Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

06-03-2018 | Original Paper | Issue 9/2018

Biodiversity and Conservation 9/2018

Key drivers of effectiveness in small marine protected areas

Journal:
Biodiversity and Conservation > Issue 9/2018
Authors:
John W. Turnbull, Yasmina Shah Esmaeili, Graeme F. Clark, Will F. Figueira, Emma L. Johnston, Renata Ferrari
Important notes
Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10531-018-1532-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
John W. Turnbull and Yasmina Shah Esmaeili contributed equally and are co-lead authors.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Coastal and marine biodiversity.

Abstract

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are a key management tool for the conservation of biodiversity and restoration of marine communities. While large, well-designed and enforced MPAs have been found to be effective, results from small MPAs vary. The Hawkesbury Shelf, a coastal bioregion in New South Wales, Australia, has ten small, near-shore MPAs known as Aquatic Reserves with a variety of protection levels from full no-take to partial protection. This study assessed the effectiveness of these MPAs and analysed how MPA age, size, protection level, wave exposure, habitat complexity, and large canopy-forming algal cover affected fish, invertebrate and benthic communities. We found aspect, protection level, complexity and algal canopy to be important predictors of communities in these MPAs. Most MPAs, however, were not effective in meeting their goals. Only full no-take protection (three out of ten MPAs) had a significant impact on fish assemblages. One no-take MPA—Cabbage Tree Bay—which is naturally sheltered from wave action and benefits from an active local community providing informal enforcement, accounted for most of the increased richness of large fish and increased biomass of targeted fish species. Our findings suggest that small MPAs can enhance biodiversity and biomass on a local scale but only if they have full no-take protection, are in sheltered locations with complex habitat, and have positive community involvement to engender support and stewardship. These results provide a baseline for robust assessment of the effectiveness of small MPAs and inform future management decisions and small MPA design in other locations.

Please log in to get access to this content

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit dem Kombi-Abo erhalten Sie vollen Zugriff auf über 1,8 Mio. Dokumente aus mehr als 61.000 Fachbüchern und rund 500 Fachzeitschriften aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Umwelt
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit dem Technik-Abo erhalten Sie Zugriff auf über 1 Mio. Dokumente aus mehr als 40.000 Fachbüchern und 300 Fachzeitschriften aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Umwelt
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Supplementary Material
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)
10531_2018_1532_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Literature
About this article

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Biodiversity and Conservation 9/2018 Go to the issue