Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Is Crowdfunding Suitable for Financing German Public Research Organization (PRO) Projects?

Authors : Valerie Daldrup, Oliver Krahl, Robin Bürger

Published in: Contemporary Developments in Entrepreneurial Finance

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

share
SHARE

Abstract

So far, public research organizations (PROs) and universities in Germany are not benefiting from the manifold opportunities of crowdsourcing platforms and crowdfunding in particular. Crowdfunding may not only provide complementary financial resources for scientific projects, but it can also enhance the spectrum of science communication and facilitate the knowledge and technology transfer process. Consequently, scientists can use crowdfunding activities to stimulate the transfer of their knowledge to business and/or society to stimulate innovation. Nevertheless, it is a challenging task to apply the full spectrum of crowdsourcing instruments in PROs and universities. The crowdfunding literature rarely covers the untapped potential and challenges associated with crowdfunding for scientific institutions. In this conceptual paper, we provide approaches how PROs and universities can successfully acquire alternative financing, in particular from crowdfunding, and use it strategically. The aim is to provide solutions to pitfalls that may prevent researchers from exploiting crowdfunding in their “funding journey.” We introduce a model called “scientific cooperative crowdfunding” as a field for further research to explore how PROs and universities can use crowdfunding in a more comprehensive way during different stages of the knowledge and technology transfer process.

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko





Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Literature
go back to reference Adamczyk, S. (2012). Managing innovation contests: Challenges of attraction and facilitation. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. Adamczyk, S. (2012). Managing innovation contests: Challenges of attraction and facilitation. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.
go back to reference Ahlers, G. K. C., et al. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 955–980. CrossRef Ahlers, G. K. C., et al. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 955–980. CrossRef
go back to reference Baeck, P., et al. (2016). Crowdfunding in the EU capital markets union EN. Commission Staff Working Document, 2016(September), 1–40. Baeck, P., et al. (2016). Crowdfunding in the EU capital markets union EN. Commission Staff Working Document, 2016(September), 1–40.
go back to reference Barr, S. H., Baker, T., & Marham, S. K. (2013). Bridging the valley of death: Lessons Learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education. Academy of Management Education & Learning, 8(3), 370–388. Barr, S. H., Baker, T., & Marham, S. K. (2013). Bridging the valley of death: Lessons Learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education. Academy of Management Education & Learning, 8(3), 370–388.
go back to reference Behlau, L. (2017). Forschungsmanagement: Ein praktischer Leitfaden (De Gruyter Textbook). De Gruyter. Behlau, L. (2017). Forschungsmanagement: Ein praktischer Leitfaden (De Gruyter Textbook). De Gruyter.
go back to reference Bijedic, T., et al. (2015). Der Einfluss institutioneller Rahmenbedingungen auf die Gründungsneigung von Wissenschaftlern an deutschen Hochschulen. IIfM-Materialien, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM), No. 233. Bonn. Bijedic, T., et al. (2015). Der Einfluss institutioneller Rahmenbedingungen auf die Gründungsneigung von Wissenschaftlern an deutschen Hochschulen. IIfM-Materialien, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM), No. 233. Bonn.
go back to reference Bijedic, T., et al. (2017). Mind the gap: Institutional and individual antecedents of entrepreneurial trajectories in the academic context. IfM Bonn Working Paper 03/17. Bonn. Bijedic, T., et al. (2017). Mind the gap: Institutional and individual antecedents of entrepreneurial trajectories in the academic context. IfM Bonn Working Paper 03/17. Bonn.
go back to reference Bonabeau, E. (2009). Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 45–52. Bonabeau, E. (2009). Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 45–52.
go back to reference Busch, C., & Matuschka, A. v. (2016). Abschlussbericht “SIGNO-Crowdfunding”. Busch, C., & Matuschka, A. v. (2016). Abschlussbericht “SIGNO-Crowdfunding”.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–42. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–42.
go back to reference Chlosta, S., et al. (2017). Gründungserfolg von Wissenschaftlern an deutschen Hochschulen. 257. Chlosta, S., et al. (2017). Gründungserfolg von Wissenschaftlern an deutschen Hochschulen. 257.
go back to reference Comin, D., et al. (2018). Do companies benefit from public research organizations? The impact of Fraunhofer. Comin, D., et al. (2018). Do companies benefit from public research organizations? The impact of Fraunhofer.
go back to reference Dornbusch, F., et al. (2016). Die Bedeutung der Fraunhofer Gesellschaft für den deutschen Mittelstand – Eine Bestandsaufnahme und Empfehlungen zur Intensivierung der Zusammenarbeit. Dornbusch, F., et al. (2016). Die Bedeutung der Fraunhofer Gesellschaft für den deutschen Mittelstand – Eine Bestandsaufnahme und Empfehlungen zur Intensivierung der Zusammenarbeit.
go back to reference Ebner, W. (2008). Community building for innovations – Der Ideenwettbewerb als Methode für die Entwicklung und Einführung einer virtuellen Innovations-Gemeinschaft. Ebner, W. (2008). Community building for innovations – Der Ideenwettbewerb als Methode für die Entwicklung und Einführung einer virtuellen Innovations-Gemeinschaft.
go back to reference European Commission. (2017). Assessing the potential for crowdfunding and other forms of alternative finance to support research and innovation. European Commission. European Commission. (2017). Assessing the potential for crowdfunding and other forms of alternative finance to support research and innovation. European Commission.
go back to reference European Parliamentary Research Service. (2017, January). Crowdfunding in Europe, 58, 44–71. European Parliamentary Research Service. (2017, January). Crowdfunding in Europe, 58, 44–71.
go back to reference Fischer, L., & Pohle, A. (2018, June). Managing the fuzzy front end in research organizations (pp. 1–14). Fischer, L., & Pohle, A. (2018, June). Managing the fuzzy front end in research organizations (pp. 1–14).
go back to reference Fraunhofer IMW. (2018). Innofinanz (Sondierungsvorhaben) – unveröffentlichter Zwischenbericht. Fraunhofer IMW. (2018). Innofinanz (Sondierungsvorhaben) – unveröffentlichter Zwischenbericht.
go back to reference Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. (2017). Jahresbericht 2017 – Arbeitswelt der Zukunft. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. (2017). Jahresbericht 2017 – Arbeitswelt der Zukunft.
go back to reference Frietsch, R., et al. (2016). Der Beitrag der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zum deutschen Innovationssystem. Frietsch, R., et al. (2016). Der Beitrag der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zum deutschen Innovationssystem.
go back to reference Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz. (2015). Pakt für Forschung und Innovation – Fortschreibung 2016–2020 (p. 65). Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz. (2015). Pakt für Forschung und Innovation – Fortschreibung 2016–2020 (p. 65).
go back to reference Goldstein, J. A., & Hazy, J. K. (2006). Editorial introduction to the special issue: From complexity to leadership and back to complexity, 8(4). Goldstein, J. A., & Hazy, J. K. (2006). Editorial introduction to the special issue: From complexity to leadership and back to complexity, 8(4).
go back to reference Gray, R. (2015). Crowdfunded science: Harnessing the wisdom of the crowd, or selling out? (pp. 1–5). Gray, R. (2015). Crowdfunded science: Harnessing the wisdom of the crowd, or selling out? (pp. 1–5).
go back to reference Hachmeister, D.-C., Duong, S., & Roessler, I. (2015). Hemmnisse und Fördermöglichkeiten für Forschung und Third Mission an Fachhochschulen. Hachmeister, D.-C., Duong, S., & Roessler, I. (2015). Hemmnisse und Fördermöglichkeiten für Forschung und Third Mission an Fachhochschulen.
go back to reference Hopp, C., & Kaminski, J. C. (2016, August). Are lead users more successful crowdfunders?. Hopp, C., & Kaminski, J. C. (2016, August). Are lead users more successful crowdfunders?.
go back to reference Hopp, C., & Kaminski, J. (2018). Crowdfunding für Innovationen – unveröffentlichter Zwischbericht im Rahmen des Verbundvorhabens Innofinanz (Sondierungsvorhaben). Hopp, C., & Kaminski, J. (2018). Crowdfunding für Innovationen – unveröffentlichter Zwischbericht im Rahmen des Verbundvorhabens Innofinanz (Sondierungsvorhaben).
go back to reference Jäger, L., & Mathes, C. (2015). Crowdfunding für Hochschulen (German edition). Books on Demand. Jäger, L., & Mathes, C. (2015). Crowdfunding für Hochschulen (German edition). Books on Demand.
go back to reference Jovanović, T., Bansemir, B., & Kirchner, M. (2017). The crowdfunding idea contest of BMW. International association for management of technology IAMOT 2017 conference proceedings. Jovanović, T., Bansemir, B., & Kirchner, M. (2017). The crowdfunding idea contest of BMW. International association for management of technology IAMOT 2017 conference proceedings.
go back to reference Siu, P., Tseng, M. M., & Hoyt, D. (2010). Shanzhai (‘Bandit’) mobile phone companies: The Guerrilla warfare of product development. Siu, P., Tseng, M. M., & Hoyt, D. (2010). Shanzhai (‘Bandit’) mobile phone companies: The Guerrilla warfare of product development.
go back to reference Solemon, B., et al. (2013). A review of the uses of crowdsourcing in higher education. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(9), 2066–2073. Solemon, B., et al. (2013). A review of the uses of crowdsourcing in higher education. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(9), 2066–2073.
go back to reference Tröger, T. H. (2017). Remarks on the German regulation of crowdfunding EBI working paper series. Tröger, T. H. (2017). Remarks on the German regulation of crowdfunding EBI working paper series.
go back to reference von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805. CrossRef von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805. CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, D. (2016, June). Corporate crowdfunding as a marketing communication tool (pp. 1–81). Wang, D. (2016, June). Corporate crowdfunding as a marketing communication tool (pp. 1–81).
go back to reference West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A research agenda. In Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A research agenda. In Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metadata
Title
Is Crowdfunding Suitable for Financing German Public Research Organization (PRO) Projects?
Authors
Valerie Daldrup
Oliver Krahl
Robin Bürger
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17612-9_12

Premium Partner