Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Karl Sauvant and Federico Ortino, Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Options for the Future

Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, 2013; ISBN 978-952-281-217-9

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The e-book published in 2013 by Karl Sauvant (Columbia University) and Federico Ortino (King’s College London) is an important addition to the literature on international investment law. In a nutshell, this book’s contribution is to outline the key features of the international investment regime, identify drivers of change, discuss critical issues, and describe some proposals for reform of the regime. The present review will focus on the suggestions put forward by Sauvant and Ortino and the challenges facing their design and implementation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Several developing countries, such as the People’s Republic of China (PRC), India, and Korea, represent both the capital-exporting and capital-importing nations. See Ranjan (2014), p. 419, 429–430; Congyan (2009), p. 457, 499; Bath and Nottage (2011).
 
2
See Alvarez (2009), p. 943, 957–959. The purpose of the BIT is to encourage the FDI between the two State-Parties, which hopefully leads to economic growth for both state-parties. On the economic impact of IIAs, see generally Chaisse and Bellak (2015).
 
3
See Choi (2007), p. 725, 731. See also Chaisse (2013), p. 332, 334–35.
 
4
Sauvant K and Ortino F (2013) Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime—Options for the Future. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland, Helsinki, p. 88.
 
5
Sauvant K and Ortino F (2013) Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime—Options for the Future. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland, Helsinki, p. 92.
 
6
Sauvant K and Ortino F (2013) Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime—Options for the Future. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland, Helsinki, p. 112.
 
7
See Sauvant K and Ortino F (2013) Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime—Options for the Future. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland, Helsinki, p. 136.
 
Literature
go back to reference Alvarez JE (2009) Contemporary foreign investment law: an “empire of law” or the “law of empire”? Ala Law Rev 60(4):943–976 Alvarez JE (2009) Contemporary foreign investment law: an “empire of law” or the “law of empire”? Ala Law Rev 60(4):943–976
go back to reference Bath V, Nottage L (eds) (2011) Foreign investment and dispute resolution law and practice in Asia. Routledge, London Bath V, Nottage L (eds) (2011) Foreign investment and dispute resolution law and practice in Asia. Routledge, London
go back to reference Chaisse J (2013) Exploring the confines of international investment and domestic health protections—general exceptions clause as a forced perspective. Am J Law Med 39:332–360 Chaisse J (2013) Exploring the confines of international investment and domestic health protections—general exceptions clause as a forced perspective. Am J Law Med 39:332–360
go back to reference Chaisse J, Bellak C (2015) Navigating the expanding universe of investment treaties—creation and use of critical index. J Int Econ Law 18(1):79–115CrossRef Chaisse J, Bellak C (2015) Navigating the expanding universe of investment treaties—creation and use of critical index. J Int Econ Law 18(1):79–115CrossRef
go back to reference Choi WM (2007) The present and future of investor state dispute paradigm. J Int Econ Law 10(3):725–747CrossRef Choi WM (2007) The present and future of investor state dispute paradigm. J Int Econ Law 10(3):725–747CrossRef
go back to reference Congyan C (2009) China-US BIT negotiations and the future of investment treaty regime. J Int Econ Law 12(2):457–506CrossRef Congyan C (2009) China-US BIT negotiations and the future of investment treaty regime. J Int Econ Law 12(2):457–506CrossRef
go back to reference Ranjan P (2014) India and bilateral investment treaties—a changing landscape. ICSID Rev 9(2):419–450CrossRef Ranjan P (2014) India and bilateral investment treaties—a changing landscape. ICSID Rev 9(2):419–450CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Karl Sauvant and Federico Ortino, Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Options for the Future
Author
Julien Chaisse
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29215-1_37