Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Environmental Management 2/2022

04-01-2022

Identifying and Aligning Ecosystem Services and Beneficiaries Associated with Best Management Practices in Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Authors: Ryann Rossi, Carin Bisland, Leah Sharpe, Emily Trentacoste, Bo Williams, Susan Yee

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 2/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Ecosystem restoration may require implementing programs or best management practices (BMPs) in areas that are geographically far from the target ecosystem. Stakeholders in these areas may feel disconnected from the target ecosystem or may not have a clear understanding of local benefits from implemented practices. To achieve widespread participation in restoration efforts, it is important to engage stakeholders located where BMPs need to be implemented to identify and consider their local priorities and impacts. Here, we demonstrate use of a structured decision-making approach to identify ecosystem services associated with BMPs in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and connect them with the priorities of stakeholders they benefit. We follow a four-step approach to define the bounds of the decision context, identify ecosystem services and beneficiaries relevant to that decision context, engage stakeholders to understand priorities, and identify potential metrics and indicators. Our approach highlights the utility of different tools, such as ecosystem service classification systems and the Final Ecosystem Goods and Services (FEGS) Scoping Tool, in engaging stakeholders to identify, communicate, and prioritize ecosystem services. The results demonstrate a method by which to connect large-scale regional restoration efforts, and the managers overseeing such efforts, with the priorities of local communities where programs will be implemented. This work will help Chesapeake Bay restoration partners identify and promote management actions that will provide the most value for communities throughout the watershed, while also benefiting restoration of Chesapeake Bay.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Allan D, Erickson D, Fay J (1997) The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol 37:149–161CrossRef Allan D, Erickson D, Fay J (1997) The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol 37:149–161CrossRef
go back to reference Angradi TR, Ringold PL, Hall K (2018) Water clarity measures as indicators of recreational benefits provided by U.S. lakes: swimming and aesthetics. Ecol Indicators 93:1005–1019CrossRef Angradi TR, Ringold PL, Hall K (2018) Water clarity measures as indicators of recreational benefits provided by U.S. lakes: swimming and aesthetics. Ecol Indicators 93:1005–1019CrossRef
go back to reference Assessment, ME (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island press, United States of America Assessment, ME (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island press, United States of America
go back to reference Boesch DF, Brinsfield RB, Magnien RE (2001) Chesapeake bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. J Environ Quality 30:303–320CrossRef Boesch DF, Brinsfield RB, Magnien RE (2001) Chesapeake bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. J Environ Quality 30:303–320CrossRef
go back to reference Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616–626CrossRef Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616–626CrossRef
go back to reference Boyd, J, Ringold, P, Krupnick, A, Johnson, RJ, Weber, MA, Hall, K (2016) Ecosystem Services Indicators: Improving the Linkage between Biophysical and Economic Analyses, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics: Vol. 8: No. 3–4, pp 359–443. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000073 Boyd, J, Ringold, P, Krupnick, A, Johnson, RJ, Weber, MA, Hall, K (2016) Ecosystem Services Indicators: Improving the Linkage between Biophysical and Economic Analyses, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics: Vol. 8: No. 3–4, pp 359–443. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1561/​101.​00000073
go back to reference Bradley, P, Fisher W, Dyson B, Yee S, Carriger J, Gambirazzio G, Bousquin JEH (2016) Application of a structured decision process for informing watershed management options in Guanica Bay, Puerto Rico. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI Bradley, P, Fisher W, Dyson B, Yee S, Carriger J, Gambirazzio G, Bousquin JEH (2016) Application of a structured decision process for informing watershed management options in Guanica Bay, Puerto Rico. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI
go back to reference Chesapeake Bay Program (2014) Chesapeake Bay watershed agreement. Chesapeake Bay Program Chesapeake Bay Program (2014) Chesapeake Bay watershed agreement. Chesapeake Bay Program
go back to reference Chesapeake Bay Program (2018) Chesapeake Bay Program quick reference guide for best management practices (BMPs): nonpoint source BMPs to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment loads to the chesapeake bay and its local waters. Chesapeake Bay Program Chesapeake Bay Program (2018) Chesapeake Bay Program quick reference guide for best management practices (BMPs): nonpoint source BMPs to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment loads to the chesapeake bay and its local waters. Chesapeake Bay Program
go back to reference Chesapeake Bay Program (2020) Chesapeake assessment and scenario tool (CAST) version 2019. Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program (2020) Chesapeake assessment and scenario tool (CAST) version 2019. Chesapeake Bay Program Office
go back to reference DeWitt, TH, Berry, WJ, Canfield, TJ, Fulford, RS, Harwell, MC, Hoffman, JC, Johnston, JM, Newcomer-Johnson, TA, Ringold, PL, Russell, MJ, Sharpe, LA, Yee, SH (2020) The final ecosystem goods & services (FEGS) approach: a beneficiary-centric method to support ecosystem-based management. In: O’Higgins, TG, Lago, M, DeWitt, TH (eds), Ecosystem-based management, ecosystem services and aquatic biodiversity: theory, tools and applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 127–145 DeWitt, TH, Berry, WJ, Canfield, TJ, Fulford, RS, Harwell, MC, Hoffman, JC, Johnston, JM, Newcomer-Johnson, TA, Ringold, PL, Russell, MJ, Sharpe, LA, Yee, SH (2020) The final ecosystem goods & services (FEGS) approach: a beneficiary-centric method to support ecosystem-based management. In: O’Higgins, TG, Lago, M, DeWitt, TH (eds), Ecosystem-based management, ecosystem services and aquatic biodiversity: theory, tools and applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 127–145
go back to reference de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272CrossRef de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272CrossRef
go back to reference Fulford, RS, Russell, M, Harvey, J, Harwell, MC (2016) Sustainability at the community level: searching for common ground as a part of a national strategy for decision support. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, Fl, EPA/600/R-16/178 Fulford, RS, Russell, M, Harvey, J, Harwell, MC (2016) Sustainability at the community level: searching for common ground as a part of a national strategy for decision support. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, Fl, EPA/600/R-16/178
go back to reference Gregory, R, Failing, L, Harstone, M, Long, G, McDaniels, T, Ohlson, D (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. John Wiley & Sons. The Atrium Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, UK Gregory, R, Failing, L, Harstone, M, Long, G, McDaniels, T, Ohlson, D (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. John Wiley & Sons. The Atrium Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, UK
go back to reference Hoyt, R, Summers, RM, Cameron, D (2017) Strategic outreach education program for local elected officials in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, EcoLogix Group Hoyt, R, Summers, RM, Cameron, D (2017) Strategic outreach education program for local elected officials in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, EcoLogix Group
go back to reference Keeney R (1992) Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA Keeney R (1992) Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference Landers, DH, Nahlik, AM (2013) Final ecosystem goods and services classification system (FEGS-CS). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC Landers, DH, Nahlik, AM (2013) Final ecosystem goods and services classification system (FEGS-CS). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC
go back to reference Laurans Y, Rankovic A, Billé R, Pirard R, Mermet L (2013) Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. J Environ Manage 119:208–219CrossRef Laurans Y, Rankovic A, Billé R, Pirard R, Mermet L (2013) Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. J Environ Manage 119:208–219CrossRef
go back to reference LoSchiavo, AJ, Best, RG, Burns, RE, Gray, S, Harwell, MC, Hines, EB, McLean, AR, St. Clair, T, Traxler, S, Vearil, JW (2013) Lessons learned from the first decade of adaptive management in comprehensive everglades restoration. Ecol Soc 18:70 LoSchiavo, AJ, Best, RG, Burns, RE, Gray, S, Harwell, MC, Hines, EB, McLean, AR, St. Clair, T, Traxler, S, Vearil, JW (2013) Lessons learned from the first decade of adaptive management in comprehensive everglades restoration. Ecol Soc 18:70
go back to reference McGee, B, M Bryer, J Davis-Martin, L Wainger, R Batiuk, J Greiner, S Newbold, K Saunders, S Phillips, Dixon, R (2017) Quantifying ecosystem services and co-benefits of nutrient and sediment pollutant reducing BMPs. STAC, Edgewater, MD, p. 39 McGee, B, M Bryer, J Davis-Martin, L Wainger, R Batiuk, J Greiner, S Newbold, K Saunders, S Phillips, Dixon, R (2017) Quantifying ecosystem services and co-benefits of nutrient and sediment pollutant reducing BMPs. STAC, Edgewater, MD, p. 39
go back to reference Newcomer-Johnson, T, F Andrews, J Corona, Ted DeWitt, M Harwell, C Rhodes, P Ringold, M Russell, P Sinha, Houtven, GV (2020) National ecosystem services classification system (NESCS Plus). U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Newcomer-Johnson, T, F Andrews, J Corona, Ted DeWitt, M Harwell, C Rhodes, P Ringold, M Russell, P Sinha, Houtven, GV (2020) National ecosystem services classification system (NESCS Plus). U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
go back to reference Nowak, DJ (2020) Understanding i-Tree: summary of programs and methods, General Technical Report. U.S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Madison, WI, p. 100 Nowak, DJ (2020) Understanding i-Tree: summary of programs and methods, General Technical Report. U.S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Madison, WI, p. 100
go back to reference Olander, L, Bagstad, K, Characklis, GW, Comer, P, Effron, M, Gunn, J, Holmes, T, Johnston, R, Kagan, J, Lehman, W, Lonsdorf, E, Loomis, J, McPhearson, T, Neale, A, Patterson, L, Richardson, L, Ricketts, T, Ross, M, Saah, D, Sifleet, S, Stockmann, K, Urban D, Wainger, L, Winthrop, R, Yoskowitz, D (2017) Data and modeling infrastructure for national integration of ecosystem services into decision making: expert summaries. NESP WP National Ecosystem Services Partnership, Durham, NC Olander, L, Bagstad, K, Characklis, GW, Comer, P, Effron, M, Gunn, J, Holmes, T, Johnston, R, Kagan, J, Lehman, W, Lonsdorf, E, Loomis, J, McPhearson, T, Neale, A, Patterson, L, Richardson, L, Ricketts, T, Ross, M, Saah, D, Sifleet, S, Stockmann, K, Urban D, Wainger, L, Winthrop, R, Yoskowitz, D (2017) Data and modeling infrastructure for national integration of ecosystem services into decision making: expert summaries. NESP WP National Ecosystem Services Partnership, Durham, NC
go back to reference Orzetti LL, Jones RC, Murphy RF (2010) Stream condition in piedmont streams with restored riparian buffers in the chesapeake bay watershed1. JAWRA 46:473–485 Orzetti LL, Jones RC, Murphy RF (2010) Stream condition in piedmont streams with restored riparian buffers in the chesapeake bay watershed1. JAWRA 46:473–485
go back to reference Pickard BR, Daniel J, Mehaffey M, Jackson LE, Neale A (2015) EnviroAtlas: A new geospatial tool to foster ecosystem services science and resource management. Ecosyst Serv 14:45–55CrossRef Pickard BR, Daniel J, Mehaffey M, Jackson LE, Neale A (2015) EnviroAtlas: A new geospatial tool to foster ecosystem services science and resource management. Ecosyst Serv 14:45–55CrossRef
go back to reference Productivity Commission (2003) Industries, land use and water quality in the Great Barrier Reef Catchment, Research Report Canberra. Productivity Commission Productivity Commission (2003) Industries, land use and water quality in the Great Barrier Reef Catchment, Research Report Canberra. Productivity Commission
go back to reference Ralls K, Starfield AM (1995) Choosing a management strategy: two structured decision-making methods for evaluating the predictions of stochastic simulation models. Conserv Biol 9:175–181CrossRef Ralls K, Starfield AM (1995) Choosing a management strategy: two structured decision-making methods for evaluating the predictions of stochastic simulation models. Conserv Biol 9:175–181CrossRef
go back to reference Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247CrossRef Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247CrossRef
go back to reference Ringold PL, Boyd J, Landers D, Weber M (2013) What data should we collect? A framework for identifying indicators of ecosystem contributions to human well-being. Front Ecol Environ 11:98–105CrossRef Ringold PL, Boyd J, Landers D, Weber M (2013) What data should we collect? A framework for identifying indicators of ecosystem contributions to human well-being. Front Ecol Environ 11:98–105CrossRef
go back to reference Roebeling PC (2006) Efficiency in great barrier reef water pollution control: a case study for the Douglas Shire. Nat Resour Model 19:539–556CrossRef Roebeling PC (2006) Efficiency in great barrier reef water pollution control: a case study for the Douglas Shire. Nat Resour Model 19:539–556CrossRef
go back to reference Russell, M, A Teague, F Alvarez, D Dantin, M Osland, J Harvey, J Nestlerode, J Rogers, L Jackson, D Pilant, F Genthner, M Lewis, A Spivak, M Harwell, Neale, A (2013) Neighborhood scale quantification of ecosystem goods and services. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecology Division, Gulf Breeze, Florida Russell, M, A Teague, F Alvarez, D Dantin, M Osland, J Harvey, J Nestlerode, J Rogers, L Jackson, D Pilant, F Genthner, M Lewis, A Spivak, M Harwell, Neale, A (2013) Neighborhood scale quantification of ecosystem goods and services. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Gulf Ecology Division, Gulf Breeze, Florida
go back to reference Schwarzenbach RP, Egli T, Hofstetter TB, Gunten UV, Wehrli B (2010) Global water pollution and human health. Ann Rev Environ Resour 35:109–136CrossRef Schwarzenbach RP, Egli T, Hofstetter TB, Gunten UV, Wehrli B (2010) Global water pollution and human health. Ann Rev Environ Resour 35:109–136CrossRef
go back to reference Sharp, R, Douglass, J, Wolny, S, Arkema, K, Bernhardt, J, Bierbower, W, Chaumont, N, Denu, D, Fisher, D, Glowinski, K, Griffin, R, Guannel, G, Guerry, A, Johnson, J, Hamel, P, Kennedy, C, Kim, CK, Lacayo, M, Lonsdorf, E, Mandle, L, Rogers, L, Silver, J, Toft, J, Verutes, G, Vogl, AL, Wood, S, Wyatt, K (2020) InVEST 3.9.2.post13+ug.g80fc42d.d20211201 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund Sharp, R, Douglass, J, Wolny, S, Arkema, K, Bernhardt, J, Bierbower, W, Chaumont, N, Denu, D, Fisher, D, Glowinski, K, Griffin, R, Guannel, G, Guerry, A, Johnson, J, Hamel, P, Kennedy, C, Kim, CK, Lacayo, M, Lonsdorf, E, Mandle, L, Rogers, L, Silver, J, Toft, J, Verutes, G, Vogl, AL, Wood, S, Wyatt, K (2020) InVEST 3.9.2.post13+ug.g80fc42d.d20211201 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund
go back to reference Sharpe LM, Harwell MC, Jackson CA (2021) Integrated stakeholder prioritization criteria for environmental management. J Environ Manag 282:111719CrossRef Sharpe LM, Harwell MC, Jackson CA (2021) Integrated stakeholder prioritization criteria for environmental management. J Environ Manag 282:111719CrossRef
go back to reference Sharpe, L, (2021) FEGS scoping tool user manual. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL Sharpe, L, (2021) FEGS scoping tool user manual. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL
go back to reference Sharpe, LM, Hernandez, CL, Jackson, CA, (2020) Prioritizing stakeholders, beneficiaries, and environmental attributes: a tool for ecosystem-based management. In: O’Higgins, TG, Lago, M, DeWitt, TH (eds.), Ecosystem-based management, ecosystem services and aquatic biodiversity: theory, tools and applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 189–211 Sharpe, LM, Hernandez, CL, Jackson, CA, (2020) Prioritizing stakeholders, beneficiaries, and environmental attributes: a tool for ecosystem-based management. In: O’Higgins, TG, Lago, M, DeWitt, TH (eds.), Ecosystem-based management, ecosystem services and aquatic biodiversity: theory, tools and applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 189–211
go back to reference Smith A, Yee SH, Russell M, Awkerman J, Fisher WS (2017) Linking ecosystem service supply to stakeholder concerns on both land and sea: an example from Guánica Bay watershed, Puerto Rico. Ecol Indicators 74:371–383CrossRef Smith A, Yee SH, Russell M, Awkerman J, Fisher WS (2017) Linking ecosystem service supply to stakeholder concerns on both land and sea: an example from Guánica Bay watershed, Puerto Rico. Ecol Indicators 74:371–383CrossRef
go back to reference Summers, JK, Linda C Harwell, Kyle D Buck, Lisa M Smith, Deborah N Vivian, Justin J Bousquin, James E Harvey, Stephen F.Hafner, Michelle D McLaughlin, McMillion, CA, (2020) Development of a cumulative resilience screening index (CRSI) for natural hazards: an assessment of resilience to acute meteorological events and selected natural hazards. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-20/274, 2020 Summers, JK, Linda C Harwell, Kyle D Buck, Lisa M Smith, Deborah N Vivian, Justin J Bousquin, James E Harvey, Stephen F.Hafner, Michelle D McLaughlin, McMillion, CA, (2020) Development of a cumulative resilience screening index (CRSI) for natural hazards: an assessment of resilience to acute meteorological events and selected natural hazards. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-20/274, 2020
go back to reference Tetra Tech Inc (2017) Estimation of BMP impact on chesapeake bay program management strategies. Tetra Tech Inc, Fairfax VA, p. 47 Tetra Tech Inc (2017) Estimation of BMP impact on chesapeake bay program management strategies. Tetra Tech Inc, Fairfax VA, p. 47
go back to reference Terziotti, S, Capel, PD, Tesoriero, AJ, Hopple, JA, Kronholm, SC (2018) Estimates of nitrate loads and yields from groundwater to streams in the Chesapeake Bay watershed based on land use and geology: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5160, p. 20., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175160 Terziotti, S, Capel, PD, Tesoriero, AJ, Hopple, JA, Kronholm, SC (2018) Estimates of nitrate loads and yields from groundwater to streams in the Chesapeake Bay watershed based on land use and geology: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5160, p. 20., https://​doi.​org/​10.​3133/​sir20175160
go back to reference United States Environmental Protection Agency (2015) National ecosystem services classification system (NESCS): framework design and policy application, EPA-800-R-15-002. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC United States Environmental Protection Agency (2015) National ecosystem services classification system (NESCS): framework design and policy application, EPA-800-R-15-002. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
go back to reference van Vliet MTH, Jones ER, Flörke M, Franssen WHP, Hanasaki N, Wada Y, Yearsley JR (2021) Global water scarcity including surface water quality and expansions of clean water technologies. Environ Res Lett 16:024020CrossRef van Vliet MTH, Jones ER, Flörke M, Franssen WHP, Hanasaki N, Wada Y, Yearsley JR (2021) Global water scarcity including surface water quality and expansions of clean water technologies. Environ Res Lett 16:024020CrossRef
go back to reference Warnell KJD, Russell M, Rhodes C, Bagstad KJ, Olander LP, Nowak DJ, Poudel R, Glynn PD, Hass JL, Hirabayashi S, Ingram JC, Matuszak J, Oleson KLL, Posner SM, Villa F (2020) Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: a case study for the Southeast. Ecosyst Serv 43:101099CrossRef Warnell KJD, Russell M, Rhodes C, Bagstad KJ, Olander LP, Nowak DJ, Poudel R, Glynn PD, Hass JL, Hirabayashi S, Ingram JC, Matuszak J, Oleson KLL, Posner SM, Villa F (2020) Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: a case study for the Southeast. Ecosyst Serv 43:101099CrossRef
go back to reference Williams, BK, RC Szaro, CD Shapiro (2009) Adaptive Management: The U.S. department of the interior technical guide. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC Williams, BK, RC Szaro, CD Shapiro (2009) Adaptive Management: The U.S. department of the interior technical guide. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC
go back to reference Yee SH, Sullivan A, Williams KC, Winters K (2019) Who benefits from national estuaries? Applying the FEGS classification system to identify ecosystem services and their beneficiaries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:2351CrossRef Yee SH, Sullivan A, Williams KC, Winters K (2019) Who benefits from national estuaries? Applying the FEGS classification system to identify ecosystem services and their beneficiaries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:2351CrossRef
go back to reference Yee SH, Paulukonis E, Simmons C, Russell M, Fulford R, Harwell L, Smith LM (2021) Projecting effects of land use change on human well-being through changes in ecosystem services. Ecol Modell 440:109358CrossRef Yee SH, Paulukonis E, Simmons C, Russell M, Fulford R, Harwell L, Smith LM (2021) Projecting effects of land use change on human well-being through changes in ecosystem services. Ecol Modell 440:109358CrossRef
go back to reference Yee, S, Cicchetti, G, DeWitt, TH, Harwell, MC, Jackson, SK, Pryor, M, Rocha, K, Santavy, DL, Sharpe, L, Shumchenia, E (2020) The ecosystem services gradient: a descriptive model for identifying levels of meaningful change. In: O’Higgins, TG, Lago, M, DeWitt, TH (eds.), Ecosystem-based management, ecosystem services and aquatic biodiversity: theory, tools and applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 291–307 Yee, S, Cicchetti, G, DeWitt, TH, Harwell, MC, Jackson, SK, Pryor, M, Rocha, K, Santavy, DL, Sharpe, L, Shumchenia, E (2020) The ecosystem services gradient: a descriptive model for identifying levels of meaningful change. In: O’Higgins, TG, Lago, M, DeWitt, TH (eds.), Ecosystem-based management, ecosystem services and aquatic biodiversity: theory, tools and applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 291–307
go back to reference Yee, SH, Bousquin, J, Bruins, R, Canfield, TJ, DeWitt, TH, de Jesús-Crespo, R, Dyson, B, Fulford, R, Harwell, M, Hoffman, J, Littlies, CJ, Johnston, JM, Mckane, RB, Green, L, Russell, M, Sharpe, L, Seeteram, N, Tashie, A, Williams, KC (2017) Practical strategies for integrating final ecosystem goods and services into community decision-making. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/266, 2017 Yee, SH, Bousquin, J, Bruins, R, Canfield, TJ, DeWitt, TH, de Jesús-Crespo, R, Dyson, B, Fulford, R, Harwell, M, Hoffman, J, Littlies, CJ, Johnston, JM, Mckane, RB, Green, L, Russell, M, Sharpe, L, Seeteram, N, Tashie, A, Williams, KC (2017) Practical strategies for integrating final ecosystem goods and services into community decision-making. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/266, 2017
Metadata
Title
Identifying and Aligning Ecosystem Services and Beneficiaries Associated with Best Management Practices in Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Authors
Ryann Rossi
Carin Bisland
Leah Sharpe
Emily Trentacoste
Bo Williams
Susan Yee
Publication date
04-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Environmental Management / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01561-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Environmental Management 2/2022 Go to the issue