Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Introduction: A New Europe, the Post-Documentary Turn and Docudrama

Author : Derek Paget

Published in: Docudrama on European Television

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This book is predicated on the idea that the screen genre docudrama became ubiquitous during the latter part of the twentieth century. It argues in general that the genre was made for new times. Fact-based art in general burgeoned during this period, part of a millennial zeitgeist. It is tempting to relate this to Francis Fukuyama’s controversial 1992 concept of the ‘End of History’, which posited a new world order at the close of a century in which the capitalist system seemed triumphant. While the coming of this order seems less likely in the second decade of the new century, it is clear enough that Greater Europe has been radically reconfigured in the past quarter-century, and that more change must come. Initially, the new era was heralded by striking workers in Poland, by Gorbachev’s glasnost policy in the USSR, and, crucially, by the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Even before the fall of the Wall, the forests of aerials pointing westwards in East Germany, remarked by many visitors from the West during the long Cold War period, were testament to many things, including the desire for a ‘free’ media in the East that would open up proscribed subjects. The extent to which any medium can actually be free will, of course, always be debatable. But the Wall and its collapse became a powerful symbol of contrasting desires arising from opposed political systems. If keeping some things out was uppermost on one side of the Wall, letting some things in was surely the aim of those aerials. On both sides was a consciousness of a Europe still troubled by its twentieth-century past and becoming confused by the looming twenty-first-century future. The ramifications of the break-up of an uneasy Pan-European postwar settlement that had seemed for two generations to be set in stone, the emergence of a new, and unsettled, Europe, triggered many things—as the subsequent two-and-a-half decades have shown.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See Chap. 2, where Tobias Ebbrecht-Hartmann points out the ‘asymmetrical viewing habits’ evident during the period of the two Germanys.
 
2
The word ‘intermateability’ derives from the modern fibre-optic industry. Here there are huge advantages to be gained from physically coupling together products from different sources. The word is practical; it signals that this can be done without mechanical damage to the components, and without compromising safety or functionality. The co-editors of this book see it as another term which is potentially useful in a positive, affirmative, assessment of docudrama.
 
3
One manifestation of the rise of fact-based discourse in dramatic art is ‘verbatim theatre’—briefly, theatrical performance derived from testimony. This form has become popular across the world—see Forsyth and Megson (2009).
 
4
Although, counter-intuitively, it must be said that the more access to information has been made available, the more a kind of scepticism has become a default audience response. One clear witness of this is the proliferation of conspiracy theories in the modern period. See, for example, my Chap. 1 in the 2015 Lacey/Paget collection, where I discuss conspiracy theories centred on 9/11 documentary footage.
 
5
See Nichols (1991, pp. 3–4 and passim) for more on ‘the discourse of sobriety’. Nichols’ phrase became key to academic discussion of documentary film. Through this phrase, he situated documentary discourse with the serious, rational areas of human social and legal activity, and thus bracketed it off from (for example) the less sober discourses of entertainment modes.
 
6
The core group presented panels at a number of international conference series such as ‘Visible Evidence’ and NECS (2007–12).
 
7
Åsa Bergström pointed out to her editors that the decision to standardise chapter titles meant that it was possible to infer from her subtitle (formerly her title) that Sweden itself was a ‘borderland’ in terms of its place in Greater Europe. It is one thing, we acknowledge, to be aware of language-group hegemony, quite another to eliminate it!
 
8
Docudrama producers Tony Garnett, Ian McBride, and Sita Williams all told me versions of what I think of as the ‘tunic button’ story. In Garnett’s case he was referring to his experience on Days of Hope (BBC1, 1975), the classic British documentary drama of the between-the-wars period (produced by him, written by Jim Allen, and directed by Ken Loach). Someone spotted that the tunic buttons on one of the military costumes were from the wrong regiment, and, according to Garnett, concluded from this that nothing in the series could be trusted. Sita Williams called it the ‘slippery slope argument’ by which one mistake condemned everything (see Paget 1998, 2011).
 
9
The writer Clive James (Observer television critic in the 1970s) was particularly cruel on this kind of fault. He was among the first English television critics to remark the creaking nature of much plot exposition in docudrama. Here he is on the 1975 BBC1 historical docudrama Churchills People: ‘Since [character King Edward the Confessor] was the centre of the action, he was occupied full time not only with telling people what they already knew, but with being told what he knew in return’ (1977, p. 117). Clumsy exposition is not just the curse of docudrama, however; it is the curse of a good deal of TV dramatic realism.
 
10
Bill Nichols, among other documentary scholars, acknowledged my 1998 addressing of the ‘specific case of docudrama’ in his Introduction to Documentary (2001, p. 182). Also see Brian Winston’s 2013 collection—called The Documentary Film Book, it none the less includes my piece on docudrama. While many historians adopt the ‘false history’ accusation against docudrama, there are now many who engage with it more productively. Robert Rosenstone stands out not only as a writer on fact-based film but also as an on-set historical advisor (see especially Rosenstone 2006). Vivien Sobchack’s 1996 collection is another important book addressing the use of history in film.
 
11
Alan Rosenthal’s crucial contribution must be acknowledged here. As well as editing collections of writing about docudrama (1999a, 2005), he has written practical guidance on the genre (the latest was published in 2007—see pp. 288–293; 296–300 on docudrama).
 
12
The key intervention in drawing a distinction between the two approaches to dramatising facts was John Caughie’s. His seminal 1980 Screen article is reprinted in Bennett et al. (1981). See Part 1, #1.7 in Winston 2013 for a digest of my distinctions between ‘docudrama’ and ‘dramadoc’.
 
13
See Ellis 2000 for more detail on the developmental phases of television itself.
 
14
Biopic, of course, is another relatively under-researched area. For many years, there was only George Custen’s seminal 1992 monograph, but there has been valuable recent input from Dennis Bingham (for example, see Bingham 2010) and also the 2014 Brown/Vidal collection. In her ‘Introduction’ to the latter, Bélen Vidal notes that the collection seeks:
a rethinking of the biopic’s generic limits, by proposing the genre as a hybrid form that changes in contact with other genres, such as the docudrama’ (p. 10).
Her Chap. 7 in the collection explores this thought in further detail. It is worth pointing out how often these books (and the ones by historians such as Rosenstone) tend to refer specifically to ‘film’ in their titles. The synergies between film and television industries, and the technological improvements in televisions, make this academic distinction more and more difficult to sustain in my view.
 
15
Briefly, ‘rootable’ refers to audiences identifying with characters, ‘relatable’ refers audience connection to story (for example, knowing a story from the news), and ‘promotable’ means that channels can advertise and promote the docudrama by means of the audience’s prior knowledge. See Lipkin (2002, Chap. 5) for more detail.
 
16
This is not, of course, to bracket out equally important contributions by writers on documentary film, theatre, and television drama.
 
17
Evan Wright was the embedded journalist/book author in question.
 
18
See Paget (2011, Chap. 2) for more detail on legal and regulatory matters as they pertain to British and American docudrama.
 
19
See TF1 International’s website, where a ‘Producers’ Intent’ section outlines the scope of the series: www.​tf1international​/​int_​fiche.​php?​Film=​1004&​Type=​2 – accessed 31 August 2015.
 
20
Sex Traffic (C4, 2004) is one example of this. A British-Canadian two-part series, with script by writer Abi Morgan (also writer of the 2011 cinema feature The Iron Lady, in which Meryl Streep played Margaret Thatcher), it was about the trafficking of young women from Eastern Europe to become sex workers in Britain. A notable exception to the failure to deal with capitalist misconduct is the financial sector docudrama The Man Who Broke Britain (BBC2, 2004—see David Rolinson’s Chap. 8).
 
21
In this connection, Tobias Ebbrecht-Hartmann has drawn my attention to Randall Halle’s 2014 book The Europeanization of Cinema: Interzones and Imaginative Communities (Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press), which examines boundary-crossing spaces in European cinema. See also his Conclusion to this book.
 
Literature
go back to reference 1864 (DR1, Denmark, 2014—tx in UK BBC4, 2015) 1864 (DR1, Denmark, 2014—tx in UK BBC4, 2015)
go back to reference Cordon (vtm Belgium, 2014, tx in UK BBC4, 2015) Cordon (vtm Belgium, 2014, tx in UK BBC4, 2015)
go back to reference Barroso, J. 2005. Docudrama y otras formas en el límite de la ficción televisiva española. In Nada es lo que parece Falsos Documentales, hibridaciones y mestizajes del documental en España, ed. M.L. Ortega, 171–206. Madrid: Ediciones Ocho y medio. Barroso, J. 2005. Docudrama y otras formas en el límite de la ficción televisiva española. In Nada es lo que parece Falsos Documentales, hibridaciones y mestizajes del documental en España, ed. M.L. Ortega, 171–206. Madrid: Ediciones Ocho y medio.
go back to reference Bennett, T., S. Boyd-Bowman, C. Mercer, and J. Woollacott (eds.). 1981. Popular television and film. London/Milton Keynes: British Film Institute/Open University Press. Bennett, T., S. Boyd-Bowman, C. Mercer, and J. Woollacott (eds.). 1981. Popular television and film. London/Milton Keynes: British Film Institute/Open University Press.
go back to reference Bingham, D. 2010. Whose lives are they anyway?: The biopic as contemporary film genre. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press. Bingham, D. 2010. Whose lives are they anyway?: The biopic as contemporary film genre. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.
go back to reference Brown, T., and B. Vidal (eds.). 2014. The biopic in contemporary film culture. New York/London: Routledge. Brown, T., and B. Vidal (eds.). 2014. The biopic in contemporary film culture. New York/London: Routledge.
go back to reference Collins, A. 2015. From iron lady to rock star. Radio Times, August 29–September 4, pp. 38–39. Collins, A. 2015. From iron lady to rock star. Radio Times, August 29–September 4, pp. 38–39.
go back to reference Custen, G. 1992. Bio/pics: How Hollywood constructed public history. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Custen, G. 1992. Bio/pics: How Hollywood constructed public history. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
go back to reference Davies, N., and R. Moorhouse. 2003. Microcosm: Portrait of a Central European city. London: Pimlico. Davies, N., and R. Moorhouse. 2003. Microcosm: Portrait of a Central European city. London: Pimlico.
go back to reference Ebbrecht, T. 2007a. Docudramatizing history on TV: German and British docudrama and historical event television in the memorial year 2005. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10(1): 35–53. Ebbrecht, T. 2007a. Docudramatizing history on TV: German and British docudrama and historical event television in the memorial year 2005. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10(1): 35–53.
go back to reference Ellis, J. 2000. Seeing things: Television in the age of uncertainty. London/New York: I.B. Tauris. Ellis, J. 2000. Seeing things: Television in the age of uncertainty. London/New York: I.B. Tauris.
go back to reference Forsyth, A., and C. Megson (eds.). 2009. Get real: Documentary theatre past and present. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Forsyth, A., and C. Megson (eds.). 2009. Get real: Documentary theatre past and present. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Lacey, S. 2015. Embedded journalism. In The ‘War on Terror’: Post 9/11 television drama, docudrama and documentary, ed. S. Lacey et al., 33–48. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. Lacey, S. 2015. Embedded journalism. In The ‘War on Terror’: Post 9/11 television drama, docudrama and documentary, ed. S. Lacey et al., 33–48. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
go back to reference Lipkin, S.N. 2002. Real emotional logic: Film and television docudrama as persuasive practice. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. Lipkin, S.N. 2002. Real emotional logic: Film and television docudrama as persuasive practice. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
go back to reference Lipkin, S.N. 2015. Post 9/11 American television drama. In The ‘War on Terror’: Post 9/11 television drama, docudrama and documentary, ed. S. Lacey et al., 49–64. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. Lipkin, S.N. 2015. Post 9/11 American television drama. In The ‘War on Terror’: Post 9/11 television drama, docudrama and documentary, ed. S. Lacey et al., 49–64. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
go back to reference Nichols, B. 1991. Representing reality: Issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Nichols, B. 1991. Representing reality: Issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
go back to reference Paget, D. 1998. No other way to tell it: Dramadoc/docudrama on television. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press. Paget, D. 1998. No other way to tell it: Dramadoc/docudrama on television. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.
go back to reference Paget, D. 2011. No other way to tell it: Docudrama on film and television. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press. Paget, D. 2011. No other way to tell it: Docudrama on film and television. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.
go back to reference Rosenstone, R.A. 2006. History on film/film on history. Harlow: Pearson Longman. Rosenstone, R.A. 2006. History on film/film on history. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
go back to reference Rosenthal, A. 1995. Writing docudrama: Dramatizing reality of film and TV. Boston/Oxford: Focal Press. Rosenthal, A. 1995. Writing docudrama: Dramatizing reality of film and TV. Boston/Oxford: Focal Press.
go back to reference Rosenthal, A. (ed.). 1999a. Why docudrama? Fact-fiction on film and TV. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Rosenthal, A. (ed.). 1999a. Why docudrama? Fact-fiction on film and TV. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
go back to reference Rosenthal, A. 2007. Writing, directing, and producing documentary films and videos. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Rosenthal, A. 2007. Writing, directing, and producing documentary films and videos. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
go back to reference Sobchack, V. (ed.). 1996. The persistence of history: Cinema, television, and the modern event. New York/London: Routledge. Sobchack, V. (ed.). 1996. The persistence of history: Cinema, television, and the modern event. New York/London: Routledge.
go back to reference Whitaker, T.R. 1977. Fields of play in modern drama. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Whitaker, T.R. 1977. Fields of play in modern drama. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Winston, B. (ed.). 2013. The documentary film book. London: BFI/Palgrave Macmillan. Winston, B. (ed.). 2013. The documentary film book. London: BFI/Palgrave Macmillan.
Metadata
Title
Introduction: A New Europe, the Post-Documentary Turn and Docudrama
Author
Derek Paget
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49979-0_1