Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Schmalenbach Business Review 1/2019

17-12-2018 | Original Article

Location in a Disk City with Consumer Concentration Around the Center

Author: Manfred Stadler

Published in: Schmalenbach Business Review | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper studies a two-stage location-price duopoly game in a disk city with consumer concentration around the city center. When consumers are uniformly distributed over the plane, unconstrained firms locate outside of the city. Consumer concentration, however, induces firms to locate nearer to each other and, when the degree of concentration is sufficiently high, inside of the city. Prices and firm profits decrease in the degree of consumer concentration. We explicitly solve the model for classes of cone-shaped, dome-shaped, and bell-shaped consumer densities. In all cases we identify a loss of welfare due to the strategic effect which causes the firms’ spatial differentiation being too large.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The disk area on the right side of the vertical line \(\tilde{x}\) is \(2\int_{\tilde{x}}^{1}r\arccos(\tilde{x}/r)dr\). Multiply at each point in this area by the local consumer density \(f(r)\) to obtain the demand function \(D(\tilde{x})\).
 
2
This is a two-dimensional extension inter alia of the triangular density function as used by Tabuchi and Thisse (1995). A corresponding specification can be found in Mazalov and Sakaguchi (2003).
 
3
If the city border is binding, firms locate on the disk’s perimeter at maximal distance. Substituting \(x_{1}=-x_{2}=1\), \(D(\tilde{x}=0)=1/2\), and \(D^{\prime}(\tilde{x}=0)=-2/\pi\) into the price equations (4) shows that the firms charge the prices \(p=\pi<p^{*}\) and hence realize the profits \(\Pi=(1/2)\pi<\Pi^{*}\). This solution is the constrained optimum as it was derived by Mazalov and Sakaguchi (2003) and Feldin (2012).
 
4
This is a two-dimensional counterpart to the one-dimensional beta density function as used by Stadler (2012).
 
5
Note that \(\Gamma(1/2)=\sqrt{\pi}\), \(\Gamma(1)=1\), and \(\Gamma(n+1)=n\Gamma(n)\) for \(n=\{1/2,1\}\).
 
6
Note that the tiny area differential \(dA\) for the polar coordinates (\(r,\phi\)) is \(dA=rdrd\phi\).
 
7
Additionally, the population of the city – an alternative measure of the “city size” – does not have to be restricted to the mass of 1. An increasing mass would leave the location and price decisions of the firms unchanged but would proportionally increase their profits.
 
8
In case of finite support, a rectangular (or a quadratic) product space would certainly be preferable to a disk space. A quadratic product space, however, is not tractable for an analysis of demand concentration since the property of polar-symmetry is not satisfied. In the case of infinite support, the geometrical difference between a disk and a square diminishes such that this problem is resolved.
 
9
As pointed out e.g. by Ansari et al. (1994), the distribution of consumer preferences in many markets is unlikely to be uniform.
 
10
Note that \(\arccos(0)=\pi/2\) and \(2\pi\int_{0}^{1}rf(r)dr=1\) for all feasible polar-symmetric consumer densities.
 
Literature
go back to reference Anderson, S.P., J.K. Goeree, and R. Ramer. 1997. Location, Location, Location. Journal of Economic Theory 77:102–127.CrossRef Anderson, S.P., J.K. Goeree, and R. Ramer. 1997. Location, Location, Location. Journal of Economic Theory 77:102–127.CrossRef
go back to reference Ansari, A., N. Economides, and A. Ghosh. 1994. Competitive Positioning in Markets with Nonuniform Preferences. Marketing Science 13:248–273.CrossRef Ansari, A., N. Economides, and A. Ghosh. 1994. Competitive Positioning in Markets with Nonuniform Preferences. Marketing Science 13:248–273.CrossRef
go back to reference Ansari, A., N. Economides, and J. Steckel. 1998. The Max-Min-Min Principle of Product Differentiation. Journal of Regional Science 38:207–230.CrossRef Ansari, A., N. Economides, and J. Steckel. 1998. The Max-Min-Min Principle of Product Differentiation. Journal of Regional Science 38:207–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Böckem, S. 1994. A Generalized Model of Horizontal Product Differentiation. Journal of Industrial Economics 17:287–298.CrossRef Böckem, S. 1994. A Generalized Model of Horizontal Product Differentiation. Journal of Industrial Economics 17:287–298.CrossRef
go back to reference Brenner, S. 2005. Hotelling Games with Three, Four, and More Players. Journal of Regional Science 45:851–864.CrossRef Brenner, S. 2005. Hotelling Games with Three, Four, and More Players. Journal of Regional Science 45:851–864.CrossRef
go back to reference Casado-Izaga, F.J. 2000. Location Decisions: The Role of Uncertainty about Consumer Tastes. Journal of Economics 71:31–46.CrossRef Casado-Izaga, F.J. 2000. Location Decisions: The Role of Uncertainty about Consumer Tastes. Journal of Economics 71:31–46.CrossRef
go back to reference D’Aspremont, C., J.J. Gabszewicz, and J.-F. Thisse. 1979. On Hotelling’s Stability in Competition. Econometrica 47:1145–1150.CrossRef D’Aspremont, C., J.J. Gabszewicz, and J.-F. Thisse. 1979. On Hotelling’s Stability in Competition. Econometrica 47:1145–1150.CrossRef
go back to reference Economides, N. 1986. Minimal and Maximal Product Differentiation in Hotelling’s Duopoly. Economics Letters 21:67–71.CrossRef Economides, N. 1986. Minimal and Maximal Product Differentiation in Hotelling’s Duopoly. Economics Letters 21:67–71.CrossRef
go back to reference Feldin, A. 2012. Three Firms on a Unit Disk Market: Intermediate Product Differentiation. Economic and Business Review 14:321–345. Feldin, A. 2012. Three Firms on a Unit Disk Market: Intermediate Product Differentiation. Economic and Business Review 14:321–345.
go back to reference Irmen, A., and J.-F. Thisse. 1998. Competition in Multi-Characteristics Spaces: Hotelling Was Almost Right. Journal of Economic Theory 78:76–102.CrossRef Irmen, A., and J.-F. Thisse. 1998. Competition in Multi-Characteristics Spaces: Hotelling Was Almost Right. Journal of Economic Theory 78:76–102.CrossRef
go back to reference Lambertini, L. 1994. Equilibrium Locations in the Unconstrained Hotelling Game. Economic Notes 24:438–446. Lambertini, L. 1994. Equilibrium Locations in the Unconstrained Hotelling Game. Economic Notes 24:438–446.
go back to reference Mazalov, V., and M. Sakaguchi. 2003. Location Game on the Plane. International Game Theory Review 5:13–25.CrossRef Mazalov, V., and M. Sakaguchi. 2003. Location Game on the Plane. International Game Theory Review 5:13–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Meagher, K.J., and K.G. Zauner. 2004. Product Differentiation and Location Decisions under Demand Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 117:201–216.CrossRef Meagher, K.J., and K.G. Zauner. 2004. Product Differentiation and Location Decisions under Demand Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 117:201–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Meagher, K.J., and K.G. Zauner. 2005. Location-then-Price Competition with Uncertain Consumer Tastes. Economic Theory 25:799–818.CrossRef Meagher, K.J., and K.G. Zauner. 2005. Location-then-Price Competition with Uncertain Consumer Tastes. Economic Theory 25:799–818.CrossRef
go back to reference Meagher, K.J., E.G.S. Teo, and W. Wang. 2008. A Duopoly Location Toolkit: Consumer Densities which Yield Unique Spatial Duopoly. Equilibria. B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8:1–21. Meagher, K.J., E.G.S. Teo, and W. Wang. 2008. A Duopoly Location Toolkit: Consumer Densities which Yield Unique Spatial Duopoly. Equilibria. B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8:1–21.
go back to reference Stadler, M. 2012. Standortwahl und Produktdifferenzierung. In Zur Zukunft des Wettbewerbs. Marburg. Metropolis Verlag, ed. H. Enke, A. Wagner, 323–338. Stadler, M. 2012. Standortwahl und Produktdifferenzierung. In Zur Zukunft des Wettbewerbs. Marburg. Metropolis Verlag, ed. H. Enke, A. Wagner, 323–338.
go back to reference Tabuchi, T. 1994. Two-Stage Two-Dimensional Spatial Competition between Two Firms. Regional Science and Urban Economics 24:207–227. Tabuchi, T. 1994. Two-Stage Two-Dimensional Spatial Competition between Two Firms. Regional Science and Urban Economics 24:207–227.
go back to reference Tabuchi, T. 2012. Multiproduct Firms in Hotelling’s Spatial Competition. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 21:445–467.CrossRef Tabuchi, T. 2012. Multiproduct Firms in Hotelling’s Spatial Competition. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 21:445–467.CrossRef
go back to reference Tabuchi, T., and J.-F. Thisse. 1995. Asymmetric Equilibria in Spatial Competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization 13:213–227.CrossRef Tabuchi, T., and J.-F. Thisse. 1995. Asymmetric Equilibria in Spatial Competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization 13:213–227.CrossRef
go back to reference Veendorp, E.C.H., and A. Majeed. 1995. Differentiation in a Two-Dimensional Market. Regional Science and Urban Economics 25:75–83. Veendorp, E.C.H., and A. Majeed. 1995. Differentiation in a Two-Dimensional Market. Regional Science and Urban Economics 25:75–83.
go back to reference Woeckener, B. 2002. Spatial Competition with an Outside Good and Distributed Reservation Prices. Journal of Economics 71:31–46. Woeckener, B. 2002. Spatial Competition with an Outside Good and Distributed Reservation Prices. Journal of Economics 71:31–46.
Metadata
Title
Location in a Disk City with Consumer Concentration Around the Center
Author
Manfred Stadler
Publication date
17-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Schmalenbach Business Review / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1439-2917
Electronic ISSN: 2194-072X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-018-0064-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Schmalenbach Business Review 1/2019 Go to the issue