Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. India’s National Security Discourse: A Conceptual Introduction

Authors : Anshuman Behera, Areeba Ahsanat Moazzam

Published in: Varying Dimensions of India’s National Security

Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the larger and rather ‘underdeveloped’ concept of security discourse (as Barry Buzan would call it), the idea of national security is often found to be entangled between two dominant narratives around power struggle and pursuit for peace in international politics. Within a policy framework, national security is often understood to have encompassed the decision and actions deemed imperative to protect domestic core values from external threats (Leffler, The Journal of American History. 77:143–152, 1990). However, such a position on national security only offers a limited understanding of the subject and the issues related to it. Stepping away from the scope of traditional understanding of international relations and security discourses, national security issues offer more critical questions, like security of what to whom and security at what cost to whom (Buzan, People, States, and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations, Wheatsheaf Books, 1983). Such questions are better answered, possibly, when the concept of national security is contextualized based on the specificities of a nation-state. In this process one can critically engage with multiple issues concerning security, ranging from the threats to people to that of the nation-state. This chapter critically engages with the various discourses of national security and in this process makes a case for various issues that need to be highlighted and discussed in the scope of India’s security concerns.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
A paper on National Security Assessment on Semantic Scholar argues, ‘Although GPS can support U.S. and allied military activities, it can at the same time create a dependency. Furthermore, enemy uses of GPS can threaten U.S. forces and broader security interests. This dual aspect of GPS—its utility in American and allied hands, along with the risks of dependency and enemy use—highlights a fundamental dilemma for decisionmakers seeking to maximize the benefits of GPS technology while minimizing its risks’.
 
Literature
go back to reference Antunes, S., & Camisao, I. (2017). In M. G. Ste`phen et al. (Eds), International relations theory (pp. 15–21). Bristol, E. International Relations Publishing. Antunes, S., & Camisao, I. (2017). In M. G. Ste`phen et al. (Eds), International relations theory (pp. 15–21). Bristol, E. International Relations Publishing.
go back to reference Bajpai, K. (2003). The idea of human security. International Studies., 40(3), 195–228.CrossRef Bajpai, K. (2003). The idea of human security. International Studies., 40(3), 195–228.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, L., & R. (1986). Redefining national security. Challenge, 29(3), 25–32.CrossRef Brown, L., & R. (1986). Redefining national security. Challenge, 29(3), 25–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Bull, H. (1995). The anarchical society (2nd ed.). Macmillan. Bull, H. (1995). The anarchical society (2nd ed.). Macmillan.
go back to reference Buzan, B. (1983). People, states, and fear: The national security problem in international relations. Wheatsheaf books. Buzan, B. (1983). People, states, and fear: The national security problem in international relations. Wheatsheaf books.
go back to reference Buzan, B. (1984). Peace, power, and security: Contending concepts in the study of international relations. Journal of Peace Research., 21(2), 109–125.CrossRef Buzan, B. (1984). Peace, power, and security: Contending concepts in the study of international relations. Journal of Peace Research., 21(2), 109–125.CrossRef
go back to reference Caudle, S. (2009) National security strategies: Security from what, for whom, and by what means. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1). Caudle, S. (2009) National security strategies: Security from what, for whom, and by what means. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1).
go back to reference Chemtob, C. M., & Claude, M. (2005). Finding the gift in the horror. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 10(3–4), 721–727.CrossRef Chemtob, C. M., & Claude, M. (2005). Finding the gift in the horror. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 10(3–4), 721–727.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, P. K. (2010). Military transformation? Which transformation, and what lies ahead? Potomac Books. Davis, P. K. (2010). Military transformation? Which transformation, and what lies ahead? Potomac Books.
go back to reference Deptula, D. (2007). Toward restructuring national security. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 1(2), 5–17. Deptula, D. (2007). Toward restructuring national security. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 1(2), 5–17.
go back to reference Development Challenges in Extremist Affected Areas. (2008). Report of an Expert Group to Planning Commission. Government of India, New Delhi. Development Challenges in Extremist Affected Areas. (2008). Report of an Expert Group to Planning Commission. Government of India, New Delhi.
go back to reference Eroukhmanoff, C. (2017). Securitization theory. In M. G., Stephen et al. (Eds.), International relations theory (pp. 104–109). Bristol, E. International Relations Publishing. Eroukhmanoff, C. (2017). Securitization theory. In M. G., Stephen et al. (Eds.), International relations theory (pp. 104–109). Bristol, E. International Relations Publishing.
go back to reference Ganguly, S. (2015). India’s national security In D. M. Malone et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford. Ganguly, S. (2015). India’s national security In D. M. Malone et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford.
go back to reference Haq, M. U. (1999). Reflections on human development. Oxford University Press. Haq, M. U. (1999). Reflections on human development. Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Hobbes, T., & Oakeshott, M. (1946). Leviathan. Hobbes, T., & Oakeshott, M. (1946). Leviathan.
go back to reference Holmes, K. R. (2015). What is national security? Index of U S military strength. The Heritage Foundation. Holmes, K. R. (2015). What is national security? Index of U S military strength. The Heritage Foundation.
go back to reference Hwang, K. (2010). Measuring geopolitical power in India: A review of the national security index (NSI). GIGA Working paper No. 136. Hwang, K. (2010). Measuring geopolitical power in India: A review of the national security index (NSI). GIGA Working paper No. 136.
go back to reference Leffler, M. P. (1990). National security. The Journal of American History., 77(1), 143–152.CrossRef Leffler, M. P. (1990). National security. The Journal of American History., 77(1), 143–152.CrossRef
go back to reference Lippmann, W. (1943). U.S. Foreign policy: Shield of the Republic. Brown and Company. Lippmann, W. (1943). U.S. Foreign policy: Shield of the Republic. Brown and Company.
go back to reference Meiser, J. W. (2017). Liberalism. In S. McGlinchey et al. (Eds.). International relations theory (pp. 22–27). Bristol. E. International Relations Publishing. Meiser, J. W. (2017). Liberalism. In S. McGlinchey et al. (Eds.). International relations theory (pp. 22–27). Bristol. E. International Relations Publishing.
go back to reference Mercurio, A., Logan, M. (2012). National security: An integration. In K. Malley-Morrison et al. International handbook of war, torture, and terrorism. Springer. Mercurio, A., Logan, M. (2012). National security: An integration. In K. Malley-Morrison et al. International handbook of war, torture, and terrorism. Springer.
go back to reference Neocleous, M. (2006). From social to national security: On the fabrication of economic order. Security Dialogue, 37(3), 363–384. Neocleous, M. (2006). From social to national security: On the fabrication of economic order. Security Dialogue, 37(3), 363–384.
go back to reference Singh, B. (2004). India’s security concerns: National regional and global. The Indian Journal of Political Science., 65(3), 345–364. Singh, B. (2004). India’s security concerns: National regional and global. The Indian Journal of Political Science., 65(3), 345–364.
go back to reference Stivachits, Y. A. (2017). The english school. In S. McGlinchey et al. (Eds.), International relations theory (pp. 28–35). Bristol. E. International Relations Publishing. Stivachits, Y. A. (2017). The english school. In S. McGlinchey et al. (Eds.), International relations theory (pp. 28–35). Bristol. E. International Relations Publishing.
go back to reference Theys, S. (2017). Constructivism. In S. McGlinchey et al. (Eds.), International relations theory (pp. 36–41). Bristol. E. International Relations Publishing. Theys, S. (2017). Constructivism. In S. McGlinchey et al. (Eds.), International relations theory (pp. 36–41). Bristol. E. International Relations Publishing.
go back to reference Ullman, R. H. (1983). Redefining security. International Security., 8(1), 129–153.CrossRef Ullman, R. H. (1983). Redefining security. International Security., 8(1), 129–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Wolfers, A. (1952). “National security” as an ambiguous symbol. Political Science Quarterly., 67(4), 481–502.CrossRef Wolfers, A. (1952). “National security” as an ambiguous symbol. Political Science Quarterly., 67(4), 481–502.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
India’s National Security Discourse: A Conceptual Introduction
Authors
Anshuman Behera
Areeba Ahsanat Moazzam
Copyright Year
2022
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7593-5_1