Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Start single access now
Request access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Public Choice

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Public Choice 3-4/2019

21-01-2019

Is civic duty the solution to the paradox of voting?

Authors: Abel François, Olivier Gergaud

Published in: Public Choice | Issue 3-4/2019

Log in

Abstract

Although sense of civic duty is seen by many scholars as the most obvious solution to the paradox of voting, very few empirical studies provide clear evidence on that motive. We use blood donation to build proxies, focusing only on intrinsic motivations, and then introduce such measures into electoral turnout regressions. Our results show that civic duty has a strong influence on voter turnout rates, confirming that the satisfaction voters receive from voting matters regardless of election outcomes. The results are even stronger when we incorporate the number of plasma and platelet donations, which take more time and require stronger commitments from donors.
previous article Adaptation and central banking
next article The incumbent’s preference for imperfect commitment

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
At the exception of the United States where donations at private blood banks often are paid (Kessel 1974).
 
2
For a fuller discussion of civic duty, see Galais and Blais (2016a).
 
3
The two others are the first statement of the previous studies and opinions about the relation between the vote and the preservation of democracy (the Downsian hypothesis about the satisfaction of voting).
 
4
Political elections always take place on Sundays in France, which lowers the opportunity costs of voting.
 
5
Blood drives and blood centers are both managed by the FBS.
 
6
For each election, we match our voter turnout data with this available from the closest census. In particular, we used the 2006 census data for the 2007 and 2012 presidential elections; the previous census of 1999 was used for the 2002 ballot.
 
7
For a discussion of the relationships between different aggregate variables and the calculus of voting, see Blais (2000), Geys (2006) and Mueller (2003).
 
8
Indeed, the number of municipal polling stations depends on the number of local inhabitants. France provides one station for every 1000 eligible voters, on average. Electoral participation commonly is higher in small municipalities.
 
9
The general linear model is recommended for estimating proportions when the residuals are not distributed normally.
 
10
It is significant at the 5% level.
 
11
Cost is measured in terms of the values of opportunities foregone and travel distance to the nearest blood donation center.
 
Literature
Ashenfelter, O., & Kelley, S. J. (1975). Determinants of participation in presidential elections. Journal of Law & Economics, 18, 695. CrossRef
Belli, R. F., Traugott, M. W., & Beckmann, M. N. (2001). What leads to voting overreports? Contrasts of overreporters to validated voters and admitted nonvoters in the american national election studies. Journal of Official Statistics, 17(4), 479–498.
Belli, R. F., Traugott, M. W., Young, M., & McGonagle, K. A. (1999). Reducing vote overreporting in surveys: Social desirability, memory failure, and source monitoring. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 90–108. CrossRef
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489–520. CrossRef
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. The American Economic Review, 96(5), 1652–1678. CrossRef
Bernstein, R., Chadha, A., & Montjoy, R. (2001). Overreporting voting: Why it happens and why it matters. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(1), 22–44. CrossRef
Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote? The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. CrossRef
Blais, A., & Galais, C. (2016). Measuring the civic duty to vote: A proposal. Electoral Studies, 41(1), 60–69. CrossRef
Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. E. (1997). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Brody, R. A., & Page, B. I. (1973). Indifference, alientation and rational decisions. Public Choice, 15(1), 1–17. CrossRef
Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston: Row, Pererson & Co.
Cancela, J., & Geys, B. (2016). Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections. Electoral Studies, 42(2), 264–275. CrossRef
Cassel, C. A. (2003). Overreporting and electoral participation research. American Politics Research, 31(1), 81–92. CrossRef
Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 us house elections. The American Political Science Review, 83, 217–231. CrossRef
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
Fauvelle-Aymar, C., & François, A. (2006). The impact of closeness on turnout: An unambiguous empirical relation based on a study of a two-round ballot. Public Choice, 127(3–4), 461–484. CrossRef
Fiorina, M. P. (1976). The voting decision: Instrumental and expressive aspects. Journal of Politics, 38(2), 390–413. CrossRef
Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611. CrossRef
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., Smith, J., & Young, O. R. (1978). A test of downsian voter rationality: 1964 presidential voting. The American Political Science Review, 72, 178–197. CrossRef
Fullerton, A. S., Dixon, J. C., & Borch, C. (2007). Bringing registration into models of vote overreporting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(4), 649–660. CrossRef
Galais, C., & Blais, A. (2016a). Beyond rationalization: Voting out of duty or expressing duty after voting? International Political Science Review, 37(2), 213–29. CrossRef
Galais, C., & Blais, A. (2016b). Do people feel more of a duty to vote in some elections? West European Politics, 39(4), 755–777. CrossRef
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(01), 33–48. CrossRef
Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663. CrossRef
Goette, L., Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. M. (2010). Prosocial motivation and blood donations: A survey of the empirical literature. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, 37(3), 149–154. CrossRef
Hillman, A. L. (2010). Expressive behavior in economics and politics. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 403–418. CrossRef
Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 161–172. CrossRef
Jones, P., & Hudson, J. (2000). Civic duty and expressive voting: Is virtue its own reward? Kyklos, 53(1), 3–16. CrossRef
Kamenica, E. (2012). Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 427–452. CrossRef
Kamenica, E., & Brad, L. E. (2014). Voters, dictators, and peons: Expressive voting and pivotality. Public Choice, 159(1–2), 159–176. CrossRef
Kessel, R. (1974). Transfused blood, serum hepatitis, and the coase theorem. Journal of Law and Economics, 17(2), 265–289. CrossRef
Loewen, P. J., & Dawes, C. T. (2012). The heritability of duty and voter turnout. Political Psychology, 33(3), 363–373. CrossRef
Presser, S. (1984). Is inaccuracy on factual survey items item-specific or respondent-specific? Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(1B), 344–355. CrossRef
Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(01), 25–42. CrossRef
Schwartz, T. (1987). Your vote counts on account of the way it is counted: An institutional solution to the paradox of not voting. Public Choice, 54(2), 101–121. CrossRef
Silver, B. D., Anderson, B. A., & Abramson, P. R. (1986). Who overreports voting? The American Political Science Review, 80(2), 613–624. CrossRef
Silver, M. (1973). A demand analysis of voting costs and voting participation. Social Science Research, 2(2), 111–124. CrossRef
Stocké, V., & Stark, T. (2007). Political involvement and memory failure as interdependent determinants of vote overreporting. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 239–257. CrossRef
Tullock, G. (1968). Toward a mathematics of politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48, 817–838. CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is civic duty the solution to the paradox of voting?
Authors
Abel François
Olivier Gergaud
Publication date
21-01-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Public Choice / Issue 3-4/2019
Print ISSN: 0048-5829
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-00635-7

Other articles of this Issue 3-4/2019

Public Choice 3-4/2019 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

An empirical examination of institutions and cross-country incarceration rates

OriginalPaper

Crowdfunding defense

OriginalPaper

The incumbent’s preference for imperfect commitment

OriginalPaper

Is the market for digital privacy a failure?

OriginalPaper

Do sanctions lead to a decline in civil liberties?

OriginalPaper

Elections, recession expectations and excessive debt: an unholy trinity