Top

Published in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Integrating Design Representations for Creativity

Author : Alistair Sutcliffe

Published in: Creativity and Rationale

Publisher: Springer London

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This chapter argues that the influence of design rationale on creativity is best achieved by concurrent use of scenarios, prototypes and models. A framework of cognitive affordances is introduced to discuss the merits and limitations of each representation. The chapter concludes by discussing how different representations might complement each other in creative scenario-based design.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Evaluating Creativity

next chapter Achieving Both Creativity and Rationale: Reuse in Design with Images and Claims

Alexander, I. (2002). Initial industrial experience of misuse cases in trade-off analysis. In Proceedings of RE-02 IEEE joint international conference on requirements engineering (pp. 61–70). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.CrossRef

Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beck, K. (1999). Extreme programming explained: Embracing change. New York: Addison-Wesley.

Borchers, J. (2001). A pattern approach to interaction design. Chichester: Wiley.

Buckingham Shum, S. (1996). Analyzing the usability of a design rationale notation. In T. P. Moran & J. M. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques and use (pp. 185–215). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Buxton, W. (2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Carroll, J. M. (Ed.). (1995). Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley.

Carroll, J. M. (2000). Making use: Scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Carroll, J. M. (2002). Making use is more than a matter of task analysis. Interacting with Computers, 14, 619–627.CrossRef

Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1992). Getting around the task-artifact framework: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10, 181–212.CrossRef

Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1996). Developing the Blacksburg Electronic Village. Communications of the ACM, 39, 69–74.CrossRef

Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Understanding language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cockburn, A. (2001). Writing effective use cases. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Conklin, J., & Begeman, M. L. (1988). gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 64, 303–331.CrossRef

Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Cross, N. (2002). Creative cognition in design: Processes of exceptional designers. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 14–19). New York: ACM Press.CrossRef

Djajadiningrat, J. P., Gaver, W. W., & Frens, J. W. (2000). Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: Methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. In D. Boyarski & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Conference proceedings: DIS2000 designing interactive systems: Processes, practices methods and techniques (pp. 66–71). New York: ACM Press.CrossRef

Dowell, J., & Long, J. L. (1998). A conception of the cognitive engineering design problem. Ergonomics, 41, 126–139.CrossRef

DSDM Consortium. (1995). DSDM consortium: Dynamic systems development method. Farnham: Tesseract Publishers.

Eason, K. D., Harker, S. D. P., & Olphert, C. W. (1996). Representing socio-technical systems options in the development of new forms of work organisation. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 5, 399–420.CrossRef

Fischer, G. (1996). Seeding, evolutionary growth and reseeding: Constructing, capturing and evolving knowledge in domain-oriented design environments. In A. G. Sutcliffe, D. Benyon, & F. Van Assche (Eds.), Domain knowledge for interactive system design; Proceedings: TC8/WG8.2 conference on domain knowledge in interactive system design (pp. 1–16). London: Chapman & Hall.

Friedman, B. (Ed.). (1997). Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. In V. Bellotti, T. Erickson, G. Cockton, & P. Korhonen (Eds.), CHI 2003 conference proceedings: Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 233–240). New York: ACM Press.CrossRef

Graham, L. (1996). Task scripts, use cases and scenarios in object oriented analysis. Object-Oriented Systems, 3, 123–142.

Hampton, J. A. (1988). Disjunction in natural categories. Memory and Cognition, 16, 579–591.CrossRef

Jacobson, I., Christerson, M., Jonsson, P., & Overgaard, G. (1992). Object-oriented software engineering: A use-case driven approach. Reading: Addison Wesley.MATH

Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Wason, P. C. (1983). Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kaindl, H. (1995). An integration of scenarios with their purposes in task modelling. In G. M. Olson & S. Schuon (Eds.), Designing interactive systems: DIS 95 conference (pp. 227–235). New York: ACM Press.CrossRef

Karsenty, L. (1996). An empirical evaluation of design rationale documents. In Proceedings of CHI’96 conference: Human factors in computing systems (pp. 150–156). New York: ACM Press.

Kuutti, K. (1995). Workprocess: Scenarios as a preliminary vocabulary. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Scenario based design (pp. 19–36). New York: Wiley.

Kyng, M. (1995). Creating contexts for design. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Scenario based design (pp. 85–108). New York: Wiley.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.

MacLean, A., & McKerlie, D. (1995). Design space analysis and user-representations (Technical Report EPC-1995-102). Cambridge, UK: Xerox Research Centre Europe.

MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V., & Moran, T. P. (1991). Questions, options and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 201–250.CrossRef

Moggridge, B. (2006). Designing interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Monk, A. G., & Wright, P. (1993). Improving your human-computer interface: A practical technique. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., & Yu, E. (1999). From object-oriented to goal-oriented requirements analysis. Communications of the ACM, 42, 31–37.CrossRef

Norman, D. A. (1999). The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Paterno, F. (1999). Model-based design and evaluation of interactive applications. Berlin: Springer.

Potts, C. (1999). ScenIC: A strategy for inquiry-driven requirements determination. In Proceedings: 4th IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering (pp. 58–65). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.

Potts, C., Takahashi, K., & Anton, A. I. (1994). Inquiry-based requirements analysis. IEEE Software, 11, 21–32.CrossRef

Rolland, C., Ben Achour, C., Cauvet, C., Ralyte, J., Sutcliffe, A. G., & Maiden, N. A. M. (1998). A proposal for a scenario classification framework. Requirements Engineering, 3, 23–47.CrossRef

Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.CrossRef

Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2001). Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human computer interaction. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–201.CrossRef

Sutcliffe, A. G. (2000). Bridging the communications gap: Developing a lingua franca for software developers and users. In Actes du XVIIIe Congres: INFORSID (pp. 13–32). Toulouse: Inforsid.

Sutcliffe, A. G. (2002). User-centred requirements engineering. London: Springer.MATHCrossRef

Sutcliffe, A. G., & Carroll, J. M. (1998). Generalizing claims and reuse of HCI knowledge. In H. Johnson, L. Nigay, & C. Roast (Eds.), People and computers XIII; Proceedings: BCS-HCI conference (pp. 159–176). Berlin: Springer.

Sutcliffe, A. G., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). Designing claims for reuse in interactive systems design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50, 213–241.CrossRef

Sutcliffe, A. G., & Maiden, N. A. M. (1992). Analysing the novice analyst: Cognitive models in software engineering. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, 719–740.CrossRef

Sutcliffe, A. G., & Ryan, M. (1997). Assessing the usability and efficiency of design rationale. In S. Howard, J. Hammond, & G. Lindgaard (Eds.), Proceedings: Human computer interaction INTERACT-97 (pp. 148–155). London: Chapman and Hall.

Sutcliffe, A. G., Maiden, N. A. M., Minocha, S., & Manuel, D. (1998). Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24, 1072–1088.CrossRef

Sutcliffe, A. G., Gault, B., & Maiden, N. A. M. (2005). ISRE: Immersive scenario-based requirements engineering with virtual prototypes. Requirements Engineering, 10, 95–111.CrossRef

Sutcliffe, A. G., Thew, S., Venters, C., De Bruijn, O., NcNaught, J., Proctor, R., & Buchan, I. (2007). ADVISES project: Scenario-based requirements analysis for e-science applications. In Proceedings of UK All Hands Conference on e-Science, Nottingham. Available on CD-ROM.

Sutcliffe, A. G., Thew, S., & Jarvis, P. (2011). Experience with user-centred requirements engineering. Requirements Engineering, 7, 1–14.

Thew, S., Sutcliffe, A. G., De Bruijn, O., McNaught, J., Procter, R., Venters, C., & Buchan, I. (2008). Experience in e-science requirements engineering. In Proceedings: 16th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (pp. 277–282). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.CrossRef

Thew, S., Sutcliffe, A. G., Procter, R., De Bruijn, O., McNaught, J., Venters, C., & Buchan, I. (2009). Requirements engineering for e-science: Experiences in epidemiology. IEEE Software, 26(1), 80–87.CrossRef

Yu, E. S. K. (1993). Modelling organisations for information systems requirements engineering. In S. Fickas & A. C. W. Finkelstein (Eds.), Proceedings: 1st international symposium on requirements engineering (pp. 34–41). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.

Title: Integrating Design Representations for Creativity
Author: Alistair Sutcliffe
Publisher: Springer London
Book: Creativity and Rationale
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4110-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4471-4111-2

Copyright Year: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4111-2_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"