Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

26-09-2016 | Original Paper

Incorporating Social Networking Sites into Traditional Pedagogy: a Case of Facebook

Authors: Bakhtiar Naghdipour, Nilgün Hancioğlu Eldridge

Published in: TechTrends | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The use of online social networking sites for educational purposes or expanding curricular opportunities has recently sparked debates in scholarly forums. This potential, however, has yet to attract sufficient attention in second language classes, and particularly in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. The current study explores the affordances of Facebook to help both improve EFL students’ vocabulary knowledge and develop their vocabulary strategy learning in a blended learning course. To this end, a Facebook page was created to engage an intact class of first-year undergraduates (N = 25) majoring in English in a package of vocabulary learning strategies. The analysis of the data from Facebook content (i.e., the posts and comments shared throughout a semester) and a student focus group discussion revealed that students benefited from participating in different activities to improve their knowledge of English vocabulary and develop their awareness of various vocabulary learning strategies. The results, however, raised several concerns about the integration of Facebook into traditional pedagogy as a formal platform for language teaching and learning.
Literature
go back to reference Allan, B. (2007). Blended learning: Tools for teaching and training. London: Facet. Allan, B. (2007). Blended learning: Tools for teaching and training. London: Facet.
go back to reference Al-Shehri, S. (2011). Connectivism: a new pathway for theorising and promoting mobile language learning. International Journal of Innovation and Leadership on the Teaching of Humanities, 1(2), 10–31. Al-Shehri, S. (2011). Connectivism: a new pathway for theorising and promoting mobile language learning. International Journal of Innovation and Leadership on the Teaching of Humanities, 1(2), 10–31.
go back to reference Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 1093–1106.CrossRef Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 1093–1106.CrossRef
go back to reference Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21–40.CrossRef Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, H. I. (2013). Identity practices of multilingual writers in social networking spaces. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 143–170. Chen, H. I. (2013). Identity practices of multilingual writers in social networking spaces. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 143–170.
go back to reference Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Godwin-Jones, R. (2010). Emerging technologies: literacies and technologies revisited. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 2–9. Godwin-Jones, R. (2010). Emerging technologies: literacies and technologies revisited. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 2–9.
go back to reference Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 183–198.CrossRef Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 183–198.CrossRef
go back to reference Horwitz, E. K. (2008). Becoming a language teacher: A practical guide to second language learning and teaching. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Horwitz, E. K. (2008). Becoming a language teacher: A practical guide to second language learning and teaching. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
go back to reference Jee, J. M. (2011). Web 2.0 technology meets mobile assisted language learning. The IALLT Journal, 41(1), 161–175. Jee, J. M. (2011). Web 2.0 technology meets mobile assisted language learning. The IALLT Journal, 41(1), 161–175.
go back to reference Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: an online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187.CrossRef Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: an online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Network-based language teaching. In N. V. Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Second and foreign language education 2nd ed., pp. 281–292). New York: Springer. Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Network-based language teaching. In N. V. Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Second and foreign language education 2nd ed., pp. 281–292). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.CrossRef Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.CrossRef
go back to reference Lamy, M.-N., & Zourou, K. (Eds.). (2013). Social networking for language education. Palgrave Macmillan, UK Lamy, M.-N., & Zourou, K. (Eds.). (2013). Social networking for language education. Palgrave Macmillan, UK
go back to reference MacDonald, J. (2008). Blended learning and online tutoring: planning learner support and activity design (2nd ed.). Aldershot: Gower. MacDonald, J. (2008). Blended learning and online tutoring: planning learner support and activity design (2nd ed.). Aldershot: Gower.
go back to reference Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: it is more for socializing and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.CrossRef Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: it is more for socializing and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.CrossRef
go back to reference McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729–740.CrossRef McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729–740.CrossRef
go back to reference McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: international exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.CrossRef McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: international exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: a dangerous idea? Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23.CrossRef Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: a dangerous idea? Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital. New York: Basic Books. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Savignon, J. S. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching: what’s ahead? Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 207–220.CrossRef Savignon, J. S. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching: what’s ahead? Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 207–220.CrossRef
go back to reference Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157–174.CrossRef Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67–75 Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67–75
go back to reference So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336.CrossRef So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336.CrossRef
go back to reference Sockett, G. (2013). Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex dynamic system: an emic approach. ReCALL, 25(01), 48–62.CrossRef Sockett, G. (2013). Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex dynamic system: an emic approach. ReCALL, 25(01), 48–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Spiliotopoulos, V. (2011). Towards a technology enhanced university education. In A. Kitchenham (Ed.), Blended learning across disciplines: Models for implementation (pp. 1–16). Hershey: Information Science Reference.CrossRef Spiliotopoulos, V. (2011). Towards a technology enhanced university education. In A. Kitchenham (Ed.), Blended learning across disciplines: Models for implementation (pp. 1–16). Hershey: Information Science Reference.CrossRef
go back to reference Stanley, G. (2013). Language learning with technology: Ideas for integrating technology in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stanley, G. (2013). Language learning with technology: Ideas for integrating technology in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 199–210.CrossRef Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 199–210.CrossRef
go back to reference Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54, 1202–1211.CrossRef Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54, 1202–1211.CrossRef
go back to reference Yancey, K. (2009). Writing by any other name. Principal Leadership, 10(1), 26–29. Yancey, K. (2009). Writing by any other name. Principal Leadership, 10(1), 26–29.
Metadata
Title
Incorporating Social Networking Sites into Traditional Pedagogy: a Case of Facebook
Authors
Bakhtiar Naghdipour
Nilgün Hancioğlu Eldridge
Publication date
26-09-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
TechTrends / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Electronic ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0118-4

Premium Partner