Top

Published in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

23. Industrie 4.0 aus Perspektive der nachhaltigen industriellen Wertschöpfung

Authors : Kai-Ingo Voigt, Daniel Kiel, Julian Marius Müller, Christian Arnold

Published in: Digitalisierung im Spannungsfeld von Politik, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Recht

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Nutzenpotenziale und Herausforderungen für Industrieunternehmen hinsichtlich Industrie 4.0 aus ökonomischer, ökologischer und sozialer Perspektive der Nachhaltigkeit. Die Grundlage bilden Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie, in der Vertreter 46 deutscher Industrieunternehmen aus den drei Branchen Maschinen- und Anlagenbau, Elektrotechnik und Automobilindustrie mittels Experteninterviews befragt wurden. Als Ergebnis werden unterschiedliche Nutzenpotenziale und Herausforderungen im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeit dargelegt, die um die Kategorien Daten und Informationen, technische Integration sowie Handlungsbedarf des Staates als übergeordnete, sich auf mehrere Dimensionen der Nachhaltigkeit auswirkende Kategorien, ergänzt werden. Abschließend zeigt der Beitrag übergeordnete Handlungsempfehlungen für Industrieunternehmen bei der Umsetzung einer nachhaltigen Wertschöpfung durch Industrie 4.0 auf.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Rechtliche Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung

next chapter Die digitale Wirtschaft: Was ändert sich am Arbeitsmarkt?

Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility. A review and research agenda. J Manage 38(4):932–968

Al-Najjar B, Anfimiadou A (2012) Environmental policies and firm value. Bus Strateg Environ 21(1):49–59CrossRef

Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manage Perspect 22(4):45–62CrossRef

Arnold C, Kiel D, Voigt KI (2016) How the industrial Internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. Int J Innov Manag 20(8):1640015-1–1640015-25CrossRef

Bauer W, Schlund S, Marrenbach D, Ganschar O (2014) Industrie 4.0 – Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland. BITKOM/Fraunhofer IAO, Berlin/Stuttgart

Beckmann M, Hielscher S, Pies I (2014) Commitment strategies for sustainability: how business firms can transform trade-offs into win-win outcomes. Bus Strateg Environ 23(1):18–37CrossRef

Blomgren A (2011) Does corporate social responsibility influence profit margins? A case study of executive perceptions. Corp Soc Resp Env Manage 18(5):263–274CrossRef

Bonekamp L, Sure M (2015) Consequences of industry 4.0 on human labour and work organisation. J Bus Media Psychol 6(1):33–40

Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Eng 8(1):37–44

Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 11(2):130–141CrossRef

Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manage J 50(1):25–32CrossRef

Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation. Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev 36(2):90–100CrossRef

Elkington J (1998) Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ Qual Manag 8(1):37–51CrossRef

Fullerton RR, Wempe WF (2009) Lean manufacturing, non-financial performance measures, and financial performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage 29(3):214–240CrossRef

Gabriel M, Pessel E (2016) Industry 4.0 and sustainability impacts: critical discussion of sustainability aspects with a special focus on future of work and ecological consequences. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara Int J Eng 1(16):131–136

Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ Res Meth 16(1):15–31CrossRef

Glavas A, Mish J (2015) Resources and capabilities of triple bottom line firms: going over old or breaking new ground? J Bus Ethics 127(3):623–642CrossRef

Glavič P, Lukman R (2007) Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. J Clean Prod 15(18):1875–1885CrossRef

Herrmann C, Schmidt C, Kurle D, Blume S, Thiede S (2014) Sustainability in manufacturing and factories of the future. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 1(4):283–292CrossRef

Holsti OR (1968) Content analysis. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (Hrsg) The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York

Hubbard G (2009) Measuring organizational performance. Beyond the triple bottom line. Bus Strateg Environ 18(3):177–191CrossRef

Jick T (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24(4):602–611CrossRef

Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0 – final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Communication Promoters Group of the Industry-Science Research Alliance, acatech, Frankfurt am Main

Kiel D, Arnold C, Collisi M, Voigt K-I (2016) The impact of the industrial Internet of things on established business models. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT) conference, Orlando, S 673–695

Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis. Sage, Los AngelesMATH

Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper H-G, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(4):239–242CrossRef

Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3(1):18–23CrossRef

Lehtonen M (2004) The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecol Econ 49(2):199–214CrossRef

Liao Y, Deschamps F, de Loures E, Ramos LFP (2017) Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 – a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int J Prod Res 55(12):3609–3629CrossRef

Littig B, Griessler E (2005) Social sustainability. A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int J Sustain Dev 8(1/2):65–78CrossRef

Markley MJ, Davis L (2007) Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 37(9):763–774CrossRef

Mason J (2002) Qualitative researching. Sage, Thousand Oaks

McWilliams A, Parhankangas A, Coupet J, Welch E, Barnum DT (2016) Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Bus Strateg Environ 25(3):193–204CrossRef

Miles MB, Huberman MA (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Milne MJ, Gray R (2013) W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. J Bus Ethics 118(1):13–29CrossRef

Norman W, MacDonald C, Arnold DG (2004) Getting to the bottom of „triple bottom line“. Bus Ethics Q 14(2):243–262CrossRef

Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441CrossRef

Ozanne LK, Phipps M, Weaver T, Carrington M, Luchs M, Catlin J (2016) Managing the tensions at the intersection of the triple bottom line: a paradox theory approach to sustainability management. J Public Policy Mark 35(2):249–261CrossRef

Peloza J (2009) The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. J Manage 35(6):1518–1541

Peukert B, Benecke S, Clavell J, Neugebauer S, Nissen NF, Uhlmann E (2015) Addressing sustainability and flexibility in manufacturing via smart modular machine tool frames to support sustainable value creation. Procedia CIRP 29:514–519CrossRef

Pfeffer J (2010) Building sustainable organizations. The human factor. Acad Manage Perspect 24(1):34–45

Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92

Schlechtendahl J, Keinert M, Kretschmer F, Lechler A, Verl A (2015) Making existing production systems Industry 4.0-ready. Prod Eng 9(1):143–148CrossRef

Schulz SA, Flanigan RL (2016) Developing competitive advantage using the triple bottom line: a conceptual framework. J Bus Ind Mark 31(4):449–458CrossRef

Seow C, Jamali D (2006) Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Bus Process Manage J 12(6):809–821CrossRef

Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40:536–541CrossRef

Wagner M (2010) The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance. A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol Econ 69(7):1553–1560CrossRef

Wan J (2011) Advances in cyber-physical systems research. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 5(11):1891–1908

Weston C, Gandell T, Beauchamp J, McAlpine L, Wiseman C, Beauchamp C (2001) Analyzing interview data: the development and evolution of a coding system. Qual Sociol 24(3):381–400CrossRef

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Title: Industrie 4.0 aus Perspektive der nachhaltigen industriellen Wertschöpfung
Authors: Kai-Ingo Voigt
Daniel Kiel
Julian Marius Müller
Christian Arnold
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book: Digitalisierung im Spannungsfeld von Politik, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Recht
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56437-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-56438-7

Copyright Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56438-7_23

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner