Top

Biodiversity and Conservation

Published in:

21-09-2021 | Original Paper

Habitat complementarity and butterfly traits are essential considerations when mitigating the effects of exotic plantation forestry

Authors: R. Gaigher, J. S. Pryke, M. J. Samways

Published in: Biodiversity and Conservation | Issue 13/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Habitat loss threatens insect diversity globally. However, complementary vegetation types in remaining habitat increases opportunities for species survival. We assess the extent to which indigenous forest patches moderate the impact of exotic commercial afforestation on grassland butterflies. Butterflies were sampled in grassland along uncorrelated gradients of landscape-scale indigenous forest and plantation cover, while controlling for variation in local vegetation composition. We separately assessed responses by butterfly groups differing in habitat preference, larval diet, and mobility. There was no effect of landscape- or local-scale variables on species richness, but there was a strong interactive effect of forest and plantation cover on butterfly assemblage structure. The effect varied according to species traits. When forest cover was high, assemblages did not differ at different levels of plantation cover. However, plantation cover significantly influenced assemblage structure when forest cover was low. Grassland with limited forest cover in the protected area supported unique assemblages with high frequency of less mobile, specialized species with herbaceous larval host plants, whereas grassland with low forest cover near plantations had a prevalence of mobile, generalist species. A positive association between forest cover and butterflies with woody larval host plants suggests that indigenous forest patches improved the suitability of fragmented grassland for a subset of butterflies, emphasising the value of natural heterogeneity in transformed areas. However, certain butterfly traits associated with large, open grassland were under-represented in grassland between plantations, underscoring the importance of open areas in the broader landscape to conserve the full diversity of species.

previous article Long-term ecology and conservation of the Kungur forest-steppe (pre-Urals, Russia): case study Spasskaya Gora

next article South Africa’s private wildlife ranches protect globally significant populations of wild ungulates

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Akeboshi A, Takagi S, Murakami M, Hasegawa M, Miyashita T (2015) A forest–grassland boundary enhances patch quality for a grassland-dwelling butterfly as revealed by dispersal processes. J Insect Conserv 19:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9732-7CrossRef

Basset Y, Mavoungou JF, Mikissa JB, Missa O, Miller SE, Kitching RL, Alonso A (2004) Discriminatory power of different arthropod data sets for the biological monitoring of anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests. Biodivers Conserv 13:709–732. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000011722.44714.a4CrossRef

Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Software 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01CrossRef

Bergman KO, Ask L, Askling J, Ignell H, Wahlman H, Milberg P (2008) Importance of boreal grasslands in Sweden for butterfly diversity and effects of local and landscape habitat factors. Biodivers Conserv 17:139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9235-xCrossRef

Bergman KO, Daniel-Ferreira J, Milberg P, Öckinger E, Westerberg L (2018) Butterflies in Swedish grasslands benefit from forest and respond to landscape composition at different spatial scales. Landsc Ecol 33:2189–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0732-yCrossRef

Bjornstad, ON (2020) ncf: Spatial Covariance Functions. R package version 1.2-9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ncf

Bommarco R, Biesmeijer JC, Meyer B, Stuart P, Potts SG, Po J, Roberts M, Steffan-Dewenter I, Erik O (2010) Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277:2075–2082. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.2221CrossRef

Brown AM, Warton DI, Andrew NR, Binns M, Cassis G, Gibb H (2014) The fourth-corner solution—using predictive models to understand how species traits interact with the environment. Methods Ecol Evol 5:344–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12163CrossRef

Brückmann SV, Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Butterfly and plant specialists suffer from reduced connectivity in fragmented landscapes. J Appl Ecol 47:799–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01828.xCrossRef

Cardoso P, Barton PS, Birkhofer K, Chichorro F, Deacon C, Fartmann T, Fukushima CS, Gaigher R, Habel JC, Hallmann CA, Hill MJ, Hochkirch A, Kwak ML, Mammola S, Ari Noriega J, Orfinger AB, Pedraza F, Pryke JS, Roque FO, Settele J, Simaika JP, Stork NE, Suhling F, Vorster C, Samways MJ (2020) Scientists’ warning to humanity on insect extinctions. Biol Conserv 242:108426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108426CrossRef

Ceballos G, Davidson A, List R, Pacheco J, Manzano-Fischer P, Santos-Barrera G, Cruzado J (2010) Rapid decline of a grassland system and its ecological and conservation implications. PLoS ONE 5:e8562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cunningham SA, Schellhorn NA, Marcora A, Batley M (2013) Movement and phenology of bees in a subtropical Australian agricultural landscape. Austral Ecol 38:456–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02432.xCrossRef

Dray S, Dufour A (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw 22:1–20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v022.i04CrossRef

Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Mono 67:345–366

Edge DA, Mecenero S (2015) Butterfly conservation in Southern Africa. J Insect Conserv 19:325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9758-5CrossRef

Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.xCrossRefPubMed

Fantinato E, Vecchio SD, Bu G (2019) The co-occurrence of different grassland communities increases the stability of pollination networks. Flora 255:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.03.017CrossRef

Fartmann, T (2006) Oviposition preferences, adjacency of old woodland and isolation explain the distribution of the Duke of Burgundy butterfly (Hamearis lucina) in calcareous grasslands in central Germany. Ann Zool Fennici 43: 335–347. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23736853

Gaigher R, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2019) Divergent fire management leads to multiple beneficial outcomes for butterfly conservation in a production mosaic. J Appl Ecol 56:1322–1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13357CrossRef

Gamez-Virues S, Perovic DJ, Gossner MM, Borschig C, Bluthgen N, De Jong H, Simons NK, Klein A-M, Krauss J, Maier G, Scherber C, Steckel J, Rothenwohrer C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Weiner CN, Weisser W, Werner M, Tscharntke T, Westphal C (2015) Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Nat Commun 6:8568. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9568CrossRefPubMed

Hui FKC (2016) Boral—bayesian ordination and regression analysis of multivariate abundance data in r. Methods Ecol Evol 7:744–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12514CrossRef

Joubert L, Samways MJ (2014) Equivalence of grasslands in an ecological network and a world heritage site. Biodivers Conserv 23:2415–2426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0730-6CrossRef

Joubert-van der Merwe L, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2019) Well-managed grassland heterogeneity promotes butterfly conservation in a corridor network. J Environ Manag 238:382–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.021CrossRef

Kadlec T, Tropek R, Konvicka M (2012) Timed surveys and transect walks as comparable methods for monitoring butterflies in small plots. J Insect Conserv 16:275–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9414-7CrossRef

Kietzka GJ, Pryke JS, Gaigher R, Samways MJ (2021) Webs of well-designed conservation corridors maintain river ecosystem integrity and biodiversity in plantation mosaics. Biol Cons 254:108965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108965CrossRef

Krämer B, Poniatowski D, Fartmann T (2012) Effects of landscape and habitat quality on butterfly communities in pre-alpine calcareous grasslands. Biol Conserv 152:253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.038CrossRef

Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Müller CB, Tscharntke T (2005) Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly. Ecography 28:465–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04201.xCrossRef

Kremen C (2015) Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1355:52–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12845CrossRefPubMed

Löffler F, Poniatowski D, Fartmann T (2020) Extinction debt across three taxa in well-connected calcareous grasslands. Biol Conserv 246:108588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108588CrossRef

Marini L, Öckinger E, Bergman K, Jauker B, Krauss J, Kuussaari M, Pöyry J, Smith HG, Steffan-dewenter I, Bommarco R (2014) Contrasting effects of habitat area and connectivity on evenness of pollinator communities. Ecography 37:544–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00369.xCrossRef

McGeoch MA, Van Rensburg BJ, Botes A (2014) The verification and application of bioindicators: a case study of dung beetles in a savanna ecosystem. J Appl Ecol 39:661–672. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00743.xCrossRef

Williams MC (ed) (2013) Conservation assessment of butterflies of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: red list and atlas. Saftronics and Animal Demography Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Mucina L, Scott-Shaw CR, Michael C, Camp KGT, Matthews WS, Powrie LW, Hoare DB (2006) Indian Ocean coastal belt. In: Mucina L, Rutherford MC (eds) The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland, Strelitzia, vol 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, pp 569–583

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501CrossRefPubMed

Naimi B, Hamm NAS, Groen TA, Skidmore AK, Toxopeus AG (2014) Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling? Ecography 37:191–203CrossRef

O’Connor TG, Puttick JR, Hoffman MT (2014) Bush encroachment in southern Africa: changes and causes. Afr J Range Forage Sci 31:67–88. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2014.939996CrossRef

Öckinger E, Schweiger O, Crist TO, Debinski DM, Krauss J, Kuussaari M, Petersen JD, Pöyry J, Settele J, Summerville KS, Bommarco R (2010) Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis. Ecol Lett 13:969–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01487.xCrossRefPubMed

Öckinger E, Bergman KO, Franzén M, Kadlec T, Krauss J, Kuussaari M, Pöyry J, Smith HG, Steffan-Dewenter I, Bommarco R (2012a) The landscape matrix modifies the effect of habitat fragmentation in grassland butterflies. Landsc Ecol 27:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9686-zCrossRef

Öckinger E, Lindborg R, Sjödin NE, Bommarco R (2012b) Landscape matrix modifies richness of plants and insects in grassland fragments. Ecography 35:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06870.xCrossRef

Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Friendly, M, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, McGlinn, D, Minchin, PR, O'Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P M, Stevens, HH, Szoecs E, Wagner, H (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

Pennington KM, Dickson CGC, Kroon DM (1978) Pennington’s butterflies of Southern Africa. Donker, Johannesburg, South Africa

Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2012a) Ecological networks act as extensions of protected areas for arthropod biodiversity conservation. J Appl Ecol 49:591–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02142.xCrossRef

Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2012b) Conservation management of complex natural forest and plantation edge effects. Landsc Ecol 27:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9668-1CrossRef

Pryke JS, Roets F, Samways MJ (2016) Wild herbivore grazing enhances insect diversity over livestock grazing in an African grassland system. PLoS ONE 11:e0164198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

QGIS Development Team (2020) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open-Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org

R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

Roberts, DW (2015) Labdsv: Ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology. R package version 2.0-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=labdsv

Samways MJ, Pryke JS (2015) Large-scale ecological networks do work in an ecologically complex biodiversity hotspot. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0697-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Samways MJ, Barton PS, Birkhofer K, Chichorro F, Deacon C, Fartmann T, Fukushima CS, Gaigher R, Habel JC, Hallmann CA, Hill MJ, Hochkirch A, Kaila L, Kwak ML, Maes D, Mammola S, Noriega JA, Orfinger AB, Pedraza F, Pryke JS, Roque FO, Settele J, Simaika JP, Stork NE, Suhling F, Vorster C, Cardoso P (2020) Solutions for humanity on how to conserve insects. Biol Conserv 242:108427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108427CrossRef

SANBI (2014) Grazing and Burning Guidelines: Managing Grasslands for Biodiversity and Livestock Production. Compiled by Lechmere-Oertel, R.G. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa.

Schmitt T, Seitz A (2000) Forests as dispersal barriers for Erebia medusa (Nymphalidae, Lepidoptera). Basic Appl Ecol 59:53–59CrossRef

Scott-Shaw, CR, Escott, BJ (2011) KwaZulu-Natal provincial pre-transformation vegetation type map. 2011. Unpublished GIS coverage [kznveg05v2_011_wll.zip], Biodiversity Conservation Planning Division, Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Slamova I, Klecka J, Konvicka M (2013) Woodland and grassland mosaic from a butterfly perspective: habitat use by Erebia aethiops (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Insect Conserv Divers 6:243–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00212.xCrossRef

Steffan-Dewenter I (2003) Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conserv Biol 17:1036–1044CrossRef

Toivonen M, Herzon I, Kuussaari M (2015) Community composition of butterflies and bumblebees in fallows: niche breadth and dispersal capacity modify responses to fallow type and landscape. J Insect Conserv 20:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9836-8CrossRef

Toivonen M, Peltonen A, Herzon I, Heliölä J, Leikola N, Kuussaari M (2017) High cover of forest increases the abundance of most grassland butterflies in boreal farmland. Insect Conserv Divers 10:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12226CrossRef

Van Oudtshoorn F (2012) Guide to grassess of Southern Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria

Van Schalkwyk J, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2019) Contribution of common vs. rare species to species diversity patterns in conservation corridors. Ecol Indic 104:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.014CrossRef

Van Schalkwyk J, Pryke JS, Samways MJ, Gaigher R (2020) Corridor width determines strength of edge influence on arthropods in conservation corridors. Landsc Ecol 35:1175–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01008-6CrossRef

Villemey A, van Halder I, Ouin A, Barbaro L, Chenot J, Tessier P, Calatayud F, Martin H, Roche P, Archaux F (2015) Mosaic of grasslands and woodlands is more effective than habitat connectivity to conserve butterflies in French farmland. Biol Conserv 191:20–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.030CrossRef

Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright ST, Warton DI (2012) Mvabund- an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods Ecol Evol 3:471–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00190.xCrossRef

Warren MS, Maes D, Van Swaay CAM, Goffart P, Van Dyck H (2021) The decline of butterflies in Europe: problems, significance, and possible solutions. PNAS 118:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002551117CrossRef

Warton DI, Wright ST, Wang Y (2012) Distance-based multivariate analyses confound location and dispersion effects. Methods Ecol Evol 3:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00127.xCrossRef

Woodhall S (2005) Field guide to butterflies of South Africa. Struik Nature, Cape Town, South Africa

Yekwayo I, Pryke JS, Roets F, Samways MJ (2017) Responses of ground living arthropods to landscape contrast and context in a forest-grassland mosaic. Biodivers Conserv 26:631–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1262-zCrossRef

Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GH (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, USACrossRef

Title: Habitat complementarity and butterfly traits are essential considerations when mitigating the effects of exotic plantation forestry
Authors: R. Gaigher
J. S. Pryke
M. J. Samways
Publication date: 21-09-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Biodiversity and Conservation / Issue 13/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-3115
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9710
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02293-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 13/2021

Sacred natural sites and biodiversity conservation: a systematic review

Correction to: Patterns and trends in two decades of research on Nepal’s mammalian fauna (2000–2019): examining the past for future implications

Synergistic effects of habitat configuration and land-use intensity shape the structure of bird assemblages in human-modified landscapes across three major neotropical biomes

The management effectiveness of protected areas in Kenya

Contrasting responses of large carnivores to land use management across an Asian montane landscape in Iran

Potential new areas for conservation of key botanical families in the subtropical Atlantic Forest