Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 2/2023

03-01-2023

How Tablet-Student Ratio and External Scripts Affect Knowledge Acquisition and Cognitive Load in Scientific Collaborative Inquiry Learning? A Three-Round Quasi-Experiment

Authors: Cixiao Wang, Qian Dong, Yuying Ma

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 2/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the advancement of informational and portable technologies, virtual manipulatives based on tablets are applied to support students’ learning in science education. However, research on the impact of tablet-student ratios on individual knowledge acquisition and cognitive load in collaborative inquiry learning has not been addressed in detail yet. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of tablet-student ratios (1:1 or 1:m) and external script availability (with or without) on students’ knowledge acquisition and cognitive load in collaborative inquiry learning when using virtual manipulatives. A three-round quasi-experiment was conducted across 3 months with 130 fifth graders from four classes learning three scientific inquiry themes. The four classes, class A (1:1 group with external script condition) with 31 students, class B (1:m group with external script condition) with 34 students, class C (1:1 group without external script condition) with 33 students, and class D (1:m group without external script condition) with 32 students, constitute four technology affordance conditions. The research conducted a pretest, posttest, and repeated-measures ANOVA to explore the effects of technology affordances on students’ knowledge acquisition and cognitive load of collaborative learning. Results show that technology affordances have impacts on students’ knowledge acquisition and cognitive load during collaborative inquiry activities. Moreover, the impacts changed over time. This study has practical implications for the instructional design of mobile device-supported collaborative inquiry activities.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239.CrossRef Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Antle, A. N. (2014). Scratching the surface: Opportunities and challenges from designing interactive tabletops for learning. In V. R. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (pp. 55–73). New York: Routledge. Antle, A. N. (2014). Scratching the surface: Opportunities and challenges from designing interactive tabletops for learning. In V. R. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (pp. 55–73). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377.CrossRef Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377.CrossRef
go back to reference Chan, J. W., & Pow, J. W. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, 103787.CrossRef Chan, J. W., & Pow, J. W. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, 103787.CrossRef
go back to reference Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students’ learning achievement and cognitive load—a format assessment perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332–344. Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students’ learning achievement and cognitive load—a format assessment perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332–344.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51–63.CrossRef Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL, Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL, Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
go back to reference Dillenbourg, P., & Betrancourt, M. (2006). Collaboration load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Theory, Handling Complexity in Learning (pp. 142–163). Pergamon. Dillenbourg, P., & Betrancourt, M. (2006). Collaboration load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Theory, Handling Complexity in Learning (pp. 142–163). Pergamon.
go back to reference Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275–301). New York: Springer.CrossRef Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275–301). New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellis, R. A., & Bliuc, A. (2015). An exploration into first-year university students’ approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970–980.CrossRef Ellis, R. A., & Bliuc, A. (2015). An exploration into first-year university students’ approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970–980.CrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Haake, J. M., & Mandl, H. (2007). Perspectives on collaboration scripts. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 1–10). New York: Springer.CrossRef Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Haake, J. M., & Mandl, H. (2007). Perspectives on collaboration scripts. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 1–10). New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Fokides, E., & Mastrokoukou, A. (2018). Results from a study for teaching human body systems to primary school students using tablets. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 154–170.CrossRef Fokides, E., & Mastrokoukou, A. (2018). Results from a study for teaching human body systems to primary school students using tablets. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 154–170.CrossRef
go back to reference García-Carmona, A. (2020). From inquiry-based science education to the approach based on scientific practices: A critical analysis and suggestions for science teaching. Science and Education, 29(2), 443–463.CrossRef García-Carmona, A. (2020). From inquiry-based science education to the approach based on scientific practices: A critical analysis and suggestions for science teaching. Science and Education, 29(2), 443–463.CrossRef
go back to reference Guzmán, J. L., & Joseph, B. (2021). Web-based virtual lab for learning design, operation, control, and optimization of an anaerobic digestion process. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30, 319–330.CrossRef Guzmán, J. L., & Joseph, B. (2021). Web-based virtual lab for learning design, operation, control, and optimization of an anaerobic digestion process. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30, 319–330.CrossRef
go back to reference Ha, O., & Fang, N. (2018). Interactive virtual and physical manipulatives for improving students’ spatial skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(8), 1088–1110.CrossRef Ha, O., & Fang, N. (2018). Interactive virtual and physical manipulatives for improving students’ spatial skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(8), 1088–1110.CrossRef
go back to reference Harper, B., & Milman, N. B. (2016). One-to-one technology in K-12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129–142.CrossRef Harper, B., & Milman, N. B. (2016). One-to-one technology in K-12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How Can Technologies Help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.CrossRef Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How Can Technologies Help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.CrossRef
go back to reference Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19.CrossRef Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19.CrossRef
go back to reference King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 13–37). New York: Springer.CrossRef King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 13–37). New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., Zambrano, R., & J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233.CrossRef Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., Zambrano, R., & J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Koning, B. B. D., & Tabbers, H. K. (2011). Facilitating understanding of movements in dynamic visualizations: An embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 501–521.CrossRef Koning, B. B. D., & Tabbers, H. K. (2011). Facilitating understanding of movements in dynamic visualizations: An embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 501–521.CrossRef
go back to reference Larrain, A., Howe, C., & Freire, P. (2018). ‘More is not necessarily better’: Curriculum materials support the impact of classroom argumentative dialogue in science teaching on content knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 282–301.CrossRef Larrain, A., Howe, C., & Freire, P. (2018). ‘More is not necessarily better’: Curriculum materials support the impact of classroom argumentative dialogue in science teaching on content knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 282–301.CrossRef
go back to reference Leon, A. C., & Heo, M. (2009). Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(3), 603–608.CrossRef Leon, A. C., & Heo, M. (2009). Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(3), 603–608.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, C. P., Wong, L. H., & Shao, Y. J. (2012). Comparison of 1:1 and 1:M CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 99–113.CrossRef Lin, C. P., Wong, L. H., & Shao, Y. J. (2012). Comparison of 1:1 and 1:M CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 99–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, Y. T., & Lin, Y. C. (2016). Effects of mental process integrated nursing training using mobile device on students’ cognitive load, learning attitudes, acceptance, and achievements. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(PB), 1213–1221. Lin, Y. T., & Lin, Y. C. (2016). Effects of mental process integrated nursing training using mobile device on students’ cognitive load, learning attitudes, acceptance, and achievements. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(PB), 1213–1221.
go back to reference Liu, C. C., Hsieh, I. C., Wen, C. T., Chang, M. H., Fan Chiang, S. H., Tsai, M. J., Chang, C. J., & Hwang, F. K. (2021). The affordances and limitations of collaborative science simulations: The analysis from multiple evidences. Computers & Education, 160, 104029. Liu, C. C., Hsieh, I. C., Wen, C. T., Chang, M. H., Fan Chiang, S. H., Tsai, M. J., Chang, C. J., & Hwang, F. K. (2021). The affordances and limitations of collaborative science simulations: The analysis from multiple evidences. Computers & Education, 160, 104029.
go back to reference Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding the mediating effect of learning approach between learning factors and higher order thinking skills in collaborative inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2475–2492.CrossRef Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding the mediating effect of learning approach between learning factors and higher order thinking skills in collaborative inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2475–2492.CrossRef
go back to reference Mende, S., Proske, A., Körndle, H., et al. (2017). Who benefits from a low versus high guidance CSCL script and why? Instructional Science, 45, 439–468.CrossRef Mende, S., Proske, A., Körndle, H., et al. (2017). Who benefits from a low versus high guidance CSCL script and why? Instructional Science, 45, 439–468.CrossRef
go back to reference Min, J., Lin, Y. T., & Tsai, H. C. (2016). Mobile APP for motivation to learning: An engineering case. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 2048–2057.CrossRef Min, J., Lin, Y. T., & Tsai, H. C. (2016). Mobile APP for motivation to learning: An engineering case. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 2048–2057.CrossRef
go back to reference Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372–377.CrossRef Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372–377.CrossRef
go back to reference Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21–47.CrossRef Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434.CrossRef Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434.CrossRef
go back to reference Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351–371.CrossRef Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351–371.CrossRef
go back to reference Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., et al. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.CrossRef Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., et al. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Mobile collaborative learning: The role of individual learning in groups through text and video content delivery in tablets. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 520–534.CrossRef Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Mobile collaborative learning: The role of individual learning in groups through text and video content delivery in tablets. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 520–534.CrossRef
go back to reference Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2016). The interplay between cognitive task complexity and user interaction in mobile collaborative training. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 333–345.CrossRef Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2016). The interplay between cognitive task complexity and user interaction in mobile collaborative training. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 333–345.CrossRef
go back to reference Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.CrossRef Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.CrossRef
go back to reference Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.CrossRef Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177.CrossRef Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177.CrossRef
go back to reference Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.CrossRef Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, C., & Le, H. (2022). The more, the merrier? Roles of device-student ratio in collaborative inquiries and its interactions with external scripts and task complexity. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1517–1542. Wang, C., & Le, H. (2022). The more, the merrier? Roles of device-student ratio in collaborative inquiries and its interactions with external scripts and task complexity. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1517–1542.
go back to reference Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020a). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143, 103683. Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020a). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143, 103683.
go back to reference Wang, C., Fang, T., & Miao, R. (2018). Learning performance and cognitive load in mobile learning: Impact of interaction complexity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 917–927. Wang, C., Fang, T., & Miao, R. (2018). Learning performance and cognitive load in mobile learning: Impact of interaction complexity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 917–927.
go back to reference Wang C., Ma Y., & Wu F. (2020b). Comparative performance and involvement in collaborative inquiry learning: Three modalities of using virtual lever manipulative. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 587–596. Wang C., Ma Y., & Wu F. (2020b). Comparative performance and involvement in collaborative inquiry learning: Three modalities of using virtual lever manipulative. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 587–596.
go back to reference Wong, L., & Looi, C. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRef Wong, L., & Looi, C. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRef
go back to reference Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 317–331.CrossRef Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 317–331.CrossRef
go back to reference Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084.CrossRef Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang, L., KaLyuga, S., Lee, C., & Lei, C. (2016). Effectiveness of collaborative learning of computer programming under different learning group formations according to students’ prior knowledge: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(2), 171–192. Zhang, L., KaLyuga, S., Lee, C., & Lei, C. (2016). Effectiveness of collaborative learning of computer programming under different learning group formations according to students’ prior knowledge: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(2), 171–192.
Metadata
Title
How Tablet-Student Ratio and External Scripts Affect Knowledge Acquisition and Cognitive Load in Scientific Collaborative Inquiry Learning? A Three-Round Quasi-Experiment
Authors
Cixiao Wang
Qian Dong
Yuying Ma
Publication date
03-01-2023
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10024-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Journal of Science Education and Technology 2/2023 Go to the issue

Premium Partners