Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2021

07-11-2019 | Original Paper

International Investment Agreements and the Escalation of Private Power in the Global Agri-Food System

Authors: Anna Clare Bull, Jagjit Plahe, Lachlan Gregory

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 3/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using food regime analysis, this paper critically analyzes how corporate actors amass, secure and apply power in the global agrifood system through International Investment Agreements (IIAs). IIAs are a key enabler of increasing corporate power in the agrifood system. We focus on three sets of investment provisions in IIAs: (a) the stringent enforceability mechanism of the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system, (b) the expansion of the concept of expropriation, and (c) limitations or prohibitions on host countries to impose performance requirements on foreign investors. We argue that these provisions compromise fairness in the international economic system. Attracted by promises of technology transfer, economic growth and employment, host states often prioritize policies that favor foreign investors even if such policies compromise domestic policy space. We provide analysis and examples of escalating corporate power at different stages of the industrial and transgenic model of agriculture.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Note the terminology “International Investment Agreements” is used to refer to bilateral investment treaties and international economic agreements with investment provisions, including free trade agreements as per the definition used by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD 2019).
 
2
National Treatment refers to non-discrimination between domestic and imported goods. Most Favored Nation refers to non-discrimination between parties to a trade agreement.
 
3
Friedmann disputes the full-scale emergence of the third food regime.
 
4
The standard four exemptions are that the property has to be taken for a public purpose, on a non-discriminatory basis, in accordance with due process of law and accompanied by compensation.
 
Literature
go back to reference Allen, P., & Guthman, J. (2006). From “old school” to “farm-to-school”. Neoliberalization from the ground up. Agriculture and Human Values, 23(4), 401–415.CrossRef Allen, P., & Guthman, J. (2006). From “old school” to “farm-to-school”. Neoliberalization from the ground up. Agriculture and Human Values, 23(4), 401–415.CrossRef
go back to reference Bernstein, H. (2016). Agrarian political economy and modern world capitalism: The contribution of food regime analysis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(3), 611–647.CrossRef Bernstein, H. (2016). Agrarian political economy and modern world capitalism: The contribution of food regime analysis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(3), 611–647.CrossRef
go back to reference Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRef Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Broad, R. (2015). Corporate bias in the World Bank Group’s International Centre for settlement of investment disputes: A case study of a global mining corporation suing El Salvador. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 36(4), 851–874. Broad, R. (2015). Corporate bias in the World Bank Group’s International Centre for settlement of investment disputes: A case study of a global mining corporation suing El Salvador. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 36(4), 851–874.
go back to reference Chang, H. J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press. Chang, H. J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.
go back to reference Choudry, A. (2006). Bilateral free trade and investment agreements and the US Corporate Biotech Agenda. A publication of Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific (PANAP) and People’s Coalition on Food Sovereignty (PCFS) Special Release. Choudry, A. (2006). Bilateral free trade and investment agreements and the US Corporate Biotech Agenda. A publication of Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific (PANAP) and People’s Coalition on Food Sovereignty (PCFS) Special Release.
go back to reference Clapp, J., & Fuchs, D. (2009). Agrifood corporations, global governance, and sustainability: A framework for analysis. In J. Clapp & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRef Clapp, J., & Fuchs, D. (2009). Agrifood corporations, global governance, and sustainability: A framework for analysis. In J. Clapp & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Collins, D. (2015). Performance requirements and investment incentives under international economic law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Collins, D. (2015). Performance requirements and investment incentives under international economic law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
go back to reference Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
go back to reference Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R., & Cotula, J. K. (2009). Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. London: FAO, IIED and IFAD. Accessed February 20, 2019, from http://www.fao.org/3/a-ak241e.pdf. Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R., & Cotula, J. K. (2009). Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. London: FAO, IIED and IFAD. Accessed February 20, 2019, from http://​www.​fao.​org/​3/​a-ak241e.​pdf.
go back to reference Creswel, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Creswel, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
go back to reference Damodaran, H. (2016, May 24). GM technology: Compulsory licensing rules withdrawn after outcry from crop research majors. The Indian Express. Damodaran, H. (2016, May 24). GM technology: Compulsory licensing rules withdrawn after outcry from crop research majors. The Indian Express.
go back to reference De Bres, H. (2014). Risse on justice in trade. Ethics & International Affairs, 28(4), 489–499.CrossRef De Bres, H. (2014). Risse on justice in trade. Ethics & International Affairs, 28(4), 489–499.CrossRef
go back to reference De Bres, H. (2016). Justice and international trade. Philosophy. Compass, 11(10), 570–579.CrossRef De Bres, H. (2016). Justice and international trade. Philosophy. Compass, 11(10), 570–579.CrossRef
go back to reference De Schutter, O. (2011). How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 249–279.CrossRef De Schutter, O. (2011). How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 249–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Friedmann, H. (1987). International regimes of food and agriculture since 1870. In T. Shanin (Ed.), Peasants and peasant societies (pp. 58–276). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Friedmann, H. (1987). International regimes of food and agriculture since 1870. In T. Shanin (Ed.), Peasants and peasant societies (pp. 58–276). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
go back to reference Friedmann, H., & McMichael, P. (1989). Agriculture and the state system: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis, 29(2), 93–117.CrossRef Friedmann, H., & McMichael, P. (1989). Agriculture and the state system: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis, 29(2), 93–117.CrossRef
go back to reference Fuchs, D. (2005). Commanding heights? The strength and fragility of business power in global politics. Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 771–801. Fuchs, D. (2005). Commanding heights? The strength and fragility of business power in global politics. Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 771–801.
go back to reference Fuchs, D., & Kalfagianni, A. (2010). The causes and consequences of private food governance. Business and Politics, 12(3), 1–34.CrossRef Fuchs, D., & Kalfagianni, A. (2010). The causes and consequences of private food governance. Business and Politics, 12(3), 1–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: the legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 353–367.CrossRef Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: the legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 353–367.CrossRef
go back to reference Ganguly, S. (1999). The Investor-State Dispute Mechanism (ISDM) and a sovereign’s power to protect public health. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 38, 113–168. Ganguly, S. (1999). The Investor-State Dispute Mechanism (ISDM) and a sovereign’s power to protect public health. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 38, 113–168.
go back to reference GATT. (1989). Submission by India, negotiating group on trade-related investment measures, Group of Negotiations on Goods, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Document # MTN.GNG/NG12/W/18. GATT. (1989). Submission by India, negotiating group on trade-related investment measures, Group of Negotiations on Goods, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Document # MTN.GNG/NG12/W/18.
go back to reference Gaukrodger, D., & Gordon, K. (2012). Investor-state dispute settlement: A scoping paper for the investment policy community. 2012/03 OECD Working Papers on International Investment, Paris. Gaukrodger, D., & Gordon, K. (2012). Investor-state dispute settlement: A scoping paper for the investment policy community. 2012/03 OECD Working Papers on International Investment, Paris.
go back to reference Genest, A. (2017). Performance requirement prohibitions in international investment law. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa and Faculty of Law Leiden University. Genest, A. (2017). Performance requirement prohibitions in international investment law. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa and Faculty of Law Leiden University.
go back to reference Gómez, K. F. (2011). Latin America and ICSID: David versus Goliath? Law and Business Review of the Americas, 17(2), 195–230. Gómez, K. F. (2011). Latin America and ICSID: David versus Goliath? Law and Business Review of the Americas, 17(2), 195–230.
go back to reference Gwynn, M. A. (2016). Power in the international investment framework. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Gwynn, M. A. (2016). Power in the international investment framework. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Jandhyala, S., Henisz, W. J., & Mansfield, E. D. (2011). Three waves of BITs: The global diffusion of foreign investment policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(6), 1047–1073.CrossRef Jandhyala, S., Henisz, W. J., & Mansfield, E. D. (2011). Three waves of BITs: The global diffusion of foreign investment policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(6), 1047–1073.CrossRef
go back to reference Jha, V., & Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N. (2011). Drafting provisions on the definition of expropriation, performance requirements, and the free movement of capital. Presented at the fifth annual forum of developing country investment negotiators—Investment and Sustainable Development: Developing Country Choices for a Better Future, Kampala, 17–19 October 2011. Jha, V., & Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N. (2011). Drafting provisions on the definition of expropriation, performance requirements, and the free movement of capital. Presented at the fifth annual forum of developing country investment negotiators—Investment and Sustainable Development: Developing Country Choices for a Better Future, Kampala, 17–19 October 2011.
go back to reference Jones, R. C. (2002). NAFTA Chapter 11 investor-to-state dispute resolution: A shield to be embraced or a sword to be feared? Brigham Young University Law Review, 2, 527–559. Jones, R. C. (2002). NAFTA Chapter 11 investor-to-state dispute resolution: A shield to be embraced or a sword to be feared? Brigham Young University Law Review, 2, 527–559.
go back to reference Kapstein, E. B. (2004). Models of international economic justice. Ethics & International Affairs, 18(2), 79–92.CrossRef Kapstein, E. B. (2004). Models of international economic justice. Ethics & International Affairs, 18(2), 79–92.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaur, R. (2012). Nation’s two bodies: rethinking the idea of ‘new’ India and its other. Third World Quarterly, 33(4), 603–621.CrossRef Kaur, R. (2012). Nation’s two bodies: rethinking the idea of ‘new’ India and its other. Third World Quarterly, 33(4), 603–621.CrossRef
go back to reference Kniess, J. (2018). Must we protect foreign investors? Moral Philosophy and Politics, 5(2), 205–225.CrossRef Kniess, J. (2018). Must we protect foreign investors? Moral Philosophy and Politics, 5(2), 205–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Landau, A. (2005). Analyzing international economic negotiations: Towards a synthesis of approaches. International Negotiation, 5(1), 1–19. Landau, A. (2005). Analyzing international economic negotiations: Towards a synthesis of approaches. International Negotiation, 5(1), 1–19.
go back to reference Maffettone, P. (2009). The WTO and the limits of distributive justice. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 35(3), 243–267.CrossRef Maffettone, P. (2009). The WTO and the limits of distributive justice. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 35(3), 243–267.CrossRef
go back to reference Marlles, J. R. (2007). Public purpose, private losses: Regulatory expropriation and environmental regulation in international investment law. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 16(2), 275–336. Marlles, J. R. (2007). Public purpose, private losses: Regulatory expropriation and environmental regulation in international investment law. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 16(2), 275–336.
go back to reference McCarthy, J., & Prudham, S. (2004). Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum, 35(3), 257–283. McCarthy, J., & Prudham, S. (2004). Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum, 35(3), 257–283.
go back to reference McMichael, P. (2005). Global development and the corporate food regime. In F. H. Buttel & P. McMichael (Eds.), New directions in the sociology of global development (Research in Rural Sociology and Development) (Vol. 11, pp. 265–299). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRef McMichael, P. (2005). Global development and the corporate food regime. In F. H. Buttel & P. McMichael (Eds.), New directions in the sociology of global development (Research in Rural Sociology and Development) (Vol. 11, pp. 265–299). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference McMichael, P. (2009). A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 139–169.CrossRef McMichael, P. (2009). A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 139–169.CrossRef
go back to reference McMichael, P. (2012). The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 681–701.CrossRef McMichael, P. (2012). The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 681–701.CrossRef
go back to reference Peck, J. (2004). Geography and public policy: Constructions of neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography, 28(3), 392–405.CrossRef Peck, J. (2004). Geography and public policy: Constructions of neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography, 28(3), 392–405.CrossRef
go back to reference Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Reddie, A. (2017). Power in international trade politics: Is ISDS a solution in search of a problem? Business and Politics, 19(4), 738–757.CrossRef Reddie, A. (2017). Power in international trade politics: Is ISDS a solution in search of a problem? Business and Politics, 19(4), 738–757.CrossRef
go back to reference Royalty, K. W., & Ross, D. (2007). NAFTA Chapter 11: “Tantamount to expropriation”: Tantamount to explosive. The International Trade Journal, 21(3), 299–327.CrossRef Royalty, K. W., & Ross, D. (2007). NAFTA Chapter 11: “Tantamount to expropriation”: Tantamount to explosive. The International Trade Journal, 21(3), 299–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Samuel, W. (1999). Small island economies in the new international environment. Social and Economic Studies, 48(1/2), 155–189. Samuel, W. (1999). Small island economies in the new international environment. Social and Economic Studies, 48(1/2), 155–189.
go back to reference Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Multinational corporations: balancing rights and responsibilities. In Proceedings of the American Society of International Law (ASIL) annual meeting (Vol. 101, pp. 3–60). Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Multinational corporations: balancing rights and responsibilities. In Proceedings of the American Society of International Law (ASIL) annual meeting (Vol. 101, pp. 3–60).
go back to reference Stiglitz, J. E., & Charlton, A. (2004). Common values for the development round. World Trade Review, 3(3), 495–506.CrossRef Stiglitz, J. E., & Charlton, A. (2004). Common values for the development round. World Trade Review, 3(3), 495–506.CrossRef
go back to reference Thrasher, R., Bevilacqua, D., & Capaldo, J. (2015). Trade agreements and the land: Investment agreements and their potential impacts on land governance. Global Development and Environment Background Paper # 15–01, Medford. Thrasher, R., Bevilacqua, D., & Capaldo, J. (2015). Trade agreements and the land: Investment agreements and their potential impacts on land governance. Global Development and Environment Background Paper # 15–01, Medford.
go back to reference UNCTAD. (2003). Foreign direct investment and performance requirements: New evidence from selected countries. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD. (2003). Foreign direct investment and performance requirements: New evidence from selected countries. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
go back to reference UNCTAD. (2012). Expropriation–UNCTAD series on issues in International Investment Agreements II. UN Doc: UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2011/7. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNCTAD. (2012). ExpropriationUNCTAD series on issues in International Investment Agreements II. UN Doc: UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2011/7. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
go back to reference Van Harten, G., & Malysheuski, P. (2016). Who has benefited financially from investment treaty arbitration? An evaluation of the size and wealth of claimants. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper # No. 14/2016. Van Harten, G., & Malysheuski, P. (2016). Who has benefited financially from investment treaty arbitration? An evaluation of the size and wealth of claimants. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper # No. 14/2016.
Metadata
Title
International Investment Agreements and the Escalation of Private Power in the Global Agri-Food System
Authors
Anna Clare Bull
Jagjit Plahe
Lachlan Gregory
Publication date
07-11-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04333-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2021 Go to the issue