Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Computational Mechanics
Published in: Computational Mechanics 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Paper

Interaction of complex fluids and solids: theory, algorithms and application to phase-change-driven implosion

Authors: Jesus Bueno, Carles Bona-Casas, Yuri Bazilevs, Hector Gomez

Published in: Computational Mechanics | Issue 6/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There is a large body of literature dealing with the interaction of solids and classical fluids, but the mechanical coupling of solids and complex fluids remains practically unexplored, at least from the computational point of view. Yet, complex fluids produce much richer physics than classical fluids when they interact with solids, especially at small scales. Here, we couple a nonlinear hyperelastic solid with a single-component two-phase flow, where the fluid can condensate and evaporate naturally due to temperature and/or pressure changes. We propose a fully-coupled fluid–structure interaction algorithm to solve the problem. We illustrate the viability of the theoretical framework and the effectiveness of our algorithms by solving several problems of phase-change-driven implosion, a physical process in which a thin structure collapses due to the condensation of a fluid.
previous article A unified monolithic approach for multi-fluid flows and fluid–structure interaction using the Particle Finite Element Method with fixed mesh
next article A plug-and-play coupling approach for parallel multi-field simulations

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Bazilevs Y, Beiro Da Veiga L, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Sangalli G (2006a) Isogeometric Analysis: approximation, stability and error estimates for h-refined meshes. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 16(07):1031–1090MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
2.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006b) Isogeometric Fluid–Structure Interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38(4–5):310–322MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
3.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G (2007) Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(14):173–201MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
4.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric Fluid–Structure Interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43(1):3–37MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
5.
Bazilevs Y, Gohean JR, Hughes TJR, Moser RD, Zhang Y (2009) Patient-specific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Comput. Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(45):3534–3550MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
6.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Evans JA, Hughes TJR, Lipton S, Scott MA, Sederberg TW (2010) Isogeometric Analysis using T-splines. Comput. Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(58):229–263MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
7.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65(1–3):236–253MATHCrossRef
8.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013a) Challenges and directions in computational fluid–structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:215–221MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
9.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013b) Computational fluid–structure interaction. Methods and applications. Wiley, ChichesterMATHCrossRef
10.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Kostov N, McIntyre S (2014) Aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines with the ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng, published online. doi:10.​1007/​s11831-014-9119-7
11.
Benson DJ, Bazilevs Y, Hsu MC, Hughes TJR (2010) Isogeometric shell analysis: the Reissner–Mindlin shell. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(5):276–289MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJR, Landis CM (2012) A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217–220:77–95
13.
14.
Chen L-Q (2002) Phase-field models for microstructure evolution. Annu Rev Mater Res 32(1):113–140CrossRef
15.
Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha \) method. J Appl Mech 60:371–375MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
16.
Cottrell JA, Reali A, Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric Analysis of structural vibrations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(4143):5257–5296MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
17.
Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A (2007) Studies of refinement and continuity in Isogeometric structural analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(4144):4160–4183MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
18.
Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
19.
Cueto-Felgueroso L, Juanes R (2008) Nonlocal interface dynamics and pattern formation in gravity-driven unsaturated flow through porous media. Phys Rev Lett 101:244504CrossRef
20.
Dettmer WG, Peric D (2008) On the coupling between fluid flow and mesh motion in the modelling of fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 43:81–90MATHCrossRef
21.
Diehl D (2007) Higher order schemes for simulation of compressible liquid–vapor flows with phase change. PhD Thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitat
22.
Donea J, Huerta A (2003) Finite element methods for flow problems. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
23.
Donea J, Huerta A, Ponthot J-Ph, Rodrguez-Ferran A (2004) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics. Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian methods, vol 1, Chapter 14. Wiley, New York
24.
25.
Elguedj T, Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2008) \(\bar{B}\) and \(\bar{F}\) projection methods for nearly incompressible linear and non-linear elasticity and plasticity using higher-order NURBS elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(3340):2732–2762MATHCrossRef
26.
Farhat C, Rallu A, Shankaran S (2008) A higher-order generalized Ghost Fluid Method for the Poor for the three-dimensional two-phase flow computation of underwater implosions. J Comput Phys 227(16):7674–7700MATHCrossRef
27.
Farhat C, Rallu A, Wang K, Belytschko T (2010) Robust and provably second-order explicit–explicit and implicit–explicit staggered time-integrators for highly non-linear compressible Fluid–Structure Interaction problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 84(1):73–107MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
28.
Galenko PK, Gomez H, Kropotin NV, Elder KR (2013) Unconditionally stable method and numerical solution of the hyperbolic phase-field crystal equation. Phys Rev E 88(1):013310CrossRef
29.
Gelbart WM, Ben-Shaul A (1996) The new science of complex fluids. J Phys Chem 100(31):13169–13189CrossRef
30.
Gibbs JW (1876) On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. Trans Conn Acad 3:108–248
31.
Gomez H, Hughes TJR (2011) Provably unconditionally stable, second-order time-accurate, mixed variational methods for phase-field models. J Comput Phys 230(13):5310–5327MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
32.
Gomez H, Calo VM, Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2008) Isogeometric Analysis of the Cahn–Hilliard phase-field model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:4333–4352MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
33.
Gomez H, Hughes TJR, Nogueira X, Calo VM (2010) Isogeometric Analysis of the isothermal Navier–Stokes–Korteweg equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(25–28):1828–1840MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
34.
Gomez H, Cueto-Felgueroso L, Juanes R (2013) Three-dimensional simulation of unstable gravity-driven infiltration of water into a porous medium. J Comput Phys 238:217–239MathSciNetCrossRef
35.
Gomez H, Reali A, Sangalli G (2014) Accurate, efficient, and (iso) geometrically flexible collocation methods for phase-field models. J Comput Phys 262:153–171MathSciNetCrossRef
36.
Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian–Eulerian Finite Element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29(3):329–349MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
37.
Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric Analysis: CAD, Finite Elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput. Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(3941):4135–4195MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
38.
Ikeda CM (2012) Fluid–Structure Interactions. Implosions of shell structures and wave impact on a flat plate. PhD Thesis, University of Maryland
39.
Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM (2000) A generalized-\(\alpha \) method for integrating the filtered Navier–Stokes equations with a stabilized Finite Element Method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(34):305–319MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
40.
Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94MATHCrossRef
41.
Kamran K, Rossi R, Oñate E, Idelshon SR (2013a) A compressible Lagrangian framework for modeling the fluid–structure interaction in the underwater implosion of an aluminum cylinder. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23(02):339–367MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
42.
Kamran K, Rossi R, Oñate E, Idelsohn SR (2013b) A compressible Lagrangian framework for the simulation of the underwater implosion of large air bubbles. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 255:210–225MATHCrossRef
43.
Lipton S, Evans JA, Bazilevs Y, Elguedj T, Hughes TJR (2010) Robustness of isogeometric structural discretizations under severe mesh distortion. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(5):357–373MATHCrossRef
44.
Liu J (2014) Thermodynamically consistent modeling and simulation of multiphase flows. PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin
45.
Liu J, Gomez H, Evans JA, Hughes TJR, Landis CM (2013) Functional entropy variables: a new methodology for deriving thermodynamically consistent algorithms for complex fluids, with particular reference to the isothermal Navier–Stokes–Korteweg equations. J Comput Phys 248:47–86MathSciNetCrossRef
46.
Long CC, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2013) Fluid–structure interaction simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices. Comput Mech 52:971–981MATHCrossRef
47.
Long CC, Esmaily-Moghadam M, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2014a) Computation of residence time in the simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices. Comput Mech 54:911–919MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
48.
Long CC, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2014b) Shape optimization of pulsatile ventricular assist devices using FSI to minimize thrombotic risk. Comput Mech 54:921–932MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
49.
Penrose O, Fife PC (1990) Thermodynamically consistent models of phase-field type for the kinetic of phase transitions. Physica D 43(1):44–62MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
50.
Rallu ASD (2009) A multiphase fluid–structure computational framework for underwater implosion problems. PhD Thesis, Stanford University
51.
Sedzinski J, Biro M, Oswald A, Tinevez J-Y, Salbreux G, Paluch E (2011) Polar actomyosin contractility destabilizes the position of the cytokinetic furrow. Nature 476(7361):462–466CrossRef
52.
Shao D, Levine H, Rappel W-J (2012) Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(18):6851–6856CrossRef
53.
Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1998) Computational inelasticity. Springer, New YorkMATH
54.
Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid–structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70:58–63MATHCrossRef
55.
56.
Suito H, Takizawa K, Huynh VQH, Sze D, Ueda T (2014) FSI analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta. Comput Mech 54:1035–1045MATHCrossRef
57.
58.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2014) Space–time computation techniques with continuous representation in time (ST-C). Comput Mech 53(1):91–99MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
59.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–Time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular Fluid–Structure Interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19(2):171–225MathSciNetCrossRef
60.
Takizawa K, Montes D, Fritze M, McIntyre S, Boben J, Tezduyar TE (2013a) Methods for FSI modeling of spacecraft parachute dynamics and cover separation. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:307–338MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
61.
Takizawa K, Montes D, McIntyre S, Tezduyar TE (2013b) Space–time VMS methods for modeling of incompressible flows at high Reynolds numbers. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:223–248
62.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boben J, Kostov N, Boswell C, Buscher A (2013c) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 52(6):1351–1364MATHCrossRef
63.
Takizawa K, Schjodt K, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2013d) Patient-specific computational analysis of the influence of a stent on the unsteady flow in cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 51:1061–1073MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
64.
Takizawa K, Takagi H, Tezduyar TE, Torii R (2014a) Estimation of element-based zero-stress state for arterial FSI computations. Comput Mech 54:895–910MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
65.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Long CC, Marsden AL, Schjodt K (2014b) ST and ALE-VMS methods for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid mechanics modeling. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 24:2437–2486MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
66.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Oiseth O, Mathisen KM, Kostov N, McIntyre S (2014c) Engineering analysis and design with ALE-VMS and space–time methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng, published online. doi:10.​1007/​s11831-014-9113-0
67.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kolesar R, Boswell C, Kanai T, Montel K (2014d) Multiscale methods for gore curvature calculations from FSI modeling of spacecraft parachutes. Comput Mech, published online. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-014-1069-2
68.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boswell C, Kolesar R, Montel K (2014e) FSI modeling of the reefed stages and disreefing of the Orion spacecraft parachutes. Comput Mech 54(5):1203–1220MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
69.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014f) Space–time fluid mechanics computation of heart valve models. Comput Mech 54:973–986MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
70.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014g) Space–time interface-tracking with topology change (ST-TC). Comput Mech 54(4):955–971MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
71.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kostov N (2014h) Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV. Comput Mech 54:213–233MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
72.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, McIntyre S, Kostov N, Kolesar R, Habluetzel C (2014i) Space–time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics. Comput Mech 53(1):1–15MATHCrossRef
73.
Takizawa K, Torii R, Takagi H, Tezduyar TE, Xu XY (2014j) Coronary arterial dynamics computation with medical-image-based time-dependent anatomical models and element-based zero-stress state estimates. Comput Mech 54:1047–1053MATHCrossRef
74.
Tezduyar TE (2001) Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8:83–130MATHCrossRef
75.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:855–900MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
76.
Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Johnson AA (1992) Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods-space–time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations. In: New methods in transient analysis, PVP-Vol. 246/AMD-Vol. 143. ASME, New York, pp 7–24
77.
Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26(10):27–36
78.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006a) Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid–structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(17–18):2002–2027MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
79.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K (2006b) Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:5743–5753MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
80.
Thiele U, Archer AJ, Robbins MJ, Gomez H, Knobloch E (2013) Localized states in the conserved Swift–Hohenberg equation with cubic nonlinearity. Phys Rev E 87(4):042915CrossRef
81.
Turner SE (2007) Underwater implosion of glass spheres. J Acoust Soc Am 121(2):844–852CrossRef
82.
van der Waals JD (1979) The thermodynamic theory of capillarity under the hypothesis of a continuous variation of density. J Stat Phys 20(2):200–244CrossRef
83.
Vilanova G, Colominas I, Gomez H (2013) Capillary networks in tumor angiogenesis: from discrete endothelial cells to phase-field averaged descriptions via isogeometric analysis. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 29(10):1015–1037MathSciNetCrossRef
84.
Zhang Y, Bazilevs Y, Goswami S, Bajaj CL, Hughes TJR (2007) Patient-specific vascular NURBS modeling for Isogeometric Analysis of blood flow. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(2930):2943–2959MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interaction of complex fluids and solids: theory, algorithms and application to phase-change-driven implosion
Authors
Jesus Bueno
Carles Bona-Casas
Yuri Bazilevs
Hector Gomez
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Computational Mechanics / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1098-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Computational Mechanics 6/2015 Go to the issue

Original Paper

A unified monolithic approach for multi-fluid flows and fluid–structure interaction using the Particle Finite Element Method with fixed mesh

Original Paper

Goal-oriented model adaptivity for viscous incompressible flows

Original Paper

Vibration of structures containing compressible liquids with surface tension and sloshing effects. Reduced-order model

Editorial

Fluid–structure interaction

OriginalPaper

Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models

Original Paper

Flow past two square cylinders with flexible splitter plates