Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Indicators Research 2/2019

05-04-2019

Local Decentralization and the Quality of Public Services in Europe

Authors: Andreas P. Kyriacou, Oriol Roca-Sagalés

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 2/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Most work studying the impact of fiscal decentralization on the provision of public services has measured the latter by way of quantitative output indicators (for example, years of schooling or mortality rates) and the former based on aggregate decentralization indicators reflecting sub-central government spending or revenue as a percentage of total spending or revenue. In this article, we reconsider the link between fiscal decentralization and public service provision based on perception-based measures of the quality of public services as well as decentralization measures that disaggregate spending according to expenditure functions. Specifically, we examine the impact of decentralizing spending in the areas of education, health and social protection down to local (municipal) governments, on perceptions concerning the quality of public services, across a panel of 30 European countries over the period 1996–2015. We find that decentralizing education and social protection spending improves the perceived quality of public services while decentralizing health expenditure undermines quality. Our empirical results are robust to the introduction of a range of potentially important covariates including measures that reflect on the degree of autonomy enjoyed by local authorities.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
We know of no empirical efforts that consider the effect of decentralizing social protection spending.
 
2
Both DEA and SFM, measure how to attain a given level of outputs with a minimum level of inputs (input approach) or the maximum attainable outputs for a given set of inputs (output approach).
 
3
Sources include the African and Asian Development Banks, Freedom House, the International Country Risk Guide, Transparency International, the Economics Intelligence Unit, Latinobarometro and the World Economic Forum. See Table 1 in Kaufmann et al. (2010) for the 31 different sources used to construct the indicators.
 
4
See the “Appendix” for the data sources and definitions as well as the summary statistics and the countries included in the sample (Tables 4, 5 and 6 respectively).
 
5
The methodology employed by Ladner et al. (2016) to construct these indicators is inspired by, and is very similar to, that used by Hooghe et al. (2016) to measure autonomy or self-government at the regional level.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adam, A., Delis, M., & Kammas, P. (2014). Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Economics of Governance, 15(1), 17–49.CrossRef Adam, A., Delis, M., & Kammas, P. (2014). Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Economics of Governance, 15(1), 17–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.CrossRef Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.CrossRef
go back to reference Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.CrossRef Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Arends, H. (2017). More with less? Fiscal decentralisation, public health spending and health sector performance. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(2), 144–174.CrossRef Arends, H. (2017). More with less? Fiscal decentralisation, public health spending and health sector performance. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(2), 144–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1157–1189.CrossRef Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1157–1189.CrossRef
go back to reference Arze del Granado, F. J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2018). Decentralized governance, expenditure composition, and preferences for public goods. Public Finance Review, 46(3), 359–388.CrossRef Arze del Granado, F. J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2018). Decentralized governance, expenditure composition, and preferences for public goods. Public Finance Review, 46(3), 359–388.CrossRef
go back to reference Barankay, I., & Lockwood, B. (2007). Decentralization and the productive efficiency of government: Evidence from Swiss cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5–6), 1197–1218.CrossRef Barankay, I., & Lockwood, B. (2007). Decentralization and the productive efficiency of government: Evidence from Swiss cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5–6), 1197–1218.CrossRef
go back to reference Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Cantarero, D., & Pascual, M. (2008). Analysing the impact of fiscal decentralization on health outcomes: Empirical evidence from Spain. Applied Economic Letters, 15(2), 109–111.CrossRef Cantarero, D., & Pascual, M. (2008). Analysing the impact of fiscal decentralization on health outcomes: Empirical evidence from Spain. Applied Economic Letters, 15(2), 109–111.CrossRef
go back to reference Cavalieri, M., & Ferrante, L. (2016). Does fiscal decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence from infant mortality in Italy. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 74–88.CrossRef Cavalieri, M., & Ferrante, L. (2016). Does fiscal decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence from infant mortality in Italy. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 74–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Costa-i-Font, J. (2012). LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion paper series fiscal federalism and european health system decentralization: A perspective. LEQS paper no. 55/2012 December 2012 Published in Costa-i-Font, Joan and Greer, Scott (Eds.), Federalism and decentralization in European health and social care. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK. Costa-i-Font, J. (2012). LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion paper series fiscal federalism and european health system decentralization: A perspective. LEQS paper no. 55/2012 December 2012 Published in Costa-i-Font, Joan and Greer, Scott (Eds.), Federalism and decentralization in European health and social care. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
go back to reference De Mello, L., & Barenstein, M. (2001). Fiscal decentralization and governance: A cross-country analysis. IMF working paper no. WP/01/71. De Mello, L., & Barenstein, M. (2001). Fiscal decentralization and governance: A cross-country analysis. IMF working paper no. WP/01/71.
go back to reference Diaz-Serrano, L., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2015). Decentralization and the welfare state: What do citizens perceive? Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 411–435.CrossRef Diaz-Serrano, L., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2015). Decentralization and the welfare state: What do citizens perceive? Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 411–435.CrossRef
go back to reference Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2261–2290.CrossRef Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2261–2290.CrossRef
go back to reference Espasa, M., Esteller-Moré, A., & Mora, T. (2017). Is decentralization really welfare enhancing? Empirical evidence from survey data (1994–2011). Kyklos, 70(2), 189–219.CrossRef Espasa, M., Esteller-Moré, A., & Mora, T. (2017). Is decentralization really welfare enhancing? Empirical evidence from survey data (1994–2011). Kyklos, 70(2), 189–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Faguet, J.-P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3–4), 867–893.CrossRef Faguet, J.-P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3–4), 867–893.CrossRef
go back to reference Faguet, J.-P., & Sánchez, F. (2014). Decentralization and access to social services in Colombia. Public Choice, 160(1–2), 227–249.CrossRef Faguet, J.-P., & Sánchez, F. (2014). Decentralization and access to social services in Colombia. Public Choice, 160(1–2), 227–249.CrossRef
go back to reference Falch, T., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2012). Public sector decentralization and school performance: International evidence. Economic Letters, 114(3), 276–279.CrossRef Falch, T., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2012). Public sector decentralization and school performance: International evidence. Economic Letters, 114(3), 276–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Habibi, N., Huang, C., Miranda, D., Murillo, V., Ranis, G., Sarkar, M., et al. (2003). Decentralization and human development in Argentina. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 73–101.CrossRef Habibi, N., Huang, C., Miranda, D., Murillo, V., Ranis, G., Sarkar, M., et al. (2003). Decentralization and human development in Argentina. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 73–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Chapman, S., Niedzwiecki, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). A postfunctionalist theory of governance. Volume I: Measuring regional authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Chapman, S., Niedzwiecki, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). A postfunctionalist theory of governance. Volume I: Measuring regional authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiménez-Rubio, D. (2011a). The impact of decentralization of health services on health outcomes: Evidence from Canada. Applied Economics, 43(26), 3907–3917.CrossRef Jiménez-Rubio, D. (2011a). The impact of decentralization of health services on health outcomes: Evidence from Canada. Applied Economics, 43(26), 3907–3917.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiménez-Rubio, D. (2011b). The impact of fiscal decentralization on infant mortality rates: Evidence from OECD countries. Social Science and Medicine, 73(9), 1401–1407.CrossRef Jiménez-Rubio, D. (2011b). The impact of fiscal decentralization on infant mortality rates: Evidence from OECD countries. Social Science and Medicine, 73(9), 1401–1407.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastrutzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank policy research paper 5430. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastrutzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank policy research paper 5430.
go back to reference Keen, M., & Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 33–53.CrossRef Keen, M., & Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 33–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., & Baldersheim, H. (2016). Measuring local autonomy in 39 countries (1990–2014). Regional & Federal Studies, 26(3), 321–357.CrossRef Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., & Baldersheim, H. (2016). Measuring local autonomy in 39 countries (1990–2014). Regional & Federal Studies, 26(3), 321–357.CrossRef
go back to reference Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31, 1095–1129.CrossRef Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31, 1095–1129.CrossRef
go back to reference Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
go back to reference Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–1149.CrossRef Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–1149.CrossRef
go back to reference OECD. (2013). Fiscal federalism 2014: Making decentralisation work. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRef OECD. (2013). Fiscal federalism 2014: Making decentralisation work. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Panizza, U. (1999). On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 97–139.CrossRef Panizza, U. (1999). On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 97–139.CrossRef
go back to reference Porcelli, F. (2014). Electoral accountability and local government efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Italian health care sector reforms. Economics of Governance, 15(3), 221–251.CrossRef Porcelli, F. (2014). Electoral accountability and local government efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Italian health care sector reforms. Economics of Governance, 15(3), 221–251.CrossRef
go back to reference Robalino, D., Picazo, O., & Voetberg, A. (2001). Does fiscal decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRef Robalino, D., Picazo, O., & Voetberg, A. (2001). Does fiscal decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRef
go back to reference Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3, 24–43.CrossRef Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3, 24–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralization in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40, 61–89.CrossRef Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralization in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40, 61–89.CrossRef
go back to reference Soto, V., Farfan, M., & Lorant, I. (2012). Fiscal decentralisation and infant mortality rate: The Colombian case. Social Science and Medicine, 74(9), 1426–1434.CrossRef Soto, V., Farfan, M., & Lorant, I. (2012). Fiscal decentralisation and infant mortality rate: The Colombian case. Social Science and Medicine, 74(9), 1426–1434.CrossRef
go back to reference Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.CrossRef Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.CrossRef
go back to reference Treisman, D. (2002). Decentralization and the quality of government. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. Treisman, D. (2002). Decentralization and the quality of government. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
go back to reference Uchimura, H., & Jutting, J. (2009). Fiscal decentralization, Chinese style: Good for health outcomes? World Development, 37(12), 1924–1936.CrossRef Uchimura, H., & Jutting, J. (2009). Fiscal decentralization, Chinese style: Good for health outcomes? World Development, 37(12), 1924–1936.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Local Decentralization and the Quality of Public Services in Europe
Authors
Andreas P. Kyriacou
Oriol Roca-Sagalés
Publication date
05-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02113-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Social Indicators Research 2/2019 Go to the issue