Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Growing Concern for the Conservation of Cavity-Nesting Birds Outside Protected Areas: Can Artificial Nest Boxes Be Effective Conservation Tools?

Authors : Hamadi I. Dulle, Saleh S. Seif, Shedrack K. Mungure, Jafari R. Kideghesho

Published in: Protected Areas in Northern Tanzania

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The overwhelming demand of deadwoods outside protected areas has not given deadwoods enough time to remain standing for the formation of the tree cavities by birds and other natural agents. Consequently, cavity adopter and large-bodied species face difficulties in finding and establishing acceptable nest sites. The focus of biodiversity conservation has been mainly within protected area systems, and less attention has been given to areas outside protected areas despite the fact that these areas support a bigger proportion of bird community. A high pace of deadwood loss on the entire landscape on the southern slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro is an irreversible situation in which is increasingly becoming a growing concern for the conservation of biodiversity beyond protected areas. Here, we investigate what extent deadwoods have in providing nest sites among cavity-nesting birds. We do this through observations and by placing artificial nest boxes on trees within three different land-use types. We found that deadwood volume and number of natural tree cavities were lower at coffee plantations as compared to mixed farming areas and Kilimanjaro National Park (KINAPA). Likewise, tree cavity positions from the ground were higher at coffee plantations than in other two land-use types. However, application of artificial nest boxes reveals that a good number of larger artificial nest boxes had greater occupancy, as did boxes placed at higher positions on trees from the ground at coffee plantations and mixed farming areas than at KINAPA, suggesting a shortage of natural cavity-nesting sites for larger birds and an avoidance of nest predation or human disturbances, respectively. Therefore, provision of artificial nest boxes could offer nesting opportunities for a range of cavity-nesting birds if designs and constructions take into consideration all possible factors that might hinder their occupation by cavity-nesting birds. In this manner, application of cavity nest boxes could be a vital alternative tool for conservation of cavity-nesting birds beyond boundaries of protected areas.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Arnett BA, Sallabanks R (1998) Land manager perceptions of avian research and information needs. In: Marzluff JM et al (eds) Avian conservation: research and management. Island Press, p 563 Arnett BA, Sallabanks R (1998) Land manager perceptions of avian research and information needs. In: Marzluff JM et al (eds) Avian conservation: research and management. Island Press, p 563
go back to reference Brandeis TJ et al (2002) Cavity-nester habitat development in artificially made Douglas-fir snags. J Wildl Manag 66(3):625CrossRef Brandeis TJ et al (2002) Cavity-nester habitat development in artificially made Douglas-fir snags. J Wildl Manag 66(3):625CrossRef
go back to reference Catry I et al (2013) Foraging habitat quality constrains effectiveness of artificial nest-site provisioning in reversing population declines in a colonial cavity nester. PLoS One 8(3):1–10CrossRef Catry I et al (2013) Foraging habitat quality constrains effectiveness of artificial nest-site provisioning in reversing population declines in a colonial cavity nester. PLoS One 8(3):1–10CrossRef
go back to reference Cockle K, Martin K, Wiebe K (2011) Selection of Nest trees by cavity-nesting birds in the Neotropical Atlantic forest. Biotropica 43(2):228–236CrossRef Cockle K, Martin K, Wiebe K (2011) Selection of Nest trees by cavity-nesting birds in the Neotropical Atlantic forest. Biotropica 43(2):228–236CrossRef
go back to reference Fargallo JA et al (2001) Nestbox provisioning in a rural population of Eurasian kestrels: breeding performance, nest predation and parasitism. Bird Study 48(2):236–244CrossRef Fargallo JA et al (2001) Nestbox provisioning in a rural population of Eurasian kestrels: breeding performance, nest predation and parasitism. Bird Study 48(2):236–244CrossRef
go back to reference Goldingay RL, Stevens JR (2009) Use of artificial tree hollows by Australian birds and bats. Wildl Res 36:81–97CrossRef Goldingay RL, Stevens JR (2009) Use of artificial tree hollows by Australian birds and bats. Wildl Res 36:81–97CrossRef
go back to reference Harper MJ, McCarthy MA, van der Ree R (2005) The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna. Wildl Res 32(6):509CrossRef Harper MJ, McCarthy MA, van der Ree R (2005) The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna. Wildl Res 32(6):509CrossRef
go back to reference Hemp A (2006) The banana forests of Kilimanjaro: biodiversity and conservation of the Chagga homegardens. Biodivers Conserv 15:1193–1217CrossRef Hemp A (2006) The banana forests of Kilimanjaro: biodiversity and conservation of the Chagga homegardens. Biodivers Conserv 15:1193–1217CrossRef
go back to reference Kideghesho JR et al (2006) Factors and ecological impacts of wildlife habitat destruction in the Serengeti ecosystem in northern Tanzania. Afr J Environ Assess Manag 11(April):17–32 Kideghesho JR et al (2006) Factors and ecological impacts of wildlife habitat destruction in the Serengeti ecosystem in northern Tanzania. Afr J Environ Assess Manag 11(April):17–32
go back to reference Kirk DA, Evenden MD, Mineau P (2011) Past and current attempts to evaluate the role of birds as predators of insect pests in temperate agriculture. In: Current ornithology. Springer, Boston, pp 175–269 Kirk DA, Evenden MD, Mineau P (2011) Past and current attempts to evaluate the role of birds as predators of insect pests in temperate agriculture. In: Current ornithology. Springer, Boston, pp 175–269
go back to reference Kook D, Moodie J, Ames D (2008) Using nest boxes for Lewis’s Woodpecker conservation in Central Oregon. In: Proceedings of the fourth international partners in flight conference: Tundra to tropics, pp 565–568 Kook D, Moodie J, Ames D (2008) Using nest boxes for Lewis’s Woodpecker conservation in Central Oregon. In: Proceedings of the fourth international partners in flight conference: Tundra to tropics, pp 565–568
go back to reference Lambrechts MML et al (2010) The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. Acta Ornithol 45(1):1–26CrossRef Lambrechts MML et al (2010) The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. Acta Ornithol 45(1):1–26CrossRef
go back to reference Le Roux DS et al (2016) Enriching small trees with artificial nest boxes cannot mimic the value of large trees for hollow-nesting birds. Restor Ecol 24(2):252–258CrossRef Le Roux DS et al (2016) Enriching small trees with artificial nest boxes cannot mimic the value of large trees for hollow-nesting birds. Restor Ecol 24(2):252–258CrossRef
go back to reference Loose SS, Anderson SH (1972) Woodpeckers habitat use in the forests of Southeast Wyoming. J Field Ornithol 66(4):503–514 Loose SS, Anderson SH (1972) Woodpeckers habitat use in the forests of Southeast Wyoming. J Field Ornithol 66(4):503–514
go back to reference Macdonald C (1979) Ontario’s cavity-nesting birds. Ontario Birds December 1992 10(3) Macdonald C (1979) Ontario’s cavity-nesting birds. Ontario Birds December 1992 10(3)
go back to reference Martin K, Aitken KE, Wiebe KL (2004) Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: Nest characteristics and niche partitioning. Condor 106:5–19CrossRef Martin K, Aitken KE, Wiebe KL (2004) Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: Nest characteristics and niche partitioning. Condor 106:5–19CrossRef
go back to reference Misana SB, Sokoni C, Mbonile MJ (2012) Land-use/cover changes and their drivers on the slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro. Tanzania 5(6):151–164 Misana SB, Sokoni C, Mbonile MJ (2012) Land-use/cover changes and their drivers on the slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro. Tanzania 5(6):151–164
go back to reference Newmark WD (1996) Insularization of Tanzanian parks and the local extinction of large mammals. Conserv Biol 10(6):1549–1556CrossRef Newmark WD (1996) Insularization of Tanzanian parks and the local extinction of large mammals. Conserv Biol 10(6):1549–1556CrossRef
go back to reference Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic, London Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic, London
go back to reference Remm K (2006) Tree cavities in riverine forests: what determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines? For Ecol Manag 221:267–277CrossRef Remm K (2006) Tree cavities in riverine forests: what determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines? For Ecol Manag 221:267–277CrossRef
go back to reference Robles H, Ciudad C, Matthysen E (2011) Forest ecology and management tree-cavity occurrence, cavity occupation and reproductive performance of secondary cavity-nesting birds in oak forests: the role of traditional management practices. For Ecol Manag 261(8):1428–1435CrossRef Robles H, Ciudad C, Matthysen E (2011) Forest ecology and management tree-cavity occurrence, cavity occupation and reproductive performance of secondary cavity-nesting birds in oak forests: the role of traditional management practices. For Ecol Manag 261(8):1428–1435CrossRef
go back to reference Scott VE et al (2004) Cavity-nesting birds of north American forests Scott VE et al (2004) Cavity-nesting birds of north American forests
go back to reference Twedt DJ, Henne-Kerr JL (2001) Artificial cavity enhance breeding bird densities in managed cottonwood forest. Wildl Soc Bull 29(2) Twedt DJ, Henne-Kerr JL (2001) Artificial cavity enhance breeding bird densities in managed cottonwood forest. Wildl Soc Bull 29(2)
go back to reference Tyson LA, Blackwell BF, Seamans TW (2011) Artificial nest cavity used successfully by native species and avoided by European starlings. Wilson J Ornithol 123(4):827–830CrossRef Tyson LA, Blackwell BF, Seamans TW (2011) Artificial nest cavity used successfully by native species and avoided by European starlings. Wilson J Ornithol 123(4):827–830CrossRef
go back to reference Warakai D et al (2013) Tree cavity-using wildlife and the potential of artificial nest boxes for wildlife management in New Guinea. Trop Conserv Sci 6(6):711–733CrossRef Warakai D et al (2013) Tree cavity-using wildlife and the potential of artificial nest boxes for wildlife management in New Guinea. Trop Conserv Sci 6(6):711–733CrossRef
go back to reference Waters JR, Noon BR, Verner J (1990) Lack of nest site limitation in a cavity-nesting bird community. J Wildl Manag 54(2):239–245CrossRef Waters JR, Noon BR, Verner J (1990) Lack of nest site limitation in a cavity-nesting bird community. J Wildl Manag 54(2):239–245CrossRef
go back to reference Wiebe KL (2011) Nest sites as limiting resources for cavity-nesting birds in mature forest ecosystems: a review of the evidence. J Field Ornithol 82(3):239–248CrossRef Wiebe KL (2011) Nest sites as limiting resources for cavity-nesting birds in mature forest ecosystems: a review of the evidence. J Field Ornithol 82(3):239–248CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Growing Concern for the Conservation of Cavity-Nesting Birds Outside Protected Areas: Can Artificial Nest Boxes Be Effective Conservation Tools?
Authors
Hamadi I. Dulle
Saleh S. Seif
Shedrack K. Mungure
Jafari R. Kideghesho
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43302-4_2