Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Introduction

Authors : Khe Foon Hew, Wing Sum Cheung

Published in: Using Blended Learning

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A recent study involving 113,035 students across 13 countries conducted by the EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research found that blended learning environments persists as the preferred learning modality even when students are beginning to experiment with fully online open enrollment courses such as massive open online courses (MOOCs) (Dahlstrom et al. in ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, Louisville, 2013). This chapter begins by presenting the various definitions used by scholars to characterize blended learning, ranging from a very board definition that encompasses almost multiple learning methods or techniques, to one that narrows it down to the integration of online and face-to-face components. Specifically, in this book, we used the following definition of blended learning, adapted from Horn and Staker (The rise of K-12 blended learning, Innosight Institute, CA, 2011): “blended learning is any time a student learns at least in part at a supervised brick-and-mortar location away from home and at least in part through the Internet with some element of student control over time, place, and/or pace”. This chapter then discusses the reason why blended learning is increasingly being adopted by many educators by outlining its four main benefits: an ability to meet students’ educational needs, improving student-to-student communication, reducing the average overall per-student cost, and improving student learning outcomes as well as lowering attrition rates. More importantly, this chapter argues that the success of blended learning does not happen automatically, just because an online component is added to a face-to-face environment. Ultimately, the success or failure of blended learning hinges on a thoughtful connection between how the online and face-to-face components are integrated, the types of pedagogical approaches employed, and how all these elements are ‘blended’ together to attain the specific learning goals. This chapter ends by presenting a blended learning design framework that emerged from a recent study of seven experienced blended learning designers, along with a description of the various frameworks or taxonomies utilized in this book to classify the different types of pedagogies, cognitive processes of learning, and/or levels of affective learning.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
go back to reference Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47(3), 177–198.CrossRef Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47(3), 177–198.CrossRef
go back to reference Byrd, P. A. (2004). The revised taxonomy and prospective teachers. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 244–248.CrossRef Byrd, P. A. (2004). The revised taxonomy and prospective teachers. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 244–248.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Design and evaluation of two blended learning approaches: Lessons learned. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1319–1337. Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Design and evaluation of two blended learning approaches: Lessons learned. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1319–1337.
go back to reference Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.CrossRef Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.CrossRef
go back to reference Cucciare, M., Weingardt, K. R., & Villafranca, S. (2008). Using blended learning to implement evidence-based psychotherapies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15(4), 299–307. Cucciare, M., Weingardt, K. R., & Villafranca, S. (2008). Using blended learning to implement evidence-based psychotherapies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15(4), 299–307.
go back to reference Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P., & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 195–208). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P., & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 195–208). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
go back to reference Ellis, A. (2001). Student-centred collaborative learning via face-to-face and asynchronous online communication: What’s the difference? In Proceedings of the 18th ASCILITE conference (pp. 169–177). Melbourne, Australia: ASCILITE. Ellis, A. (2001). Student-centred collaborative learning via face-to-face and asynchronous online communication: What’s the difference? In Proceedings of the 18th ASCILITE conference (pp. 169–177). Melbourne, Australia: ASCILITE.
go back to reference Foo, K. L. (2014). Exploratory study on blended learning. Unpublished master thesis. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Foo, K. L. (2014). Exploratory study on blended learning. Unpublished master thesis. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
go back to reference Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Wiley. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
go back to reference Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). New York, NY: Routledge. Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). New York, NY: Routledge.
go back to reference Hadjerrouit, S. (2008). Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education, 7(2), 181–210. Hadjerrouit, S. (2008). Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education, 7(2), 181–210.
go back to reference Hanna, W. (2007). The new Bloom’s taxonomy: Implications for music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 108(4), 7–16.CrossRef Hanna, W. (2007). The new Bloom’s taxonomy: Implications for music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 108(4), 7–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, R. H., Garralda, A., Li, D., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1), 1–23. Jones, R. H., Garralda, A., Li, D., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1), 1–23.
go back to reference Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
go back to reference McCray, G. E. (2000). The hybrid course: Merging on-line instruction and the traditional classroom. Information Technology and Management, 1(4), 307–327.CrossRef McCray, G. E. (2000). The hybrid course: Merging on-line instruction and the traditional classroom. Information Technology and Management, 1(4), 307–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development: Washington, D.C. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development: Washington, D.C.
go back to reference Meyen, E. L., Aust, R., Gauch, J. M., Hinton, H. S., Isaacson, R. E., Smith, S. J., et al. (2002). e-Learning: A programmatic research construct for the future. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 37–46. Meyen, E. L., Aust, R., Gauch, J. M., Hinton, H. S., Isaacson, R. E., Smith, S. J., et al. (2002). e-Learning: A programmatic research construct for the future. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 37–46.
go back to reference New York Times. (2013, February 19). The trouble with online college (editorial). p. A22. New York Times. (2013, February 19). The trouble with online college (editorial). p. A22.
go back to reference Nobel, T. (2004). Integrating the revised bloom’s taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 193–211.CrossRef Nobel, T. (2004). Integrating the revised bloom’s taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 193–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207–216.CrossRef Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Oliver, D., Dobele, T., Greber, M., & Roberts, T. (2004). This course has a bloom rating of 3.9. In R. Lister & A. Young (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth Australasian conference on computing education 2004 (pp. 227–231). Dunedin, New Zealand: Australian Computer Society. Oliver, D., Dobele, T., Greber, M., & Roberts, T. (2004). This course has a bloom rating of 3.9. In R. Lister & A. Young (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth Australasian conference on computing education 2004 (pp. 227–231). Dunedin, New Zealand: Australian Computer Society.
go back to reference Ross, B., & Gage, K. (2006). Global perspectives on blended learning: Insight from WebCT andour customers in higher education. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 155–168). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Ross, B., & Gage, K. (2006). Global perspectives on blended learning: Insight from WebCT andour customers in higher education. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 155–168). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
go back to reference Salmon, G. (2004). E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. Taylor & Francis Group. Salmon, G. (2004). E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. Taylor & Francis Group.
go back to reference Sharma, P. & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Macmillan Education Australia. Sharma, P. & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Macmillan Education Australia.
go back to reference Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute, Inc. Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute, Inc.
go back to reference Strambi, A., & Bouvet, E. (2003). Flexibility and interaction at a distance: A mixed-mode environment for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 81–102. Strambi, A., & Bouvet, E. (2003). Flexibility and interaction at a distance: A mixed-mode environment for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 81–102.
go back to reference Su, W. M., Osisek, P., & Starnes, B. (2004). Applying the revised bloom’s taxonomy to a medical-surgical nursing lesson. Nurse Educator, 3, 116–120.CrossRef Su, W. M., Osisek, P., & Starnes, B. (2004). Applying the revised bloom’s taxonomy to a medical-surgical nursing lesson. Nurse Educator, 3, 116–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Twigg, C.A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review, 38(5), 28, 30, 32–36, 38. Twigg, C.A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review, 38(5), 28, 30, 32–36, 38.
go back to reference Ward, J., & LaBranche, G. (2003). Blended learning: The convergence of e-learning and meetings. Franchising World, 35(4), 22–23. Ward, J., & LaBranche, G. (2003). Blended learning: The convergence of e-learning and meetings. Franchising World, 35(4), 22–23.
go back to reference Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2010). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen Education Group report. Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2010). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen Education Group report.
go back to reference Wingard, R. G. (2004). Classroom teaching changes in web-enhanced courses: A multi-institutional study. Educause Quarterly, 27(1), 26–35. Wingard, R. G. (2004). Classroom teaching changes in web-enhanced courses: A multi-institutional study. Educause Quarterly, 27(1), 26–35.
go back to reference Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). Online and hybrid course enrollment and performance in Washington State community and technical colleges. CCRC working paper no. 31. Community College Research Center Teachers College: Columbia University. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). Online and hybrid course enrollment and performance in Washington State community and technical colleges. CCRC working paper no. 31. Community College Research Center Teachers College: Columbia University.
go back to reference Young, J. R. (2002, March 22). ‘Hybrid’ teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(28), A33−A34 Young, J. R. (2002, March 22). ‘Hybrid’ teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(28), A33−A34
Metadata
Title
Introduction
Authors
Khe Foon Hew
Wing Sum Cheung
Copyright Year
2014
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-089-6_1

Premium Partner