Skip to main content
Top

Inequalities for Katugampola conformable partial derivatives

  • Open Access
  • 01-12-2019
  • Research
Published in:

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the paper, we introduce two concepts of Katugampola conformable partial derivatives and α-conformable integrals. As applications, we establish Opial type inequalities for Katugampola conformable partial derivatives and α-conformable integrals. The new inequalities in special cases yield some of the recent results on inequality of this type.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

In 1960, Opial [1] established the following interesting and important inequality.
Theorem A
Suppose that \(f\in C^{1}[0,a]\) satisfies \(f(0)=f(a)=0\) and \(f(x)>0\) for all \(x\in(0,a)\). Then the inequality holds
$$ \int_{0}^{a} \bigl\vert f(x)f'(x) \bigr\vert \,dx\leq\frac{a}{4} \int _{0}^{a}\bigl(f'(x) \bigr)^{2}\,dx, $$
(1.1)
where this constant \(a/4\) is best possible.
Opial’s inequality and its generalizations, extensions, and discretizations play a fundamental role in establishing the existence and uniqueness of initial and boundary value problems for ordinary and partial differential equations as well as difference equations [26]. Inequality (1.1) has received considerable attention, and a large number of papers dealing with new proofs, extensions, generalizations, variants, and discrete analogues of Opial’s inequality have appeared in the literature [718].
Recently, some new Opial’s inequalities for the conformable fractional integrals have been established (see [1922]). In the paper, we introduce two new concepts of Katugampola conformable partial derivatives and α-conformable integrals. As applications, we establish some Opial type inequalities for Katugampola conformable partial derivatives and α-conformable integrals.

2 Inequalities for Katugampola conformable partial derivatives

We recall the well-known Katugampola derivative formulation of conformable derivative of order for \(\alpha\in(0,1]\) and \(t\in[0,\infty)\), given by
$$ D_{\alpha}(f) (t)=\lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\frac {f(te^{\varepsilon t^{-\alpha}})-f(t)}{\varepsilon}, $$
(2.1)
and
$$ D_{\alpha}(f) (0)=\lim_{t\rightarrow0}D_{\alpha}(f) (t), $$
(2.2)
provided the limits exist. If f is fully differentiable at t, then
$$D_{\alpha}(f) (t)=t^{1-\alpha}\frac{df}{dt}(t). $$
A function f is α-differentiable at a point \(t\geq0\) if the limits in (2.1) and (2.2) exist and are finite. Inspired by this, we propose a new concept of α-conformable partial derivative. In the way of (2.1), we define α-conformable partial derivative.
Definition 2.1
(α-conformable partial derivative)
Let \(\alpha\in(0,1]\) and \(s,t\in[0,\infty)\). Suppose that \(f(s,t)\) is a continuous function and partially derivable, the α-conformable partial derivative at a point \(s\geq0\), denoted by \(\frac{\partial}{\partial s}(f)_{\alpha}(s,t)\), is defined by
$$ \frac{\partial}{\partial s}(f)_{\alpha}(s,t)=\lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow0} \frac{f(se^{\varepsilon s^{-\alpha}},t)-f(s,t)}{ \varepsilon}, $$
(2.3)
provided the limits exist, and is called α-conformable partially derivable.
To generalize Definition 2.1, we give the following definition.
Definition 2.2
(Katugampola conformable partial derivative)
Let \(\alpha\in(0,1]\) and \(s,t\in[0,\infty)\). Suppose that \(f(s,t)\) and \(\frac{\partial}{\partial s}(f)_{\alpha}(s,t)\) are continuous functions and partially derivable, the Katugampola conformable partial derivative, denoted by \(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(f)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\), is defined by
$$ \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(f)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)=\lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow 0} \frac{\frac{\partial}{\partial s}(f)_{\alpha}(s,te^{\varepsilon t^{-\alpha}})-\frac{\partial}{\partial s}(f)_{\alpha}(s,t)}{\varepsilon}, $$
(2.4)
provided the limits exist, and is called Katugampola conformable partially derivable.
Definition 2.3
(α-conformable integral)
Let \(\alpha\in(0,1]\), \(0\leq a< b\), and \(0\leq c< d\). A function \(f(x,y):[a,b]\times[c,d]\rightarrow{\Bbb {R}}\) is α-conformable integrable if the integral
$$ \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d}f(x,y)\, d_{\alpha}x\, d_{\alpha}y:= \int _{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d} (xy)^{\alpha-1}f(x,y)\, dx\, dy $$
(2.5)
exists and is finite.
Lemma 2.1
Let \(\alpha\in(0,1]\), \(s,t\in[0,\infty)\), and \(f(s,t)\), \(g(s,t)\) be Katugampola conformable partially differentiable, then
$$ \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(f\circ g)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)=f'\bigl(g(s,t) \bigr)\cdot\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(g)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)+ \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t), $$
(2.6)
where f has derivative at \(g(s,t)\).
Proof
From Definitions 2.1 and 2.2, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial}{\partial s}(f\circ g)_{\alpha}(s,t) =&\frac{\partial}{\partial s}\bigl(f \bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \\ =&s^{1-\alpha}\frac{\partial}{\partial s}\bigl(f\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\bigr) \\ =&s^{1-\alpha}f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\frac{\partial}{\partial s}\bigl(g(s,t) \bigr) \\ =&f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\frac{\partial}{\partial s}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t). \end{aligned}$$
Hence
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(f\circ g)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) =&\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \biggl( \frac{\partial}{\partial s}(f\circ g)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \\ =&\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \biggl(f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr) \frac{\partial }{\partial s}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \\ =&t^{1-\alpha}\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \biggl(f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr) \cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial s}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr) \\ =&t^{1-\alpha}\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \bigl(f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr) \bigr)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t) +t^{1-\alpha}f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\biggl(\frac{\partial}{\partial s}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t)\biggr) \\ =&\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) +f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\cdot\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(g)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t). \end{aligned}$$
This completes the proof. □
This similar chain rule theorem is important, but it is also understood. In order for the reader to better understand this theorem, we give another proof below.
Second proof
Let
$$\delta=g\bigl(se^{\varepsilon s^{-\alpha}},t\bigr)-g(s,t) . $$
Obviously, if \(\varepsilon\rightarrow0\), then \(\delta\rightarrow0\). From the hypotheses, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(f\circ g)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) =&\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \biggl( \frac{\partial}{\partial s}\bigl(f\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \\ =&\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \biggl(\lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(g(se^{\varepsilon s^{-\alpha}},t))-f(g(s,t))}{ \varepsilon} \biggr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \\ =&\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \biggl(\lim_{\delta\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(g(s,t)+\delta)-f(g(s,t))}{\delta}\cdot \lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow 0}\frac{\delta}{\varepsilon} \biggr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \\ =&\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \biggl(f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr) \frac{\partial}{\partial s}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \\ =&f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\cdot\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(g)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)+ \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(g)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(f'\bigl(g(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t). \end{aligned}$$
This completes the proof. □
Theorem 2.1
Let \(p(s,t), u(s,t):[a,b]\times[c,d]\rightarrow {\Bbb {R}}\) with \(a,c\geq 0\) be Katugampola conformable partially derivable such that \(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)>0\), \(\alpha\in(0,1]\) and \(p(a,c)=p(a,d)=p(b,c)=p(b,d)=0\), and F be derivable on \([0,\infty)\) and \(F'\) be increasing. Let φ be a convex and increasing function on \([0,\infty)\), and define
$$ z(s,t)= \int_{a}^{s} \int_{c}^{t}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}( \sigma,\tau)\cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau) \vert }{\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)} \biggr)\, d_{\alpha} \sigma \, d_{\alpha}\tau. $$
(2.7)
Then
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d} \biggl\{ \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\cdot F' \biggl(p(s,t)\cdot \varphi \biggl( \frac{|u(s,t)|}{p(s,t)} \biggr) \biggr) \\& \qquad {}+\frac{\partial }{\partial t}(z)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr\} \, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha }t \\& \quad \leq F \biggl( \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert \frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \vert }{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr)\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \biggr), \end{aligned}$$
(2.8)
where
$$\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) =t^{1-\alpha} \frac{\partial}{\partial t}F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr). $$
Proof
Let
$$y(s,t)= \int_{a}^{s} \int_{c}^{t} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}( \sigma,\tau) \biggr\vert \, d_{\alpha}\sigma\, d_{\alpha}\tau $$
such that
$$\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(y)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)= \biggl\vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \biggr\vert $$
and \(y(s,t)\geq|u(s,t)|\). Since φ is convex and increasing, by using Jensen’s inequality, we get
$$\begin{aligned} \varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert u(s,t) \vert }{p(s,t)} \biggr) \leq& \varphi \biggl( \frac{y(s,t)}{p(s,t)} \biggr) \\ =& \varphi \biggl(\frac{\int_{a}^{s}\int_{c}^{t}\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)\frac{ \vert \frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau) \vert }{\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial\tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)}\,d_{\alpha }\sigma \,d_{\alpha}\tau}{\int_{a}^{s}\int_{c}^{t}\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)\,d_{\alpha}\sigma \,d_{\alpha}\tau } \biggr) \\ \leq&\frac{1}{p(s,t)} \int_{a}^{s} \int_{c}^{t}\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}( \sigma,\tau)\cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau) \vert }{\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)} \biggr)\,d_{\alpha}\sigma \,d_{\alpha}\tau \\ =&\frac{1}{p(s,t)} \int_{a}^{s} \int_{c}^{t}\frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}( \sigma,\tau)\cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{\frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(y)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)} \biggr)\, d_{\alpha} \sigma \, d_{\alpha}\tau. \end{aligned}$$
(2.9)
From (2.9) and noting that \(F'\) is increasing, and Lemma 2.1, (2.7) and in view of that F is derivable on \([0,\infty)\), we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d} \biggl\{ \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\cdot F' \biggl(p(s,t)\cdot \varphi \biggl( \frac{|u(s,t)|}{p(s,t)} \biggr) \biggr) \\& \qquad {}+\frac{\partial }{\partial t}(z)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr\} \,d_{\alpha}s\,d_{\alpha }t \\& \quad \leq \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d} \biggl\{ \frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \cdot F' \bigl(z(s,t) \bigr) \\& \qquad {}+ \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(z)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr\} \,d_{\alpha}s\,d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad = \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(F\circ z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\,d_{\alpha}s\,d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad = \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t} \biggl(F \biggl( \int_{a}^{s} \int_{b}^{t}\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}( \sigma,\tau) \\& \qquad {}\cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{\frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(y)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)} \biggr)\,d_{\alpha}\sigma \,d_{\alpha}\tau \biggr) \biggr)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\,d_{\alpha}s \,d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad = F \biggl( \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}( \sigma,\tau)\cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{\frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(y)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \sigma\partial \tau}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(\sigma,\tau)} \biggr)\,d_{\alpha}\sigma \,d_{\alpha}\tau \biggr) \\& \quad = F \biggl( \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert \frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \vert }{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr)\,d_{\alpha}s \,d_{\alpha}t \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.1
Putting \(\varphi(x)=x\) in (2.7), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d} \biggl\{ \biggl\vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \biggr\vert \cdot F' \bigl(\bigl|u(s,t)\bigr|\bigr) \\& \qquad {}+\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (y)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(y(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t)\biggr\} \, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad \leq F \biggl( \int_{a}^{b} \int_{c}^{d} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \biggr\vert \, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \biggr), \end{aligned}$$
(2.10)
where
$$y(s,t)= \int_{a}^{s} \int_{c}^{t} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}( \sigma,\tau) \biggr\vert \, d_{\alpha}\sigma \, d_{\alpha}\tau. $$
This inequality (2.10) is just a two-dimensional generalization of the following inequality which was established in [20] and [21]:
$$\int_{a}^{b} \bigl\vert D_{\alpha}u(t) \bigr\vert \cdot F' \bigl( \bigl\vert u(t) \bigr\vert \bigr)\, d_{\alpha}t\leq F \biggl( \int_{a}^{b} \bigl\vert D_{\alpha}u(t) \bigr\vert \, d_{\alpha}t \biggr). $$
Theorem 2.2
Let α, \(p(s,t)\), \(u(s,t)\), \(z(s,t)\), φ, F be as in Theorem 2.1 and replace \([a,b]\times[c,d]\) by \([0,a]\times[0,b]\). Let h be a concave and increasing function on \([0,\infty)\), and ϕ be a continuous and positive function on \([0,\infty)\) and such that
$$ \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(F\circ z)_{\alpha ^{2}}(s,t)\cdot\phi \biggl( \frac{1}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr)\leq \frac{F(z(a,b))}{z(a,b)}\cdot\phi' \biggl( \frac{t}{z(a,b)} \biggr). $$
(2.11)
Then
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{0}^{a} \int_{0}^{b} \biggl\{ \psi\biggl(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \vert }{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr) \biggr)\cdot F' \biggl(p(s,t)\cdot\varphi \biggl( \frac{|u(s,t)|}{p(s,t)} \biggr) \biggr) \\& \qquad {} +\psi \biggl(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \biggr)\cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \cdot\frac{\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(z(s,t))_{\alpha}(s,t)}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr\} \, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad \leq\varPhi \biggl( \int_{0}^{a} \int_{0}^{b}\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert \frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \vert }{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr)\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \biggr), \end{aligned}$$
(2.12)
where
$$ \psi(r)=rh \biggl(\phi \biggl(\frac{1}{r} \biggr) \biggr), $$
(2.13)
and
$$ \varPhi(r)=F(r)\cdot h \biggl(\frac{1}{r} \int_{0}^{a} \int_{0}^{b}\phi ' \biggl( \frac{t}{r} \biggr)\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \biggr). $$
(2.14)
Proof
From (2.9), we have
$$ \varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert u(s,t) \vert }{p(s,t)} \biggr)\leq\frac {z(s,t)}{p(s,t)}. $$
(2.15)
From (2.7), (2.15), (2.13) (2 times), Lemma 2.1, and noting that h is a concave, increasing and using reverse Jensen’s inequality, and (2.11) and (2.14), we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{0}^{a} \int_{0}^{b} \biggl\{ \psi \biggl( \frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \vert }{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr) \biggr)\cdot F' \biggl(p(s,t)\cdot\varphi \biggl( \frac{|u(s,t)|}{p(s,t)} \biggr) \biggr) \\& \qquad {} + \psi \biggl(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \biggr)\cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \cdot\frac{\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(z)_{\alpha}(s,t)}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr\} \, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad \leq \int_{0}^{a} \int_{0}^{b} \biggl\{ \psi \biggl( \frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \biggr)\cdot F'\bigl(z(s,t) \bigr) \\& \qquad {} + h \biggl(\phi \biggl(\frac{1}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr) \biggr) \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(z)_{\alpha}(s,t) \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t) \biggr\} \, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad = \int_{0}^{a} \int_{0}^{b}h \biggl(\phi \biggl(\frac{1}{\frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr) \biggr)\cdot \biggl(\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\cdot F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr) \\& \qquad {}+\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(z)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t)\biggr)\, d_{\alpha}s \, d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad = \frac{\int_{0}^{a}\int_{0}^{b}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(F\circ z )_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\cdot h (\phi (\frac{1}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} ) )\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t}{\int_{0}^{a}\int_{0}^{b}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t} (F\circ z )_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t} \int_{0}^{a} \int _{0}^{b}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(F\circ z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad \leq h \biggl(\frac{\int_{0}^{a}\int_{0}^{b}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(F\circ z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\cdot \phi (\frac{1}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} ) \, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t}{\int_{0}^{a}\int_{0}^{b}\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(F\circ z )_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t} \biggr)F\bigl(z(a,b)\bigr) \\& \quad \leq h \biggl(\frac{\int_{0}^{a}\int_{0}^{b}\frac{F(z(a,b))}{z(a,b)}\phi ' (\frac{t}{z(a,b)} )\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha }t}{F(z(a,b))} \biggr)F\bigl(z(a,b)\bigr) \\& \quad = \varPhi\bigl(z(a,b)\bigr) \\& \quad = \varPhi \biggl( \int_{0}^{a} \int_{0}^{b}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{ \vert \frac {\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \vert }{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(p)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)} \biggr)\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.2
Putting \(\varphi(x)=x\) in (2.12), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{0}^{b}\psi \biggl( \biggl\vert \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \biggr\vert \biggr)\cdot F' \bigl(\bigl|u(s,t)\bigr| \bigr)\, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad \leq\varPhi \biggl( \int_{0}^{a} \int_{0}^{b} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(u)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t) \biggr\vert \, d_{\alpha}s\, d_{\alpha}t \biggr)-N_{\alpha}(a,b), \end{aligned}$$
(2.16)
where
$$N_{\alpha}(a,b)=\int_{0}^{a}\int_{0}^{b}\psi \biggl(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)\biggr)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigl(F'\bigl(z(s,t)\bigr)\bigr)_{\alpha}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(z)_{\alpha}(s,t)}{\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}(z)_{\alpha^{2}}(s,t)}\,d_{\alpha}s\,d_{\alpha}t. $$
This inequality (2.16) is just a two-dimensional generalization of the following inequality which was established in [21]:
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{0}^{b}\psi \biggl(D_{\alpha}p(t) \cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac { \vert D_{\alpha}u(t) \vert }{D_{\alpha}p(t)} \biggr) \biggr)\cdot F' \biggl(p(t)\cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac{|u(t)|}{p(t)} \biggr) \biggr)\, d_{\alpha}t \\& \quad \leq\varPhi \biggl( \int_{0}^{b}D_{\alpha}p(t)\cdot\varphi \biggl(\frac { \vert D_{\alpha}u(t) \vert }{ D_{\alpha}p (t)} \biggr)\, d_{\alpha}t \biggr), \end{aligned}$$
where \(D_{\alpha}p(t)=D_{\alpha}(p)(t)\), \(\psi(r)=rh (\phi (\frac{1}{r} ) )\) and \(\varPhi(r)=F(r)h (\phi (\frac{b}{r} ) )\), and h is a concave and increasing function on \([0,\infty)\).

Acknowledgements

The first author expresses his gratitude to professor G. Leng and W. Li for their valuable helps.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Title
Inequalities for Katugampola conformable partial derivatives
Authors
Chang-Jian Zhao
Wing-Sum Cheung
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1029-242X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-019-2000-3
1.
go back to reference Opial, Z.: Sur une inégalité. Ann. Pol. Math. 8, 29–32 (1960) MathSciNetCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Agarwal, R.P., Pang, P.Y.H.: Opial Inequalities with Applications in Differential and Difference Equations. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1995) CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Agarwal, R.P., Lakshmikantham, V.: Uniqueness and Nonuniqueness Criteria for Ordinary Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore (1993) CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bainov, D., Simeonov, P.: Integral Inequalities and Applications. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1992) CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Li, J.D.: Opial-type integral inequalities involving several higher order derivatives. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 167, 98–100 (1992) MathSciNetCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mitrinovič, D.S., Pečarić, J.E., Fink, A.M.: Inequalities Involving Functions and Their Integrals and Derivatives. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1991) CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cheung, W.S.: On Opial-type inequalities in two variables. Aequ. Math. 38, 236–244 (1989) MathSciNetCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cheung, W.S., Zhao, D.D., Pečarić, J.E.: Opial-type inequalities for differential operators. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 66, 2028–2039 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Godunova, E.K., Levin, V.I.: On an inequality of Maroni. Mat. Zametki 2, 221–224 (1967) MathSciNet
10.
go back to reference Mitrinovič, D.S.: Analytic Inequalities. Springer, Berlin (1970) CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pachpatte, B.G.: On integral inequalities similar to Opial’s inequality. Demonstr. Math. 22, 21–27 (1989) MathSciNetMATH
12.
go back to reference Pachpatte, B.G.: On Opial-type integral inequalities. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 120, 547–556 (1986) MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zhao, C.-J., Cheung, W.S.: Sharp integral inequalities involving high-order partial derivatives. J. Inequal. Appl. 2008, Article ID 571417 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhao, C.-J., Cheung, W.S.: On Opial-type integral inequalities and applications. Math. Inequal. Appl. 17(1), 223–232 (2014) MathSciNetMATH
15.
go back to reference Pečarić, J.E.: An integral inequality. In: Srivastava, H.M., Rassias, T.M. (eds.) Analysis, Geometry, and Groups: A Riemann Legacy Volume, Part II, pp. 472–478. Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor (1993)
16.
go back to reference Pečarić, J.E., Brnetić, I.: Note on generalization of Godunova–Levin–Opial inequality. Demonstr. Math. 30, 545–549 (1997) MathSciNetMATH
17.
go back to reference Pečarić, J.E., Brnetić, I.: Note on the generalization of Godunova–Levin–Opial inequality in several independent variables. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 215, 274–282 (1997) MathSciNetCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rozanova, G.I.: Integral inequalities with derivatives and with arbitrary convex functions. Mosk. Gos. Ped. Inst. Vcen. Zap. 460, 58–65 (1972) MathSciNet
19.
go back to reference Sarikaya, M.Z., Budak, H.: New inequalities of Opial type for conformable fractional integrals. Turk. J. Math. 41, 1164–1173 (2017) MathSciNetCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Traple, J.: On a boundary value problem for systems of ordinary differential equations of second order. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Jagiell., Pr. Mat. 5, 159–168 (1971) MathSciNetMATH
21.
go back to reference Sarikaya, M.Z., Bilisik, C.C.: Some Opial type inequalities for conformable fractional integrals. AIP Conf. Proc. 1991(1), 020013 (2018) CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sarikaya, M.Z., Budak, H.: Opial type inequalities for conformable fractional integrals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 19, Article ID 93 (2016)

Premium Partner

    Image Credits
    Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Nagarro GmbH/© Nagarro GmbH, AvePoint Deutschland GmbH/© AvePoint Deutschland GmbH, AFB Gemeinnützige GmbH/© AFB Gemeinnützige GmbH, USU GmbH/© USU GmbH, Ferrari electronic AG/© Ferrari electronic AG