Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Grundlagen Read chapter Read first chapter

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Gewissenhaftigkeit als Erfolgsfaktor

Author : Klaus Watzka

Published in: Erfolgsfaktor Gewissenhaftigkeit von Mitarbeitern

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Hauptkapitel wird aus Unternehmenssicht aufgezeigt, warum eine gewissenhafte Belegschaft eine überaus wertvolle Ressource ist. Es wird verdeutlicht, zu welchen Handlungsfeldern und wichtigen unternehmerischen Zielgrößen dieses Persönlichkeitsmerkmal essenzielle Beiträge leisten kann. Im Einzelnen sind das u. a.: Leistungs-, Motivations-, und Zufriedenheitssteigerung, Senkung von Fehlzeiten und Fluktuation, positive Effekte auf die Mitarbeiterführung und Zusammenarbeit. So weit wie möglich, werden für die Argumentation empirische Studien genutzt, die mit ihren Ergebnissen, theoretischen Hintergründen und Praxisimplikationen vorgestellt werden. Für die Unternehmenspraxis werden erste Handlungsempfehlungen abgeleitet.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Gewissenhaftigkeit
next chapter Risiken von Gewissenhaftigkeit
Literature
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.CrossRef
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.CrossRef
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18(4), 359–372.CrossRef
Barrick, M. R., et al. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning oft the new millenium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 9–29.CrossRef
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595–615.CrossRef
Berthel, J., & Becker, F. G. (2017). Personal-Management (11. Aufl.). Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.CrossRef
Beus, J. M., et al. (2015). A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 481–498.CrossRef
Blickle, G., et al. (2006). Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(2), 220–233.CrossRef
Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010). Employee personality as a moderator of the relationship between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 91–103.CrossRef
Carter, N. T., et al. (2014). Uncovering curvilinear relationships between conscientiousness and job performance: How theoretically appropriate measurement makes an empirical difference. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 564–586.CrossRef
Cheng, H., et al. (2014). Factors influencing adult quality of life: Findings from a nationally representative sample in the UK. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 241–246.CrossRef
Christiansen, N., et al. (2014). What employees dislike about their jobs: Relationship between personality-based fit and work satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 25–29.CrossRef
Claessens, B. J. C., et al. (2010). Things to do today …: A daily diary study on task completion at work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59(2), 273–295.CrossRef
Courtright, S. H., et al. (2017). Quality charters or quality members? A control theory perspective on team charters and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10), 1462–1470.CrossRef
Deng, S. et al. (2017). How do personality traits shape information-sharing behaviour in social media behavior? Exploring the mediating effect of generalized trust. Information Research, 22(3), Paper 763.
Derue, D. S., et al. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52.CrossRef
Deventer, J., et al. (2019). Against all odds – Is a more differentiated view of personality development in emerging adulthood needed? The case of young apprentices. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 60–86.CrossRef
de Vries, R. E., & van Gelder, J.-L. (2015). Explaining workplace delinquency: The role of honesty–humility, ethical culture, and employee surveillance. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 12–116.CrossRef
Dreier, K. (2012). Gewissenhaftigkeit und Ausbildungserfolg: Wie Fleiß, Ordnung und Selbstwirksamkeitsüberzeugungen IHK-Noten beeinflussen. Dissertation Universität Hamburg, Fachbereich Psychologie.
Dreier, K., & Moldzio, T. (2010). Karriere dank Ordnung und Fleiß: Ein neuer Test misst die Gewissenhaftigkeit. Wirtschaftspsychologie aktuell, 2010(1), 14–16.
Dudley, N. M., et al. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40–57.CrossRef
Dumfart, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2016). Conscientiousness is the most powerful noncognitive predictor of school achievement in adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 37(1), 8–15.CrossRef
D’Zurilla, T. J. et al. (2011). Predicting social problem solving using personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 142–147.
Fietze, S. (2011). Arbeitszufriedenheit und Persönlichkeit: „Wer schaffen will, muss fröhlich sein!“ DIW-SOEPpapers.
Giersberg, G. (2020). Manager sind korrupt, Mitarbeiter klauen. FAZ vom 18.08.2020, 22.
Gold, J. M., et al. (2020). Conscientiousness in weight loss maintainers and regainers. Health Psychology, 39(5), 421–429.CrossRef
Greenbaum, R. L., et al. (2012). Bottom-line mentality as an antecedent of social undermining and the moderating roles of core self-evaluations and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 343–359.CrossRef
Hagemann, V., & Kluge, A. (2014). Einflussfaktoren auf den Erfolg von und Methoden der Erfolgsmessung beruflicher Weiterbildung. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 2014(2), 81–93.
Hall, P. A., et al. (2013). Cognitive and personality factors in the prediction of health behaviors: An examination of total, direct and indirect effects. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(6), 1057–1068.CrossRef
Hayes, N., & Joseph, S. (2003). Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 723–727.CrossRef
Hill, P. L., & Allemand, M. (2012). Explaining the link between conscientiousness and forgivingness. Journal of Research in Personality., 46(5), 497–503.CrossRef
Hochwarter, W. A., et al. (2000). Perceptions of organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 472–478.CrossRef
Hofbauer, R., & Schwingsmehl, M. (2017). Bedeutet hohe Arbeitszufriedenheit, dass die Arbeitsbedingungen gut sind? Momentum Quarterly – Zeitschrift für Sozialen Fortschritt, 6(2), 85–106.
Hoffmann, B. J., et al. (2011). Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology., 84(2), 347–381.CrossRef
Howard, P. J. & Howard, J. M. (2008). Führen mit den Big-Five-Persönlichkeitsmodell. Campus.
Hu, J., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Leader-team complementary: Exploring the interactive effects of leader personality traits and team power distance values on team processes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 935–955.CrossRef
Huang, J. L., et al. (2017). Employee conscientiousness, agreeableness, and supervisor justice rule compliance: A three-study investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(11), 1564–1589.CrossRef
Hülsheger, U. R., & Maier, G. W. (2010). The careless or the conscentious. Who profits most from goal progress? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 246–254.
Humphrey, S. E., et al. (2007). Trait configurations in self-managed teams: A conceptual examination of the use of seeding for maximizing and minimizing trait variance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 885–892.CrossRef
Inceoglu, I., & Warr, P. (2012). Personality and job engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 1–9 (Vorabdruck).
Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). On the value of aiming high: The causes and consequences of ambition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 758–775.CrossRef
Judge, T. A. et al. (2002a). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
Judge, T. A. et al. (2002b). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
Judge, T. A., & Illies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797–807.CrossRef
Judge, T. A., et al. (1997). Five-factor model of personality and employee absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 745–755.CrossRef
Jung, H. (2017). Personalwirtschaft (10. Aufl.). de Gruyter Oldenbourg Verlag.
KPMG (Hrsg.). (2020). Im Spannungsfeld – Wirtschaftskriminalität in Deutschland 2020. o. O.: KPMG-Studie vom 17. August 2010.
Lang, D. (2008). Soziale Kompetenz und Persönlichkeit. Zusammenhänge zwischen sozialer Kompetenz und den Big Five der Persönlichkeit bei jungen Erwachsenen. Dissertation Universität Koblenz-Landau.
Lievens, F., et al. (2009). Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1514–1535.CrossRef
Lievens, F., et al. (2001). Assessors’ use of personality traits in descriptions of assessment centre candidates: A five-factor model perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(5), 623–636.CrossRef
Lippke, S., et al. (2018). Rehabilitants’ conscientiousness as a moderator of the intention-planning-behavior chain. Rehabilitation Psychology, 63(3), 460–467.CrossRef
Major, D. A., et al. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 927–935.CrossRef
Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 647–660.CrossRef
Matzler, K., et al. (2011). Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management., 22(2), 296–310.CrossRef
Matzler, K., et al. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology., 29(3), 301–313.CrossRef
Mawritz, M. B., et al. (2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 737–747.CrossRef
Mill, A. et al. (2018). The role of co-occuring emotions and personality traits in anger expression. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–3.
Minbashian, A., et al. (2010). Task-contingent conscientiousness as a unit of personality at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 793–806.CrossRef
Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy, and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61–72.CrossRef
Mooradian, T., et al. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37(4), 523–540.CrossRef
Morawetz, C., et al. (2017). Successful emotion regulation is predicted by amygdala activity and aspects of personality: A latent variable approach. Emotion, 17(3), 421–441.CrossRef
Motel, L. L. (2017). Cross cultural meta-analysis of personality and leadership effectiveness and evaluation of changes over time. Theses and Dissertations/UWM Digital Commons.
Muck, P. M. (2006). Persönlichkeit und berufsbezogenes Sozialverhalten. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (2. Aufl., S. 527–577). Hogrefe.
Muck, P. M. (2004). Rezension des „NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae (NEO-PI-R)“ von F. Ostendorf und A. Angleitner. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 48(4), 203–210.
Nandkeolyar, A. K., et al. (2014). Surviving an abusive supervisor: The joint role of conscientiousness and coping strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 138–150.CrossRef
Nerdinger, F. W., et al. (2019). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (4. Aufl.). Springer.CrossRef
Neyer, F. J., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2018). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit (6. Aufl.). Springer.CrossRef
O’Boyle Jr., E. H. et al. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.
Orvis, K. A., et al. (2008). Conscientiousness and reactions to psychological contract breach: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1183–1193.CrossRef
Pallesen, S. et al. (2017). An experimental study on the attribution of personality traits to bullies and targets in a workplace setting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–7.
Pletzer, J. L., et al. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.CrossRef
Preisendörfer, P. (2010). Präsentismus. Prävalenz und Bestimmungsfaktoren unterlassener Krankmeldungen bei der Arbeit. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung (ZfP), 24(4), 401–408.
Robertson, I. T., et al. (2000). Conscientiousness and managerial performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 171–180.CrossRef
Rubenstein, A. L., et al. (2018). Surveying the forest: A meta-analysis, moderator investigation, and future-oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover. Personnel Psychology, 71(1), 23–65.CrossRef
Ruffing, S., et al. (2015). Predicting students‘ learning strategies: The contribution of chronotype over personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 199–204.CrossRef
Sackett, P. R., & Walmsley, P. T. (2014). Which personality attributes are most important in the workplace? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 538–551.CrossRef
Salgado, J. F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 323–346.CrossRef
Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 30–43.CrossRef
Sattler, A. (2015). Mit Persönlichkeit zum Erfolg – Interview mit Markus Vogel (Fa. Provadis) und Markus Bühner (LMU München). Personalmagazin, 16(8), 26.
Sattler, S., & Schunck, R. (2016). Associations between the big five personality traits and the non-medical use of prescription drugs for cognitive enhancement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–14.
Schatz, T. et al. (2000). Temporale Muster und Persönlichkeit. In R. Dollase et al. (Hrsg.), Temporale Muster. Die ideale Reihenfolge der Tätigkeiten (S. 179–193). Leske+Budrich.
Schaufeli, W. B., et al. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.CrossRef
Schuler, H., & Höft, S. (2006). Konstruktorientierte Verfahren der Personalauswahl. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (2. Aufl., S. 101–144). Hogrefe.
Simmering, M. J., et al. (2003). Conscientiousness, autonomy fit, and development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 954–963.CrossRef
Smith, C. A., et al. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.CrossRef
Steptoe, A., et al. (2017). Conscientiousness, hair cortisol concentration, and health behavior in older men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 86, 122–127.CrossRef
Störmer, S. und Fahr, R. (2010). Individual determinants of work attendance: Evidence on the role of personality (Discussion Paper No. 4927). Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA).
Stouten, J., et al. (2011). Tolerance of justice violations: The effects of need on emotional reactions after violating equality in social dilemmas. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 357–380.CrossRef
Studer-Luethi, B., et al. (2012). Influence of neuroticism and conscientiousness on working memory training outcome. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 44–49.CrossRef
Taylor, S. G., & Kluemper, D. H. (2012). Linking perceptions of role stress and incivility to workplace aggression: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 316–329.CrossRef
Trapmann, S., et al. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the Big Five and academic success at university. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215(2), 132–151.CrossRef
Trautwein, U., et al. (2015). Using individual interest and conscientiousness to predict academic effort: Additive, synergetistic, or compensatory effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 142–162.CrossRef
Vedel, A. (2014). The Big Five and tertiary academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 66–76.CrossRef
Volodina, A., et al. (2015). Success in the first phase of the vocational career: The role of cognitive and scholastic abilities, personality factors, and vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 11–22.CrossRef
von Rosenstiel, L. (2006). Die Bedeutung von Arbeit. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (2. Aufl., S. 15–43). Hogrefe.
Wagner, D. T., et al. (2012). Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1068–1076.CrossRef
Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286.CrossRef
Watzka, K. (2014). Personalmanagement für Führungskräfte. Springer Gabler.CrossRef
Weller, J. et al. (2018). Accounting for individual differences in decision-making competence: Personality and gender differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–13
Weuster, A., & Kaufmann, S. (2005). Zwischen den Zeilen. Personal, 37(9), 58–61
Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2019). A century of research on conscientiousness at work. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 116(46), 23004–23010. https://​www.​pnas.​org/​cgi/​doi/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1073/​pnas.​1908430116.
Wingender, L. M., & Wolff, H.-G. (2019). Die Rolle von Networking-Verhalten in der beruflichen Entwicklung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement (S. 217–239). Springer.CrossRef
Witt, L. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Social skill as moderator of the conscientiousness-performance relationship: Convergent results across four studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 809–820.CrossRef
Witt, L. A., et al. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 164–169.CrossRef
Woodley, H. J. R. et al. (2016). Examining equity sensitivity: An investigation using the Big Five and HEXACO models of personality. Frontiers of Psychology, 6, 1–15.
Wunderer, R. (2006). Führung und Zusammenarbeit (6. Aufl.). Luchterhand Verlag.
Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2008). Subjective cognitive effort: A model of states, traits, and time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 617–631.CrossRef
Young, H. R., et al. (2018). Who are the most engaged at work? A meta-analysis of personality and employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1330–1346.CrossRef
Zacher, H. et al. (2008). Lernen im Team: Zusammenhänge zwischen Personen- und Teammerkmalen und der Leistung von Multiplikatoren. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52/N.F. 26(2), 81–90.
Zorn, R. (2020). Ich bin gewohnt, dass ich unterschätzt werde – Interview mit Matthias Ginter. FAZ, 28.
Metadata
Title
Gewissenhaftigkeit als Erfolgsfaktor
Author
Klaus Watzka
Copyright Year
2021
Book
Erfolgsfaktor Gewissenhaftigkeit von Mitarbeitern

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-35033-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-35034-5

Copyright Year: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35034-5_3