Skip to main content
Top
Published in: NanoEthics 2/2020

30-03-2020 | Original Research Paper

“I Don’t Want to Do Anything Bad.” Perspectives on Scientific Responsibility: Results from a Qualitative Interview Study with Senior Scientists

Authors: Sebastian Wäscher, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Anna Deplazes-Zemp

Published in: NanoEthics | Issue 2/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents scientists’ understanding of their roles in society and corresponding responsibilities. It discusses the researchers’ perspective against the background of the contemporary literature on scientific responsibility in the social sciences and philosophy and proposes a heuristic that improves the understanding of the complexity of scientific responsibility. The study is based on qualitative interviews with senior scientists. The presented results show what researchers themselves see as their responsibilities, how they assume them, and what challenges they perceive with respect to their responsibilities. Regarding the latter, the interviewed researchers highlight those aspects of responsibility that go beyond the expertise of their professional role, and thus cannot be carried by scientists alone. For example, scientists alone cannot determine the general direction science takes, or the useful application of their research. The interviewed researchers describe those challenges as responsibilities that must be shared across different societal groups. In the theoretical literature, responsibility has been described as a relation between an actor (who), the action for which someone is responsible (what), and the normative framework against which someone is responsible (why). We will draw on this concept of “relational responsibility” to identify the various actors, normative frameworks, and actions relevant to scientific responsibility. This will serve as a heuristic tool to help identify the entanglement of responsibilities spread across several societal groups.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The edited volume from Vincent, van de Poel and van den Hoven [37] or the article by Fischer [23] provide good overviews of the responsibility discourse.
 
2
During the study the interview guide was slightly adjusted according to prior experiences. Furthermore, all interviews have been conducted by the same person (S.W.), who adjusted the questions according to the flow of the interview.
 
3
Due to an adjustment in the course of the study, four interviews were not analyzed, as they no longer fit the inclusion criteria. Three interviews were conducted with media experts who were intended to be a second group of interviewees. However, it did not prove to be feasible to compare scientists and media experts at the given point in time. The same holds true for the group of junior researchers, who were also considered as a contrasting group. Hence, one interview with a junior researcher was also excluded.
 
4
For example, the recent genetic modification of two Chinese babies with the CRISPR/Cas9 technology [73], or the risk of releasing genetically modified organisms into the environment, can be understood as misuse.
 
5
Other topics of science communication have been discussed intensively in the literature and provided a robust corpus of data regarding the science and society relationship [78, 79]. It is not the aim of this paper to discuss the science and society relationship in detail; however, the next section will discuss one central challenge regarding scientific responsibility: the decision-making process in society.
 
6
Another approach to structuring aspects of scientific responsibility with the help of a relational responsibility regarding knowledge of synthetic biology was proposed by Deplazes Zemp and Leidel [90]. Another similar approach regarding the understanding of risk was proposed by Boholm and Corvellec [91].
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Butts CF (1948) Science and social responsibility. Philos Sci 15(2):100–103CrossRef Butts CF (1948) Science and social responsibility. Philos Sci 15(2):100–103CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cetto AM, Schneegans S, Moore H et al (eds) (2000) World conference on science for the twenty-first century: a new commitment. Banson, London Cetto AM, Schneegans S, Moore H et al (eds) (2000) World conference on science for the twenty-first century: a new commitment. Banson, London
7.
go back to reference Heisenberg W (2002) Der Teil und das Ganze: Gespräche im Umkreis der Atomphysik. Piper, München Heisenberg W (2002) Der Teil und das Ganze: Gespräche im Umkreis der Atomphysik. Piper, München
8.
go back to reference Lorenz R (2010) Die „Göttinger Erklärung“ von 1957: Gelehrtenprotest in der Ära Adenauer. In: Lorenz R, Klatt J (eds) Manifeste. Transcript Verlag, pp 199–228 Lorenz R (2010) Die „Göttinger Erklärung“ von 1957: Gelehrtenprotest in der Ära Adenauer. In: Lorenz R, Klatt J (eds) Manifeste. Transcript Verlag, pp 199–228
11.
go back to reference Berg P, Baltimore D, Brenner S, Roblin RO, Singer MF (1975) Summary statement of the Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72(6):1981–1984CrossRef Berg P, Baltimore D, Brenner S, Roblin RO, Singer MF (1975) Summary statement of the Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72(6):1981–1984CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Baltimore D, Berg P, Botchan M, Carroll D, Charo RA, Church G, Corn JE, Daley GQ, Doudna JA, Fenner M, Greely HT, Jinek M, Martin GS, Penhoet E, Puck J, Sternberg SH, Weissman JS, Yamamoto KR (2015) Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 348(6230):36–38. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1028 CrossRef Baltimore D, Berg P, Botchan M, Carroll D, Charo RA, Church G, Corn JE, Daley GQ, Doudna JA, Fenner M, Greely HT, Jinek M, Martin GS, Penhoet E, Puck J, Sternberg SH, Weissman JS, Yamamoto KR (2015) Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 348(6230):36–38. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1126/​science.​aab1028 CrossRef
16.
go back to reference European Commission (2012) Responsible research and innovation: Europe's ability to respond to societal challenges. EDC collection. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg European Commission (2012) Responsible research and innovation: Europe's ability to respond to societal challenges. EDC collection. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
17.
go back to reference Davies SR, Glerup C, Horst M (2014) On being responsible: multiplicity in responsible development. In: Arnaldi S, Ferrari A, Magaudda P et al (eds) Responsibility in nanotechnology development. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 143–159 Davies SR, Glerup C, Horst M (2014) On being responsible: multiplicity in responsible development. In: Arnaldi S, Ferrari A, Magaudda P et al (eds) Responsibility in nanotechnology development. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 143–159
19.
go back to reference Douglas HE (2003) The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility). Am Philos Q 40(1):59–68 Douglas HE (2003) The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility). Am Philos Q 40(1):59–68
20.
go back to reference Hart HLA, Gardner J (2009) Punishment and responsibility: essays in the philosophy of law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford Hart HLA, Gardner J (2009) Punishment and responsibility: essays in the philosophy of law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
21.
go back to reference Jonas H (1988) Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, 8th ed. Insel-Verl., Frankfurt am Main Jonas H (1988) Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, 8th ed. Insel-Verl., Frankfurt am Main
22.
go back to reference Bayertz K (ed) (1995) Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? Wiss. Buchges, Darmstadt Bayertz K (ed) (1995) Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem? Wiss. Buchges, Darmstadt
24.
go back to reference Forge J (2008) The responsible scientist: a philosophical inquiry. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh Forge J (2008) The responsible scientist: a philosophical inquiry. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
25.
go back to reference Douglas HE (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, PittsburghCrossRef Douglas HE (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, PittsburghCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lenk H (1991) Zu einer praxisnahen Ethik der Verantwortung in den Wissenschaften. In: Lenk H (ed) Wissenschaft und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart, pp 54–75 Lenk H (1991) Zu einer praxisnahen Ethik der Verantwortung in den Wissenschaften. In: Lenk H (ed) Wissenschaft und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart, pp 54–75
27.
go back to reference Lenk H (1992) Zwischen Wissenschaft und Ethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main Lenk H (1992) Zwischen Wissenschaft und Ethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
28.
go back to reference Sombetzki J (2014) Verantwortung als Begriff, Fähigkeit, Aufgabe. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, WiesbadenCrossRef Sombetzki J (2014) Verantwortung als Begriff, Fähigkeit, Aufgabe. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, WiesbadenCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vincent NA (2011) A structured taxonomy of responsibility concepts. In: Vincent NA, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, pp 15–35CrossRef Vincent NA (2011) A structured taxonomy of responsibility concepts. In: Vincent NA, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, pp 15–35CrossRef
30.
go back to reference van de Poel I (2011) The relation between forward-looking and backward-looking responsibility. In: Vincent NA, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, pp 37–52CrossRef van de Poel I (2011) The relation between forward-looking and backward-looking responsibility. In: Vincent NA, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, pp 37–52CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Duff RA (2007) Responsibility. In: King P (ed) Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy online. Routledge Duff RA (2007) Responsibility. In: King P (ed) Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy online. Routledge
35.
go back to reference von Schomberg R (2010) Organising collective responsibility: on precaution, codes of conduct and understanding public debate. In: Fiedeler U, Coenen C, Davies SR et al (eds) Understanding nanotechnology: philosophy, policy and publics. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft AKA/IOS Press, Heidelberg, pp 61–70 von Schomberg R (2010) Organising collective responsibility: on precaution, codes of conduct and understanding public debate. In: Fiedeler U, Coenen C, Davies SR et al (eds) Understanding nanotechnology: philosophy, policy and publics. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft AKA/IOS Press, Heidelberg, pp 61–70
37.
go back to reference Vincent NA, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) (2011) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism (Library of ethics and applied philosophy 27). Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York Vincent NA, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) (2011) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism (Library of ethics and applied philosophy 27). Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York
38.
go back to reference Davis M (1999) Professional responsibility: just following the rules? Bus Prof Ethics J 18(1):65–87CrossRef Davis M (1999) Professional responsibility: just following the rules? Bus Prof Ethics J 18(1):65–87CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Weber M, Wells GC, Dreijmanis J (2008) Max Weber’s complete writings on academic and political vocations. In: Classics series. Algora Pub, New York Weber M, Wells GC, Dreijmanis J (2008) Max Weber’s complete writings on academic and political vocations. In: Classics series. Algora Pub, New York
42.
go back to reference Merton RK (1974) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations [4th pr.]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Merton RK (1974) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations [4th pr.]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
43.
go back to reference Luhmann N (2009) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main Luhmann N (2009) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
44.
go back to reference Hackett EJ (2008) The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Hackett EJ (2008) The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
47.
go back to reference von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R (ed) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 51–74CrossRef von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R (ed) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 51–74CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Grunwald A (2012) Responsible nanobiotechnology: philosophy and ethics. CRC Press, Hoboken Grunwald A (2012) Responsible nanobiotechnology: philosophy and ethics. CRC Press, Hoboken
52.
go back to reference Arnaldi S, Ferrari A,Magaudda P, Marin F (eds) (2014) Responsibility in nanotechnology development (The international library of ethics, law and technology 13). Springer, Dordrecht Arnaldi S, Ferrari A,Magaudda P, Marin F (eds) (2014) Responsibility in nanotechnology development (The international library of ethics, law and technology 13). Springer, Dordrecht
60.
go back to reference Wyndham J, Albro R, Ettinger J et al (2015) Social responsibilities: a preliminary inquiry into the perspectives of scientists, engineers and health professionals (Report prepared under the auspices of the AAAS Science and Human Rights Coalition and AAAS Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights and Law Program). https://doi.org/10.1126/srhrl.aaa9798 Wyndham J, Albro R, Ettinger J et al (2015) Social responsibilities: a preliminary inquiry into the perspectives of scientists, engineers and health professionals (Report prepared under the auspices of the AAAS Science and Human Rights Coalition and AAAS Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights and Law Program). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1126/​srhrl.​aaa9798
63.
go back to reference Helfferich C (2011) Die Qualität qualitativer Daten: manual für die Durchführung qualitativer interviews, 4th edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden Helfferich C (2011) Die Qualität qualitativer Daten: manual für die Durchführung qualitativer interviews, 4th edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
64.
go back to reference Stake RE (2010) Qualitative research: studying how things work. Guilford Press, New York Stake RE (2010) Qualitative research: studying how things work. Guilford Press, New York
65.
go back to reference Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
68.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL (2009) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research [4th paperback pr.]. Aldine, New Brunswick Glaser BG, Strauss AL (2009) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research [4th paperback pr.]. Aldine, New Brunswick
69.
go back to reference Charmaz K (2014) Constructing grounded theory. In: Introducing qualitative methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC Charmaz K (2014) Constructing grounded theory. In: Introducing qualitative methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC
70.
go back to reference Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.) (2009) On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct in research, 3rd edn. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.) (2009) On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct in research, 3rd edn. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C
78.
go back to reference Jamieson KH, Kahan DM, Scheufele DA (eds) (2017) The Oxford handbook on the science of science communication. In: Oxford library of psychology. Oxford University Press, New York Jamieson KH, Kahan DM, Scheufele DA (eds) (2017) The Oxford handbook on the science of science communication. In: Oxford library of psychology. Oxford University Press, New York
79.
go back to reference Bubela T, Nisbet MC, Borchelt R, Brunger F, Critchley C, Einsiedel E, Geller G, Gupta A, Hampel J, Hyde-Lay R, Jandciu EW, Jones SA, Kolopack P, Lane S, Lougheed T, Nerlich B, Ogbogu U, O'Riordan K, Ouellette C, Spear M, Strauss S, Thavaratnam T, Willemse L, Caulfield T (2009) Science communication reconsidered. Nat Biotechnol 27(6):514–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0609-514 CrossRef Bubela T, Nisbet MC, Borchelt R, Brunger F, Critchley C, Einsiedel E, Geller G, Gupta A, Hampel J, Hyde-Lay R, Jandciu EW, Jones SA, Kolopack P, Lane S, Lougheed T, Nerlich B, Ogbogu U, O'Riordan K, Ouellette C, Spear M, Strauss S, Thavaratnam T, Willemse L, Caulfield T (2009) Science communication reconsidered. Nat Biotechnol 27(6):514–518. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​nbt0609-514 CrossRef
83.
go back to reference Lacey H (2005) Is science value free?: values and scientific understanding. Philosophical Issues in Science. Taylor and Francis, Florence Lacey H (2005) Is science value free?: values and scientific understanding. Philosophical Issues in Science. Taylor and Francis, Florence
85.
go back to reference Wylie A, Kincaid H, Dupré J (2007) Value-free science?: ideals and illusions. Oxford University Press, Oxford Wylie A, Kincaid H, Dupré J (2007) Value-free science?: ideals and illusions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
88.
go back to reference Forge J (2000) Moral responsibility and the 'ignorant scientist'. Sci Eng Ethics 6(3):341–349CrossRef Forge J (2000) Moral responsibility and the 'ignorant scientist'. Sci Eng Ethics 6(3):341–349CrossRef
90.
go back to reference Deplazes-Zemp A, Leidel S (2011) Scientific knowledge leads to moral responsibilities – case study synthetic biology. In: Cockell M, Billotte J (eds) Common knowledge: the challenge of transdisciplinarity, 1st edn. EPFL Press, Lausanne, pp 61–73 Deplazes-Zemp A, Leidel S (2011) Scientific knowledge leads to moral responsibilities – case study synthetic biology. In: Cockell M, Billotte J (eds) Common knowledge: the challenge of transdisciplinarity, 1st edn. EPFL Press, Lausanne, pp 61–73
Metadata
Title
“I Don’t Want to Do Anything Bad.” Perspectives on Scientific Responsibility: Results from a Qualitative Interview Study with Senior Scientists
Authors
Sebastian Wäscher
Nikola Biller-Andorno
Anna Deplazes-Zemp
Publication date
30-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
NanoEthics / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Electronic ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-020-00365-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

NanoEthics 2/2020 Go to the issue