Skip to main content
Top

2025 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Instrumentation Selection Criteria for Field Monitoring of Retaining Systems

Authors : Dinesh Bishnoi, Vikas Patil, S. M. Dasaka, A. Murali Krishna

Published in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics (ICTG) 2024, Volume 8

Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In today’s technology era, many alternatives are available for measuring soil and structural response, and direct measurement in-situ using instruments/sensors is the best option among several alternatives. Proper selection of instrumentation for any field test is essential to obtain reliable data. The present paper discusses the instrumentation plan adopted for a field test that was conducted to assess the suitability of geofoam as a compressible inclusion material in retaining walls. The compressible inclusion is a material that is introduced between the wall and backfill which deforms in a controlled manner allowing the soil to change its stress state from at-rest to active or near-active state, causing lateral pressure reduction on the wall. The field testing aimed to measure the earth pressure on the wall, wall deflection, and compression of the geofoam. The options available for measuring each of these parameters, such as earth pressure cells and their type, inclinometer, displacement transducers, etc., are analyzed with the criterion for selecting the right instrument for measuring each parameter. Each instrument has its challenges and some of these challenges encountered during field testing are discussed in detail about earth pressure cells and inclinometers. To make sense of the data obtained by instruments, the user must have some secondary measurement tools to justify the data obtained by primary instruments.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Bentler JG, Labuz JF (2006) Performance of a cantilever retaining wall. Am Soc Civ Eng, ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(8):1062–1070CrossRef Bentler JG, Labuz JF (2006) Performance of a cantilever retaining wall. Am Soc Civ Eng, ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(8):1062–1070CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bentler JG, Labuz JF, Schultz AE (2005) Earth pressure behind a gravity retaining wall, vol 14. Minnesota Department of Transportation, p 182 Bentler JG, Labuz JF, Schultz AE (2005) Earth pressure behind a gravity retaining wall, vol 14. Minnesota Department of Transportation, p 182
3.
go back to reference Bordes JL, Debreuille PJ (1984) Some facts about long-term reliability of vibrating wire instruments. Reliability of geotechnical instrumentation, pp 20–27 Bordes JL, Debreuille PJ (1984) Some facts about long-term reliability of vibrating wire instruments. Reliability of geotechnical instrumentation, pp 20–27
4.
go back to reference Gade VK, Dasaka SM (2019) Influence of contacting material on calibration response of diaphragm earth pressure cells. Indian Geotech J 50(1):133–141CrossRef Gade VK, Dasaka SM (2019) Influence of contacting material on calibration response of diaphragm earth pressure cells. Indian Geotech J 50(1):133–141CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ganjalipour K (2021) Review of inclinometer errors and provide correction methods for bias shift error and depth position error of the probe. Geotech Geol Eng 39:4017–4034CrossRef Ganjalipour K (2021) Review of inclinometer errors and provide correction methods for bias shift error and depth position error of the probe. Geotech Geol Eng 39:4017–4034CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hannon JB, Jackura KA (1985) Measurement of earth pressure. Transp Res Rec 1004:6–13 Hannon JB, Jackura KA (1985) Measurement of earth pressure. Transp Res Rec 1004:6–13
7.
go back to reference Horvath JS (1994) Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam—an introduction to material behavior. Geotext Geomembr 13:263–280CrossRef Horvath JS (1994) Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam—an introduction to material behavior. Geotext Geomembr 13:263–280CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Horvath JS (1997) The compressible inclusion function of eps geofoam. Geotext Geomembr 15(1–3):77–120CrossRef Horvath JS (1997) The compressible inclusion function of eps geofoam. Geotext Geomembr 15(1–3):77–120CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Keykhosropour L, Lemnitzer A, Star L, Marinucci A, Keowen S (2018) Implementation of soil pressure sensors in large-scale soil-structure interaction studies. ASTM Geotech Test J 41(4):730–746CrossRef Keykhosropour L, Lemnitzer A, Star L, Marinucci A, Keowen S (2018) Implementation of soil pressure sensors in large-scale soil-structure interaction studies. ASTM Geotech Test J 41(4):730–746CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lazebnik GE, Tsinker GP (1998) Monitoring of soil-structure interaction: instruments for measuring soil pressures. Springer Science & Business Media Dordrecht Lazebnik GE, Tsinker GP (1998) Monitoring of soil-structure interaction: instruments for measuring soil pressures. Springer Science & Business Media Dordrecht
11.
go back to reference Machan G, Bennett VG (2008) Use of inclinometers for geotechnical instrumentation on transportation projects. Transportation Research Board, E-C129 Machan G, Bennett VG (2008) Use of inclinometers for geotechnical instrumentation on transportation projects. Transportation Research Board, E-C129
12.
go back to reference Selig ET (1980) Soil stress gage calibration. ASTM Geotech Test J 3(4):153–158CrossRef Selig ET (1980) Soil stress gage calibration. ASTM Geotech Test J 3(4):153–158CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Weiler WA, Kulhawy FH (1982) Factors affecting stress cell measurements in soil. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 108:1529–1548 Weiler WA, Kulhawy FH (1982) Factors affecting stress cell measurements in soil. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 108:1529–1548
Metadata
Title
Instrumentation Selection Criteria for Field Monitoring of Retaining Systems
Authors
Dinesh Bishnoi
Vikas Patil
S. M. Dasaka
A. Murali Krishna
Copyright Year
2025
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8241-3_40