Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
Motivated by symbolic ideology research and Social Identity Theory (SIT), this article introduces an original measure of ideological social identity (ISI) designed to capture feelings of psychological attachment to an ideological in-group and facilitate analysis of their attitudinal and behavioral effects. Data from a nationally representative sample of survey experimental participants indicates that the ISI scale is empirically distinct from ideological self-placement, the standard measure of symbolic ideology, and it conditions the effects of self-placement on vote choice in actual and hypothetical election scenarios. ISI is also common within the American public, particularly among conservatives, and responsive to environmental stimuli that make ideology salient including electoral competition and “new media” news sources. In addition to its immediate contributions, this research represents a necessary first step toward more fully exploiting the profound theoretical and empirical implications of SIT in studies of ideological identification.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Abramowitz, A. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. The Journal of Politics, 60(3), 634–652. CrossRef
Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2006). Exploring the bases of partisanship in the American electorate: Social identity vs. ideology. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 175–187. CrossRef
Achen, C. A. (1975). Mass political attitudes and the survey response. American Political Science Review, 69(4), 1218–1231. CrossRef
Allen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. (1975). Categorization, belief similarity, and group discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 971–977. CrossRef
Althaus, S. L., & Coe, K. (2011). Priming patriots: Social identity processes and the dynamics of public support for war. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1), 65–88. CrossRef
Baum, L. (2006). Judges and their audiences: A perspective on judicial behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in inter-group behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 27–52. CrossRef
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. CrossRef
Braumoeller, B. F. (2004). Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization, 58(4), 807–820. CrossRef
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and being different. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. CrossRef
Brewer, M. B. (2002). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. CrossRef
Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. (1978). Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(3), 393–400. CrossRef
Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. D. (2000). Group distinctiveness, social identity, and collective mobilization. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
Carmines, E. G., & Berkman, M. (1994). Ethos, ideology, and partisanship: Exploring the paradox of conservative Democrats. Political Behavior, 16(2), 203–218. CrossRef
Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal and conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 617–645. CrossRef
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Doise, W., & Sinclair, A. (1973). The categorization process in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(2), 145–157. CrossRef
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 563–588. CrossRef
Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 813–827. CrossRef
Free, L. A., & Cantril, H. (1967). The political beliefs of Americans. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common in-group identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of inter-group bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26.
Gibson, J. L., & Gouws, A. (2000). Social identities and political intolerance: Linkages within the South African mass public. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 278–292. CrossRef
Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2005). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393–403. CrossRef
Greene, S. (2000). The psychological sources of partisan-leaning independence. American Politics Quarterly, 28(4), 511–537. CrossRef
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Huddy, L. (1997). Feminists and feminism in the news. In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, the media, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Huddy, L., & Khatib, N. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 63–77. CrossRef
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. CrossRef
Jacoby, W. G. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 178–205. CrossRef
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. CrossRef
Kinder, D. R. (1983). Diversity and complexity in American public opinion. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Knight, K. (1985). Ideology in the 1980 election: Ideological sophistication does matter. The Journal of Politics, 47(3), 828–853. CrossRef
Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levitin, T. E., & Miller, W. E. (1979). Ideological interpretations of presidential elections. The American Political Science Review, 73(3), 751–771. CrossRef
Lewis-Beck, M. S., Jacoby, W. G., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: The Michigan University Press.
Luttbeg, N. R., & Gant, M. M. (1985). The failure of liberal-conservative ideology as a cognitive structure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(1), 80–93. CrossRef
Mael, F., & Tetrick, L. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 813–824. CrossRef
Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative-liberal identity receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23(2), 156–188. CrossRef
Mullen, B., Brown, R. J., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 103–122. CrossRef
Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(2), 158–174. CrossRef
Nie, N., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1976). The changing American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Popp, E., & Rudolph, T. J. (2011). A tale of two ideologies: Explaining public support for economic interventions. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 808–820. CrossRef
Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106. CrossRef
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, R. P. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. CrossRef
Theiss-Morse, E. (2009). Who counts as an American? The boundaries of national identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A social categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Weisberg, H. F., & Hasecke, E. B. (1999). The social identity underpinnings of partisan strength. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Zschirnt, S. (2011). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identification revisited. Political Behavior, 33(4), 685–701. CrossRef
- Ideological Social Identity: Psychological Attachment to Ideological In-Groups as a Political Phenomenon and a Behavioral Influence
Christopher J. Devine
- Publication date
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta