Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Graphic Design as Visual Arguments: Does This Make a Reliable Appraisal Possible?

Author: Karel van der Waarde

Published in: Perspective on Design

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

share
SHARE

Abstract

The article shows how assessments of graphic design can be made more reliable when graphic design is approached as a visual argument. Each designed object makes a claim that it is improving a situation thereby implicitly stating that a current situation was not satisfactory. This article uses two warning pictograms as examples to show how visual information can be assessed. The pictograms warn against the risks of taking medicines while pregnant, and the potential affect of medicines on driving cars. These pictograms claim that they warn effectively about possible unwanted effects of a medicine. Toulmin’s diagram describes the relation between a claim and its supporting evidence and reasons. An application of this diagram to both pictograms shows that just assessing the claim is not sufficient, and that it is necessary to question the available evidence and reasons too. At least six different fields provides rules and principles that can be used to assess the evidence and reasons. Designers, clients, legislation and standards, professional peers, people/patients, and society can all legitimately assess the design of pictograms. One of the major challenges for graphic design is to find relevant evidence and reasons, and to consider these in such a way that a balance between the different fields is achieved.
Literature
go back to reference Directive 2001/83/EC (2001) Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Off J Eur Commun L 311/67 Directive 2001/83/EC (2001) Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Off J Eur Commun L 311/67
go back to reference EMCDDA (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction) (2012) Driving under the influence of drugs, alcohol and medicines in Europe—findings from the DRUID project. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2810/​74023 EMCDDA (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction) (2012) Driving under the influence of drugs, alcohol and medicines in Europe—findings from the DRUID project. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2810/​74023
go back to reference ISO 9186 (International Standard Organisation) (2014) Graphical symbols. ISO, Geneva ISO 9186 (International Standard Organisation) (2014) Graphical symbols. ISO, Geneva
go back to reference ISO 22727 (International Standard Organisation) (2007) Graphical symbols—creation and design of public information symbols—requirements. ISO, Geneva ISO 22727 (International Standard Organisation) (2007) Graphical symbols—creation and design of public information symbols—requirements. ISO, Geneva
go back to reference Toulmin SE (1958[2003]) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Toulmin SE (1958[2003]) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference van der Waarde K (2012) Communication design education: could nine reflections be sufficient? In: Poggenpohl S (ed) Special issue of Visible language on ‘Envisioning a future of Design education’, vol 46(1/2), pp 8–35 van der Waarde K (2012) Communication design education: could nine reflections be sufficient? In: Poggenpohl S (ed) Special issue of Visible language on ‘Envisioning a future of Design education’, vol 46(1/2), pp 8–35
go back to reference van der Waarde K (2018) Research and design watch: a personal view. Inform Des J 24(1):80–84 van der Waarde K (2018) Research and design watch: a personal view. Inform Des J 24(1):80–84
Metadata
Title
Graphic Design as Visual Arguments: Does This Make a Reliable Appraisal Possible?
Author
Karel van der Waarde
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32415-5_7

Premium Partners