Top

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Published in:

22-05-2024 | LCA FOR AGRICULTURE

Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic Arabica coffees: from farm to pack

Authors: Leda Coltro, Maria Paula Tavares, Karla B. F. S. Sturaro

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 9/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to update the previously LCA study of the coffee production in Brazil in order to estimate environmental indicators, namely carbon footprint, water use, fossil resource depletion, etc. of coffee cultivation in the main regions of coffee production in Brazil, besides roasted coffee beans and ground roasted coffee.

Methods

The scope was to evaluate the coffee production systems located at Minas Gerais and São Paulo States, which have different climatic conditions. The system boundaries considered the stages from raw material extraction until the farm gate (green coffee beans) and industry gate (roasted coffee beans and ground roasted coffee), i.e., a cradle-to-gate system. Farm-specific data were combined with agricultural production and industrial data to elaborate coffee production environmental indicators. The data were obtained from conventional and organic coffee producers for the crops 2017/18 and 2018/19. The functional unit adopted was 1 kg green coffee beans and 1 kg roasted coffee beans and ground roasted coffee.

Results and discussion

A reduction of fertilizers and electricity consumption and an increase of diesel and limestone consumption were observed when the results of conventional coffee cultivation are compared with our previous study developed for the crops 2001/2002 and 2002/2003. Approximately 70% of the CO₂ emissions was due to field emissions related to urea and limestone applications. Field emissions are also the major contributor for other seven impact categories evaluated. Climate change, including biogenic carbon and land use change, showed negative values for green coffee beans due to carbon fixation in the product. Fertilizer production was responsible for approx. 60% of fossil resource scarcity.

Conclusions

For conventional coffee, the GWP₁₀₀ was approx. 1.4 kg CO₂-eq. kg⁻¹ green coffee beans and 1.8 kg CO₂-eq. kg⁻¹ roasted coffee beans and ground roasted coffee. For organic coffee, the GWP₁₀₀ was approx. 0.3 kg CO₂-eq. kg⁻¹ green coffee beans and 0.5 kg CO₂-eq. kg⁻¹ roasted coffee beans and ground roasted coffee. The use of water is also low, as the farms evaluated do not adopt the irrigation system at the coffee growing stage.

Recommendations

Improvements should be concentrated on the agricultural stage of the coffee production chain since this is the stage with the greatest contribution to the environmental impact categories. Some examples that can contribute to reducing GHG emissions as well as other environmental impact categories are increasing productivity, lower input consumption (fertilizers, correctives, and fuels), and optimizing transport stages.

previous article Life cycle assessment as a driver for process optimisation of cellobiose lipids fermentation and purification

next article Factors influencing the carbon footprint of rice production in Northeastern Vietnam

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Acosta-Alba I, Boissy J, Chia E, Andrieu N (2019) Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01689-5CrossRef

Akenroye TO, Dora M, Kumar M, Elbaz J, Kah S, Jebli F (2021) A taxonomy of barriers to the adoption of sustainable practices in the coffee farming process. J Clean Prod 312:127818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127818CrossRef

Amicarelli V, Lagioia G, Bux C (2021) Global warming potential of food waste through the life cycle assessment: an analytical review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 91:106677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106677CrossRef

Araújo TKL, Nóbrega RO, Fernandes DDS, Araújo MCU, Diniz PHGD, Silva EC (2021) Non-destructive authentication of gourmet ground roasted coffees using NIR spectroscopy and digital images. Food Chem 364:130452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130452CrossRef

Basavalingaiah K, Paramesh V, Parajuli R, Girisha HC, Shivaprasad M, Vidyashree GV, Thoma G, Hanumanthappa M, Yogesh GS, Misra SD, Bhat S, Irfan MM, Rajanna GA (2022) Energy flow and life cycle impact assessment of coffee-pepper production systems: an evaluation of conventional, integrated and organic farms in India. Environ Impact Assess Rev 92:106687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106687CrossRef

Birkenberg A, Birner R (2018) The world´s first carbon neutral coffee: lessons on certification and innovation from a pioneer case in Costa Rica. J Clean Prod 189:485–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.226CrossRef

Brazilian Energy Balance 2023: Year 2022 (2023) Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. Rio de Janeiro: EPE. 274. Available online: https://www.epe.gov.br/sites-pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/PublicacoesArquivos/publicacao-748/topico-687/BEN2023.pdf

Brentrup F, Küsters J, Lammel J, Kuhlmann H (2000) Methods to estimate on field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:349–357. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2000.08.030CrossRef

Cibelli M, Cimini A, Cerchiara G, Moresi M (2021) Carbon footprint of diferente methods of coffee preparation. Sustain Prod Consum 27:1614–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.004CrossRef

Coltro L, Mourad AL, Oliveira PAPLV, Baddini JPOA, Kletecke RM (2006) Environmental profile of Brazilian green coffee. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.01.230CrossRef

Coltro L, Tavares MPF, Pantano AP (2020) Environmental indicators of coffee cultivated in São Paulo State, Brazil. In: Towards Sustainable Agri-Food Systems. Proceedings of the 12^th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of Food, vol 1. Berlin Virtually, Germany. DIL, Quakenbruck, Germany, pp 327–330

Consonni R, Polla D, Cagliani LR (2018) Organic and conventional coffee differentiation by NIR spectroscopy. Food Control 94:284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.013CrossRef

De Ponti T, Rijk B, van Ittersum MK (2012) The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture. Agric Systems 108:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.004CrossRef

Debastiani R, Santos CEI, Yoneama ML, Amaral L, Dias JF (2014) Ion bean analysis of ground coffee and roasted coffee beans. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B318:202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2013.05.105CrossRef

Erickson JE, Cisar JL, Volin JC, Snyder GH (2001) Comparing nitrogen runoff and leaching between alternative residential landscapes. Crop Sci 41:1889–1895CrossRef

Falguera V, Aliguer N, Falguera M (2012) An integrated approach to current trends in food consumption: moving toward functional and organic products? Food Control 26:274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.051CrossRef

Ferramenta GHG Protocol Versão 2020.1.2 (2020) Programa brasileiro GHG Protocol. GVCES, São Paulo. Available at: http://ferramenta.ghgprotocolbrasil.com.br/index.php?r=site/conteudo&id=1

Giraldi-Diaz MR, Medina-Salas L, Castillo-González E, León-Lira R (2018) Environmental impact associated with the supply chain and production of grounding and roasting coffee through life cycle analysis. Sustainability 10:4598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124598CrossRef

Gomiero T, Pimentel D, Paoletti MG (2011) Environmental impacto f diferente agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture. Crit Review Plant Sci 30:95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554355CrossRef

Guido Z, Knudson C, Finan T, Madajewicz M, Rhiney K (2020) Shocks and cherries: the production of vulnerability among smallholder coffee farms in Jamaica. World Develop 132:104979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104979CrossRef

Guinée JB (ed) (2002) Handbook on LCA: Operational guidelines to the ISO Standards. Leiden University, Kluwer publisher, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Centrum Milieukunde Leiden (CML)

Hajjar R, Newton P, Adshead D, Bogaerts M, Maguire-Rajpaul VA, Pinto LFG, McDermott CL, Milder JC, Wollenberg E, Agraval A (2019) Scaling up sustainability in commodity agricultura: tranferability of governance mechanisms across the coffee and cattle sectors in Brazil. J Clean Prod 206:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.102CrossRef

Hamdan Fauzi AM, Rusli MS, Rustiadi E (2019) A study of the smallholder coffee agroindustry sustainability condition using the life cycle assessment approach in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. J Eco Eng 20:153–160. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/108637CrossRef

Hassard HA, Couch MH, Techa-erawan T, McLellan BC (2014) Product carbon footprint and energy analysis of alternative coffee products in Japan. J Clean Prod 73:310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.006CrossRef

Humbert S, Loerincik Y, Rossi V, Margni M, Jolliet O (2009) Life cycle assessment of spray dried soluble coffee and comparison with alternatives (drip filter and capsule espresso). J Clean Prod 17:1351–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.011CrossRef

ICO (2020) International coffee organization. London. https://icocoffee.org/

IPCC (2019) 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Calvo Buenda E, Tanabe K, Kranjc A, Baasansuren J, Fukuda M, Ngarize S, Osako A, Pyrozhenko Y, Shermanau P, Federici S. (eds). Published: IPCC, Switzerland

ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization. Genève 28

ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization. Genève 54

Jurjonas M, Crossman K, Solomon J, Baez WL (2016) Potential links between certified organic coffee and deforestation in a protected area in Chiapas, Mexico. World Develop 78:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.030CrossRef

Killian B, Rivera L, Soto M, Navichoc D (2013) Carbon footprint across the coffee supply chain: the case of Costa Rica coffee. J Agric Sci Tech B3:151–170

Lee Y, Bateman A (2021) The competitiveness of fair trade and organic versus conventional coffee base don consumer panel data. Ecol Econ 184:106986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106986CrossRef

Liu M, Ogunmoroti A, Liu W, Li M, Bi M, Liu W, Cui Z (2022) Assessment and projection environmental impacts of food waste treatment in China from life cycle perspectives. Sci Total Environ 807:150751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150751CrossRef

Martins LD, Eugenio FC, Rodrigues WN, Tomaz MA, dos Santos AR, Ramalho JC (2018) Carbon and wáter footprints in Brazilian coffee plantations – the spatial and temporal distribution. Emir J Food Agric 30:482–487. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i6.1718CrossRef

Mourad AL, Coltro L, Oliveira PAPLV, Kletecke RM, Baddini JPOA (2007) A simple methodology for elaborating the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:408–413CrossRef

Munyendo LM, Njoroge DM, Owaga EE, Mugendi B (2021) Coffee phytochemicals and post-harvest handling – a complex and delicate balance. J Food Compos Anal 102:103995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103995CrossRef

Nab C, Maslin M (2020) Life cycle assessment synthesis of the carbon footprint of Arabica coffee: case study of Brazil and Vietnam conventional and sustainable coffee production and export to the United Kingdom. Geo: Geogr Environ 7:19. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.96CrossRef

Noponen MRA, Edwards-Jones G, Haggar JP, Soto G, Attarzadeh N, Healey JR (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions in coffee grown with differing input levels under conventional and organic management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 151:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.019CrossRef

Novaes RML, Pazianotto RA, Brandão M, Alves BJR, May A, Folegatti-Matsuura MIS (2017) Estimating 20-year land use change and derived CO₂ emissions associated with crops, pasture and forestry in Brazil and each of its 27 states. Glob Change Biol 23:3716–3728. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13708CrossRef

Noya I, Gonzáles-García S, Bacenetti J, Arroja L, Moreira MT (2015) Comparative life cycle assessment of three representative feed cereals production in the Po Valley (Italy). J Clean Prod 99:250–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.001CrossRef

PE (1992–2015) GaBi software system and databases for life cycle engineering. Copyright, TM. Sttutgart, Echterdingen

Piao RS, Fonseca L, Januário EC, Saes MSM, Almeida LF (2019) The adoption of voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) and value chain upgrading in the Brazilian coffee production context. J Rural Studies 71:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.007CrossRef

Rocha MSR, Caldeira-Pires A (2019) Environmental product declaration promotion in Brazil: SWOT analysis and strategies. J Cleaner Prod 235:1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.266CrossRef

Smil V (2000) Phosphorus in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:53–88CrossRef

Smith LG, Jones PJ, Kirk GJD, Pearce BD, Williams AG (2018) Modelling the production impacts of a widespread conversion to organic agriculture in England and Wales. Land Use Pol 76:391–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.035CrossRef

Staver C, Juventia S, Navarrete E, Navarrete L, Sepulveda N, Barrios M (2020) Long-term response of groundcover components to organic and conventional weed control in shaded and open-sun coffee in Nicaragua. Crop Prot 133:105150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105150CrossRef

Tavares MPF, Mourad AL (2020) Coffee beverage preparation by different methods from an environmental perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:1356–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01719-2CrossRef

Tricase C, Lamonaca E, Ingrao C, Bacenetti J, Giudice A (2018) A comparative life cycle assessment between organic and conventional barley cultivation for sustainable agriculture pathways. J Clean Prod 172:3747–3759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.008CrossRef

Trinh LTK, Hu AH, Lan YC, Chen ZH (2020) Comparative life cycle assessment for conventional and organic coffee cultivation in Vietnam. Int J Environ Sci Tech 17:1307–1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02539-5CrossRef

Usva K, Sinkko T, Silvenius F, Riipi I, Heusala H (2020) Carbon and water footprint of coffee consumed in Finland – life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:1976–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01799-5CrossRef

Villalón-López N, Serrano-Contreras JI, Téllez-Medina DI, Zepeda LG (2018) An ¹H NMR-based metabolomic approach to compare the chemical profiling of retail samples of ground roasted and instant coffees. Food Res Int 106:263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.077CrossRef

Title: Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic Arabica coffees: from farm to pack
Authors: Leda Coltro
Maria Paula Tavares
Karla B. F. S. Sturaro
Publication date: 22-05-2024
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 9/2024
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02317-7

A parametric approach for developing embodied environmental benchmark values for buildings

Open Access
BUILDING COMPONENTS AND BUILDINGS

Statistics-based LCA of artisanal fishing in the Union of the Comoros: efficiency challenges

DATA AVAILABILITY, DATA QUALITY

Unveil the carbon footprint of textiles dyed with different reactive dyestuff recipes from an industrial manufacturing perspective

CARBON FOOTPRINTING

Correction: Requirements for comparative life cycle assessment studies for single-use and reusable packaging and products: recommendation for decision and policy-makers

Correction

Enabling comprehensive assessment of marine eutrophication impacts and their evaluation against regional safe operating space

Open Access
LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

Life cycle assessment as a driver for process optimisation of cellobiose lipids fermentation and purification

Open Access
GREEN CHEMISTRY