1 Introduction
1.1 Selection techniques and design factors for a 3D virtual environment
Dim. | Selection | Gestures | Feature | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pointing | Confirmation | ||||
Chatterjee et al. [12] | 2D | Gaze-ray | Gesture | Grasp/shake | Select objects of various sizes |
Pfeuffer et al. [25] | 2D | Gaze-ray | Pen-based touch | – | Accurate pointing required |
Pfeuffer et al. [26] | 3D | Gaze-ray | Gesture | Pinch | Uni-/bi-manual selection |
Pouke et al. [27] | 3D | Gaze-ray | Gesture | Jerk/shake/tilt | Accurate pointing required |
Yoo et al. [36] | 3D | Face orientation | Gesture | Pull/push | Accurate pointing required |
1.2 Eye-hand based selection techniques
-
Fast and easy selection for small or distant objects.
-
Fast and easy selection for an object partially overlapped by others.
-
High resemblance to human grasping.
-
Low physical fatigue.
-
Elimination of the eye-hand visibility mismatch.
-
Smooth transition from selection to 6DOF manipulation.
2 Gaze–grasp pose interaction
2.1 Overview
2.2 Implementation
2.3 Characteristics
3 User study
3.1 Participants
3.2 System setup
3.3 Two scenarios
3.3.1 Toy block test
3.3.2 3D reciprocal tapping test
3.4 Results
-
Selection time—The results for selection time for various object sizes are presented in Fig. 5. For selection time, we performed three-way repeated measures using ANOVA with three independent variables: selection technique, object size, and attempt. Reported p-values and post-hoc include Bonferroni correction. There was a statistically significant effect from the selection technique (\(F(1, 19)=43.986, p<0.001\)), object size (\(F(2,38)=173.225, p<0.001\)), and attempt (\(F(2,38)=6.464, p<0.005\)). There was also statistically significant interaction in technique-size (\(F(2,38)=11.704, p<0.001\)), and technique-attempt (\(F(2,38)=4.452, p<0.05\)). Other interactions were not statistically significant.
-
Error rate—The results for error rate for various object sizes are presented in Fig. 6. For error rate, we performed three-way repeated measures using ANOVA with three independent variables: selection technique, object size, and attempt. There was a statistically significant effect from the selection technique (\(F(1, 19)=5.123, p<0.05\)), object size (\(F(2,38)=10.660, p<0.001\)), and attempt (\(F(2,38)=3.423, p<0.05\)). There was also a statistically significant interaction in technique-size (\(F(2,38)=6.733, p<0.005\)). Other interactions were not statistically significant.
-
Subjective rating questionnaire—Fig. 7 displays the mean rating for each of the seven questionnaire topics. A Friedman test revealed that there were significant differences in the ratings for general comfort (\(\chi ^2(1) = 4.765, p<0.05\)), naturalness (\(\chi ^2(1) = 9.941, p<0.005\)), and adaptability (\(\chi ^2(1) = 4.571, p<0.05\)) between the two techniques. For the mental and physical effort, a lower score is favored and the opposite is true for the other cases.