Top

TechTrends

Published in:

07-11-2023 | Original Paper

In Consideration of Context: The Potential of Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

Authors: Kristin Herman, Miguel Ramlatchan, Ross Herman

Published in: TechTrends | Issue 1/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Over the past decade, geospatial technologies have emerged as a tool for developing spatial reasoning and cognitive processes. While the foundational Learning to Think Spatially report from the National Research Center (2006) launched research into the use of geospatial technologies in isolation, more recently, cloud-based simulation software have begun to partner with geographic information system (GIS) databases to aid instructional designers in creating simulations in fields such as geology and geography. Both of these use cases - traditional geography instruction and immersive simulations - undervalue the potential of GIS to address larger issues within the Instructional Design and Technology (IDT) field. This conceptual paper seeks to present the potential of GIS systems as a designerly tool which can be used to reduce the cognitive load of communicating with very complex data sets and effectively show how information dynamically changes over time. Provisioning contextual analysis as a central skill of the designer may lead to more inclusive designs than a focus on adding steps to process-based models or focusing only on tools.

previous article Applying Systems Thinking for Designing Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Experiences in Education

next article Game-Based Learning and Systems Thinking: an Innovative Instructional Approach for the 21st Century

Ahlqvist, O., & Schlieder, C. (2018). Introducing geogames and geoplay: Characterizing an emerging research field. In O. Ahlqvist & C. Schlieder (Eds.), Geogames and Geoplay. Game-based Approaches to the Analysis of Geo-Information (pp. 1–18). Springer.

Baaki, J., & Luo, T. (2017). Stimulating students’ use of external representations for a distance education time machine design. Tech Trends, 61(4), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0155-zCrossRef

Baaki, J., & Luo, T. (2019). Instructional designers guided by external representations in a design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(3), 513–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-09493-2CrossRef

Baaki, J., & Tracey, M. (2019). Weaving a localized context in use. What it means for instructional design. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 8(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.28990/jaid2011.00100CrossRef

Baaki, J., Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2017). Give us something to react to and make it rich: Designers refecting-in-action with external representations. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(4), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9371-2CrossRef

Babinski, G. (2021). GIS&T for equity and social justice. In John P. Wilson (ed.) The Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge (2nd Quarter 2021 Edition). https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2021.2.2

Baker, R., & Dwyer, F. (2000). A meta-analytic assessment of the effect of visualized instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(4), 417–426.

Baker, T. R., Kerski, J. J., Huynh, N. T., Viehrig, K., & Bednarz, S. W. (2012). Call for an agenda and Center for GIS Education Research. Review of International Geographic Education Online, 2(3), 254–288 Retrieved from https://rigeo.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/05/RIGEO-V2-N3-1.pdf

Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Educational Technology Publications.

Banathy, B. H. (1997). Designing social systems in a changing world: Contemporary systems thinking. Springer.

Barstow, D., Gerrard, M. D., Kapisovsky, P. M., Tinker, R. F., & Wojtkiewicz, V. (1994). First national conference on the educational applications of GIS (EdGIS): Conference report. TERC Communications.

Blaser, A. D., Sester, M., & Egenhofer, M. J. (2000). Visualization in an early stage of the problem-solving process in GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 26(1), 57–66.CrossRef

Boling, E. & Gray, C.M. (2015). Designerly Tools, Sketching, and Instructional Designers and the Guarantors of Design. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. Tracey (eds) The Design of Learning Experience. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_8

Boling, E., Lachheb, A., Abramenka-Lachheb, V., Basdogan, M., Sankaranarayanan, R., & Chartrand, G. (2023). Factoring power and positionality into research on instructional design interventions. In B. Hokanson, M. Exter, M. Schmidt, & A. Tawfik (Eds.), Toward Inclusive Learning Design: Social Justice, Equity, and Community. Springer-Verlag.

Bradshaw, A. C. (2017). Critical Pedagogy and Educational Technology. In A. D. Benson, R. Joseph, & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Culture, learning, and technology (pp. 8-27). Routledge.

Bradshaw, A. C. (2018). Reconsidering the instructional design and technology timeline through a lens of social justice. Tech Trends, 62(4), 36–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0269-6CrossRef

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6CrossRef

Bruner, J. S. (1973). Going beyond the information given. In J. M. Anglin (Ed.), Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing (pp. 218–238). Norton.

Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2009). The critical, relational practice of instructional design in higher education: An emerging model of change agency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 645–663.CrossRef

Carr, A. A. (1996). Distinguishing systemic from systematic. TechTrends, 41(1), 16–20.CrossRef

Carr-Chellman, D. J., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2020). Integrating systems: The history of systems from von Bertalanffy to profound learning. TechTrends, 64, 704–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00540-1CrossRef

Christensen, T. K., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (2004). How do instructional-design practitioners make instructional-strategy decisions? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(3), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.2004.tb00313.xCrossRef

Clarke, K. C. (2013). What is the world’s oldest map? The Cartographic Journal, 50(2), 136–143.CrossRef

Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Pfeiffer.

Collins, L. (2018). The impact of paper versus digital map technology on students' spatial thinking skill acquisition. Journal of Geography, 117(4), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2017.1374990CrossRef

Collins, P. H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 8. Retrieved from https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/

Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: What just happened? Design Studies, 86, article no. 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101187

Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. Berg.

Cross, N., Dorst, K., & Roozenburg, N. F. M. (Eds.). (1992). Research in design thinking. Delft University Press.

Curran, E., & Bowlick, F. (2022). Geographic Information Science education at Esri Development Center institutions. Transactions in GIS, 26(1), 341–361.CrossRef

Dick, W. (1995). Instructional design and creativity: A response to critics. Educational Technology, 35(4), 5–11.

Dorst, K. (2006). Understanding Design. Gingko Press Inc..

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006CrossRef

Favier, T. T., & Van der Schee, J. (2014). The effects of geography lessons with geospatial technologies on the development of high school students' relational thinking. Computers & Education, 76, 225–236.CrossRef

Few, S. (2012). Show me the numbers: Designing tables and graphs to enlighten. Analytics Press.

Fleming, M., & Levie, W. H. (1993). Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences (2nd ed.). Educational Technology Publications, Inc.

Gagné, R. M. (Ed.). (1965). Psychological principles in system development. Holt Rinehart & Winston.

Gibbons, A. S., Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2014). Instructional Design Models. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_48CrossRef

Gibbons, A. (2014). The new contexts of instructional design: Instruction, learning, technology, and design. In An Architectural Approach to Instructional Design, 125-158. Routledge.

Goodchild, M. E. (1988). Stepping over the line: Technological constraints and the new cartography. American Cartographer, 15, 311–319.CrossRef

Goodchild, M. (2004). GIScience, Geography, Form, and Process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 709–714. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3694087CrossRef

Gray, C., & Boling, E. (2016). Inscribing ethics and values in designs for learning: A problematic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 969–1001.CrossRef

Gray, C. M., Dagli, C., Demiral-Uzan, M., Ergulec, F., Tan, V., Altuwaijri, A. A., Gyabak, K., Hilligoss, M., Kizilboga, R., Tomita, K., & Boling, E. (2015). Judgment and instructional design: How ID practitioners work in practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 25–49. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.odu.edu/10.1002/piq.21198CrossRef

Gruender, C. D. (1996). Constructivism and learning: A philosophical appraisal. Educational Technology, 36(3), 21–29.

Harris, A., & Leonardo, Z. (2018). Intersectionality, race-gender subordination, and education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759071CrossRef

Harvey, D. (2017). Listen, Anarchist!’ A personal response to Simon Springer’s ‘Why a Radical Geography Must Be Anarchist. Dialogues in Human Geography, 7, 233–250.CrossRef

Herman, K., Baaki, J., & Tracey, M. (2023). “Faced with given circumstances”: A localized context of use approach. In B. Hokanson, M. Exter, M. Schmidt, & A. Tawfik (Eds.), Toward Inclusive Learning Design: Social Justice, Equity, and Community. Springer-Verlag.

Hutchinson, A., & Tracey, M. W. (2015). Design ideas, reflection, and professional identity: How graduate students explore the idea generation process. Instructional Science, 43(5), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9354-9CrossRef

Jo, I., & Bednarz, S. W. (2009). Evaluating geography textbook questions from a spatial perspective: using concepts of space, tools of representation, and cognitive processes to evaluate spatiality. Journal of Geography, 108, 4–13.CrossRef

Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146.CrossRef

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500CrossRef

Kolvoord, B., Keranen, K., & Rittenhouse, S. (2019). The geospatial semester: concurrent enrollment in geospatial technologies. Journal of Geography, 118(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1483961CrossRef

Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–99.CrossRef

Laursen, L. N., & Haase, L. M. (2019). The shortcomings of design thinking when compared to designerly thinking. The Design Journal, 22(6), 813–832.CrossRef

Lee, J., & Bednarz, R. (2009). Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33, 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276714CrossRef

Leonard, K. (2021). Putting indigenous place-names and languages back on the map. ESRI. Retrieved from https://www.esri.com/about/newsroom/arcnews/putting-indigenous-place-names-and-languages-back-on-maps/

Lowell, V. L., & Moore, R. L. (2020). Developing practical knowledge and skills of online instructional design students through authentic learning and real-world activities. TechTrends, 64, 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00518-zCrossRef

Mathews, A. J., & Wikle, T. A. (2019). GIS&T pedagogies and instructional challenges in higher education: A survey of educators. Transactions in GIS, 23(5), 892–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12534CrossRef

Mayer, R., Howarth, J., Kaplan, M., & Hanna, S. (2018). Applying the segmenting principle to online geography slideshow lessons. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 563–577.CrossRef

McLoad, G., Allen, T. R., Steinhilber, E., Hutt, S., Solano, M., & Burdick, K. (2020). Future Sea Level and Recurrent Flooding Risk for Coastal Virginia. Commonwealth Center for Recurrent Flooding Resiliency. Retrieved from Future Sea Level and Recurrent Flooding Risk for Coastal Virginia – CCRFR (floodingresiliency.org)

Melero, J., Hernández-Leo, D., Sun, J., Santos, P., & Blat, J. (2015). How was the activity? A visualization support for a case of location-based learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 317–329.CrossRef

Millea, J., Green, I., & Putland, G. (2005). Emerging Technologies: A Framework for Thinking. Australian Capital Territory Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/54114

Monmonier, M. (2004). Rhumb Lines and Map Wars: A Social History of the Mercator Projection. University of Chicago Press; Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226534329

Moore, S. (2021). The design models we have are not the design models we need. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.51869/104/smo

National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2013). Future U.S. workforce for geospatial intelligence. National Academies Press.

Nelson, H. G. (2020). The promise of systemic designing: Giving form to water. In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy, 1-49. Springer.

Papert, S. (1987). A critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. Retrieved from http://www.papert.org/articles/ACritiqueofTechnocentrism.html.

Parker, H. D. (1988). The unique qualities of a geographic information system: A commentary. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(11), 1547–1549.

Pavlovskaya, M. (2018). Critical GIS as a tool for social transformation. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, 62, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12438CrossRef

Qiu, X. (2006). Geographic information technologies: an influence on the spatial ability of university students. Geography. San Marcos, Texas, Texas State University-San Marcos: 127.

Reeves, T. C., & Lin, L. (2020). The research we have is not the research we need. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09811-3CrossRef

Ricker, B.A., Rickles, P.R., Fagg, G.A., and Haklay, M.E. (2020). Tool, toolmaker, and scientist: case study experiences using GIS in interdisciplinary research. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2020.1748113

Rickles, P., & Ellul, C. (2017). Innovations in and the changing landscape of geography education with geographic information systems. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(3), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1331210CrossRef

Rieber, L. (1995). A historical review of visualization in human cognition. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 45–56.CrossRef

Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1992.tb00546.xCrossRef

Rowland, G. (1994). Design and evaluating: Creating futures and appreciation error. Educational Technology, 34(1), 10–22 https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428127

Schaal, S., Otto, S., Schaal, S., & Lude, A. (2018). Game-Related enjoyment or personal pre-requisites – Which is the crucial factor when using geogames to encourage adolescents to value local biodiversity. International Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1441571CrossRef

Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books Inc..

Schön, D. A. (1992). The theory of inquiry: Dewey’s legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/1180029CrossRef

Sheppard, E. (2005). Knowledge production through critical GIS: Genealogy and prospects. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40(4), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.3138/GH27-1847-QP71-7TP7CrossRef

Sockman, B. R., Baker, F. W., III, Blevins, S. J., Bond, M. A., & Doucet Rand, A. (2020). Introduction to the September 2020 special issue: Harnessing systems thinking to inform meaningful change efforts in organizations. Tech Trends, 64(5), 682–683.CrossRef

Spence, I. (2005). No humble pie: The origins and usage of a statistical chart. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030004353CrossRef

Springer, S. (2014). Why a radical geography must be anarchist. Dialogues in Human Geography, 4(3), 249–270.CrossRef

Stables, K. (2008). Designing matters, designing minds: The importance of nurturing the designerly in young people. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 13(3), 8–18.

Stefaniak, J. (2020). The utility of design thinking to promote systemic instructional design practices in the workplace. TechTrends, 64(2), 202–210.CrossRef

Stefaniak, J. E., & Tracey, M. W. (2014). An examination of the decision-making process used by designers in multiple disciplines. TechTrends, 58(5), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0789-7CrossRef

Stefaniak, J., Baaki, J., & Hoard, B. (2018). The influence of perceived constraints during needs assessment on design conjecture. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9173-5CrossRef

Stefaniak, J., & Xu, M. (2020). An examination of the systemic reach of instructional design models: a systematic review. Tech Trends, 64, 710–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00539-8CrossRef

Stefaniak, J., Baaki, J., & Stapleton, L. (2022). An exploration of conjecture strategies used by instructional design students to support design decision-making. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 585–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10092-1CrossRef

Stefaniak, J., Tawfik, A., & Sentz, J. (2023). Supporting dynamic instructional design decisions within a bounded rationality. TechTrends, 67, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00792-zCrossRef

Svihla, V. (2021). Design thinking. In J. K. McDonald & R. E. West (Eds.), Design for Learning: Principles, Processes, and Praxis. EdTech Books https://edtechbooks.org/id/design_thinking

Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.CrossRef

Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. (1990). A layers-of-necessity instructional development model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 77–85.CrossRef

Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. (1997). The role of context in learning and ID. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(2), 85–115 https://www.jstor.org/stable/30221388CrossRef

Thomas, M., Mitchell, M., & Joseph, R. (2002). The third dimension of ADDIE. TechTrends, 46(2), 40–45.CrossRef

Tian, J., Ren, C., Lei, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). Designing MATLAB course for undergraduates in cartography and geographic information science: Linking research and teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–44.CrossRef

Tian, J., Koh, J., Ren, C., & Wang, Y. (2022). Understanding higher education students' developing perceptions of geocapabilities through the creation of story maps with geographical information systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 687–705.CrossRef

Vélez, V., & Solorzano, D. (2017). Critical race spatial analysis: Conceptualizing GIS as a tool for critical race research in education. In D. Morrison, S. A. Annamma, & D. Jackson (Eds.), Critical Race Spatial Analysis: Mapping to Understand and Address Educational Inequity (pp. 8–31). Stylus.

von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The history and status of general systems theory. The Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 407–426.

Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1991). Adapting instructional design to project circumstance: The layers of necessity model. Educational Technology, 38(7), 48–52: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44427688

Welch, M., Barlex, D., & Lim, H. S. (2000). Sketching: Friend or foe to the novice designer? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 102(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008991319644CrossRef

Werner, P., Jażdżewska, I., & Zwoliński, Z. (2015). Current state and future perspectives of university education of GIS and Geoinformation in Poland. In I. Jażdżewska (Ed.), GIS in Higher Education in Poland: Curriculum, Issues, Discussion. University of Lodz Press.

West, D., Luzeckyj, A., Toohey, D., VAnderlie, J., & Searle, B. (2020). Do academics and university administrators really know better? The ethics of positioning student perspectives in learning analytics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4653CrossRef

Whitbeck, C. (1996). Ethics as design: Doing justice to moral problems. Hastings Center Report, 26(3), 9–16 https://edtechbooks.org/-kwsZCrossRef

Wikle, T., & Fagin, T. (2014). GIS Course Planning: A Comparison of Syllabi at US College and Universities. Transactions in GIS, 18(4), 574–585.CrossRef

Woodley, X., Hernandez, C., Parra, J., & Negash, B. (2017). Celebrating difference: Best practices in culturally responsive teaching online. TechTrends, 61(5), 470–478.CrossRef

Xiang, X., & Liu, Y. (2019). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking skills : Learning differences of university students within a web-based GIS mapping environment : Learning differences in spatial thinking skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1865–1881.CrossRef

Young, P. A. (2008). The culture based model: Constructing a model of culture. Journal of Educational, Technology & Society, 11(2), 107–118.

Title: In Consideration of Context: The Potential of Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Authors: Kristin Herman
Miguel Ramlatchan
Ross Herman
Publication date: 07-11-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: TechTrends / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Electronic ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00916-z

Springer Professional

In Consideration of Context: The Potential of Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education and Its Implications for Assessment

Are We Dupes? Limitations of AI Systems: What Should Educators Do with Them?

The Ethical Consequences, Contestations, and Possibilities of Designs in Educational Systems

Special Issue on Emerging Learning Technologies and Systems Thinking: Here’s to New Beginnings

Adapting to the Future: ChatGPT as a Means for Supporting Constructivist Learning Environments

Don’t put the Cart Before the Horse: Self-Study on Using VR in Education