Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

16. Implementation of Mutual Recognition Legislative Instruments

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The chapter deals with final implementation of individual mutual recognition legislative instruments. It is divided into nine sections. Section 16.1 is introduction of the chapter. Section 16.2 focuses on the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant, Sect. 16.3 focuses on the Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA on the mutual recognition of custodial sentences and deprivation of liberty, Sect. 16.4 focuses on the Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA on mutual recognition of probation measures and alternative sanctions, Sect. 16.5 focuses on the Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the mutual recognition of financial penalties, Sect. 16.6 focuses on the Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA on the mutual recognition of confiscation orders, Sect. 16.7 focuses on the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order, Sect. 16.8 focuses on the Directive 2014/41/EU on the European investigation order and Sect. 16.9 focuses on the Directive 2011/99/EU on the European protection order.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
European Commission (2014): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, COM(2014)57 final, p. 12.
 
2
Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 190/1 of 18th July 2002.
 
3
Article 34(1) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.
 
4
Commission of the European Communities (2008): ‘Report from the Commission based on Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’ (revised version), COM(2008) 8 final, p. 2.
 
5
Mackarel (2007), p. 46.
 
6
Council of the European Union (2009): ‘Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations – The practical application of the European Arrest Warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States’, 8302/2/09, REV 2, p. 6.
 
7
Sievers (2008), pp. 114 and 115.
 
8
Act to Implement the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between the Member States of the European Union (European Arrest Warrant Act) of 21st July 2004 [Ger.: Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Rahmenbeschlusses über den Europäischen Haftbefehl und die Übergabeverfahren zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union (Europäisches Haftbefehlsgesetz—EuHbG) Vom 21. Juli 2004], Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 2004, p. 1748.
 
9
Act on the International Judicial Assistance in Criminal Matters of 3rd December 1982 [Ger.: Gesetz über die internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen Vom 3. Dezember 1982]. Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 1982, p. 2071; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union: ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on Germany’, 7058/2/09, REV 2.
 
10
Judgment of the Second Senate of the Federal High Constitutional Court of Germany of 18th July 2005—2 BvR 2236/04 [Ger.: Urteil des Zweiten Senats des Bundesverfassungsgericht in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 18. Juli 2005—2 BvR 2236/04], ruling.
 
11
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany of 23rd May 1949 [Ger.: Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23. Mai 1949].
 
12
Act to Implement the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between the Member States of the European Union (European Arrest Warrant Act) of 20th July 2006 [Ger.: Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Rahmenbeschlusses über den Europäischen Haftbefehl und die Übergabeverfahren zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union (Europäisches Haftbefehlsgesetz—EuHbG) Vom 20. Juli 2006], Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 2006, p. 1721.
 
13
Łazowski (2005), p. 572.
 
14
Code of Criminal Procedure—Act of 6th June 1997 (Journal of Laws, No. 89, Item 555 with amendments) [Polish: Kodeks postępowania karnego—Ustawa z dnia 6 czerwca 1997 r. (Dziennik Ustaw, Nr 89, poz. 555 ze zmianami)]; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on Poland’, 14240/1/07, REV 1.
 
15
Act of 18th March 2004 amending the Criminal Code, Criminal Procedure Code and Minor Offences Code [Polish: Ustawa z dnia 18 marca 2004 r. o zmianie ustawy Kodeks karny, ustawy—Kodeks postçpowania karnego oraz ustawy—Kodeks wykroczen]; Journal of Laws [Dziennik Ustaw], 2004, No. 69, Item 626.
 
16
Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic of 24th June 2004 No. 403/2004 Coll. on the European Arrest Warrant and on Amending and Supplementing Certain Laws [Slovak: Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky zo dňa 24. júna 2004 č. 403/2004 Z. z. o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze (a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov)].
 
17
Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic of 9th March 2010 No. 154/2010 Coll. on the European Arrest Warrant [Slovak: Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky zo dňa 9. marca 2010 č. 154/2010 Z. z. o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze]. See: Klimek (2012), pp. 181–192.
 
18
Act of 19th December 2003 on the European arrest warrant [French: Loi du 19 décembre 2003 relative au mandat d’arrêt européen; Dutch: Wet van 19 December 2003 betreffende het Europees aanhoudingsbevel]; details on national legislation available in English—Council of the European Union (2006): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on Belgium’, 16454/2/06, REV2.
 
19
Extradition Act 2003; details on national legislation—Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on the United Kingdom’, 9974/2/07, REV 2 EXT 1.
 
20
Mitsilegas (2008), pp. 202, 203 and 211.
 
21
Gay (2006).
 
22
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 of the Council Framework Decision of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States’, Commission staff working document, SEC(2007) 979, pp. 4 and 5.
 
23
Sinn and Wörner (2007), p. 207.
 
24
Mitsilegas (2008), p. 211.
 
25
Klimek (2012), pp. 185 and 186; Klimek (2011c), pp. 54 and 55; Klimek (2011a), p. 477; Klimek (2011b), pp. 442–448; Ivor et al. (2013), pp. 535–574.
 
26
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 6.
 
27
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 6.
 
28
Burgess and Vllaard (2006), p. 238.
 
29
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, pp. 6 and 7.
 
30
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 7.
 
31
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 7.
 
32
Specimens of the European arrest warrant in all EU’s languages see European Judicial Network online http://​www.​ejn-crimjust.​europa.​eu/​ejn/​libcategories.​aspx?​Id=​14; in addition, as regards accepted languages, see the document of the Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, Annex IV—Languages Accepted by the Member States When Receiving an European Arrest Warrant, p. 76 et seq.
 
33
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘European Handbook on How to Issue a European Arrest Warrant’, 8216/2/08, REV 2, p. 11.
 
34
Council of the European Union (2007): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on the United Kingdom’, 9974/2/07, REV 2 EXT 1, p. 64.
 
35
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 19.
 
36
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 27.
 
37
Council of the European Union (2006): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on Ireland’, 11843/2/06, REV 2, p. 44.
 
38
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, pp. 27 and 28.
 
39
Council of the European Union (2006): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on Belgium’, 16454/2/06, REV 2, p. 55.
 
40
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 28.
 
41
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 32.
 
42
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 8.
 
43
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 9.
 
44
Council of the European Union (2008): ‘Evaluation report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations: “The practical application of the European arrest warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States”: Report on the Netherlands’, 15370/2/08, REV 2, p. 31.
 
45
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 40.
 
46
Commission of the European Communities (2007): ‘Annex to the Report from the Commission on the implementation since 2005 […]’, p. 11.
 
47
Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi—case C-42/11Joao Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge, para. 31.
 
48
Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27th November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union, L 327/27 of 5th December 2008.
 
49
European Commission (2014): ‘Tables State of play and Declarations accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, Commission staff working document, SWD(2014) 34 final, p. 3; Council of the European Union (2014): ‘Implementation of the Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union – Information provided to the General Secretariat’, 9618/1/14, REV 1.
 
50
European Organisation of Prison and Correctional Services (2013): ‘Expert Group on Framework Decision 909’, Working Group Report, p. 6.
 
51
European Commission (2014): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, COM(2014)57 final, p. 11.
 
52
Act on the International Judicial Assistance in Criminal Matters of 3rd December 1982 [Ger.: Gesetz über die internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen Vom 3. Dezember 1982]. Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 1982, p. 2071.
 
53
Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic of 2nd December 2011 No. 549/2011 Coll. on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Imposing Criminal Sanction Involving Deprivation of Liberty in the European Union and on Amending and Supplementing the Act No. 221/2006 Coll. on the Execution of Custody as amended by later legislation [Slovak: zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky z 2. decembra 2011 č. 549/2011 Z. z. o uznávaní a výkone rozhodnutí, ktorými sa ukladá trestná sankcia spojená s odňatím slobody v Európskej únii a o zmene a doplnení zákona č. 221/2006 Z. z. o výkone väzby v znení neskorších predpisov].
 
54
Act of the Parliament of the Czech Republic of 20th March No. 140/2013 Coll. on the International Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters [Czech: zákon Parlamentu České republiky ze dne 20. března 2013 č. 140/2013 Sb. o mezinárodní justiční spolupráci ve věcech trestních].
 
55
European Commission (2014): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, COM(2014)57 final, p. 10.
 
56
European Commission (2014): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, COM(2014)57 final, pp. 8 and 9.
 
57
Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27th November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union, L 337/102 of 16th December 2008.
 
58
European Commission (2014): ‘Tables State of play and Declarations accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, Commission staff working document, SWD(2014) 34 final, p. 3.
 
59
European Commission (2014): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, COM(2014)57 final, pp. 4 and 11.
 
60
Act on the International Judicial Assistance in Criminal Matters of 3rd December 1982 [Ger.: Gesetz über die internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen Vom 3. Dezember 1982]. Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 1982, p. 2071.
 
61
Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic of 2nd December 2011 No. 533/2011 Coll. on the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Imposing Penal Sanction Not Involving Deprivation of Liberty or Probation Measures with a View to the Supervision in the European Union [Slovak: zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky z 2. decembra 2011 č. 533/2011 Z. z. o uznávaní a výkone rozhodnutí, ktorými sa ukladá trestná sankcia nespojená s odňatím slobody alebo probačné opatrenie na účely dohľadu v Európskej únii].
 
62
Act of the Parliament of the Czech Republic of 20th March No. 140/2013 Coll. on the International Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters [Czech: zákon Parlamentu České republiky ze dne 20. března 2013 č. 140/2013 Sb. o mezinárodní justiční spolupráci ve věcech trestních].
 
63
Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24th February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union, L 76/16 of 22nd March 2005.
 
64
Council of the European Union (2010): ‘Implementation of the Framework Decision of the Council of the European Union of 24 February 2005 (2005/214/JHA) of the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties – Information provided to the General Secretariat’, 16924/2/10, REV 2; Council of the European Union (2010): ‘Questionnaire on the implementation of the Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties’, 17205/10.
 
65
Commission of the European Communities (2008): ‘Report from the Commission based on Article 20 of the Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24th February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties’, COM(2008) 888 final, p. 8.
 
66
Council of the European Union (2010): ‘Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties – Follow up of the mutual recognition instruments – outcome of the discussions based on the results of the questionnaire on implementation’, 17998/10, p. 2.
 
67
Act on the International Judicial Assistance in Criminal Matters of 3rd December 1982 [Ger.: Gesetz über die internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen Vom 3. Dezember 1982]. Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 1982, p. 2071.
 
68
Loi n° 2007-297 du 5 mars 2007 relative à la prévention de la délinquance. J.O. n° 56 du 7 mars 2007, page 4297 et suivantes.
 
69
Décret du 3 mai 2007. J.O. n° 105 du 5 mai 2007, page 7963 et suivantes.
 
70
Act of the national Council of the Slovak Republic of 1st June 2011 No. 183/2011 Coll. on Recognition and Execution of Financial Penalties in the European Union and on Amending and Supplementing Certain Laws [Slovak: zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky z 1. júna 2011 č. 183/2011 Z. z. o uznávaní a výkone rozhodnutí o peňažnej sankcii v Európskej únii a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov].
 
71
Act of the Parliament of the Czech Republic of 20th March No. 140/2013 Coll. on the International Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters [Czech: zákon Parlamentu České republiky ze dne 20. března 2013 č. 140/2013 Sb. o mezinárodní justiční spolupráci ve věcech trestních].
 
72
2007. évi XXXVI. törvény a szabálysértési jogsegélyről.
 
73
Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6th October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union, L 328/59 of 24th November 2006.
 
74
European Commission (2010): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council based on Article 22 of the Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders’, COM(2010) 428 final, p. 13.
 
75
Act on the International Judicial Assistance in Criminal Matters of 3rd December 1982 [Ger.: Gesetz über die internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen Vom 3. Dezember 1982]. Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) I, 1982, p. 2071.
 
76
Act of the Parliament of the Czech Republic of 20th March No. 140/2013 Coll. on the International Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters [Czech: zákon Parlamentu České republiky ze dne 20. března 2013 č. 140/2013 Sb. o mezinárodní justiční spolupráci ve věcech trestních].
 
77
European Commission (2010): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council based on Article 22 of the Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders’, COM(2010) 428 final, p. 5.
 
78
European Commission (2010): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council based on Article 22 of the Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders’, COM(2010) 428 final, p. 6.
 
79
European Commission (2010): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council based on Article 22 of the Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders’, COM(2010) 428 final, pp. 8 and 9.
 
80
European Commission (2010): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council based on Article 22 of the Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders’, COM(2010) 428 final, pp. 9 and 10.
 
81
European Commission (2010): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council based on Article 22 of the Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders’, COM(2010) 428 final, p. 10.
 
82
Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23rd October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention. Official Journal of the European Union, L 294/20 of 11th November 2009.
 
83
European Commission (2011): ‘Strengthening mutual trust in the European judicial area – A Green Paper on the application of EU criminal justice legislation in the field of detention’, COM(2011) 327 final.
 
84
European Commission (2014): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, COM(2014)57 final, pp. 5 and 11.
 
85
European Commission (2014): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, COM(2014)57 final, pp. 9 and 10.
 
86
Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3rd April 2014 regarding the European investigation order in criminal matters. Official Journal of the European Union, L 130/1 of 1st May 2014.
 
87
Gesamte Rechtsvorschrift für Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen mit den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union.
 
88
Act of the Parliament of the Czech Republic of 20th March No. 140/2013 Coll. on the International Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters [Czech: zákon Parlamentu České republiky ze dne 20. března 2013 č. 140/2013 Sb. o mezinárodní justiční spolupráci ve věcech trestních].
 
89
Ustawa z dnia 28 listopada 2014 roku o ochronie i pomocy dla pokrzywdzonego i świadka.
 
90
Act of the national Council of the Slovak Republic of 12th November 2015 No. 398/2015 Coll. on the European Protection Order in Criminal Matters and on Amending and Supplementing Certain Laws [Slovak: zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky z 12. novembra 2015 č. 398/2015 Z. z. o európskom ochrannom príkaze v trestných veciach a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov].
 
91
Ley 23/2014, de 20 de noviembre, de reconocimiento mutuo de resoluciones penales en la Unión Europea.
 
Literature
go back to reference Burgess M, Vllaard H (2006) State territoriality and European integration. Routledge, Abingdon Burgess M, Vllaard H (2006) State territoriality and European integration. Routledge, Abingdon
go back to reference Ivor J, Klimek L, Záhora J (2013) Trestné právo Európskej únie a jeho vplyv na právny poriadok Slovenskej republiky [transl.: Criminal law of the European Union and its impact on the legal order of the Slovak Republic]. Eurokódex, Žilina, pp 535–574 Ivor J, Klimek L, Záhora J (2013) Trestné právo Európskej únie a jeho vplyv na právny poriadok Slovenskej republiky [transl.: Criminal law of the European Union and its impact on the legal order of the Slovak Republic]. Eurokódex, Žilina, pp 535–574
go back to reference Klimek L (2011) Úvahy de lege ferenda k novému slovenskému zákonu o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze [transl.: Lex ferenda towards New Slovak Act on the European arrest warrant]. Trestní právo 15:54–58 Klimek L (2011) Úvahy de lege ferenda k novému slovenskému zákonu o európskom zatýkacom rozkaze [transl.: Lex ferenda towards New Slovak Act on the European arrest warrant]. Trestní právo 15:54–58
go back to reference Klimek L (2011a) Genéza európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu a proces jeho implementácie v Slovenskej republike [transl.: Genesis of the European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Slovak Republic]. Právny obzor 94:462–483 Klimek L (2011a) Genéza európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu a proces jeho implementácie v Slovenskej republike [transl.: Genesis of the European arrest warrant and its implementation in the Slovak Republic]. Právny obzor 94:462–483
go back to reference Klimek L (2011b) Odovzdávanie štátnych príslušníkov prostredníctvom európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu [transl.: Surrender of nationals via European arrest warrant]. In: Dufalová L et al (eds) Míľniky práva v stredoeurópskom priestore 2011 [transl.: Milestones of law in the area of Central Europe, vol 2011]. Conference proceedings from the conference, Faculty of Law, Comenius University, 31 March – 2 April 2011, Častá-Papiernička. Comenius University, Bratislava, pp 442–448 Klimek L (2011b) Odovzdávanie štátnych príslušníkov prostredníctvom európskeho zatýkacieho rozkazu [transl.: Surrender of nationals via European arrest warrant]. In: Dufalová L et al (eds) Míľniky práva v stredoeurópskom priestore 2011 [transl.: Milestones of law in the area of Central Europe, vol 2011]. Conference proceedings from the conference, Faculty of Law, Comenius University, 31 March – 2 April 2011, Častá-Papiernička. Comenius University, Bratislava, pp 442–448
go back to reference Klimek L (2012) New law on the European arrest warrant in the Slovak Republic: does it fulfil standards at the level of the EU? Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 20:181–192CrossRef Klimek L (2012) New law on the European arrest warrant in the Slovak Republic: does it fulfil standards at the level of the EU? Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 20:181–192CrossRef
go back to reference Łazowski A (2005) Poland: constitutional tribunal on the surrender of Polish citizens under the European arrest warrant. Decision of 27 April 2005. Eur Constitutional Law Rev 1:569–581CrossRef Łazowski A (2005) Poland: constitutional tribunal on the surrender of Polish citizens under the European arrest warrant. Decision of 27 April 2005. Eur Constitutional Law Rev 1:569–581CrossRef
go back to reference Mackarel M (2007) The European arrest warrant – the early years: implementing and using the warrant. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 15:37–65CrossRef Mackarel M (2007) The European arrest warrant – the early years: implementing and using the warrant. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Justice 15:37–65CrossRef
go back to reference Mitsilegas V (2008) Drafting to implement EU law: the European arrest warrant in the United Kingdom. In: Stefanou C, Xanthaki H (eds) Drafting legislation: a modern approach. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 199–211 Mitsilegas V (2008) Drafting to implement EU law: the European arrest warrant in the United Kingdom. In: Stefanou C, Xanthaki H (eds) Drafting legislation: a modern approach. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 199–211
go back to reference Sievers J (2008) Too different to trust? First experiences with the application of the European arrest warrant. In: Guild E, Geyer F (eds) Security versus Justice? Police and judicial cooperation in the European Union. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 109–128 Sievers J (2008) Too different to trust? First experiences with the application of the European arrest warrant. In: Guild E, Geyer F (eds) Security versus Justice? Police and judicial cooperation in the European Union. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 109–128
go back to reference Sinn A, Wörner L (2007) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in Germany – its constitutionality, laws and current developments. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 3:204–220 Sinn A, Wörner L (2007) The European arrest warrant and its implementation in Germany – its constitutionality, laws and current developments. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 3:204–220
Metadata
Title
Implementation of Mutual Recognition Legislative Instruments
Author
Libor Klimek
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44377-5_16