Advertisement
Published in:
18-05-2024
“Laws Could Always Be Revoked”: Sociopolitical Uncertainty in the Transition to Marriage Equality
Authors: J. Kale Monk, TeKisha M. Rice, Brian G. Ogolsky, Stef Sloan, Pamela J. Lannutti
Published in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy | Issue 3/2024
Log inActivate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by (Link opens in a new window)
Abstract
The article 'Laws Could Always Be Revoked': Sociopolitical Uncertainty in the Transition to Marriage Equality examines the impact of sociopolitical uncertainties on the relational dynamics of sexual minority individuals during the transition to marriage equality. It introduces the Contextual Relational Uncertainty (CRU) model, which posits that sociopolitical upheaval can lead to uncertainty in relationships. The study explores the association between sociopolitical uncertainty and relational uncertainty, highlighting the heightened concerns and questions that arise during periods of change. The research also delves into the experiences of individuals following the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, providing a rich qualitative analysis of the lingering doubts and concerns. The article offers valuable insights into the complex interplay between legal, social, and relational uncertainties, making it a must-read for those interested in understanding the broader implications of sociopolitical changes on personal and interpersonal well-being.
AI Generated
This summary of the content was generated with the help of AI.
Abstract
Introduction
Shifting sociopolitical landscapes may create doubts, questions, or concerns for individuals, especially those who hold a disenfranchised identity or are in marginalized relationships (Meyer in Psychology of Sexualities Review 7:81–90, 2016). As a result of political and societal opposition following the Supreme Court Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, for example, legal and social uncertainties may lead to distress for same-sex couples.
Methods
Guided by the Contextual Relational Uncertainty (CRU) model (Monk & Ogolsky in Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(2):243–261, 2019), we test the association between sociopolitical uncertainties (i.e., uncertainty about legal recognition, social acceptance, and norms or scripts) and relational uncertainty (i.e., self, partner, and relationship uncertainty) among people in same-sex (n = 180) and different-sex (n = 180) relationships 1 year after the Obergefell ruling.
Results
We found that most sources of sociopolitical uncertainty were positively associated with the sources of relational uncertainty. Using thematic analysis, we also analyzed responses to open-ended questions about concerns and experiences related to the Obergefell v. Hodges decision. We identified primary themes including increased (a) social certainty and (b) relational security, but also increased uncertainty related to (c) the breadth and permanence of legal recognition, (d) family norms and roles, and (e) potential backlash.
Conclusions
Overall, these findings provide more evidence of the positive and negative consequences of precarious societal transitions on the lives of individuals, particularly people in marginalized relationships.
Policy Implications
Policymakers and court system officials should be conscious of the full import of legislation. Even when producing legislation that is perceived to benefit a population, policies and educational resources should be considered that further support these communities across the transition.
