Top

Published in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Influence of Topography on Adhesion and Bioadhesion

Authors : Donglee Shin, J. Carson Meredith

Published in: Contamination Mitigating Polymeric Coatings for Extreme Environments

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Nature, through evolution, has developed many different structured adhesive systems to create strong and reliable adhesion on various substrates, including those with rough or smooth surfaces under dry and wet conditions. However, the details of the adhesive interactions of structured or roughened surfaces are just beginning to be resolved. This chapter examines the physical principles of dry and wet adhesion of structured surfaces from simple to complex geometries. A particular emphasis is placed on bioadhesive systems that achieve an impressive level of control over adhesion via fascinating structural features such as fibrils and spines. The influence of surface morphology and roughness on adhesion is also covered. Recent studies show that the attachment abilities of bioadhesive systems are dramatically reduced below a critical roughness. Based on this and other principles borrowed from nature, strategies can be pursued to create anti-adhesive surfaces via manipulating the surface topography of the substrate.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Aerospace and Marine Environments as Design Spaces for Contamination-Mitigating Polymeric Coatings

next chapter Use of Liquid Ad(ab)sorbing Surfaces for Anti-icing Applications

Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Atherton S, Newton MI (2010) An introduction to superhydrophobicity. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 161:124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2009.11.001CrossRef

Lv J, Song Y, Jiang L, Wang J (2014) Bioinspired strategies for anti-icing. ACS Nano 8:3152–3169. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn406522nCrossRefPubMed

Lee A, Moon MW, Lim H et al (2012) Water harvest via dewing. Langmuir 28:10183–10191. https://doi.org/10.1021/la3013987CrossRefPubMed

Park K-C, Kim P, Grinthal A et al (2016) Condensation on slippery asymmetric bumps. Nature 531:78–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16956CrossRefPubMed

Gu ZZ, Uetsuka H, Takahashi K et al (2003) Structural color and the lotus effect. Angew Chem Int Ed 42:894–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200390235CrossRef

Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W et al (1997) Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. J Fluid Mech 338:59–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096004673CrossRef

Geim AK, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV et al (2003) Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nat Mater 2:461–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat917CrossRefPubMed

Hao P, Yao Z, Zhang X (2011) Study of dynamic hydrophobicity of micro-structured hydrophobic surfaces and lotus leaves. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 54:675–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-011-4269-1CrossRef

Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050096CrossRef

10.

Parker AR, Lawrence CR (2001) Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature 414:33–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/35102108CrossRefPubMed

11.

Parker AR, Townley HE (2007) Biomimetics of photonic nanostructures. Nat Nanotechnol 2:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.152CrossRefPubMed

12.

Luo Y, Liu Y, Anderson J et al (2015) Improvement of water-repellent and hydrodynamic drag reduction properties on bioinspired surface and exploring sharkskin effect mechanism. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 120:369–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-015-9198-9CrossRef

13.

Autumn K, Liang YA, Hsieh ST et al (2000) Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405:681–685CrossRefPubMed

14.

Federle W, Barnes WJP, Baumgartner W et al (2006) Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. J R Soc Interface 3:689–697. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Varenberg M, Pugno NM, Gorb SN (2010) Spatulate structures in biological fibrillar adhesion. Soft Matter 6:3269. https://doi.org/10.1039/c003207gCrossRef

16.

Spolenak R, Gorb S, Gao H, Arzt E (2005) Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 461:305–319. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2004.1326CrossRef

17.

Dirks JH, Li M, Kabla A, Federle W (2012) In vivo dynamics of the internal fibrous structure in smooth adhesive pads of insects. Acta Biomater 8:2730–2736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.008CrossRefPubMed

18.

Lin H, Qu Z, Meredith JC (2016) Pressure sensitive microparticle adhesion through biomimicry of the pollen-stigma interaction. Soft Matter 12:2965–2975. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM02845KCrossRefPubMed

19.

Edlund AF, Swanson R, Preuss D (2004) Pollen and stigma structure and function: the role of diversity in pollination. Plant Cell 16:S84–S97. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.015800CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Scholz I, Bückins M, Dolge L et al (2010) Slippery surfaces of pitcher plants: nepenthes wax crystals minimize insect attachment via microscopic surface roughness. J Exp Biol 213:1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.035618CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bauer U, Federle W (2009) The insect-trapping rim of nepenthes pitchers: surface structure and function. Plant Signal Behav 4:1019–1023. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.11.9664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Kim P, Wong TS, Alvarenga J et al (2012) Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance. ACS Nano 6:6569–6577. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn302310qCrossRefPubMed

23.

Kreder MJ, Alvarenga J, Kim P, Aizenberg J (2016) Design of anti-icing surfaces: smooth, textured or slippery? Nat Rev Mater 1:15003. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2015.3CrossRef

24.

Efimenko K, Finlay J, Callow ME et al (2009) Development and testing of hierarchically wrinkled coatings for marine antifouling. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1:1031–1040. https://doi.org/10.1021/am9000562CrossRefPubMed

25.

Hamaker HC (1937) The London—van der Waals attraction between spherical particles. Physica 4:1058–1072CrossRef

26.

Butt H-J, Kappl M (2009) Normal capillary forces. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 146:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.10.002CrossRef

27.

Mehrotra VP, Sastry KVS (1980) Pendular bond strength between unequal-sized spherical particles. Powder Technol 25:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(80)87031-8CrossRef

28.

Gu Y, Li D (1999) The van der Waals interaction between a spherical particle and a cylinder. J Colloid Interface Sci 217:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.6349CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hartmann U (1991) Van der Waals interactions between sharp probes and flat sample surfaces. Phys Rev B 43:2404–2407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.2404CrossRef

30.

Tselishchev YG, Val’tsifer VA (2003) Influence of the type of contact between particles joined by a liquid bridge on the capillary cohesive forces. Colloid J 65:385–389. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024275327145CrossRef

31.

Tadmor R (2001) The London-van der Waals interaction energy between objects of various geometries. J Phys Condens Matter 13:L195–L202. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/13/9/101CrossRef

32.

Majumder A, Sharma A, Ghatak A (2010) Bioinspired adhesion and adhesives: controlling adhesion by micro-nano structuring of soft surfaces. In: Chakraborty S (ed) Microfluid. Microfabr. Springer, New York, pp 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1543-6_7

33.

Labonte D, Federle W (2015) Rate-dependence of “wet” biological adhesives and the function of the pad secretion in insects. Soft Matter 11:8661–8673. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM01496DCrossRefPubMed

34.

Jagota A, Hui CY (2011) Adhesion, friction, and compliance of biomimetic and bioinspired structured interfaces. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 72:253–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2011.08.001CrossRef

35.

Wohl CJ, Smith JG, Palmieri FL, Connell JW (2017) The physics of insect impact and residue expansion. Adv Polym Sci (in press)

36.

Wong T-S, Kang SH, Tang SKY et al (2011) Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity. Nature 477:443–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10447CrossRefPubMed

37.

Gorb SN (2008) Biological attachment devices: exploring nature’s diversity for biomimetics. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 366:1557–1574. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2172CrossRef

38.

Gorb SN (2011) Biological fibrillar adhesives: functional principles and biomimetic applications. In: Handb Adhes Technol, pp 1409–1436. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01169-6_54

39.

Derks D, Lindner A, Creton C, Bonn D (2003) Cohesive failure of thin layers of soft model adhesives under tension. J Appl Phys 93:1557–1566. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1533095CrossRef

40.

Croll S (2002) DLVO theory applied to TiO2 pigments and other materials in latex paints. Prog Org Coat 44:131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9440(01)00261-2CrossRef

41.

Lin L (2003) Mechanisms of pigment dispersion. Pigm Resin Technol 32:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/03699420310464784CrossRef

42.

Leite FL, Bueno CC, Da Róz AL et al (2012) Theoretical models for surface forces and adhesion and their measurement using atomic force microscopy. Int J Mol Sci 13(10):12773–12856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131012773CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Israelachvili JN (2010) Intermolecular and surface forces, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge, p 710. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375182-9.10025-9

44.

Hertz H (1896) Miscellaneous papers. Macmillan, London

45.

Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD (1971) Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 324:301–313. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1971.0141CrossRef

46.

Grierson DS, Flater EE, Carpick RW (2005) Accounting for the JKR-DMT transition in adhesion and friction measurements with atomic force microscopy. J Adhes Sci Technol 19:291–311. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568561054352685CrossRef

47.

Kamperman M, Kroner E, Del Campo A et al (2010) Functional adhesive surfaces with “Gecko” effect: the concept of contact splitting. Adv Eng Mater 12:335–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201000104CrossRef

48.

Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YP (1975) Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 53:314–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1CrossRef

49.

Götzinger M, Peukert W (2004) Particle adhesion force distributions on rough surfaces. Langmuir 20:5298–5303. https://doi.org/10.1021/la049914fCrossRefPubMed

50.

Rabinovich YI, Adler JJ, Ata A et al (2000) Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 232:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.7167CrossRefPubMed

51.

Fuller KNG, Tabor D (1975) The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 345:327–342. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1975.0138CrossRef

52.

Persson BNJ, Tosatti E (2001) The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. J Chem Phys 115:5597–5610. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1398300CrossRef

53.

Rumpf H (1974) Die Wissenschaft des agglomerierens. Chem Ing Tech 46:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.330460102CrossRef

54.

Gao H, Yao H (2004) Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:7851–7856. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400757101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Eichenlaub S, Kumar G, Beaudoin S (2006) A modeling approach to describe the adhesion of rough, asymmetric particles to surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 299:656–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.010CrossRefPubMed

56.

Prokopovich P, Starov V (2011) Adhesion models: from single to multiple asperity contacts. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 168:210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2011.03.004CrossRef

57.

Yu J, Chary S, Das S et al (2012) Friction and adhesion of gecko-inspired PDMS flaps on rough surfaces. Langmuir 28:11527–11534. https://doi.org/10.1021/la301783qCrossRefPubMed

58.

Cai S, Bhushan B (2007) Meniscus and viscous forces during normal separation of liquid-mediated contacts. Nanotechnology 18:465704. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/46/465704CrossRefPubMed

59.

Dirks JH, Federle W (2011) Fluid-based adhesion in insects – principles and challenges. Soft Matter 7:11047. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm06269gCrossRef

60.

Dirks JH (2014) Physical principles of fluid-mediated insect attachment-shouldn’t insects slip? Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.127CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Orr FM, Scriven LE, Rivas AP (1975) Pendular rings between solids: meniscus properties and capillary force. J Fluid Mech 67:723. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075000572CrossRef

62.

Matthewson MJ (1988) Adhesion of spheres by thin liquid films. Philos Mag A 57:207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418618808204510CrossRef

63.

Ata A, Rabinovich Y, Singh R (2002) Role of surface roughness in capillary adhesion. J Adhes Sci Technol 4243:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856102760067145CrossRef

64.

Willett CD, Adams MJ, Johnson SA, Seville JPK (2000) Capillary bridges between two spherical bodies. Langmuir 16:9396–9405. https://doi.org/10.1021/la000657yCrossRef

65.

Rabinovich YI, Esayanur MS, Moudgil BM (2005) Capillary forces between two spheres with a fixed volume liquid bridge: theory and experiment. Langmuir 21:10992–10997. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0517639CrossRefPubMed

66.

Bhushan B (2003) Adhesion and stiction: mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Nanom Struct 21:2262. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1627336CrossRef

67.

Lee T, Charrault E, Neto C (2014) Interfacial slip on rough, patterned and soft surfaces: a review of experiments and simulations. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 210:21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.02.015CrossRef

68.

Mongruel A, Chastel T, Asmolov ES, Vinogradova OI (2013) Effective hydrodynamic boundary conditions for microtextured surfaces. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 87:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.011002CrossRef

69.

Kunert C, Harting J, Vinogradova OI (2010) Random-roughness hydrodynamic boundary conditions. Phys Rev Lett 105:2–5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.016001CrossRef

70.

Maali A, Pan Y, Bhushan B, Charlaix E (2012) Hydrodynamic drag-force measurement and slip length on microstructured surfaces. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 85:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.066310CrossRef

71.

Vinogradova OI (1995) Drainage of a thin liquid film confined between hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 11:2213–2220. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00006a059CrossRef

72.

Pilkington GA, Gupta R, Fréchette J (2016) Scaling hydrodynamic boundary conditions of microstructured surfaces in the thin channel limit. Langmuir 32:2360–2368. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04134CrossRefPubMed

73.

Nizkaya TV, Dubov AL, Mourran A, Vinogradova OI (2016) Probing effective slippage on superhydrophobic surfaces by atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter 12:6910–6917. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM01074ACrossRefPubMed

74.

Creton C, Gorb SN (2007) Sticky feet: from animals to materials. MRS Bull 32:466–472CrossRef

75.

Pacini E, Hesse M (2005) Pollenkitt - its composition, forms and functions. Flora Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants 200:399–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.02.006CrossRef

76.

Lin H, Gomez I, Meredith JC (2013) Pollenkitt wetting mechanism enables species-specific tunable pollen adhesion. Langmuir 29:3012–3023CrossRefPubMed

77.

Huber G, Gorb SN, Hosoda N et al (2007) Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion. Acta Biomater 3:607–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.007CrossRefPubMed

78.

Lake GJ, Thomas AG (1967) The strength of highly elastic materials. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 300:108–119. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1967.0160CrossRef

79.

Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R (2003) From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:10603–10606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1534701100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

80.

Peattie AM, Full RJ (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:18595–18600. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707591104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Labonte D, Clemente CJ, Dittrich A et al (2016) Extreme positive allometry of animal adhesive pads and the size limits of adhesion-based climbing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:201519459. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519459113CrossRef

82.

Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YA et al (2002) Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:12252–12256. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192252799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

83.

Bhushan B, Sayer RA (2007) Gecko feet: natural attachment systems for smart adhesion. In: Appl Scanning Probe Methods VII, pp 41–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/11785705

84.

Gao H, Wang X, Yao H et al (2005) Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mech Mater 37:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2004.03.008CrossRef

85.

Bullock JMR, Drechsler P, Federle W (2008) Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence. J Exp Biol 211:3333–3343. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.020941CrossRefPubMed

86.

Autumn K, Majidi C, Groff RE et al (2006) Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays. J Exp Biol 209:3558–3568. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02469CrossRefPubMed

87.

Tian Y, Pesika N, Zeng H et al (2006) Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19320–19325. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608841103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

88.

Drechsler P, Federle W (2006) Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192:1213–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0150-5CrossRefPubMed

89.

Gorb EV, Hosoda N, Miksch C, Gorb SN (2010) Slippery pores: anti-adhesive effect of nanoporous substrates on the beetle attachment system. J R Soc Interface 7:1571–1579. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0081CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

90.

De Souza EJ, Brinkmann M, Mohrdieck C, Arzt E (2008) Enhancement of capillary forces by multiple liquid bridges. Langmuir 24:8813–8820. https://doi.org/10.1021/la8005376CrossRefPubMed

91.

Su Y, Ji B, Huang Y, Hwang K (2007) Effects of contact shape on biological wet adhesion. J Mater Sci 42:8885–8893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1759-7CrossRef

92.

Gorb S, Varenberg M (2007) Mushroom-shaped geometry of contact elements in biological adhesive systems. J Adhes Sci Technol 21:1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856107782328317CrossRef

93.

Barnes WJP (2007) Functional morphology and design constraints of smooth adhesive pads. MRS Bull 32:479–485. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2007.81CrossRef

94.

Barnes WJP, Goodwyn PJP, Nokhbatolfoghahai M, Gorb SN (2011) Elastic modulus of tree frog adhesive toe pads. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 197:969–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-011-0658-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

95.

Barnes WJP, Oines C, Smith JM (2006) Whole animal measurements of shear and adhesive forces in adult tree frogs: insights into underlying mechanisms of adhesion obtained from studying the effects of size and scale. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192:1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0146-1CrossRefPubMed

96.

Scholz I, Barnes WJP, Smith JM, Baumgartner W (2009) Ultrastructure and physical properties of an adhesive surface, the toe pad epithelium of the tree frog, Litoria Caerulea white. J Exp Biol 212:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.019232CrossRefPubMed

97.

Iturri J, Xue L, Kappl M et al (2015) Torrent frog-inspired adhesives: attachment to flooded surfaces. Adv Funct Mater 25:1499–1505. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201403751CrossRef

98.

Endlein T, Barnes WJP, Samuel DS et al (2013) Sticking under wet conditions: the remarkable attachment abilities of the torrent frog, Staurois Guttatus. PLoS One 8(9):e73810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

99.

Dirks J-H, Clemente CJ, Federle W (2010) Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping. J R Soc Interface 7:587–593. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0308CrossRefPubMed

100.

Thio BJR, Lee JH, Meredith JC (2009) Characterization of ragweed pollen adhesion to polyamides and polystyrene using atomic force microscopy. Environ Sci Technol 43:4308–4313CrossRefPubMed

101.

Lin H, Lizarraga L, Bottomley LA, Meredith JC (2015) Effect of water absorption on pollen adhesion. J Colloid Interface Sci 442:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.065CrossRefPubMed

102.

Zinkl GM, Zwiebel BI, Grier DG, Preuss D (1999) Pollen-stigma adhesion in Arabidopsis: a species-specific interaction mediated by lipophilic molecules in the pollen exine. Development 126:5431–5440PubMed

103.

Luu DT, Passelègue E, Dumas C, Heizmann P (1998) Pollen-stigma capture is not species discriminant within the Brassicaceae Family. C R Acad Sci III 321:747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(98)80015-2CrossRef

104.

Cho WK, Ankrum JA, Guo D et al (2012) Microstructured barbs on the north American porcupine quill enable easy tissue penetration and difficult removal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:21289–21294. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216441109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

105.

Ling J, Jiang L, Chen K et al (2016) Insertion and pull behavior of worker honeybee stinger. J Bionic Eng 13:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60303-7CrossRef

106.

Zhao Z-L, Zhao H-P, Ma G-J et al (2015) Structures, properties, and functions of the stings of honey bees and paper wasps: a comparative study. Biol Open 4:921–928. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.012195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

107.

Yang SY, O’Cearbhaill ED, Sisk GC et al (2013) A bioinspired swellable microneedle adhesive for mechanical interlocking with tissue. Nat Commun 4:1702. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2715CrossRefPubMed

108.

Song Y, Dai Z, Wang Z et al (2016) The synergy between the insect-inspired claws and adhesive pads increases the attachment ability on various rough surfaces. Sci Rep 6:26219. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26219CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

109.

Wolff JO, Gorb SN (2012) Surface roughness effects on attachment ability of the spider Philodromus Dispar (Araneae, Philodromidae). J Exp Biol 215:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.061507CrossRefPubMed

110.

Wang L, Johannesson CM, Zhou Q (2015) Effect of surface roughness on attachment ability of locust Locusta migratoria manilensis. Wear 332:694–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.02.036CrossRef

111.

Bullock JMR, Federle W (2011) The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle Gastrophysa viridula. Insect Sci 18:298–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01369.xCrossRef

112.

Peressadko AG, Gorb SN (2004) Surface profile and friction force generated by insects. In: First Int Ind Conf Bionik 2004, pp 257–261

113.

Prüm B, Florian Bohn H, Seidel R et al (2013) Plant surfaces with cuticular folds and their replicas: influence of microstructuring and surface chemistry on the attachment of a leaf beetle. Acta Biomater 9:6360–6368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.030CrossRefPubMed

114.

Gaume L, Perret P, Gorb E et al (2004) How do plant waxes cause flies to slide? Experimental tests of wax-based trapping mechanisms in three pitfall carnivorous plants. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2003.11.005CrossRefPubMed

115.

Gorb E, Haas K, Henrich A et al (2005) Composite structure of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on insect attachment. J Exp Biol 208:4651–4662. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01939CrossRefPubMed

116.

Gorb EV, Purtov J, Gorb SN (2014) Adhesion force measurements on the two wax layers of the waxy zone in Nepenthes alata pitchers. Sci Rep 4:5154. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

117.

Gorb EV, Baum MJ, Gorb SN (2013) Development and regeneration ability of the wax coverage in Nepenthes alata pitchers: a cryo-SEM approach. Sci Rep 3:3078. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03078CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

118.

Eichler-Volf A, Kovalev A, Wedeking T et al (2016) Bioinspired monolithic polymer microsphere arrays as generically anti-adhesive surfaces. Bioinspir Biomim 11:25002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/11/2/025002CrossRef

119.

Varanasi KK, Deng T, Smith JD et al (2010) Frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 97:234102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3524513CrossRef

120.

Schutzius TM, Jung S, Maitra T et al (2015) Physics of icing and rational design of surfaces with extraordinary icephobicity. Langmuir 31:4807–4821. https://doi.org/10.1021/la502586aCrossRefPubMed

121.

Wohl CJ, Smith JG, Penner RK et al (2013) Evaluation of commercially available materials to mitigate insect residue adhesion on wing leading edge surfaces. Prog Org Coat 76:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.08.009CrossRef

122.

Krishnan KG, Milionis A, Loth E et al (2017) Influence of hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces on reducing aerodynamic insect residues. Appl Surf Sci 392:723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.096CrossRef

123.

Carman ML, Estes TG, Feinberg AW et al (2006) Engineered antifouling microtopographies - correlating wettability with cell attachment. Biofouling 22:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010500484854CrossRefPubMed

124.

Genzer J, Efimenko K (2006) Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to marine fouling: a review. Biofouling 22:339–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010600980223CrossRefPubMed

125.

Scardino AJ, de Nys R (2011) Mini review: biomimetic models and bioinspired surfaces for fouling control. Biofouling 27:73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2010.536837CrossRefPubMed

126.

Magin CM, Cooper SP, Brennan AB (2010) Non-toxic antifouling strategies. Mater Today 13:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70058-4CrossRef

127.

Borodich FM, Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2010) Fracture behaviour of plant epicuticular wax crystals and its role in preventing insect attachment: a theoretical approach. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 100:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-010-5794-xCrossRef

128.

Edwards JS, Tarkanian M (1970) The adhesive pads of Heteroptera: a re-examination. Proc R Entomol Soc Lond A Gen Entomol 45:1–5

129.

Bauer U, Federle W, Seidel H et al (2015) How to catch more prey with less effective traps: explaining the evolution of temporarily inactive traps in carnivorous pitcher plants. Proc Biol Sci 282:20142675. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

130.

Bauer U, Bohn HF, Federle W (2008) Harmless nectar source or deadly trap: nepenthes pitchers are activated by rain, condensation and nectar. Proc Biol Sci 275:259–265. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1402CrossRefPubMed

131.

Bohn HF, Federle W (2004) Insect aquaplaning: nepenthes pitcher plants capture prey with the peristome, a fully wettable water-lubricated anisotropic surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:14138–14143. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405885101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

132.

Epstein AK, Wong T-S, Belisle RA et al (2012) Liquid-infused structured surfaces with exceptional anti-biofouling performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:13182–13187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201973109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

133.

Darmanin T, Guittard F (2013) Recent advances in the potential applications of bioinspired superhydrophobic materials. R Soc Chem 0:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA02071ECrossRef

134.

Sun X, Damle VG, Liu S, Rykaczewski K (2015) Bioinspired stimuli-responsive and antifreeze-secreting anti-icing coatings. Adv Mater Interfaces 2:25–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201400479CrossRef

135.

Bhushan B (2012) Bioinspired structured surfaces. Langmuir 28:1698–1714. https://doi.org/10.1021/la2043729CrossRefPubMed

136.

Ivanova EP, Hasan J, Webb HK et al (2013) Bactericidal activity of black silicon. Nat Commun 4:2838. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3838CrossRefPubMed

Title: Influence of Topography on Adhesion and Bioadhesion
Authors: Donglee Shin
J. Carson Meredith
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Contamination Mitigating Polymeric Coatings for Extreme Environments
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45838-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-45839-3

Copyright Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2017_40

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Premium Partners