Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Innovation and Future Technology Scenarios in Health Care: Ideas and Studies

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Innovations are turning the health care market into a technology-dominated sector. Artificial intelligence (AI), preventive medicine and all variations of upcoming technology will influence the health care market of the future. In the short term, it seems unthinkable in times when all expect higher costs in the future that we will accept that our economies need to lower health care costs by 20% or even more. People are getting older, leading to many additional treatments in the next decades, e.g. knee replacement treatments, cancer therapy treatments, coronary heart disease treatments and many other therapies that will emerge should people reach ages of, on average, 100 or more. The economy can only meet the requirements for successful international economic competition if we stop the upcoming explosion in health care costs, which are mostly financed by health insurance contributions and taxes. However, the reality is that our health care systems in Europe will not be able to deliver the best medicine to all people, especially not in those countries with demographic change, if the costs rise in the next decades as forecasts predict. We would like to present several ideas for and long-term scenarios of a health care revolution as well as present scientific studies, including the acceptance of users and patients, because we think acceptance by users and patients is a key factor for success in the future. Automation, BIG DATA combined with AI and patient cooperation are the requirements for a highly efficient and cost-effective health care system. Another key factor is preventive medicine. Let’s start with the idea of logic automation in health care.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417.CrossRef Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417.CrossRef
go back to reference Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857–875.CrossRef Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857–875.CrossRef
go back to reference Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2013). Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 60–69. Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2013). Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 60–69.
go back to reference Bullinger, A. C., et al. (2012). Open innovation in health care: Analysis of an open health platform. Health Policy, 105(2), 165–175.CrossRef Bullinger, A. C., et al. (2012). Open innovation in health care: Analysis of an open health platform. Health Policy, 105(2), 165–175.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Eckberg, D. L., & Neurolab Autonomic Nervous System Team. (2003). Bursting into space: Alterations of sympathetic control by space travel. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 177(3), 299–311.CrossRef Eckberg, D. L., & Neurolab Autonomic Nervous System Team. (2003). Bursting into space: Alterations of sympathetic control by space travel. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 177(3), 299–311.CrossRef
go back to reference Estrin, D., & Sim, I. (2010). Open mHealth architecture: An engine for health care innovation. Science, 330(6005), 759–760.CrossRef Estrin, D., & Sim, I. (2010). Open mHealth architecture: An engine for health care innovation. Science, 330(6005), 759–760.CrossRef
go back to reference Harhoff, D., & Mayrhofer, P. (2010). Managing user communities and hybrid innovation processes: Concepts and design implications. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 137–144.CrossRef Harhoff, D., & Mayrhofer, P. (2010). Managing user communities and hybrid innovation processes: Concepts and design implications. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 137–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a “low-tech” field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 213–221.CrossRef Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a “low-tech” field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 213–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Kanto, L., et al. (2014). How do customer and user understanding, the use of prototypes and distributed collaboration support rapid innovation activities? In Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2014 Portland International Conference. IEEE. Kanto, L., et al. (2014). How do customer and user understanding, the use of prototypes and distributed collaboration support rapid innovation activities? In Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2014 Portland International Conference. IEEE.
go back to reference Lakhani, K. R., Boudreau, K. J., Loh, P. R., et al. (2013). Prize-based contests can provide solutions to computational biology problems. Nature Biotechnology, 31(2), 108.CrossRef Lakhani, K. R., Boudreau, K. J., Loh, P. R., et al. (2013). Prize-based contests can provide solutions to computational biology problems. Nature Biotechnology, 31(2), 108.CrossRef
go back to reference Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2006). Users’ contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management, 36(3), 251–272.CrossRef Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2006). Users’ contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management, 36(3), 251–272.CrossRef
go back to reference Levchenko, I., Xu, S., Mazouffre, S., Keidar, M., & Bazaka, K. (2019). Mars colonization: Beyond getting there. Global Challenges, 3(1), 1800062.CrossRef Levchenko, I., Xu, S., Mazouffre, S., Keidar, M., & Bazaka, K. (2019). Mars colonization: Beyond getting there. Global Challenges, 3(1), 1800062.CrossRef
go back to reference Mermel, L. A. (2012). Infection prevention and control during prolonged human space travel. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 56(1), 123–130.CrossRef Mermel, L. A. (2012). Infection prevention and control during prolonged human space travel. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 56(1), 123–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Mion, F. U. (2019). Flying drones to exchange lab samples: Service innovation by the Swiss Multisite Hospital EOC. In Service design and service thinking in healthcare and hospital management (pp. 463–479). Cham: Springer.CrossRef Mion, F. U. (2019). Flying drones to exchange lab samples: Service innovation by the Swiss Multisite Hospital EOC. In Service design and service thinking in healthcare and hospital management (pp. 463–479). Cham: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Parmentier, G., & Mangematin, V. (2014). Orchestrating innovation with user communities in the creative industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 40–53.CrossRef Parmentier, G., & Mangematin, V. (2014). Orchestrating innovation with user communities in the creative industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 40–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Scott, J. E., & Scott, C. H. (2019). Models for drone delivery of medications and other healthcare items. In Unmanned aerial vehicles: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 376–392). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.CrossRef Scott, J. E., & Scott, C. H. (2019). Models for drone delivery of medications and other healthcare items. In Unmanned aerial vehicles: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 376–392). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.CrossRef
go back to reference Steen, M., Buijs, J., & Williams, D. (2014). The role of scenarios and demonstrators in promoting shared understanding in innovation projects. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 11(01), 1440001.CrossRef Steen, M., Buijs, J., & Williams, D. (2014). The role of scenarios and demonstrators in promoting shared understanding in innovation projects. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 11(01), 1440001.CrossRef
go back to reference Van de Vrande, V., et al. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6), 423–437.CrossRef Van de Vrande, V., et al. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6), 423–437.CrossRef
go back to reference Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55(1), 63–78.CrossRef Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55(1), 63–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57. Von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57.
go back to reference West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy, 32(7), 1259–1285.CrossRef West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy, 32(7), 1259–1285.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Innovation and Future Technology Scenarios in Health Care: Ideas and Studies
Author
Philipp Plugmann
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41309-5_4