Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

12-06-2017 | Original Research

Give Me a Customizable Dashboard: Personalized Learning Analytics Dashboards in Higher Education

Authors: Lynne D. Roberts, Joel A. Howell, Kristen Seaman

Published in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Issue 3/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the increased capability of learning analytics in higher education, more institutions are developing or implementing student dashboards. Despite the emergence of dashboards as an easy way to present data to students, students have had limited involvement in the dashboard development process. As part of a larger program of research examining student and academic perceptions of learning analytics, we report here on work in progress exploring student perceptions of dashboards and student preferences for dashboard features. First, we present findings on higher education students’ attitudes towards learning analytic dashboards resulting from four focus groups (N = 41). Thematic analysis of the focus group transcripts identified five key themes relating to dashboards: ‘provide everyone with the same learning opportunities’, ‘to compare or not to compare’, ‘dashboard privacy’, ‘automate alerts’ and ‘make it meaningful—give me a customizable dashboard’. Next we present findings from a content analysis of students’ drawings of dashboards demonstrating that students are interested in features that support learning opportunities, provide comparisons to peers and are meaningful to the student. Finally, we present preliminary findings from a survey of higher education students, reinforcing students’ desire to choose whether to have a dashboard and to be able to customize their dashboards. These findings highlight the potential for providing students with some level of control over learning analytics as a means to increasing self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Future research directions aimed at better understanding students emotional and behavioral responses to learning analytics feedback on dashboards and alerts are outlined.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Student participant pools are widely used in psychology. As part of their education in research methods, undergraduate psychology students participate in a range of research projects each year. Students select from a range of studies lodged with the student participant pool and are awarded participation points on completion of each study. Students electing not to participate in research complete an alternative activity.
 
Literature
go back to reference Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. doi:10.1145/2330601.2330666. Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. doi:10.​1145/​2330601.​2330666.
go back to reference Atif, A., Bilgin, A., & Richards, D. (2015). Student preferences and attitudes to the use of early alerts. In Paper presented at the twenty-first Americas conference on information systems. Atif, A., Bilgin, A., & Richards, D. (2015). Student preferences and attitudes to the use of early alerts. In Paper presented at the twenty-first Americas conference on information systems.
go back to reference Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.610. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.​1037/​0022-3514.​46.​3.​610.
go back to reference Corrin, L., & de Barba, P. (2014). Exploring students’ interpretation of feedback delivered through learning analytics dashboards. In Proceedings of the ascilite 2014 conference. doi:10.1145/2723576.2723662. Corrin, L., & de Barba, P. (2014). Exploring students’ interpretation of feedback delivered through learning analytics dashboards. In Proceedings of the ascilite 2014 conference. doi:10.​1145/​2723576.​2723662.
go back to reference de Freitas, S., Gibson, D., Du Plessis, C., Halloran, P., Williams, E., Ambrose, M., et al. (2015). Foundations of dynamic learning analytics: Using university student data to increase retention. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/bjet.12212. de Freitas, S., Gibson, D., Du Plessis, C., Halloran, P., Williams, E., Ambrose, M., et al. (2015). Foundations of dynamic learning analytics: Using university student data to increase retention. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.​1111/​bjet.​12212.
go back to reference Dyckhoff, A. L., Zielke, D., Bültmann, M., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 58–76. Dyckhoff, A. L., Zielke, D., Bültmann, M., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 58–76.
go back to reference Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. doi:10.1037/h0076760. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. doi:10.​1037/​h0076760.
go back to reference Few, S. (2013). Information dashboard design: Displaying data for at-a-glance monitoring. Burlingame, CA: Analytics Press. Few, S. (2013). Information dashboard design: Displaying data for at-a-glance monitoring. Burlingame, CA: Analytics Press.
go back to reference Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2016). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods. doi:10.1177/1525822X16639015. Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2016). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods. doi:10.​1177/​1525822X16639015​.
go back to reference Hatala, M., Beheshitha, S. S., & Gašević, D. (2016). Associations between students’ approaches to learning and learning analytics visualizations. In Paper presented at LAL 2016 workshop at LAK 2016, Edinburgh. Hatala, M., Beheshitha, S. S., & Gašević, D. (2016). Associations between students’ approaches to learning and learning analytics visualizations. In Paper presented at LAL 2016 workshop at LAK 2016, Edinburgh.
go back to reference Heath, J., & Leinonen, E. (2016). An institution wide approach to learning analytics. In C. A. M. Gavan (Ed.), Developing effective educational experiences through learning analytics (pp. 73–87). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRef Heath, J., & Leinonen, E. (2016). An institution wide approach to learning analytics. In C. A. M. Gavan (Ed.), Developing effective educational experiences through learning analytics (pp. 73–87). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, J., Jo, I. H., & Park, Y. (2016). Effects of learning analytics dashboard: Analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 13–24.CrossRef Kim, J., Jo, I. H., & Park, Y. (2016). Effects of learning analytics dashboard: Analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 13–24.CrossRef
go back to reference Li, I., Dey, A., Forlizzi, J., Höök, K., & Medynskiy, Y. (2011). Personal informatics and HCI: Design, theory, and social implications. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA’11 (pp. 2417–2420). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1979482.1979573. Li, I., Dey, A., Forlizzi, J., Höök, K., & Medynskiy, Y. (2011). Personal informatics and HCI: Design, theory, and social implications. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA’11 (pp. 2417–2420). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.​1145/​1979482.​1979573.
go back to reference McPherson, J., Tong, H. L., Fatt, S. J., & Liu, D. Y. (2016). Student perspectives on data provision and use: Starting to unpack disciplinary differences. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. doi:10.1145/2883851.2883945. McPherson, J., Tong, H. L., Fatt, S. J., & Liu, D. Y. (2016). Student perspectives on data provision and use: Starting to unpack disciplinary differences. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. doi:10.​1145/​2883851.​2883945.
go back to reference O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Self-awareness and self-control. Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Self-awareness and self-control. Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
go back to reference Park, Y., & Jo, I.-H. (2015). Development of the learning analytics dashboard to support students’ learning performance. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(1), 110–133. Park, Y., & Jo, I.-H. (2015). Development of the learning analytics dashboard to support students’ learning performance. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(1), 110–133.
go back to reference Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., Clifton, R. A., & Chipperfield, J. G. (2005). Perceived academic control and failure in college students: A 3-year study of scholastic attainment. Research in Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-3364-4. Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., Clifton, R. A., & Chipperfield, J. G. (2005). Perceived academic control and failure in college students: A 3-year study of scholastic attainment. Research in Higher Education. doi:10.​1007/​s11162-005-3364-4.
go back to reference Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., & Pelletier, S. T. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.776. Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., & Pelletier, S. T. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.​1037/​0022-0663.​93.​4.​776.
go back to reference QSR International Pty Ltd. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, Version 10. QSR International Pty Ltd. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, Version 10.
go back to reference Reimers, G., & Neovesky, A. (2015). Student focused dashboards. In Paper presented at the 7th international conference on computer supported education. doi:10.5220/0005475103990404. Reimers, G., & Neovesky, A. (2015). Student focused dashboards. In Paper presented at the 7th international conference on computer supported education. doi:10.​5220/​0005475103990404​.
go back to reference Roberts, L. D., Howell, J. A., Seaman, K., & Gibson, D. C. (2016). Student attitudes toward learning analytics in higher education: “The fitbit version of the learning world”. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1959. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01959. Roberts, L. D., Howell, J. A., Seaman, K., & Gibson, D. C. (2016). Student attitudes toward learning analytics in higher education: “The fitbit version of the learning world”. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1959. doi:10.​3389/​fpsyg.​2016.​01959.
go back to reference Schwendimann, B. A., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Vozniuk, A., Prieto, L. P., Boroujeni, M. S., Holzer, A., et al. (2016). Understanding learning at a glance: An overview of learning dashboard studies. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 532–533). ACM. doi:10.1145/2883851.2883930. Schwendimann, B. A., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Vozniuk, A., Prieto, L. P., Boroujeni, M. S., Holzer, A., et al. (2016). Understanding learning at a glance: An overview of learning dashboard studies. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 532–533). ACM. doi:10.​1145/​2883851.​2883930.
go back to reference Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2015). Student perspectives on the use of their data: Between intrusion, surveillance and care. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 1–8. Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2015). Student perspectives on the use of their data: Between intrusion, surveillance and care. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 1–8.
go back to reference Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., et al. (2014). Learning dashboards: An overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. doi:10.1007/s00779-013-0751-2. Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., et al. (2014). Learning dashboards: An overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. doi:10.​1007/​s00779-013-0751-2.
go back to reference Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2016). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2016). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist. doi:10.​1080/​00461520.​2016.​1207538.
go back to reference You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers and Education, 77, 125–133. You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers and Education, 77, 125–133.
Metadata
Title
Give Me a Customizable Dashboard: Personalized Learning Analytics Dashboards in Higher Education
Authors
Lynne D. Roberts
Joel A. Howell
Kristen Seaman
Publication date
12-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Electronic ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9316-1

Premium Partners