2002 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
Interactions and main sources of friction between national regimes
Authors : Nicolas Buclet, Wim Hafkamp, Sylvie Lupton, Ulrich Petschow
Published in: Municipal Waste Management in Europe
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Included in: Professional Book Archive
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
The previous chapter emphasised the differences between European countries. Although these countries share many common characteristics and, with the exception of Greece, have embarked on similar economic development, the differences are important. The countries are the product of specific historical development, and have evolved for many years with few outside influences. In each country, patterns of co-ordination were adopted and reinforced over time, producing conventions. Within each regime, composed of conventions and based on a foundation of principles, economic activity has followed a different course. As a consequence, the categories of actors and, more to the point, the importance of each actor within regimes, are far from homogeneous throughout the EU. Therefore, with the growing economic ties between countries sharing a common economic space (first the EEC, subsequently the EU), any interaction involves the confrontation of regimes based on very different premises and representing different interests. In other words, interactions between EU Member States are asymmetric, sometimes leading to the negative influence of particular national regimes.