Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare 1/2020

14-09-2019 | Original Paper

Lobbying as a multidimensional tug of war

Authors: John Duggan, Jacque Gao

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare | Issue 1/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We analyze lobbying as contest in which lobbyists exert effort to pull a policy outcome in a multidimensional space in their preferred directions. We prove existence and uniqueness of equilibrium and perform comparative statics on the cost of effort and policy utility of the lobbyists. As cost of effort increases, the equilibrium policy outcome and inefficiency (i.e., total effort expended) are constant. Assuming power utility, the equilibrium policy minimizes a social loss function that depends on curvature of utilities. As lobbyists become less tolerant of larger losses, the equilibrium policy outcome converges to the Rawlsian policy, which maximizes the payoff of the worst-off lobbyist, and inefficiency may become large or go to zero, depending on the configuration of ideal points. As lobbyists become less tolerant of smaller losses, the equilibrium outcome converges to the mean of the lobbyists’ ideal points, and inefficiency goes to zero.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Intuitively, if output is highly homogeneous, as would be the case in agricultural markets, then foreign products priced to slightly undercut the domestic market will lead to a sharp decrease in profits of domestic firms. In the opposite case where outputs are very distinct, e.g., if consumer brand loyalty is strong, then failure to obtain desired import restrictions would entail a smaller decrease in profits.
 
2
Chung and Duggan (2018) extend the concept of geometric median to non-Euclidean utilities, and they motivate their concept of directional equilibrium as a tug of war; in contrast to the current paper, it is implicitly assumed that all voters pull with equal force. See the literature review of that paper for a history of the geometric median idea.
 
Literature
go back to reference Banks J (2000) Buying supermajorities in finite legislatures. Am Political Sci Rev 94:677–681CrossRef Banks J (2000) Buying supermajorities in finite legislatures. Am Political Sci Rev 94:677–681CrossRef
go back to reference Banks J, Duggan J (2000) A bargaining model of collective choice. Am Political Sci Rev 94:73–88CrossRef Banks J, Duggan J (2000) A bargaining model of collective choice. Am Political Sci Rev 94:73–88CrossRef
go back to reference Banks J, Duggan J (2006) A general bargaining model of legislative policy-making. Q J Political Sci 1:49–85CrossRef Banks J, Duggan J (2006) A general bargaining model of legislative policy-making. Q J Political Sci 1:49–85CrossRef
go back to reference Baron D, Ferejohn J (1989) Bargaining in legislatures. Am Political Sci Rev 83:1181–1206CrossRef Baron D, Ferejohn J (1989) Bargaining in legislatures. Am Political Sci Rev 83:1181–1206CrossRef
go back to reference Baye M, Kovenock D, De Vries C (1993) Rigging the lobbying process: an application of the all-pay auction. Am Econ Rev 83:289–294 Baye M, Kovenock D, De Vries C (1993) Rigging the lobbying process: an application of the all-pay auction. Am Econ Rev 83:289–294
go back to reference Baye M, Kovenock D, De Vries C (1996) The all-pay auction with complete information. Econ Theory 8:291–305CrossRef Baye M, Kovenock D, De Vries C (1996) The all-pay auction with complete information. Econ Theory 8:291–305CrossRef
go back to reference Bernheim D, Whinston M (1986a) Menu auctions, resource allocation, and economic influence. Q J Political Sci 101:1–31CrossRef Bernheim D, Whinston M (1986a) Menu auctions, resource allocation, and economic influence. Q J Political Sci 101:1–31CrossRef
go back to reference Che Y-K, Gale I (1998) Caps on political lobbying. Am Econ Rev 88:643–651 Che Y-K, Gale I (1998) Caps on political lobbying. Am Econ Rev 88:643–651
go back to reference Chung H, Duggan J (2018) Directional equilibria. J Theor Politics 30:272–305CrossRef Chung H, Duggan J (2018) Directional equilibria. J Theor Politics 30:272–305CrossRef
go back to reference Corchón L (2007) The theory of contests: a survey. Rev Econ Des 11:69–100 Corchón L (2007) The theory of contests: a survey. Rev Econ Des 11:69–100
go back to reference Dekel E, Jackson M, Wolinsky A (2008) Vote buying: legislatures and lobbying. Q J Polit Sci 4:103–128CrossRef Dekel E, Jackson M, Wolinsky A (2008) Vote buying: legislatures and lobbying. Q J Polit Sci 4:103–128CrossRef
go back to reference Epstein G, Nitzan S (2004) Strategic restraint in contests. Eur Econ Rev 48:201–210CrossRef Epstein G, Nitzan S (2004) Strategic restraint in contests. Eur Econ Rev 48:201–210CrossRef
go back to reference Esteban J, Ray D (1999) Conflict and distribution. J Econ Theory 87:379–415CrossRef Esteban J, Ray D (1999) Conflict and distribution. J Econ Theory 87:379–415CrossRef
go back to reference Groseclose T, Snyder J (1996) Buying supermajorities. Am Political Sci Rev 90:303–315CrossRef Groseclose T, Snyder J (1996) Buying supermajorities. Am Political Sci Rev 90:303–315CrossRef
go back to reference Grossman G, Helpman E (1994) Protection for sale. Am Econ Rev 84:833–850 Grossman G, Helpman E (1994) Protection for sale. Am Econ Rev 84:833–850
go back to reference Hillman A, Riley J (1989) Politically contestable rents and transfers. Econ Politics 1:17–39CrossRef Hillman A, Riley J (1989) Politically contestable rents and transfers. Econ Politics 1:17–39CrossRef
go back to reference Konrad K, Kovenock D (2005) Equilibrium and efficiency in the tug-of-war. CESifo Working Paper No. 1562 Konrad K, Kovenock D (2005) Equilibrium and efficiency in the tug-of-war. CESifo Working Paper No. 1562
go back to reference Laussel D, Le Breton M (2001) Conflict and cooperation: the structure of equilibrium payoffs in common agency. J Econ Theory 100:93–128CrossRef Laussel D, Le Breton M (2001) Conflict and cooperation: the structure of equilibrium payoffs in common agency. J Econ Theory 100:93–128CrossRef
go back to reference Le Breton M, Salanié F (2003) Lobbying under political uncertainty. J Public Econ 87:2589–2610CrossRef Le Breton M, Salanié F (2003) Lobbying under political uncertainty. J Public Econ 87:2589–2610CrossRef
go back to reference Martimort D, Semenov A (2008) Ideological uncertainty and lobbying competition. J Public Econ 92:456–481CrossRef Martimort D, Semenov A (2008) Ideological uncertainty and lobbying competition. J Public Econ 92:456–481CrossRef
go back to reference Mitra D (1999) Endogenous lobby formation and endogenous protection: a long-run model of trade policy determination. Am Econ Rev 89:1116–1134CrossRef Mitra D (1999) Endogenous lobby formation and endogenous protection: a long-run model of trade policy determination. Am Econ Rev 89:1116–1134CrossRef
go back to reference Münster J (2006) Lobbying contests with endogenous policy proposals. Econ Politics 18:389–397CrossRef Münster J (2006) Lobbying contests with endogenous policy proposals. Econ Politics 18:389–397CrossRef
go back to reference Plott C (1967) A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. Am Econ Rev 57:787–806 Plott C (1967) A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. Am Econ Rev 57:787–806
go back to reference Reny P (1999) On the existence of pure and mixed strategy nash equilibria in discontinuous games. Econometrica 67:1029–1056CrossRef Reny P (1999) On the existence of pure and mixed strategy nash equilibria in discontinuous games. Econometrica 67:1029–1056CrossRef
go back to reference Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent seeking. In: Buchanen J, Tollison R, Tullock G (eds) Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, pp 97–112 Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent seeking. In: Buchanen J, Tollison R, Tullock G (eds) Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, pp 97–112
Metadata
Title
Lobbying as a multidimensional tug of war
Authors
John Duggan
Jacque Gao
Publication date
14-09-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Electronic ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-019-01215-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Social Choice and Welfare 1/2020 Go to the issue