1998 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
Learning from Past Experience? Local Agenda 21 Processes and Integrated Urban Development Planning in Germany
Authors : Sandra H. Lustig, Ulrike Weiland
Published in: Participation and the Quality of Environmental Decision Making
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Included in: Professional Book Archive
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Local Agenda 21 (LA 21) processes are moving slowly in Germany and are concentrated on environmental issues. The current debate on sustainable urban development is, in part, focusing on issues that were dealt with in the 1970s by Stadtentwicklungsplanung (STEP), a form of integrated urban development planning, but frequently without using the experiences from those efforts. In this chapter, STEP and LA 21 in Germany are characterised and compared to each other using structural and functional criteria. Using the experiences with STEP, recommendations for the practice of LA 21 are made. LA 21 goes beyond STEP, but there are lessons to be learned. LA 21 efforts, which concentrate on one or a few issues, should develop a long-term plan of action. It is important for LA 21 initiatives to clarify their status and their relations to the other forms of planning’ When assessing what may be realistic for LA 21, it is essential to be conscious of the local power structure, the local planning system, and the potentials and limitations both of public participation and of local government itself. If this knowledge is used constructively, participatory LA 21 processes will be able to contribute to urban sustainability and to improving local decision-making processes.