2):5–12CrossRef

11.

Lampris C, Lupo R, Cheeseman CR (2009) Geopolymerisation of silt generated from construction and demolition waste washing plants. Waste Manag 29(1):368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.007CrossRef

12.

Reig L, Tashima MM, Borrachero MV, Monzó J, Cheeseman CR, Payá J (2013) Properties and microstructure of alkali-activated red clay brick waste. Constr Build Mater 43:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.031CrossRef

13.

Segura Sierpes Y, Borrachero Rosado MV, Monzó Balbuena JM, Payá Bernabeu J (2016) Preliminary studies on hydrated cement for its reuse in geopolymers. Dyna 83(196):229–238. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v83n196.54189

14.

Del Río M, Izquierdo P, Salto I, Santa Cruz J (2010) “La regulación jurídica de los residuos de construcción demolición (RCD) en España. El caso de la Comunidad de Madrid,” Inf. la Construcción, vol. 62, no. 517, pp. 81–86. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.08.059

15.

Colorado D, Echeverry GI, Colorado H (2019) Logistics as an essential area for the development of the solid waste management in Colombia. Inf Técnico 83(2):131–154CrossRef

16.

Colorado HA, Echeverri-Lopera GI (2020) The solid waste in Colombia analyzed via gross domestic product: towards a sustainable economy. Rev Fac Ing 96:51–63. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20191046CrossRef

17.

de Azevedo ARG, Marvila MT, Ali M, Khan MI, Masood F, Vieira CMF (2021) Effect of the addition and processing of glass polishing waste on the durability of geopolymeric mortars. Case Stud Constr Mater 15:e00662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00662

18.

Durach CF, Kembro J, Wieland A (2017) A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manag 53(4):67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145CrossRef

19.

Murata K, Wakabayashi K, Watanabe A (2014) Study on and instrument to assess knowledge supply chain systems using advanced kaizen activity in SMEs. Supply Chain Forum 15(2):20–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2014.11517339CrossRef

20.

Scopus–Analyze search results (2020). [Online]. Available: https://aplicacionesbiblioteca.udea.edu.co:2125/term/analyzer.uri?sid=7abad18ee2539b0ee505458514f99b8f&origin=resultslist&src=s&s=%22cdw%22+or+%7BDEMOLITION+AND+CONSTRUCTION+WASTE%7D+OR+%28%22DEMOLITION+AND+CONSTRUCTION+WASTE%22%29+and+%22geopolymer%22+or. [Accessed: 07-Jun-2020].

21.

Asensio E, Medina C, Frías M, Sánchez de Rojas MI (2020) Fired clay-based construction and demolition waste as pozzolanic addition in cements. Design of new eco-efficient cements. J Clean Prod 265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121610

22.

Younis KH, Salihi KA, Ibrahim TK (2020) An overview of geo-polymer concrete including recycled aggregate. Int J Sci Technol Res 9(3):6239–6245

23.

Zhao Y, Gao J, Liu C, Chen X, Xu Z (2020) The particle-size effect of waste clay brick powder on its pozzolanic activity and properties of blended cement. J Clean Prod 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118521

24.

López Ruiz LA, Roca Ramón X, Gassó Domingo S (2020) The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector—A review and an integrative model approach. J Clean Prod 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238

25.

McLellan BC, Williams RP, Lay J, Van Riessen A, Corder GD (2011) Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement. J Clean Prod 19(9–10):1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010CrossRef

26.

Morán del Pozo JM, Juan Valdés A, Aguado PJ, Guerra MI, Medina C (2011) Estado actual de la gestión de residuos de construcción y demolición: limitaciones,” Inf. la Construcción, vol. 63, no. 521, pp. 89–95. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.09.038

27.

Pericot NG, Del Solar P (2013) Optimizing the recycling rate on construction waste: the approach of sustainability tools October 2014, p 13

28.

Pacheco Bustos CA, Fuentes Pumarejo LG, Sánchez Cotte ÉH, Rondón Quintana HA (2017) Residuos de construcción y demolición (RCD), una perspectiva de aprovechamiento para la ciudad de barranquilla desde su modelo de gestión,” Ing. y Desarro., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 533–555

29.

Robayo-Salazar RA, Mejía-Arcila JM, Mejía de Gutiérrez R (2017) Eco-efficient alkali-activated cement based on red clay brick wastes suitable for the manufacturing of building materials. J Clean Prod 166:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.243CrossRef

30.

Song W, Yi J, Wu H, He X, Song Q, Yin J (2019) Effect of carbon fiber on mechanical properties and dimensional stability of concrete incorporated with granulated-blast furnace slag. J Clean Prod 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117819

31.

Tan J, Cai J, Li X, Pan J, Li J (2020) Development of eco-friendly geopolymers with ground mixed recycled aggregates and slag. J Clean Prod 256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120369

32.

Fořt J et al (2018) Application of waste brick powder in alkali activated aluminosilicates: Functional and environmental aspects. J Clean Prod 194:714–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.181CrossRef

33.

Komnitsas K (2016) Co-valorization of marine sediments and construction and demolition wastes through alkali activation. J Environ Chem Eng 4(4):4661–4669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.11.003CrossRef

34.

Zawrah MF, Gado RA, Feltin N, Ducourtieux S, Devoille L (2016) Recycling and utilization assessment of waste fired clay bricks (Grog) with granulated blast-furnace slag for geopolymer production. Process Saf Environ Prot 103:237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.001CrossRef

35.

Nath P, Sarker PK (2014) Use of OPC to improve setting and early strength properties of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature. Cem Concr Compos. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.08.008CrossRef

36.

Bassani M, Tefa L, Coppola B, Palmero P (2020) Alkali-activation of aggregate fi nes from construction and demolition waste: valorisation in view of road pavement subbase applications. J Clean Prod 234(2019):71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.207CrossRef

37.

Assi LN, Eddie E, Ziehl P (2018) Effect of source and particle size distribution on the mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 167:372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.193CrossRef

38.

Dassekpo JBM, Zha X, Zhan J, Ning J (2017) The effects of the sequential addition of synthesis parameters on the performance of alkali activated fly ash mortar. Results Phys. 7(May):1506–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.04.019CrossRef

39.

Kourti I, Rani DA, Deegan D, Boccaccini AR, Cheeseman CR (2010) Production of geopolymers using glass produced from DC plasma treatment of air pollution control (APC) residues. J Hazard Mater 176(1–3):704–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.089CrossRef

40.

Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Mallicoat SW, Kriven WM, Van Deventer JSJ (2005) Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 269(1–3):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060CrossRef

41.

Puligilla S, Mondal P (2013) Role of slag in microstructural development and hardening of fly ash-slag geopolymer. Cem Concr Res 43(1):70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.004CrossRef

Title: Geopolymers Made of Construction and Demolition Waste: Current Trends and Perspectives
Authors: Angelica Cardoza
Henry A. Colorado
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: REWAS 2022: Developing Tomorrow’s Technical Cycles (Volume I)
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92562-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-92563-5

Copyright Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92563-5_73