Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Literature on Production Risk

Author : Nabaz T. Khayyat

Published in: Energy Demand in Industry

Publisher: Springer Netherlands

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A noticeable number of econometric studies on production technology and firm behavior have been conducted since 1970s, where the flexible functional form technique is introduced. These studies have mainly focused on two issues, first, in measuring the producer’s responses to changes in the price of input and output, and second in measuring the productivity growth. The majority of these studies have relied on one of the two assumptions: The assumption of deterministic setting which indicates that for a given level of inputs the output level will be certainly known, or the assumption of homoskedastic production technology which implies that inputs do not affect the variability of the output.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Arrow, K. J. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Chicago: Markham Press. Arrow, K. J. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Chicago: Markham Press.
go back to reference Asche, F., & Tveteras, R. (1999). Modeling production risk with a two-step procedure. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 24(2), 424–439. Asche, F., & Tveteras, R. (1999). Modeling production risk with a two-step procedure. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 24(2), 424–439.
go back to reference Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 395. doi:10.2307/1240194.CrossRef Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 395. doi:10.​2307/​1240194.CrossRef
go back to reference Briys, E., & Eeckhoudt, L. (1985). Relative risk aversion in comparative statics: Comment. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 281–283. Briys, E., & Eeckhoudt, L. (1985). Relative risk aversion in comparative statics: Comment. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 281–283.
go back to reference Chambers, R. G. (1983). Scale and productivity-measurement under risk. American Economic Review, 73(4), 802–805. doi:10.2307/1816579. Chambers, R. G. (1983). Scale and productivity-measurement under risk. American Economic Review, 73(4), 802–805. doi:10.​2307/​1816579.
go back to reference Coppejans, M., Gilleskie, D., Sieg, H., & Strumpf, K. (2007). Consumer demand under price uncertainty: Empirical evidence from the market for cigarettes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 510–521. doi:10.1162/rest.89.3.510.CrossRef Coppejans, M., Gilleskie, D., Sieg, H., & Strumpf, K. (2007). Consumer demand under price uncertainty: Empirical evidence from the market for cigarettes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 510–521. doi:10.​1162/​rest.​89.​3.​510.CrossRef
go back to reference Coyle, B. T. (1999). Risk aversion and yield uncertainty in duality models of production: A mean-variance approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(3), 553–567. doi:10.2307/1244015.CrossRef Coyle, B. T. (1999). Risk aversion and yield uncertainty in duality models of production: A mean-variance approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(3), 553–567. doi:10.​2307/​1244015.CrossRef
go back to reference Griffiths, W. E., & Anderson, J. R. (1982). Using time-series and cross-section data to estimate a production function with positive and negative marginal risks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77(379), 529–536. doi:10.2307/2287706.CrossRef Griffiths, W. E., & Anderson, J. R. (1982). Using time-series and cross-section data to estimate a production function with positive and negative marginal risks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77(379), 529–536. doi:10.​2307/​2287706.CrossRef
go back to reference Hey, J. D. (1985). Relative risk aversion in comparative statics: Comment. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 284–285. Hey, J. D. (1985). Relative risk aversion in comparative statics: Comment. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 284–285.
go back to reference Hurd, B. H. (1994). Yield response and production risk—an analysis of integrated pest-management in cotton. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 19(2), 313–326. Hurd, B. H. (1994). Yield response and production risk—an analysis of integrated pest-management in cotton. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 19(2), 313–326.
go back to reference Katz, E. (1983). Relative Risk Aversion in Comparative Statics. American Economic Review, 73(3), 452–453. Katz, E. (1983). Relative Risk Aversion in Comparative Statics. American Economic Review, 73(3), 452–453.
go back to reference Koundouri, P., & Nauges, C. (2005). On production function estimation with selectivity and risk considerations. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30(03). Koundouri, P., & Nauges, C. (2005). On production function estimation with selectivity and risk considerations. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30(03).
go back to reference Kumbhakar, S. C. (2002a). Risk preference and productivity measurement under output price uncertainty. Empirical Economics, 27(3 SRC—GoogleScholar), 461–472. Kumbhakar, S. C. (2002a). Risk preference and productivity measurement under output price uncertainty. Empirical Economics, 27(3 SRC—GoogleScholar), 461–472.
go back to reference Kumbhakar, S. C. (2002b). Risk preferences and technology: A joint analysis. Marine Resource Economics, 17(2 SRC—GoogleScholar), 77–89. Kumbhakar, S. C. (2002b). Risk preferences and technology: A joint analysis. Marine Resource Economics, 17(2 SRC—GoogleScholar), 77–89.
go back to reference Kumbhakar, S. C., Hjalmarsson, L., & Heshmati, A. (2002). How fast do banks adjust? A dynamic model of labour-use with an application to Swedish banks. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18(1), 79–102.CrossRef Kumbhakar, S. C., Hjalmarsson, L., & Heshmati, A. (2002). How fast do banks adjust? A dynamic model of labour-use with an application to Swedish banks. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18(1), 79–102.CrossRef
go back to reference Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1987). A comparison of alternative approaches to the measurement of productive efficiency. In A. Dogramaci & R. Färe (Eds.), Applications of Modern Production Theory: Efficiency and Productivity (Vol. 9, pp. 3–32). Springer Netherlands. Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1987). A comparison of alternative approaches to the measurement of productive efficiency. In A. Dogramaci & R. Färe (Eds.), Applications of Modern Production Theory: Efficiency and Productivity (Vol. 9, pp. 3–32). Springer Netherlands.
go back to reference Menezes, C. F., & Hanson, D. L. (1970). On the theory of risk aversion. International Economic Review, 11(3), 481–487.CrossRefMATH Menezes, C. F., & Hanson, D. L. (1970). On the theory of risk aversion. International Economic Review, 11(3), 481–487.CrossRefMATH
go back to reference Pope, R. D., & Chavas, J. P. (1994). Cost-functions under production uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(2), 196–204. doi:10.2307/1243621.CrossRef Pope, R. D., & Chavas, J. P. (1994). Cost-functions under production uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(2), 196–204. doi:10.​2307/​1243621.CrossRef
go back to reference Pope, R. D., & Kramer, R. A. (1979). Production uncertainty and factor demands for the competitive firm. Southern Economic Journal, 46(2), 489–501. doi:10.2307/1057421.CrossRef Pope, R. D., & Kramer, R. A. (1979). Production uncertainty and factor demands for the competitive firm. Southern Economic Journal, 46(2), 489–501. doi:10.​2307/​1057421.CrossRef
go back to reference Robison, L., & Barry, P. (1987). The competitive firm’s response to risk. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company. Robison, L., & Barry, P. (1987). The competitive firm’s response to risk. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
go back to reference Sandmo, A. (1971). On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty. The American Economic Review, 61(1), 65–73. Sandmo, A. (1971). On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty. The American Economic Review, 61(1), 65–73.
go back to reference Tveterås, R. (1997). Econometric Modelling of Production Technology Under Risk: The Case of Norwegian Salmon Aquaculture Industry. PhD Dissertation, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen, Norway. Tveterås, R. (1997). Econometric Modelling of Production Technology Under Risk: The Case of Norwegian Salmon Aquaculture Industry. PhD Dissertation, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen, Norway.
go back to reference Tveterås, R. (1999). Production risk and productivity growth: Some findings for Norwegian Salmon aquaculture. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12(2 SRC—GoogleScholar), 161–179. Tveterås, R. (1999). Production risk and productivity growth: Some findings for Norwegian Salmon aquaculture. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12(2 SRC—GoogleScholar), 161–179.
go back to reference Tveterås, R. (2000). Flexible panel data models for risky production technologies with an application to Salomon aquaculture. Journal of Econometric Reviews, 19(3 SRC—GoogleScholar), 367–389. Tveterås, R. (2000). Flexible panel data models for risky production technologies with an application to Salomon aquaculture. Journal of Econometric Reviews, 19(3 SRC—GoogleScholar), 367–389.
go back to reference Tveterås, R., & Heshmati, A. (2002). Patterns of productivity growth in the norwegian salmon farming industry. International Review of Economics and Business, 2(3), 367–393. Tveterås, R., & Heshmati, A. (2002). Patterns of productivity growth in the norwegian salmon farming industry. International Review of Economics and Business, 2(3), 367–393.
go back to reference Wan, G. H., Griffiths, W. E., & Anderson, J. R. (1992). Using panel data to estimate risk effects in seemingly unrelated Production functions. Empirical Economics, 17(1 SRC—GoogleScholar), 35–49. Wan, G. H., Griffiths, W. E., & Anderson, J. R. (1992). Using panel data to estimate risk effects in seemingly unrelated Production functions. Empirical Economics, 17(1 SRC—GoogleScholar), 35–49.
Metadata
Title
Literature on Production Risk
Author
Nabaz T. Khayyat
Copyright Year
2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9953-9_4