Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics 3/2019

19-12-2018

Influence of Embodiment and Substrate of Social Robots on Users’ Decision-Making and Attitude

Authors: Bingcheng Wang, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau

Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Issue 3/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We explored decision-making and attitudes from humans toward robots with different embodiments and substrates. Specifically, four types of robots were compared through experiments, namely, a virtual reality robot, an augmented reality robot, a physical robot, and a physical but tele-present robot that was displayed on a screen. For the experiments, 60 participants were divided into four groups to answer ten questions, and the robots provided advice about each question. Then, the participants chose whether to take the advice and their initial and final choices were registered. We measured each participant’s faith, attachment, social presence, and credibility toward the four robots through questionnaires. We found that the physical embodiment is significantly more favored by the participants, whereas the virtual embodiment is the less favored. Moreover, a robot sharing the same substrate as the participant is preferred over one not sharing the same substrate. These findings, their interpretation, and application to robots can lead to improved design and development of social robots.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Freund E, Meister A, Roβmann J (1998) Simulation of human avatars in virtual-reality. In: Robotics 98, pp 279–285 Freund E, Meister A, Roβmann J (1998) Simulation of human avatars in virtual-reality. In: Robotics 98, pp 279–285
2.
go back to reference Warpefelt H (2015) Cues and insinuations: indicating affordances of non-player character using visual indicators. In: DiGRA Conference Warpefelt H (2015) Cues and insinuations: indicating affordances of non-player character using visual indicators. In: DiGRA Conference
3.
go back to reference Moon J (2018) Reviews of social embodiment for design of non-player characters in virtual reality-based social skill training for autistic children. Multimodal Technol Interact 2(3):53CrossRef Moon J (2018) Reviews of social embodiment for design of non-player characters in virtual reality-based social skill training for autistic children. Multimodal Technol Interact 2(3):53CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Scheier C, Pfeifer R (1999) The embodied cognitive science approach. In: Tschacher W, Dauwalder J-P (eds) Dynamics, synergetics, autonomous agents: nonlinear systems approaches to cognitive psychology and cognitive science. World Scientific, pp 159–179 Scheier C, Pfeifer R (1999) The embodied cognitive science approach. In: Tschacher W, Dauwalder J-P (eds) Dynamics, synergetics, autonomous agents: nonlinear systems approaches to cognitive psychology and cognitive science. World Scientific, pp 159–179
5.
go back to reference Li J (2015) The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int J Hum Comput Stud 77:23–37CrossRef Li J (2015) The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int J Hum Comput Stud 77:23–37CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brooks D, Chen YP, Howard AM (2015) Simulation versus embodied agents: does either induce better human adherence to physical therapy exercise? In: 2012 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob). IEEE Brooks D, Chen YP, Howard AM (2015) Simulation versus embodied agents: does either induce better human adherence to physical therapy exercise? In: 2012 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob). IEEE
7.
go back to reference Thellman S et al (2016) Physical vs. virtual agent embodiment and effects on social interaction. In: International conference on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, Berlin Thellman S et al (2016) Physical vs. virtual agent embodiment and effects on social interaction. In: International conference on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, Berlin
8.
go back to reference Milgram P et al (1995) Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In: Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies. 1995. International society for optics and photonics Milgram P et al (1995) Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In: Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies. 1995. International society for optics and photonics
10.
go back to reference Kiesler S et al (2008) Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot–like agent. Soc Cognit 26(2):169–181CrossRef Kiesler S et al (2008) Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot–like agent. Soc Cognit 26(2):169–181CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lee KM et al (2006) Can robots manifest personality?: an empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. J Commun 56(4):754–772CrossRef Lee KM et al (2006) Can robots manifest personality?: an empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. J Commun 56(4):754–772CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schultz AC, Goodrich MA (2007) Human–robot interaction: a survey. Found Trends Hum Comput Interact 1(3):203–275CrossRefMATH Schultz AC, Goodrich MA (2007) Human–robot interaction: a survey. Found Trends Hum Comput Interact 1(3):203–275CrossRefMATH
13.
go back to reference Rau PLP, Li Y, Liu J (2013) Effects of a social robot’s autonomy and group orientation on human decision-making. Adv Hum–Comput Interact 2013:1–13CrossRef Rau PLP, Li Y, Liu J (2013) Effects of a social robot’s autonomy and group orientation on human decision-making. Adv Hum–Comput Interact 2013:1–13CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wainer J et al (2006) The role of physical embodiment in human–robot interaction. In: The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. IEEE Wainer J et al (2006) The role of physical embodiment in human–robot interaction. In: The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. IEEE
15.
go back to reference Powers A et al (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction—HRI ‘07 Powers A et al (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction—HRI ‘07
16.
go back to reference Looije R, Neerincx MA, Cnossen F (2010) Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: design and evaluation of social behaviors. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(6):386–397CrossRef Looije R, Neerincx MA, Cnossen F (2010) Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: design and evaluation of social behaviors. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(6):386–397CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bainbridge WA et al (2010) The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int J Soc Robot 3(1):41–52CrossRef Bainbridge WA et al (2010) The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int J Soc Robot 3(1):41–52CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reeves B et al (2003) Robots versus on-screen agents: effects on social and emotional responses. In: CHI 2003 Reeves B et al (2003) Robots versus on-screen agents: effects on social and emotional responses. In: CHI 2003
19.
go back to reference Wainer J et al (2007) Embodiment and human–robot interaction: a task-based perspective. In: The 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007. IEEE Wainer J et al (2007) Embodiment and human–robot interaction: a task-based perspective. In: The 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007. IEEE
20.
go back to reference Li J, Chignell M (2011) Communication of emotion in social robots through simple head and arm movements. Int J Soc Robot 3(2):125–142CrossRef Li J, Chignell M (2011) Communication of emotion in social robots through simple head and arm movements. Int J Soc Robot 3(2):125–142CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Komatsu T et al (2011) Effects of different types of artifacts on interpretations of artificial subtle expressions (ASEs). In: CHI’11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM Komatsu T et al (2011) Effects of different types of artifacts on interpretations of artificial subtle expressions (ASEs). In: CHI’11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM
22.
go back to reference Shinozawa K et al (2005) Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. Int J Hum Comput Stud 62(2):267–279CrossRef Shinozawa K et al (2005) Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. Int J Hum Comput Stud 62(2):267–279CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ju W, Sirkin D (2010) Animate objects: how physical motion encourages public interaction. In: International conference on persuasive technology. Springer, Berlin Ju W, Sirkin D (2010) Animate objects: how physical motion encourages public interaction. In: International conference on persuasive technology. Springer, Berlin
24.
go back to reference Jost C, Le Pévédic B, Duhaut D (2012) Robot is best to play with human! In: RO-MAN, 2012 IEEE Jost C, Le Pévédic B, Duhaut D (2012) Robot is best to play with human! In: RO-MAN, 2012 IEEE
25.
go back to reference Komatsu T (2010) Comparison an on-screen agent with a robotic agent in an everyday interaction style: how to make users react toward an on-screen agent as if they are reacting toward a robotic agent. In: Human–robot interaction. InTech Komatsu T (2010) Comparison an on-screen agent with a robotic agent in an everyday interaction style: how to make users react toward an on-screen agent as if they are reacting toward a robotic agent. In: Human–robot interaction. InTech
26.
go back to reference Nomura T, Sasa M (2009) Investigation of differences on impressions of and behaviors toward real and virtual robots between elder people and university students. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2009. ICORR 2009. IEEE Nomura T, Sasa M (2009) Investigation of differences on impressions of and behaviors toward real and virtual robots between elder people and university students. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2009. ICORR 2009. IEEE
27.
go back to reference Fasola J, Mataric M (2013) A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. J Hum Robot Interact 2(2):3–32CrossRef Fasola J, Mataric M (2013) A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. J Hum Robot Interact 2(2):3–32CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lim S, Reeves B (2010) Computer agents versus avatars: responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(1–2):57–68CrossRef Lim S, Reeves B (2010) Computer agents versus avatars: responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(1–2):57–68CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bailenson JN, Blascovich J (2004) Avatars. In: Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction. Berkshire Publishing Group, Citeseer Bailenson JN, Blascovich J (2004) Avatars. In: Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction. Berkshire Publishing Group, Citeseer
31.
go back to reference Pritchard SC et al (2016) Non-hierarchical influence of visual form, touch, and position cues on embodiment, agency, and presence in virtual reality. Front Psychol 7:1649CrossRef Pritchard SC et al (2016) Non-hierarchical influence of visual form, touch, and position cues on embodiment, agency, and presence in virtual reality. Front Psychol 7:1649CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rau PLP, Li Y, Li D (2009) Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots. Comput Hum Behav 25(2):587–595CrossRef Rau PLP, Li Y, Li D (2009) Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots. Comput Hum Behav 25(2):587–595CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T (2005) Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction. AI Soc 20(2):138–150CrossRef Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T (2005) Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction. AI Soc 20(2):138–150CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Madsen M, Gregor S (2000) Measuring human–computer trust. In: Proceedings of the 11th Australasian conference on information systems Madsen M, Gregor S (2000) Measuring human–computer trust. In: Proceedings of the 11th Australasian conference on information systems
35.
go back to reference Fogg B, Tseng H (1999) The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Fogg B, Tseng H (1999) The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM
36.
go back to reference Riek L (2012) Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. J Hum Robot Interact 1:119–136CrossRef Riek L (2012) Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. J Hum Robot Interact 1:119–136CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of Embodiment and Substrate of Social Robots on Users’ Decision-Making and Attitude
Authors
Bingcheng Wang
Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
Publication date
19-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Electronic ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0510-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

International Journal of Social Robotics 3/2019 Go to the issue

Editorial

Editorial

Premium Partners