Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Germany’s Growing Power in EUrope: From Multilateral Collectivism Towards Re-Nationalization and Destabilization?

Author : Alexander Reichwein

Published in: Fear and Uncertainty in Europe

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The chapter deals with the puzzling relationship between Germany and EUrope. Arguing that even unified and more powerful Germany does neither behave in line with Kenneth N. Waltz’s power balancing- nor with John Mearsheimer’s regional hegemony seeking-predictions, it discusses three issues: (1) How does German foreign and security policy in the post-Cold War era fit into the realist picture? Which factors drive and shape Germany’s European policy? (2) Did Germany strive for collective action within the EU to reach common European goals? Or did Berlin use its increased power to realize national interests through unilateral actions? Is there a tendency that Germany moves away from multilateral collectivism towards an assertive, rather unilateral, re-nationalized foreign policy? Or is there a third way of German foreign policy? (3) What are the consequences of a rising Germany? Does Germany cause new fear, uncertainty and destabilization, and does EUrope suffer from a new ‘German problem’? The chapter reconstructs the long road of Germany’s foreign policy from the so called ‘Checkbook Diplomacy’ during the Second Gulf War via the Balkan wars to EU enlargement, and from Iraq War via the Libya intervention to the Crimea annexation through neoclassical realist lenses. In doing so, it works out milestones and identifies continuity as well as turning points and an ongoing process of gradual and remarkable shifts in both, Germany’s self-conception (including self-expectations) and external expectations, and in rhetoric about a ‘new responsibility’ since the late 1990s, leading to a more assertive and shaping German foreign policy sui generis in a changing EUrope – with quite different consequences.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See Crawford 1996; Die Welt, 7 November 1991, “Bonn setzt die EG unter Druck.”
 
2
All states with the exception of Greece which had a package deal with Germany not to block the recognition, but to elude the decision because of an unsolved Greek-Macedonian dispute concerning a Greek province called Makedonia, and unsolved territorial questions at that time.
 
3
Interview with Gianni de Michaelis in L’espresso, 4 July 1993, cited according to Lucarelli (1995: 21, footnote 25).
 
4
Federal President Joachim Gauck’s speech “Germany’s role in the world: Reflections on responsibility, norms and alliances” on 31 January 2014 at the opening of the Munich Security Conference (cited according to Hellmann 2015, 2016a, b); Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier’s speech on 1 February 2014 at the Munich Security Conference (cited according to Hellmann 2015, 2016a, b).
 
Literature
go back to reference Allison, Roy. 2013. Russia, the West, and Military Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Allison, Roy. 2013. Russia, the West, and Military Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Art, Robert J. 2004. “Europe Hedges Its Security Best.” In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, edited by T. V. Paul, J. J. Wirtz, and M. Fortmann. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Art, Robert J. 2004. “Europe Hedges Its Security Best.” In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, edited by T. V. Paul, J. J. Wirtz, and M. Fortmann. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Banchoff, Thomas. 1997. “German Policy Towards the European Union: The Effects of Historical Memory.” German Politics 6 (1): 60–76.CrossRef Banchoff, Thomas. 1997. “German Policy Towards the European Union: The Effects of Historical Memory.” German Politics 6 (1): 60–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Banchoff, Thomas. 1999. “German Identity and European Integration.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 259–289.CrossRef Banchoff, Thomas. 1999. “German Identity and European Integration.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 259–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Baumann, Rainer, and Gunther Hellmann. 2001. “Germany and the Use of Military Force: ‘Total War’, the ‘Culture of Restraint’, and the Quest for Normality.” In New Europe, New Germany, Old Foreign Policy? German Foreign Policy Since Unification, edited by D. Webber. London: Cass.CrossRef Baumann, Rainer, and Gunther Hellmann. 2001. “Germany and the Use of Military Force: ‘Total War’, the ‘Culture of Restraint’, and the Quest for Normality.” In New Europe, New Germany, Old Foreign Policy? German Foreign Policy Since Unification, edited by D. Webber. London: Cass.CrossRef
go back to reference Brockmeier, Sarah. 2013. “Germany and the Intervention in Libya.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 55 (6): 63–90.CrossRef Brockmeier, Sarah. 2013. “Germany and the Intervention in Libya.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 55 (6): 63–90.CrossRef
go back to reference Brooks, Stephen G. 1997. “Dueling Realisms.” International Organization 51 (3): 445–477.CrossRef Brooks, Stephen G. 1997. “Dueling Realisms.” International Organization 51 (3): 445–477.CrossRef
go back to reference Bulmer, Simon, and William E. Paterson. 2011. “Germany and the European Union: From ‘Tamed Power’ to Normalized Power?” International Affairs 86 (5): 1051–1073.CrossRef Bulmer, Simon, and William E. Paterson. 2011. “Germany and the European Union: From ‘Tamed Power’ to Normalized Power?” International Affairs 86 (5): 1051–1073.CrossRef
go back to reference Byman, Daniel L., and Kenneth M. Pollack. 2001. “Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In.” International Security 25 (4): 107–146.CrossRef Byman, Daniel L., and Kenneth M. Pollack. 2001. “Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In.” International Security 25 (4): 107–146.CrossRef
go back to reference Crawford, Beverly. 1996. “Explaining Defection from International Cooperation: Germany’s Unilateral Recognition of Croatia.” World Politics 48 (4): 482–521.CrossRef Crawford, Beverly. 1996. “Explaining Defection from International Cooperation: Germany’s Unilateral Recognition of Croatia.” World Politics 48 (4): 482–521.CrossRef
go back to reference Crawford, Beverly. 2007. Power and German Foreign Policy: Embedded Hegemony in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Crawford, Beverly. 2007. Power and German Foreign Policy: Embedded Hegemony in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Crowe, Brian. 2003. “A Common European Foreign Policy After Iraq?” International Affairs 79 (3): 533–546.CrossRef Crowe, Brian. 2003. “A Common European Foreign Policy After Iraq?” International Affairs 79 (3): 533–546.CrossRef
go back to reference Flockhart, Trine. 1996. “The Dynamics of Expansion: NATO, WEU and EU.” European Security 5 (2): 196–218.CrossRef Flockhart, Trine. 1996. “The Dynamics of Expansion: NATO, WEU and EU.” European Security 5 (2): 196–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Forsberg, Tuomas. 2016. “From Ostpolitik to “frostpolitik”: Merkel, Putin and German Foreign Policy Towards Russia.” International Affairs 92 (1): 21–42.CrossRef Forsberg, Tuomas. 2016. “From Ostpolitik to “frostpolitik”: Merkel, Putin and German Foreign Policy Towards Russia.” International Affairs 92 (1): 21–42.CrossRef
go back to reference Friis, Lykke, and Anna Murphy. 2000. “Negotiating in a Time of Crisis: The European Union’s Response to the Military Conflict in Kosovo.” RSC Working Paper No. 2000/20, Florence. Friis, Lykke, and Anna Murphy. 2000. “Negotiating in a Time of Crisis: The European Union’s Response to the Military Conflict in Kosovo.” RSC Working Paper No. 2000/20, Florence.
go back to reference Garton Ash, Timothy. 1996. “Germany’s Choice.” In In Search of Germany, edited by M. Mertes, S. Muller, and H. Winkler. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Garton Ash, Timothy. 1996. “Germany’s Choice.” In In Search of Germany, edited by M. Mertes, S. Muller, and H. Winkler. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
go back to reference Gordon, Philip H. 1994. “Berlin’s Difficulties: The Normalisation of German Foreign Policy.” Orbis 38 (2): 225–244.CrossRef Gordon, Philip H. 1994. “Berlin’s Difficulties: The Normalisation of German Foreign Policy.” Orbis 38 (2): 225–244.CrossRef
go back to reference Haftendorn, Helga. 2006. “Epilogue: A New Geometry? A German Perspective.” In The Strategic Triangle: France, Germany, and the United States in the Shaping of the New Europe, edited by Helga Haftendorn, et al. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Haftendorn, Helga. 2006. “Epilogue: A New Geometry? A German Perspective.” In The Strategic Triangle: France, Germany, and the United States in the Shaping of the New Europe, edited by Helga Haftendorn, et al. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
go back to reference Harnisch, Sebastian, and Hanns-Werner Maull. 2001a. “Introduction.” In Germany as a Civilian Power? The Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull and Sebastian Harnisch. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Harnisch, Sebastian, and Hanns-Werner Maull. 2001a. “Introduction.” In Germany as a Civilian Power? The Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull and Sebastian Harnisch. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
go back to reference Harnisch, Sebastian, and Hanns-Werner Maull. 2001b. “Learned Its Lesson Well? Germany as a Civilian Power Ten Years After Unification?” In Germany as a Civilian Power? The Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull and Sebastian Harnisch. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Harnisch, Sebastian, and Hanns-Werner Maull. 2001b. “Learned Its Lesson Well? Germany as a Civilian Power Ten Years After Unification?” In Germany as a Civilian Power? The Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull and Sebastian Harnisch. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
go back to reference Haslam, Jonathan. 1998. “Russia’s Seat at the Table: A Place Denied or a Place Delayed?” International Affairs 74 (1): 119–130.CrossRef Haslam, Jonathan. 1998. “Russia’s Seat at the Table: A Place Denied or a Place Delayed?” International Affairs 74 (1): 119–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Hellmann, Gunther. 1996. “Goodbye Bismarck? The Foreign Policy of Contemporary Germany.” Mershon International Studies Review 40 (1): 1–39.CrossRef Hellmann, Gunther. 1996. “Goodbye Bismarck? The Foreign Policy of Contemporary Germany.” Mershon International Studies Review 40 (1): 1–39.CrossRef
go back to reference Hellmann, Gunther. 2011. “Normatively Disarmed, But Self-confident. German Foreign Policy 20 Years After Reunification.” Internationale Politik Global Edition 3: 45–51. Hellmann, Gunther. 2011. “Normatively Disarmed, But Self-confident. German Foreign Policy 20 Years After Reunification.” Internationale Politik Global Edition 3: 45–51.
go back to reference Hellmann, Gunther. 2015. “Im offensiven Mittelfeld: Deutschlands neue Spielmacherrolle in der europäischen Politik.” In “Früher, entschiedener und substantieller”? Die neue Debatte über Deutschlands Außenpolitik, edited by G. Hellmann, D. Jacobi, and U. Stark Urrestazaru. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Hellmann, Gunther. 2015. “Im offensiven Mittelfeld: Deutschlands neue Spielmacherrolle in der europäischen Politik.” In “Früher, entschiedener und substantieller”? Die neue Debatte über Deutschlands Außenpolitik, edited by G. Hellmann, D. Jacobi, and U. Stark Urrestazaru. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
go back to reference Hellmann, Gunther. 2016a. “Germany’s World: Power and Followership in a Crisis-Ridden Europe.” Global Affairs 2 (1): 3–20.CrossRef Hellmann, Gunther. 2016a. “Germany’s World: Power and Followership in a Crisis-Ridden Europe.” Global Affairs 2 (1): 3–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Hellmann, Gunther. 2016b. “Zwischen Gestaltungsmacht und Hegemonialfalle. Zur neuesten Debatte über eine ‘neue deutsche Außenpolitik’.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 28–29: 4–12. Hellmann, Gunther. 2016b. “Zwischen Gestaltungsmacht und Hegemonialfalle. Zur neuesten Debatte über eine ‘neue deutsche Außenpolitik’.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 28–29: 4–12.
go back to reference Hoffmann, Stanley. 1968. “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe.” In Conditions of World Order, edited by Stanley Hoffmann. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Hoffmann, Stanley. 1968. “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe.” In Conditions of World Order, edited by Stanley Hoffmann. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
go back to reference Hoffmann, Stanley. 1995. The European Sisyphus: Essays on Europe, 1964–1994. Oxford: Westview Press. Hoffmann, Stanley. 1995. The European Sisyphus: Essays on Europe, 1964–1994. Oxford: Westview Press.
go back to reference Hyde-Price, Adrian. 2009. Germany and European Order. Enlarging NATO and the EU. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Hyde-Price, Adrian. 2009. Germany and European Order. Enlarging NATO and the EU. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
go back to reference Joetze, Günter. 2006. “Pan-European Stability: Still a Key Task?” In Germany’s Uncertain Power: Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Joetze, Günter. 2006. “Pan-European Stability: Still a Key Task?” In Germany’s Uncertain Power: Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Joffe, Joseph. 1984. “Europe’s American Pacifier.” Foreign Policy 54: 64–82. Joffe, Joseph. 1984. “Europe’s American Pacifier.” Foreign Policy 54: 64–82.
go back to reference Kappel, Robert. 2014. “Global Power Shifts and Germany’s New Foreign Policy Agenda.” Strategic Analysis 38 (3): 341–352.CrossRef Kappel, Robert. 2014. “Global Power Shifts and Germany’s New Foreign Policy Agenda.” Strategic Analysis 38 (3): 341–352.CrossRef
go back to reference Katzenstein, Peter J. 1997. “The Smaller European States, Germany and Europe.” In Tamed Power: Germany in Europe, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1997. “The Smaller European States, Germany and Europe.” In Tamed Power: Germany in Europe, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Libal, Michael. 1997. Limits of Persuasion: Germany and the Yugoslav Crisis, 1991–1992. Westport, Conn: Praeger. Libal, Michael. 1997. Limits of Persuasion: Germany and the Yugoslav Crisis, 1991–1992. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
go back to reference Loriaux, Michael. 1999. “Realism and Reconciliation: France, Germany, and the European Union.” In Unipolar Politics. Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War, edited by Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno. New York: Columbia University Press. Loriaux, Michael. 1999. “Realism and Reconciliation: France, Germany, and the European Union.” In Unipolar Politics. Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War, edited by Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno. New York: Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Lucarelli, Sonia. 1995. “The European Response to the Yugoslav Crisis: Story of a Two-Level Constraint.” RSC Working Paper No. 95/37, Florence. Lucarelli, Sonia. 1995. “The European Response to the Yugoslav Crisis: Story of a Two-Level Constraint.” RSC Working Paper No. 95/37, Florence.
go back to reference Markovits, Andrei, and Simon Reich. 1991. “Should Europe Fear the Germans?” German Politics and Society 23: 1–20. Markovits, Andrei, and Simon Reich. 1991. “Should Europe Fear the Germans?” German Politics and Society 23: 1–20.
go back to reference Maull, Hanns-Werner. 1995. “Germany in the Yugoslav Crisis.” Survival 37 (4): 99–130.CrossRef Maull, Hanns-Werner. 1995. “Germany in the Yugoslav Crisis.” Survival 37 (4): 99–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Maull, Hanns-Werner. 2006. “Conclusion: Uncertain Power—German Foreign Policy into the 21th Century.” In Germany’s Uncertain Power: Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Maull, Hanns-Werner. 2006. “Conclusion: Uncertain Power—German Foreign Policy into the 21th Century.” In Germany’s Uncertain Power: Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. “Back to the Future. Instability in Europe After the Cold War.” International Security 15 (1): 5–56.CrossRef Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. “Back to the Future. Instability in Europe After the Cold War.” International Security 15 (1): 5–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Mearsheimer, John J. 1993. “The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent.” Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 50–66.CrossRef Mearsheimer, John J. 1993. “The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent.” Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 50–66.CrossRef
go back to reference Mearsheimer, John J. 2014. “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs 93 (5): 77–89. Mearsheimer, John J. 2014. “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs 93 (5): 77–89.
go back to reference Miskimmon, Alastair. 2013. “German Foreign Policy and the Libya Crisis.” German Politics 21 (4): 392–410.CrossRef Miskimmon, Alastair. 2013. “German Foreign Policy and the Libya Crisis.” German Politics 21 (4): 392–410.CrossRef
go back to reference Mouritzen, Hans. 2006. “Choosing Side in the European Iraq Conflict: A Test for New Geopolitical Theory.” European Security 15 (2): 137–163.CrossRef Mouritzen, Hans. 2006. “Choosing Side in the European Iraq Conflict: A Test for New Geopolitical Theory.” European Security 15 (2): 137–163.CrossRef
go back to reference Overhaus, Marco. 2006. “Civilian Power Under Stress: Germany, NATO and the European Security and Defense Policy.” In Germany’s Uncertain Power: Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Overhaus, Marco. 2006. “Civilian Power Under Stress: Germany, NATO and the European Security and Defense Policy.” In Germany’s Uncertain Power: Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Peters, Ingo. 2004. “ESDP as a Transatlantic Issue: Problems of Mutual Ambiguity.” International Studies Review 6 (3): 381–401.CrossRef Peters, Ingo. 2004. “ESDP as a Transatlantic Issue: Problems of Mutual Ambiguity.” International Studies Review 6 (3): 381–401.CrossRef
go back to reference Phillips, Ann L. 1998. “The Politics of Reconciliation: Germany in Central-East Europe.” German Politics 7 (2): 64–85.CrossRef Phillips, Ann L. 1998. “The Politics of Reconciliation: Germany in Central-East Europe.” German Politics 7 (2): 64–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Reichwein, Alexander. 2012. “The Tradition of Neoclassical Realism.” In Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back In, edited by Asle Toje and Barbara Kunz. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Reichwein, Alexander. 2012. “The Tradition of Neoclassical Realism.” In Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back In, edited by Asle Toje and Barbara Kunz. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Reichwein, Alexander. 2015. “Realism and European Foreign Policy: Promises and Shortcomings.” In The SAGE Handbook of European Foreign Policy, edited by Knud Erik Jørgensen, et al. London: Sage. Reichwein, Alexander. 2015. “Realism and European Foreign Policy: Promises and Shortcomings.” In The SAGE Handbook of European Foreign Policy, edited by Knud Erik Jørgensen, et al. London: Sage.
go back to reference Rudolf, Peter. 2005. “The Myth of the “German Way”: German Foreign Policy and Transatlantic Relations.” Survival 47 (1): 133–152.CrossRef Rudolf, Peter. 2005. “The Myth of the “German Way”: German Foreign Policy and Transatlantic Relations.” Survival 47 (1): 133–152.CrossRef
go back to reference Schröder, Gerhard. 1999. “Die Grundkoordinaten deutscher Außenpolitik sind unverändert: Frieden und Sicherheit und Stabiles Umfeld für Wohlstand festigen.” Bulletin der Bundesregierung. Bonn: Presse- und Informationsamt 83/S, 6 December. Schröder, Gerhard. 1999. “Die Grundkoordinaten deutscher Außenpolitik sind unverändert: Frieden und Sicherheit und Stabiles Umfeld für Wohlstand festigen.” Bulletin der Bundesregierung. Bonn: Presse- und Informationsamt 83/S, 6 December.
go back to reference Smith, Nicholas R. 2017. “What the West Can Learn from Rationalizing Russia’s Action in Ukraine.” Orbis 61 (3): 354–368.CrossRef Smith, Nicholas R. 2017. “What the West Can Learn from Rationalizing Russia’s Action in Ukraine.” Orbis 61 (3): 354–368.CrossRef
go back to reference Sperling, James. 1994. “German Foreign Policy After Reunification: An End of Cheque Book Diplomacy.” West European Politics 17 (1): 73–97.CrossRef Sperling, James. 1994. “German Foreign Policy After Reunification: An End of Cheque Book Diplomacy.” West European Politics 17 (1): 73–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Staun, Jorgen M. 2017. Normal at Last? German Strategic Culture and the Holocaust. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Defence College, Report October. Staun, Jorgen M. 2017. Normal at Last? German Strategic Culture and the Holocaust. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Defence College, Report October.
go back to reference Szabo, Stephen F. 2006. “Enlarging NATO: The German-American Design for a New Alliance.” In The Strategic Triangle: France, Germany, and the United States in the Shaping of the New Europe, edited by Helga Haftendorn, et al. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Szabo, Stephen F. 2006. “Enlarging NATO: The German-American Design for a New Alliance.” In The Strategic Triangle: France, Germany, and the United States in the Shaping of the New Europe, edited by Helga Haftendorn, et al. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
go back to reference Tewes, Henning. 2002. Germany, Civilian Power and the New Europe. Enlarging NATO and the EU. Basingstoke and Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Tewes, Henning. 2002. Germany, Civilian Power and the New Europe. Enlarging NATO and the EU. Basingstoke and Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Toje, Asle. 2008. “The Consensus-Expectations Gap: Explaining Europe’s Ineffective Foreign Policy.” Security Dialogue 39 (1): 121–141.CrossRef Toje, Asle. 2008. “The Consensus-Expectations Gap: Explaining Europe’s Ineffective Foreign Policy.” Security Dialogue 39 (1): 121–141.CrossRef
go back to reference Wagener, Martin. 2006. “Normalization in Security Policy? Deployments of Bundeswehr Forces Abroad in the Era Schörder, 1998–2004.” In Germany’s Uncertain Power: Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Wagener, Martin. 2006. “Normalization in Security Policy? Deployments of Bundeswehr Forces Abroad in the Era Schörder, 1998–2004.” In Germany’s Uncertain Power: Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, edited by Hanns-Werner Maull. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Waltz, Kenneth N. 1993. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics.” International Security 18 (2): 44–79.CrossRef Waltz, Kenneth N. 1993. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics.” International Security 18 (2): 44–79.CrossRef
go back to reference Waltz, Kenneth N. 2000. “Structural Realism After the Cold War.” International Security 25 (1): 5–41.CrossRef Waltz, Kenneth N. 2000. “Structural Realism After the Cold War.” International Security 25 (1): 5–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Wivel, Anders. 2008. “Balancing Against Threats or Bandwagoning with Power? Europe and the Transatlantic Relationship After the Cold War.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (3): 289–305.CrossRef Wivel, Anders. 2008. “Balancing Against Threats or Bandwagoning with Power? Europe and the Transatlantic Relationship After the Cold War.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (3): 289–305.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Germany’s Growing Power in EUrope: From Multilateral Collectivism Towards Re-Nationalization and Destabilization?
Author
Alexander Reichwein
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_5