Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

13. Intellectual Property Management

Authors : Tim Mazzarol, Sophie Reboud

Published in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Commercialisation has been described as the process of preparing and taking an established product, process or service to market (DITR 2003). The process ends when the product, process or service is finally marketed successfully to the customer. It is typically the costliest part of the innovation process, requires the most entrepreneurial effort and involves the most commercial risk. At the heart of the commercialisation process is the development and economic leverage of IP, which is the ability of creative ideas to be identified and protected for future commercial benefit. In this chapter, we explore the nature of IP and IP rights as well as how such IP can be brought to market via the commercialisation process. The chapter examines the role of intellectual property (IP) in the innovation process including: types of IP, the protection of IP, and how to assess the technical feasibility of an innovation. Also considered is the process of licensing and the valuation of IP in the commercialisation of an innovation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2004). Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 621–635.CrossRef Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2004). Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 621–635.CrossRef
go back to reference Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.CrossRef Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.CrossRef
go back to reference Ambrozy, R. S. (2013). Understanding the Most common types of intellectual property rights and applying them to the product development process. In K. B. Khan, S. E. Kay, R. J. Slotegraaf, & S. Uban (Eds.), The PDMA handbook of new product development (3rd ed., pp. 368–384). Hoboken: Wyley. Ambrozy, R. S. (2013). Understanding the Most common types of intellectual property rights and applying them to the product development process. In K. B. Khan, S. E. Kay, R. J. Slotegraaf, & S. Uban (Eds.), The PDMA handbook of new product development (3rd ed., pp. 368–384). Hoboken: Wyley.
go back to reference Berkman, M. (2002). Valuing intellectual property assets for licensing transactions. The Licensing Journal, 22(4), 16–23. Berkman, M. (2002). Valuing intellectual property assets for licensing transactions. The Licensing Journal, 22(4), 16–23.
go back to reference Bertolotti, N. (1995). Valuing intellectual property. Managing Intellectual Property, 46, 28–32. Bertolotti, N. (1995). Valuing intellectual property. Managing Intellectual Property, 46, 28–32.
go back to reference Bulakowski, A., & Nesbitt, B. (2012). IP valuation: Is the “25% Rule” still relevant? ipCG Blog, ipCapital Group. Retrieved from www.ipcg.com Bulakowski, A., & Nesbitt, B. (2012). IP valuation: Is the “25% Rule” still relevant? ipCG Blog, ipCapital Group. Retrieved from www.​ipcg.​com
go back to reference Crosby, M. (2000). Patents, innovation and growth. Economic Record, 76(234), 255–262.CrossRef Crosby, M. (2000). Patents, innovation and growth. Economic Record, 76(234), 255–262.CrossRef
go back to reference DITR. (2003). Science and innovation mapping experts workshop: commercialisation, utilisation and intellectual property. Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources: Science and Innovation Mapping Taskforce. Retrieved from Rydges Capital Hill. DITR. (2003). Science and innovation mapping experts workshop: commercialisation, utilisation and intellectual property. Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources: Science and Innovation Mapping Taskforce. Retrieved from Rydges Capital Hill.
go back to reference Goldscheider, R. (2011). The classic 25% rule and the art of intellectual property licensing. Duke Law & Technology Review, 2011(6), 1–22. Goldscheider, R. (2011). The classic 25% rule and the art of intellectual property licensing. Duke Law & Technology Review, 2011(6), 1–22.
go back to reference Harrison, S., & Sullivan, P. H. (2000). Profiting from intellectual capital: Learning from leading companies. Industrial and Commercial Training, 32(4), 139–148. Harrison, S., & Sullivan, P. H. (2000). Profiting from intellectual capital: Learning from leading companies. Industrial and Commercial Training, 32(4), 139–148.
go back to reference Hering, I. (2002). Integrating IP Management. Managing Intellectual Property, 117(12), 25–27. Hering, I. (2002). Integrating IP Management. Managing Intellectual Property, 117(12), 25–27.
go back to reference Kazmi, A. (2009). Licencing. In C. Wankel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of business in today’s world (pp. 1010–1011). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Kazmi, A. (2009). Licencing. In C. Wankel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of business in today’s world (pp. 1010–1011). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
go back to reference Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418–438.CrossRef Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418–438.CrossRef
go back to reference Mard, M. (2000). Financial Factors. Licencing Journal, 20(8), 25–30. Mard, M. (2000). Financial Factors. Licencing Journal, 20(8), 25–30.
go back to reference Miller, W. L. (2001). Innovation for business growth. Research-Technology Management, 44(5), 26–41.CrossRef Miller, W. L. (2001). Innovation for business growth. Research-Technology Management, 44(5), 26–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, W. L., & Morris, L. (1999). 4th Generation R&D: Managing knowledge, technology, and innovation. New York: Wiley. Miller, W. L., & Morris, L. (1999). 4th Generation R&D: Managing knowledge, technology, and innovation. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference QPSX (2005). Intellectual property strategy. Perth: QPSX Pty Ltd. QPSX (2005). Intellectual property strategy. Perth: QPSX Pty Ltd.
go back to reference Reed, R., & Defillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.CrossRef Reed, R., & Defillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.CrossRef
go back to reference Sausmer, J. (2010). The income approach to valuing intellectual property. New Jersey CPA, May/June(2010), 28. Sausmer, J. (2010). The income approach to valuing intellectual property. New Jersey CPA, May/June(2010), 28.
go back to reference SBDC. (2005). Intellectual property, small business brief. Retrieved from small business development corporation, [Online]. www.sbdc.com.au SBDC. (2005). Intellectual property, small business brief. Retrieved from small business development corporation, [Online]. www.​sbdc.​com.​au
go back to reference Steffens, P. R., & Douglas, E. J. (2007). Valuing technology investments: Use real options thinking but forget real options valuation. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(1), 58–77.CrossRef Steffens, P. R., & Douglas, E. J. (2007). Valuing technology investments: Use real options thinking but forget real options valuation. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(1), 58–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Tenenbaum, D. (2002). Valuing intellectual property assets. The Computer & Internet Lawyer, 19(2), 1–8. Tenenbaum, D. (2002). Valuing intellectual property assets. The Computer & Internet Lawyer, 19(2), 1–8.
go back to reference Williams, K. (1999, October). Are you valuing your intellectual assets correctly? Strategic Finance, pp. 76–77. Williams, K. (1999, October). Are you valuing your intellectual assets correctly? Strategic Finance, pp. 76–77.
go back to reference Williams, R. L., & Bukowitz, W. R. (2001). The Yin and Yang of intellectual capital management: The impact of ownership on realizing value from intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(2), 96–108.CrossRef Williams, R. L., & Bukowitz, W. R. (2001). The Yin and Yang of intellectual capital management: The impact of ownership on realizing value from intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(2), 96–108.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intellectual Property Management
Authors
Tim Mazzarol
Sophie Reboud
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9412-6_13