Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Introduction: Change and Continuity in Institutional Transformation in Korea

Authors : Seungjoo Lee, Sang-young Rhyu

Published in: The Political Economy of Change and Continuity in Korea

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The political economy in South Korea (hereafter Korea) has dramatically transformed since the Asian financial crisis in 1997. Interestingly, since the crisis, the political economy of Korea has displayed two diametrically opposed features (Park 2015). One the one hand, the institutional foundations that spearheaded high economic growth until the 1980s eroded in the face of the forces of globalization ushered in by the crisis (Pirie 2006, 2012; Moon and Chung 2014). It seems that under the exponentially increasing complexity of the world economy, the Korean government is no longer able to provide a strategic guidance for the national economy, rapidly converging into the Anglo-American model of political economy. The track record of liberalization measures such as financial liberalization, corporate governance reform, and labor reform suggests that the empirical basis of these arguments is robust.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
By contrast, Thurbon argues that the political leadership’s ambition dictated the Korean government’s for ill-designed and reckless liberalization in the pre-crisis period, which ultimately became structural causes of the crisis (Thurbon 2001).
 
2
Henry Yeung (2016) stresses “strategic coupling” among state, firm, and global production networks.
 
3
At the same time, because the dynamics has unfolded unevenly across industrial sectors, one can find significant variations between industrial sectors (Lim 2010).
 
Literature
go back to reference Amsden, Alice. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Amsden, Alice. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Byon, Sang Kyu, Han Joo Kim, and Tae You Kim. 2002. Export-oriented Industrialization Strategy and Industrial Growth Factors in the 1990s: The Case of Mobile Phone Industry. Journal of Information and Communications 9 (2): 115–141. (in Korean). Byon, Sang Kyu, Han Joo Kim, and Tae You Kim. 2002. Export-oriented Industrialization Strategy and Industrial Growth Factors in the 1990s: The Case of Mobile Phone Industry. Journal of Information and Communications 9 (2): 115–141. (in Korean).
go back to reference Choi, Byung-Doo. 2012. Developmental Neoliberalism and the Hybridity of the Urban Policy of South Korea. In Locating Neoliberalism in East Asia: Neoliberalizing Spaces in Developmental States, ed. Bae-Gyoon Park, Richard Child Hill, and Asato Saito. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing. Choi, Byung-Doo. 2012. Developmental Neoliberalism and the Hybridity of the Urban Policy of South Korea. In Locating Neoliberalism in East Asia: Neoliberalizing Spaces in Developmental States, ed. Bae-Gyoon Park, Richard Child Hill, and Asato Saito. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.
go back to reference Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Ha, Yong Chool. 2012. Continuity and Change in the Institutional Foundations of Korean Crony Capitalism: A Preliminary Assessment. Journal of Korean Politics 21 (3): 207–248. Ha, Yong Chool. 2012. Continuity and Change in the Institutional Foundations of Korean Crony Capitalism: A Preliminary Assessment. Journal of Korean Politics 21 (3): 207–248.
go back to reference Hong, Sung Gul. 2006. The Political Economy of the IT Industry Development. In Theory of New Growth State in the Information Age, ed. Sung Gul Hong and Seok Man Yoon. Seoul: Nanam. (in Korean). Hong, Sung Gul. 2006. The Political Economy of the IT Industry Development. In Theory of New Growth State in the Information Age, ed. Sung Gul Hong and Seok Man Yoon. Seoul: Nanam. (in Korean).
go back to reference Hughes, Helen. 1999. Crony Capitalism and the East Asian Currency and Financial Crises. Policy 15: 3–9. Hughes, Helen. 1999. Crony Capitalism and the East Asian Currency and Financial Crises. Policy 15: 3–9.
go back to reference Ji, Joo-hyoung. 2009. The shift in the State form and mode of power exercise in South Korea: From the authoritarian developmental state to Neoliberal state power. Korean Political Science Review 43 (4): 175–203.CrossRef Ji, Joo-hyoung. 2009. The shift in the State form and mode of power exercise in South Korea: From the authoritarian developmental state to Neoliberal state power. Korean Political Science Review 43 (4): 175–203.CrossRef
go back to reference Kalinowski, Thomas. 2015. Crisis Management and the Diversity of Capitalism: Fiscal Stimulus Packages and the East Asian (neo-)Developmental State. Economy and Society 44 (2): 244–270.CrossRef Kalinowski, Thomas. 2015. Crisis Management and the Diversity of Capitalism: Fiscal Stimulus Packages and the East Asian (neo-)Developmental State. Economy and Society 44 (2): 244–270.CrossRef
go back to reference Kang, David C. 2002. Bad Loans to Good Friends: Money Politics and the Developmental State in South Korea. International Organization 56 (1): 177–207.CrossRef Kang, David C. 2002. Bad Loans to Good Friends: Money Politics and the Developmental State in South Korea. International Organization 56 (1): 177–207.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, Byung-kook, and Lim Hyuk-baek. 2000. The Myth and Reality of Crony Capitalism in East Asia. Ideology Quarterly 45: 7–74. (in Korean). Kim, Byung-kook, and Lim Hyuk-baek. 2000. The Myth and Reality of Crony Capitalism in East Asia. Ideology Quarterly 45: 7–74. (in Korean).
go back to reference Kim, Young-In. 2013. From the Developmental State to the Post Developmental State: The Case of Lee Myung-bak Government’s ‘Low Carbon Green Growth’ Policy. The Korean Journal of Area Studies 31 (1): 29–53. (in Korean).CrossRef Kim, Young-In. 2013. From the Developmental State to the Post Developmental State: The Case of Lee Myung-bak Government’s ‘Low Carbon Green Growth’ Policy. The Korean Journal of Area Studies 31 (1): 29–53. (in Korean).CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, Ihn Young. 2008. Revisting the Developmental State Theory in Korea: Changes in Developmental State and Its Characteristics since the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Northeast Asian Studies 47: 183–204. (in Korean). Kim, Ihn Young. 2008. Revisting the Developmental State Theory in Korea: Changes in Developmental State and Its Characteristics since the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Northeast Asian Studies 47: 183–204. (in Korean).
go back to reference Kim, Jeong Hae. 2005. Regulatory Reforms on Big Business and Changes in State’s Role in Korea. Korean Journal of Public Administration 43 (4): 327–355. (in Korean). Kim, Jeong Hae. 2005. Regulatory Reforms on Big Business and Changes in State’s Role in Korea. Korean Journal of Public Administration 43 (4): 327–355. (in Korean).
go back to reference Krugman, Paul. 1997. What ever happened to the Asian Miracle? Fortune. Aug. 18. Krugman, Paul. 1997. What ever happened to the Asian Miracle? Fortune. Aug. 18.
go back to reference ———. 1998. “The Capitalist; I Told You So.” The New York Times Magazine. May 3. ———. 1998. “The Capitalist; I Told You So.” The New York Times Magazine. May 3.
go back to reference Lee, Chung H., Keun Lee, and Kangkook Lee. 2002. Chaebol, Financial Liberalization, and Economic Crisis: Transformation of Quasi-Internal Organization in Korea. Asian Economic Journal 16: 17–35.CrossRef Lee, Chung H., Keun Lee, and Kangkook Lee. 2002. Chaebol, Financial Liberalization, and Economic Crisis: Transformation of Quasi-Internal Organization in Korea. Asian Economic Journal 16: 17–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, Seungjoo. 2004. Transforming the developmental state in Korea under Globalization. In Handbook of development policy studies, ed. Gedeon M. Mudacumura and M. Shamsul Haque, 509–522. New York: Marcel Dekker. Lee, Seungjoo. 2004. Transforming the developmental state in Korea under Globalization. In Handbook of development policy studies, ed. Gedeon M. Mudacumura and M. Shamsul Haque, 509–522. New York: Marcel Dekker.
go back to reference Lee, Seungjoo. 2018. The Asian financial crisis and the formation of the new political economy model in Korea. In Political economic history of Korean model of developmental state, ed. Hoon Jaung and Seungjoo Lee, 238–296. Seoul: Ingansarang. (in Korean). Lee, Seungjoo. 2018. The Asian financial crisis and the formation of the new political economy model in Korea. In Political economic history of Korean model of developmental state, ed. Hoon Jaung and Seungjoo Lee, 238–296. Seoul: Ingansarang. (in Korean).
go back to reference Lee, Seungjoo, and Hyun Park. 2010. Self-Reinforcing Mechanism and Continuity in Policy Network: The Case of the IT Industry. Journal of Korean Politics 19 (3): 77–104. (in Korean). Lee, Seungjoo, and Hyun Park. 2010. Self-Reinforcing Mechanism and Continuity in Policy Network: The Case of the IT Industry. Journal of Korean Politics 19 (3): 77–104. (in Korean).
go back to reference Lew, Seok-Choon, and Hey Suk Wang. 2007. A Re-interpretation of Korean Economic Development through Social Capital: The Interplay of Strong State and Strong Society. Society and Theory 12: 109–162. (in Korean).CrossRef Lew, Seok-Choon, and Hey Suk Wang. 2007. A Re-interpretation of Korean Economic Development through Social Capital: The Interplay of Strong State and Strong Society. Society and Theory 12: 109–162. (in Korean).CrossRef
go back to reference Lim, Haeran. 2008. Changes of industrial policy and governance in Korea. Journal of Korean Politics 17 (2): 1–32. Lim, Haeran. 2008. Changes of industrial policy and governance in Korea. Journal of Korean Politics 17 (2): 1–32.
go back to reference Lim, Haeran. 2010. The transformation of the developmental state and economic reform in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia 40 (2): 188–210.CrossRef Lim, Haeran. 2010. The transformation of the developmental state and economic reform in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia 40 (2): 188–210.CrossRef
go back to reference MacIntyre, Andrew J., T.J. Pempel, and John Ravenhill, eds. 2008. Crisis as Catalyst: Asia's Dynamic Political Economy. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press. MacIntyre, Andrew J., T.J. Pempel, and John Ravenhill, eds. 2008. Crisis as Catalyst: Asia's Dynamic Political Economy. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.CrossRef Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.CrossRef
go back to reference Moon, Don, and Jin Young Chung. 2014. From ‘Developmental State Model’ to ‘Neoliberal Model’ – A Critical Assessment on the Debates of the ‘Korean Developmental Model’. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 21 (2): 129–164. (in Korean).CrossRef Moon, Don, and Jin Young Chung. 2014. From ‘Developmental State Model’ to ‘Neoliberal Model’ – A Critical Assessment on the Debates of the ‘Korean Developmental Model’. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 21 (2): 129–164. (in Korean).CrossRef
go back to reference Park, Sang Young. 2015. Analysis on the Cohabitation of Developmentalism and Neoliberalism in Korea: Changes in the Korean Developmental State since the 1990s and Varieties of Developmental-Neoliberal Mixes. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 22 (4): 5–40. (in Korean). Park, Sang Young. 2015. Analysis on the Cohabitation of Developmentalism and Neoliberalism in Korea: Changes in the Korean Developmental State since the 1990s and Varieties of Developmental-Neoliberal Mixes. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 22 (4): 5–40. (in Korean).
go back to reference Pierson, Paul. 1999. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.CrossRef Pierson, Paul. 1999. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.CrossRef
go back to reference Pirie, Iain. 2005. The new Korean State. New Political Economy 10(1): 25–42. Pirie, Iain. 2005. The new Korean State. New Political Economy 10(1): 25–42.
go back to reference Rhyu, Sang-Young, and Seungjoo Lee. 2006. Economic Reform and Changes in Informal Networks between Government and Business in South Korea. Journal of 21st Century Political Science 16 (1): 43–66. (in Korean). Rhyu, Sang-Young, and Seungjoo Lee. 2006. Economic Reform and Changes in Informal Networks between Government and Business in South Korea. Journal of 21st Century Political Science 16 (1): 43–66. (in Korean).
go back to reference Shin, Jang-Sup, and Ha-Joon Chang. 2003. Restructuring Korea Inc. London: RoutledgeCourzon.CrossRef Shin, Jang-Sup, and Ha-Joon Chang. 2003. Restructuring Korea Inc. London: RoutledgeCourzon.CrossRef
go back to reference Stubbs, Richard. 2009. What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The Unfolding Debate. The Pacific Review 22 (1): 1–22.CrossRef Stubbs, Richard. 2009. What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The Unfolding Debate. The Pacific Review 22 (1): 1–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Thurbon, Elizabeth. 2001. “Two paths to financial liberalization: South Korea and Taiwan.” The Pacific Review 14 (2): 241–267. Thurbon, Elizabeth. 2001. “Two paths to financial liberalization: South Korea and Taiwan.” The Pacific Review 14 (2): 241–267.
go back to reference Um, Kyusook, Hyun-Chin Lim, and Suk-Man Hwang. 2014. South Korea’s developmental state at a crossroads: Disintegration or re-emergence 45(2): 211–253. Um, Kyusook, Hyun-Chin Lim, and Suk-Man Hwang. 2014. South Korea’s developmental state at a crossroads: Disintegration or re-emergence 45(2): 211–253.
go back to reference Vogel, Steven K. 2006. Japan Remodeled: How Government and Industry Are Reforming Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Vogel, Steven K. 2006. Japan Remodeled: How Government and Industry Are Reforming Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Vogel, Steven. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Vogel, Steven. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the market: Economic theory and role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the market: Economic theory and role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Wade, Robert, and Frank Veneroso. 1998. The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex. New Left Review 228: 3–20. Wade, Robert, and Frank Veneroso. 1998. The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex. New Left Review 228: 3–20.
go back to reference Weiss, Linda. 2000. Developmental States in Transition: Adapting, Dismantling, Innovating, not ‘Normalizing’. The Pacific Review 13 (1): 21–55.CrossRef Weiss, Linda. 2000. Developmental States in Transition: Adapting, Dismantling, Innovating, not ‘Normalizing’. The Pacific Review 13 (1): 21–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 1999. The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 1999. The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Yang, Jae Jin. 2005. Developmentalism after Development: Growth, Crisis, and Future of the Korean Developmental State. Korean Public Administration Review 39 (1): 1–18. (in Korean). Yang, Jae Jin. 2005. Developmentalism after Development: Growth, Crisis, and Future of the Korean Developmental State. Korean Public Administration Review 39 (1): 1–18. (in Korean).
go back to reference Yeung, Henry Wei-chung. 2016. Strategic Coupling: East Asian Industrial Transformation in the New Global Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Yeung, Henry Wei-chung. 2016. Strategic Coupling: East Asian Industrial Transformation in the New Global Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Yoon, Sang Woo. 2009. Internalizing Neoliberal Globalization in Korea: A Case for ‘Developmental Neoliberalization’. Economy and Society 83: 40–68. (in Korean). Yoon, Sang Woo. 2009. Internalizing Neoliberal Globalization in Korea: A Case for ‘Developmental Neoliberalization’. Economy and Society 83: 40–68. (in Korean).
Metadata
Title
Introduction: Change and Continuity in Institutional Transformation in Korea
Authors
Seungjoo Lee
Sang-young Rhyu
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71453-0_1