Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Institutional Determinants of IR Disclosure Quality

Authors : Marco Fasan, Carlo Marcon, Chiara Mio

Published in: Integrated Reporting

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to study whether and how the institutional context where a company operates influences Integrated Reporting (IR) disclosure quality, as measured through a unique hand-collected dataset. Our results show strong empirical support for the hypothesis that a country’s institutional characteristics significantly shape IR disclosure quality. In particular, we find that disclosure quality is higher in civil law countries and in countries with higher employee protection, levels of market coordination, ownership concentration, education, density of trade unions, corporate social responsibility and economic development. Conversely, the higher the investor protection, the lower the IR disclosure quality. These results allow us to draw new insights on the nature of IR and its relationship with institutional contexts.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference AccountAbility. 2005. The accountability rating. London: AccountAbility. AccountAbility. 2005. The accountability rating. London: AccountAbility.
go back to reference Amran, A., and R. Haniffa. 2011. Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: Case of a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment 20: 141–156.CrossRef Amran, A., and R. Haniffa. 2011. Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: Case of a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment 20: 141–156.CrossRef
go back to reference Brammer, S., and S. Pavelin. 2006. Voluntary environmental disclosure by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33: 1168–1188.CrossRef Brammer, S., and S. Pavelin. 2006. Voluntary environmental disclosure by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33: 1168–1188.CrossRef
go back to reference Brammer, S., G. Jackson, and D. Matten. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review 10: 3–28.CrossRef Brammer, S., G. Jackson, and D. Matten. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review 10: 3–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Buhr, N., and M. Freedman. 2001. Culture, institutional factors and differences in environmental disclosure between Canada and the United States. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12: 293–322.CrossRef Buhr, N., and M. Freedman. 2001. Culture, institutional factors and differences in environmental disclosure between Canada and the United States. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12: 293–322.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, S., and P. Bouvain. 2009. Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics 87: 299–317.CrossRef Chen, S., and P. Bouvain. 2009. Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics 87: 299–317.CrossRef
go back to reference Clarkson, P.M., Y. Li, G.D. Richardson, and S.P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33: 303–327.CrossRef Clarkson, P.M., Y. Li, G.D. Richardson, and S.P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33: 303–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 2003. Environmental reporting management: A continental European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22: 43–62.CrossRef Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 2003. Environmental reporting management: A continental European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22: 43–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Da Silva Monteiro, S.M., and B. Aibar-Guzman. 2010. Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 185–204.CrossRef Da Silva Monteiro, S.M., and B. Aibar-Guzman. 2010. Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 185–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Dimaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.CrossRef Dimaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.CrossRef
go back to reference Dong, M., and A. Stettler. 2011. Estimating firm-level and country-level effects in cross-sectional analyses: An application of hierarchical modeling in corporate disclosure studies. The International Journal of Accounting 46: 271–303.CrossRef Dong, M., and A. Stettler. 2011. Estimating firm-level and country-level effects in cross-sectional analyses: An application of hierarchical modeling in corporate disclosure studies. The International Journal of Accounting 46: 271–303.CrossRef
go back to reference Fortanier, F., A. Kolk, and J. Pinske. 2011. Harmonization in CSR reporting: MNEs and global CSR standards. Management International Review 51: 665–696.CrossRef Fortanier, F., A. Kolk, and J. Pinske. 2011. Harmonization in CSR reporting: MNEs and global CSR standards. Management International Review 51: 665–696.CrossRef
go back to reference Frias-Aceituno, J.V., L. Rodriguez-Ariza, and I.M. Garcia-Sanchez. 2013a. The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20: 219–233.CrossRef Frias-Aceituno, J.V., L. Rodriguez-Ariza, and I.M. Garcia-Sanchez. 2013a. The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20: 219–233.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2013b. Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study. Journal of Cleaner Production 44: 45–55. ———. 2013b. Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study. Journal of Cleaner Production 44: 45–55.
go back to reference ———. 2014. Explanatory factors of integrated sustainability and financial reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment 23: 56–72. ———. 2014. Explanatory factors of integrated sustainability and financial reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment 23: 56–72.
go back to reference Gallo, P.J., and L. Jones Christensen. 2011. Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business & Society 50: 315–349.CrossRef Gallo, P.J., and L. Jones Christensen. 2011. Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business & Society 50: 315–349.CrossRef
go back to reference Gamerschalg, R., K. Moller, and F. Veerbeten. 2011. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science 5: 233–262.CrossRef Gamerschalg, R., K. Moller, and F. Veerbeten. 2011. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science 5: 233–262.CrossRef
go back to reference Garcia-Sanchez, I.M., L. Rodriguez-Ariza, and J.V. Frias-Aceituno. 2013. The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review 22: 828–838.CrossRef Garcia-Sanchez, I.M., L. Rodriguez-Ariza, and J.V. Frias-Aceituno. 2013. The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review 22: 828–838.CrossRef
go back to reference Haddock, J. 2005. Consumer influence on Internet-based corporate communication of environmental activities: The UK food sector. British Food Journal 107: 792–805.CrossRef Haddock, J. 2005. Consumer influence on Internet-based corporate communication of environmental activities: The UK food sector. British Food Journal 107: 792–805.CrossRef
go back to reference Hahn, R., and M. Kuhnen. 2013. Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production 59: 5–21.CrossRef Hahn, R., and M. Kuhnen. 2013. Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production 59: 5–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Haniffa, R., and T.E. Cooke. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24: 391–430.CrossRef Haniffa, R., and T.E. Cooke. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24: 391–430.CrossRef
go back to reference IFC, World Bank. 2011. Protecting investors. http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/protecting-investors# IFC, World Bank. 2011. Protecting investors. http://​www.​doingbusiness.​org/​data/​exploretopics/​protecting-investors#
go back to reference Islam, M.A., and C. Deegan. 2008. Motivations for an organization within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21: 850–874.CrossRef Islam, M.A., and C. Deegan. 2008. Motivations for an organization within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21: 850–874.CrossRef
go back to reference Jackson, G., and A. Apostolakou. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics 94: 371–394.CrossRef Jackson, G., and A. Apostolakou. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics 94: 371–394.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, J.C., and N. Berg. 2012. Determinants of traditional sustainability reporting versus integrated reporting. An institutionalist approach. Business Strategy and the Environment 21: 299–316.CrossRef Jensen, J.C., and N. Berg. 2012. Determinants of traditional sustainability reporting versus integrated reporting. An institutionalist approach. Business Strategy and the Environment 21: 299–316.CrossRef
go back to reference Kent, P., and R. Monem. 2008. What drives TBL reporting: Good governance or threat of legitimacy? Australian Accounting Review 18: 297–309.CrossRef Kent, P., and R. Monem. 2008. What drives TBL reporting: Good governance or threat of legitimacy? Australian Accounting Review 18: 297–309.CrossRef
go back to reference La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52: 1131–1150.CrossRef La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52: 1131–1150.CrossRef
go back to reference La Porta, R.F., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113–1155.CrossRef La Porta, R.F., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113–1155.CrossRef
go back to reference Lai, A., G. Melloni, and R. Stacchezzini. 2014. Corporate sustainable development: Is integrated reporting a legitimation strategy? Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.1002/bse.1863. Lai, A., G. Melloni, and R. Stacchezzini. 2014. Corporate sustainable development: Is integrated reporting a legitimation strategy? Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.​1002/​bse.​1863.
go back to reference Matten, D., and J. Moon. 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33(2): 404–424.CrossRef Matten, D., and J. Moon. 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33(2): 404–424.CrossRef
go back to reference Neumayer, E., and R. Perkins. 2004. What explains the uneven take-up of ISO 14001 at the global level? A panel-data analysis. Environment and Planning 36: 823–839.CrossRef Neumayer, E., and R. Perkins. 2004. What explains the uneven take-up of ISO 14001 at the global level? A panel-data analysis. Environment and Planning 36: 823–839.CrossRef
go back to reference Nikolaeva, R., and M. Bicho. 2011. The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39: 136–157.CrossRef Nikolaeva, R., and M. Bicho. 2011. The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39: 136–157.CrossRef
go back to reference Parsa, S., and R. Kouhy. 2008. Social reporting by companies listed on the alternative investment market. Journal of Business Ethics 79: 345–360.CrossRef Parsa, S., and R. Kouhy. 2008. Social reporting by companies listed on the alternative investment market. Journal of Business Ethics 79: 345–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Prado-Lorenzo, J.M., L. Rodriguez-Dominguez, I. Gallego-Alvarez, and I.M. Garcia-Sanchez. 2009. Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in companies world-wide. Management Decision 47: 1133–1157.CrossRef Prado-Lorenzo, J.M., L. Rodriguez-Dominguez, I. Gallego-Alvarez, and I.M. Garcia-Sanchez. 2009. Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in companies world-wide. Management Decision 47: 1133–1157.CrossRef
go back to reference Sierra-Garcia, L., A. Zorio-Grima, and M. Garcia-Benau. 2013. Stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. doi:10.1002/csr.1345. Sierra-Garcia, L., A. Zorio-Grima, and M. Garcia-Benau. 2013. Stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. doi:10.​1002/​csr.​1345.
go back to reference Sotorrio, L.L., and J.L.F. Sanchez. 2010. Corporate social reporting for different audiences: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 272–283.CrossRef Sotorrio, L.L., and J.L.F. Sanchez. 2010. Corporate social reporting for different audiences: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 272–283.CrossRef
go back to reference Tagesson, T., V. Blank, P. Broberg, and S.-O. Collin. 2009. What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: A study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 352–364.CrossRef Tagesson, T., V. Blank, P. Broberg, and S.-O. Collin. 2009. What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: A study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 352–364.CrossRef
go back to reference UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). 2010. Global education digest 2010: Comparing education statistics across the world. Montreal: UIS. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). 2010. Global education digest 2010: Comparing education statistics across the world. Montreal: UIS.
go back to reference Vormedal, I., and A. Ruud. 2009. Sustainability reporting in Norway: An assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio-political drivers. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 207–222. Vormedal, I., and A. Ruud. 2009. Sustainability reporting in Norway: An assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio-political drivers. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 207–222.
Metadata
Title
Institutional Determinants of IR Disclosure Quality
Authors
Marco Fasan
Carlo Marcon
Chiara Mio
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55149-8_10